scholarly journals In vivo Neural Crest Cell Migration Is Controlled by “Mixotaxis”

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias H. Barriga ◽  
Eric Theveneau
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Directed Cell Migration ◽  
Hard Truth

Directed cell migration is essential all along an individual’s life, from embryogenesis to tissue repair and cancer metastasis. Thus, due to its biomedical relevance, directed cell migration is currently under intense research. Directed cell migration has been shown to be driven by an assortment of external biasing cues, ranging from gradients of soluble (chemotaxis) to bound (haptotaxis) molecules. In addition to molecular gradients, gradients of mechanical properties (duro/mechanotaxis), electric fields (electro/galvanotaxis) as well as iterative biases in the environment topology (ratchetaxis) have been shown to be able to direct cell migration. Since cells migrating in vivo are exposed to a challenging environment composed of a convolution of biochemical, biophysical, and topological cues, it is highly unlikely that cell migration would be guided by an individual type of “taxis.” This is especially true since numerous molecular players involved in the cellular response to these biasing cues are often recycled, serving as sensor or transducer of both biochemical and biophysical signals. In this review, we confront literature on Xenopus cephalic neural crest cells with that of other cell types to discuss the relevance of the current categorization of cell guidance strategies. Furthermore, we emphasize that while studying individual biasing signals is informative, the hard truth is that cells migrate by performing a sort of “mixotaxis,” where they integrate and coordinate multiple inputs through shared molecular effectors to ensure robustness of directed cell motion.

scholarly journals Lamellipodin and the Scar/WAVE complex cooperate to promote cell migration in vivo

2013 ◽  
Vol 203 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ah-Lai Law ◽  
Anne Vehlow ◽  
Maria Kotini ◽  
Lauren Dodgson ◽  
Daniel Soong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Border Cell ◽  
Promote Cell Migration ◽  
Wave Complex

Cell migration is essential for development, but its deregulation causes metastasis. The Scar/WAVE complex is absolutely required for lamellipodia and is a key effector in cell migration, but its regulation in vivo is enigmatic. Lamellipodin (Lpd) controls lamellipodium formation through an unknown mechanism. Here, we report that Lpd directly binds active Rac, which regulates a direct interaction between Lpd and the Scar/WAVE complex via Abi. Consequently, Lpd controls lamellipodium size, cell migration speed, and persistence via Scar/WAVE in vitro. Moreover, Lpd knockout mice display defective pigmentation because fewer migrating neural crest-derived melanoblasts reach their target during development. Consistently, Lpd regulates mesenchymal neural crest cell migration cell autonomously in Xenopus laevis via the Scar/WAVE complex. Further, Lpd’s Drosophila melanogaster orthologue Pico binds Scar, and both regulate collective epithelial border cell migration. Pico also controls directed cell protrusions of border cell clusters in a Scar-dependent manner. Taken together, Lpd is an essential, evolutionary conserved regulator of the Scar/WAVE complex during cell migration in vivo.

scholarly journals Cell surface beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase functions during neural crest cell migration and neurulation in vivo

1992 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
HJ Hathaway ◽  
BD Shur
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Basal Lamina ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cell Migration ◽  
Crest Cell

Mesenchymal cell migration and neurite outgrowth are mediated in part by binding of cell surface beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase (GalTase) to N-linked oligosaccharides within the E8 domain of laminin. In this study, we determined whether cell surface GalTase functions during neural crest cell migration and neural development in vivo using antibodies raised against affinity-purified chicken serum GalTase. The antibodies specifically recognized two embryonic proteins of 77 and 67 kD, both of which express GalTase activity. The antibodies also immunoprecipitated and inhibited chick embryo GalTase activity, and inhibited neural crest cell migration on laminin matrices in vitro. Anti-GalTase antibodies were microinjected into the head mesenchyme of stage 7-9 chick embryos or cranial to Henson's node of stage 6 embryos. Anti-avian GalTase IgG decreased cranial neural crest cell migration on the injected side but did not cross the embryonic midline and did not affect neural crest cell migration on the uninjected side. Anti-avian GalTase Fab crossed the embryonic midline and perturbed cranial neural crest cell migration throughout the head. Neural fold elevation and neural tube closure were also disrupted by Fab fragments. Cell surface GalTase was localized to migrating neural crest cells and to the basal surfaces of neural epithelia by indirect immunofluorescence, whereas GalTase was undetectable on neural crest cells prior to migration. These results suggest that, during early embryogenesis, cell surface GalTase participates during neural crest cell migration, perhaps by interacting with laminin, a major component of the basal lamina. Cell surface GalTase also appears to play a role in neural tube formation, possibly by mediating neural epithelial adhesion to the underlying basal lamina.

Ephrin-B ligands play a dual role in the control of neural crest cell migration

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (15) ◽  
pp. 3621-3632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Santiago ◽  
Carol A. Erickson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Eph Receptors ◽  
Ephb Receptors ◽  
Crest Cell

Little is known about the mechanisms that direct neural crest cells to the appropriate migratory pathways. Our aim was to determine how neural crest cells that are specified as neurons and glial cells only migrate ventrally and are prevented from migrating dorsolaterally into the skin, whereas neural crest cells specified as melanoblasts are directed into the dorsolateral pathway. Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands have been shown to be essential for migration of many cell types during embryonic development. Consequently, we asked if ephrin-B proteins participate in the guidance of melanoblasts along the dorsolateral pathway, and prevent early migratory neural crest cells from invading the dorsolateral pathway. Using Fc fusion proteins, we detected the expression of ephrin-B ligands in the dorsolateral pathway at the stage when neural crest cells are migrating ventrally. Furthermore, we show that ephrins block dorsolateral migration of early-migrating neural crest cells because when we disrupt the Eph-ephrin interactions by addition of soluble ephrin-B ligand to trunk explants, early neural crest cells migrate inappropriately into the dorsolateral pathway. Surprisingly, we discovered the ephrin-B ligands continue to be expressed along the dorsolateral pathway during melanoblast migration. RT-PCR analysis, in situ hybridisation, and cell surface-labelling of neural crest cell cultures demonstrate that melanoblasts express several EphB receptors. In adhesion assays, engagement of ephrin-B ligands to EphB receptors increases melanoblast attachment to fibronectin. Cell migration assays demonstrate that ephrin-B ligands stimulate the migration of melanoblasts. Furthermore, when Eph signalling is disrupted in vivo, melanoblasts are prevented from migrating dorsolaterally, suggesting ephrin-B ligands promote the dorsolateral migration of melanoblasts. Thus, transmembrane ephrins act as bifunctional guidance cues: they first repel early migratory neural crest cells from the dorsolateral path, and then later stimulate the migration of melanoblasts into this pathway. The mechanisms by which ephrins regulate repulsion or attraction in neural crest cells are unknown. One possibility is that the cellular response involves signalling to the actin cytoskeleton, potentially involving the activation of Cdc42/Rac family of GTPases. In support of this hypothesis, we show that adhesion of early migratory cells to an ephrin-B-derivatized substratum results in cell rounding and disruption of the actin cytoskeleton, whereas plating of melanoblasts on an ephrin-B substratum induces the formation of microspikes filled with F-actin.

scholarly journals The neural crest stem cells: control of neural crest cell fate and plasticity by endothelin-3

2001 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELISABETH DUPIN ◽  
CARLA REAL ◽  
NICOLE LeDOUARIN
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
The Body ◽  
Neural Crest Stem Cells ◽  
Environmental Signals

How the considerable diversity of neural crest (NC)-derived cell types arises in the vertebrate embryo has long been a key question in developmental biology. The pluripotency and plasticity of differentiation of the NC cell population has been fully documented and it is well-established that environmental cues play an important role in patterning the NC derivatives throughout the body. Over the past decade, in vivo and in vitro cellular approaches have unravelled the differentiation potentialities of single NC cells and led to the discovery of NC stem cells. Although it is clear that the final fate of individual cells is in agreement with their final position within the embryo, it has to be stressed that the NC cells that reach target sites are pluripotent and further restrictions occur only late in development. It is therefore a heterogenous collection of cells that is submitted to local environmental signals in the various NC-derived structures. Several factors were thus identified which favor the development of subsets of NC-derived cells in vitro. Moreover, the strategy of gene targeting in mouse has led at identifying new molecules able to control one or several aspects of NC cell differentiation in vivo. Endothelin peptides (and endothelin receptors) are among those. The conjunction of recent data obtained in mouse and avian embryos and reviewed here contributes to a better understanding of the action of the endothelin signaling pathway in the emergence and stability of NC-derived cell phenotypes.

scholarly journals DAN (NBL1) promotes collective neural crest migration by restraining uncontrolled invasion

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (10) ◽  
pp. 3339-3354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca McLennan ◽  
Caleb M. Bailey ◽  
Linus J. Schumacher ◽  
Jessica M. Teddy ◽  
Jason A. Morrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Bmp Signaling ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Neural Crest Cell Migration ◽  
Crest Cell

Neural crest cells are both highly migratory and significant to vertebrate organogenesis. However, the signals that regulate neural crest cell migration remain unclear. In this study, we test the function of differential screening-selected gene aberrant in neuroblastoma (DAN), a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonist we detected by analysis of the chick cranial mesoderm. Our analysis shows that, before neural crest cell exit from the hindbrain, DAN is expressed in the mesoderm, and then it becomes absent along cell migratory pathways. Cranial neural crest and metastatic melanoma cells avoid DAN protein stripes in vitro. Addition of DAN reduces the speed of migrating cells in vivo and in vitro, respectively. In vivo loss of function of DAN results in enhanced neural crest cell migration by increasing speed and directionality. Computer model simulations support the hypothesis that DAN restrains cell migration by regulating cell speed. Collectively, our results identify DAN as a novel factor that inhibits uncontrolled neural crest and metastatic melanoma invasion and promotes collective migration in a manner consistent with the inhibition of BMP signaling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document