scholarly journals Deconvolution Tactics and Normalization in Renal Spatial Transcriptomics

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Melo Ferreira ◽  
Benjamin J. Freije ◽  
Michael T. Eadon
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Batch Effect ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Heterogeneous Groups ◽  
Health And Disease ◽  
Type Decomposition

The kidney is composed of heterogeneous groups of epithelial, endothelial, immune, and stromal cells, all in close anatomic proximity. Spatial transcriptomic technologies allow the interrogation of in situ expression signatures in health and disease, overlaid upon a histologic image. However, some spatial gene expression platforms have not yet reached single-cell resolution. As such, deconvolution of spatial transcriptomic spots is important to understand the proportion of cell signature arising from these varied cell types in each spot. This article reviews the various deconvolution strategies discussed in the 2021 Indiana O’Brien Center for Microscopy workshop. The unique features of Seurat transfer score methodology, SPOTlight, Robust Cell Type Decomposition, and BayesSpace are reviewed. The application of normalization and batch effect correction across spatial transcriptomic samples is also discussed.

scholarly journals MarkerCount: A stable, count-based cell type identifier for single cell RNA-Seq experiments

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanbyeol Kim ◽  
Joongho Lee ◽  
Keunsoo Kang ◽  
Seokhyun Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Batch Effect ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Stable Performance ◽  
Downstream Analysis

Abstract Cell type identification is a key step to downstream analysis of single cell RNA-seq experiments. Indispensible information for this is gene expression, which is used to cluster cells, train the model and set rejection thresholds. Problem is they are subject to batch effect arising from different platforms and preprocessing. We present MarkerCount, which uses the number of markers expressed regardless of their expression level to initially identify cell types and, then, reassign cell type in cluster-basis. MarkerCount works both in reference and marker-based mode, where the latter utilizes only the existing lists of markers, while the former required pre-annotated dataset to train the model. The performance was evaluated and compared with the existing identifiers, both marker and reference-based, that can be customized with publicly available datasets and marker DB. The results show that MarkerCount provides a stable performance when comparing with other reference-based and marker-based cell type identifiers.

MarkerCount: A stable, count-based cell type identifier for single cell RNA-Seq experiments

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
HanByeol Kim ◽  
Joongho Lee ◽  
Keunsoo Kang ◽  
Seokhyun Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Batch Effect ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Stable Performance ◽  
Downstream Analysis

Abstract Cell type identification is a key step to downstream analysis of single cell RNA-seq experiments. Indispensible information for this is gene expression, which is used to cluster cells, train the model and set rejection thresholds. Problem is they are subject to batch effect arising from different platforms and preprocessing. We present MarkerCount, which uses the number of markers expressed regardless of their expression level to initially identify cell types and, then, reassign cell type in cluster-basis. MarkerCount works both in reference and marker-based mode, where the latter utilizes only the existing lists of markers, while the former required pre-annotated dataset to train the model. The performance was evaluated and compared with the existing identifiers, both marker and reference-based, that can be customized with publicly available datasets and marker DB. The results show that MarkerCount provides a stable performance when comparing with other reference-based and marker-based cell type identifiers.

scholarly journals Identifying gene expression programs of cell-type identity and cellular activity with single-cell RNA-Seq

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Kotliar ◽  
Adrian Veres ◽  
M Aurel Nagy ◽  
Shervin Tabrizi ◽  
Eran Hodis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Matrix Factorization ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Environmental Cues ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Type Identity ◽  
Brain Organoid ◽  
Non Negative Matrix Factorization

Identifying gene expression programs underlying both cell-type identity and cellular activities (e.g. life-cycle processes, responses to environmental cues) is crucial for understanding the organization of cells and tissues. Although single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) can quantify transcripts in individual cells, each cell’s expression profile may be a mixture of both types of programs, making them difficult to disentangle. Here, we benchmark and enhance the use of matrix factorization to solve this problem. We show with simulations that a method we call consensus non-negative matrix factorization (cNMF) accurately infers identity and activity programs, including their relative contributions in each cell. To illustrate the insights this approach enables, we apply it to published brain organoid and visual cortex scRNA-Seq datasets; cNMF refines cell types and identifies both expected (e.g. cell cycle and hypoxia) and novel activity programs, including programs that may underlie a neurosecretory phenotype and synaptogenesis.

scholarly journals A single cell brain atlas in human Alzheimer’s disease

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Grubman ◽  
Gabriel Chew ◽  
John F. Ouyang ◽  
Guizhi Sun ◽  
Xin Yi Choo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Web Resource ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disease that is largely dependent on the complex cellular microenvironment in the brain. This complexity impedes our understanding of how individual cell types contribute to disease progression and outcome. To characterize the molecular and functional cell diversity in the human AD brain we utilized single nuclei RNA- seq in AD and control patient brains in order to map the landscape of cellular heterogeneity in AD. We detail gene expression changes at the level of cells and cell subclusters, highlighting specific cellular contributions to global gene expression patterns between control and Alzheimer’s patient brains. We observed distinct cellular regulation of APOE which was repressed in oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) and astrocyte AD subclusters, and highly enriched in a microglial AD subcluster. In addition, oligodendrocyte and microglia AD subclusters show discordant expression of APOE. Integration of transcription factor regulatory modules with downstream GWAS gene targets revealed subcluster-specific control of AD cell fate transitions. For example, this analysis uncovered that astrocyte diversity in AD was under the control of transcription factor EB (TFEB), a master regulator of lysosomal function and which initiated a regulatory cascade containing multiple AD GWAS genes. These results establish functional links between specific cellular sub-populations in AD, and provide new insights into the coordinated control of AD GWAS genes and their cell-type specific contribution to disease susceptibility. Finally, we created an interactive reference web resource which will facilitate brain and AD researchers to explore the molecular architecture of subtype and AD-specific cell identity, molecular and functional diversity at the single cell level.HighlightsWe generated the first human single cell transcriptome in AD patient brainsOur study unveiled 9 clusters of cell-type specific and common gene expression patterns between control and AD brains, including clusters of genes that present properties of different cell types (i.e. astrocytes and oligodendrocytes)Our analyses also uncovered functionally specialized sub-cellular clusters: 5 microglial clusters, 8 astrocyte clusters, 6 neuronal clusters, 6 oligodendrocyte clusters, 4 OPC and 2 endothelial clusters, each enriched for specific ontological gene categoriesOur analyses found manifold AD GWAS genes specifically associated with one cell-type, and sets of AD GWAS genes co-ordinately and differentially regulated between different brain cell-types in AD sub-cellular clustersWe mapped the regulatory landscape driving transcriptional changes in AD brain, and identified transcription factor networks which we predict to control cell fate transitions between control and AD sub-cellular clustersFinally, we provide an interactive web-resource that allows the user to further visualise and interrogate our dataset.Data resource web interface:http://adsn.ddnetbio.com

scholarly journals Self-reporting transposons enable simultaneous readout of gene expression and transcription factor binding in single cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnav Moudgil ◽  
Michael N. Wilkinson ◽  
Xuhua Chen ◽  
June He ◽  
Alex J. Cammack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Specific Cell

AbstractIn situ measurements of transcription factor (TF) binding are confounded by cellular heterogeneity and represent averaged profiles in complex tissues. Single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) is capable of resolving different cell types based on gene expression profiles, but no technology exists to directly link specific cell types to the binding pattern of TFs in those cell types. Here, we present self-reporting transposons (SRTs) and their use in single cell calling cards (scCC), a novel assay for simultaneously capturing gene expression profiles and mapping TF binding sites in single cells. First, we show how the genomic locations of SRTs can be recovered from mRNA. Next, we demonstrate that SRTs deposited by the piggyBac transposase can be used to map the genome-wide localization of the TFs SP1, through a direct fusion of the two proteins, and BRD4, through its native affinity for piggyBac. We then present the scCC method, which maps SRTs from scRNA-seq libraries, thus enabling concomitant identification of cell types and TF binding sites in those same cells. As a proof-of-concept, we show recovery of cell type-specific BRD4 and SP1 binding sites from cultured cells. Finally, we map Brd4 binding sites in the mouse cortex at single cell resolution, thus establishing a new technique for studying TF biology in situ.

scholarly journals The single-cell epigenetic regulatory landscape in mammalian perinatal testis development

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinyue Liao ◽  
Hoi Ching Suen ◽  
Shitao Rao ◽  
Alfred Chun Shui Luk ◽  
Ruoyu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cellular Heterogeneity ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Cell Type

AbstractSpermatogenesis depends on an orchestrated series of developing events in germ cells and full maturation of the somatic microenvironment. To date, the majority of efforts to study cellular heterogeneity in testis has been focused on single-cell gene expression rather than the chromatin landscape shaping gene expression. To advance our understanding of the regulatory programs underlying testicular cell types, we analyzed single-cell chromatin accessibility profiles in more than 25,000 cells from mouse developing testis. We showed that scATAC-Seq allowed us to deconvolve distinct cell populations and identify cis-regulatory elements (CREs) underlying cell type specification. We identified sets of transcription factors associated with cell type-specific accessibility, revealing novel regulators of cell fate specification and maintenance. Pseudotime reconstruction revealed detailed regulatory dynamics coordinating the sequential developmental progressions of germ cells and somatic cells. This high-resolution data also revealed putative stem cells within the Sertoli and Leydig cell populations. Further, we defined candidate target cell types and genes of several GWAS signals, including those associated with testosterone levels and coronary artery disease. Collectively, our data provide a blueprint of the ‘regulon’ of the mouse male germline and supporting somatic cells.

scholarly journals RNA splicing programs define tissue compartments and cell types at single cell resolution

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Eve Olivieri ◽  
Roozbeh Dehghannasiri ◽  
Peter Wang ◽  
SoRi Jang ◽  
Antoine de Morree ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Rna Splicing ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Mouse Lemur ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Multiple Organs ◽  
Single Cell Pcr

More than 95% of human genes are alternatively spliced. Yet, the extent splicing is regulated at single-cell resolution has remained controversial due to both available data and methods to interpret it. We apply the SpliZ, a new statistical approach that is agnostic to transcript annotation, to detect cell-type-specific regulated splicing in > 110K carefully annotated single cells from 12 human tissues. Using 10x data for discovery, 9.1% of genes with computable SpliZ scores are cell-type specifically spliced. These results are validated with RNA FISH, single cell PCR, and in high throughput with Smart-seq2. Regulated splicing is found in ubiquitously expressed genes such as actin light chain subunit MYL6 and ribosomal protein RPS24, which has an epithelial-specific microexon. 13% of the statistically most variable splice sites in cell-type specifically regulated genes are also most variable in mouse lemur or mouse. SpliZ analysis further reveals 170 genes with regulated splicing during sperm development using, 10 of which are conserved in mouse and mouse lemur. The statistical properties of the SpliZ allow model-based identification of subpopulations within otherwise indistinguishable cells based on gene expression, illustrated by subpopulations of classical monocytes with stereotyped splicing, including an un-annotated exon, in SAT1, a Diamine acetyltransferase. Together, this unsupervised and annotation-free analysis of differential splicing in ultra high throughput droplet-based sequencing of human cells across multiple organs establishes splicing is regulated cell-type-specifically independent of gene expression.

scholarly journals SMNN: Batch Effect Correction for Single-cell RNA-seq data via Supervised Mutual Nearest Neighbor Detection

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuchen Yang ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Huijun Qian ◽  
Kirk C. Wilhelmsen ◽  
Yin Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Batch Effect ◽  
Batch Effects ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Label Information ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractBatch effect correction has been recognized to be indispensable when integrating single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from multiple batches. State-of-the-art methods ignore single-cell cluster label information, but such information can improve effectiveness of batch effect correction, particularly under realistic scenarios where biological differences are not orthogonal to batch effects. To address this issue, we propose SMNN for batch effect correction of scRNA-seq data via supervised mutual nearest neighbor detection. Our extensive evaluations in simulated and real datasets show that SMNN provides improved merging within the corresponding cell types across batches, leading to reduced differentiation across batches over MNN, Seurat v3, and LIGER. Furthermore, SMNN retains more cell type-specific features, partially manifested by differentially expressed genes identified between cell types after SMNN correction being biologically more relevant, with precision improving by up to 841%.Key PointsBatch effect correction has been recognized to be critical when integrating scRNA-seq data from multiple batches due to systematic differences in time points, generating laboratory and/or handling technician(s), experimental protocol, and/or sequencing platform.Existing batch effect correction methods that leverages information from mutual nearest neighbors across batches (for example, implemented in SC3 or Seurat) ignore cell type information and suffer from potentially mismatching single cells from different cell types across batches, which would lead to undesired correction results, especially under the scenario where variation from batch effects is non-negligible compared with biological effects.To address this critical issue, here we present SMNN, a supervised machine learning method that first takes cluster/cell-type label information from users or inferred from scRNA-seq clustering, and then searches mutual nearest neighbors within each cell type instead of global searching.Our SMNN method shows clear advantages over three state-of-the-art batch effect correction methods and can better mix cells of the same cell type across batches and more effectively recover cell-type specific features, in both simulations and real datasets.

scholarly journals Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals thoracolumbar vertebra heterogeneity and rib-genesis in pigs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianbo Li ◽  
Ligang Wang ◽  
Dawei Yu ◽  
Junfeng Hao ◽  
Longchao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Lumbar Vertebra ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Coupled Process ◽  
Gene Expression Dynamics ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Thoracolumbar Vertebra

Thoracolumbar vertebra (TLV) and rib primordium (RP) development is a common evolutionary feature across vertebrates although whole-organism analysis of TLV and RP gene expression dynamics has been lacking. Here we investigated the single-cell transcriptomic landscape of thoracic vertebra (TV), lumbar vertebra (LV), and RP cells from a pig embryo at 27 days post-fertilization (dpf) and identified six cell types with distinct gene-expression signatures. In-depth dissection of the gene-expression dynamics and RNA velocity revealed a coupled process of osteogenesis and angiogenesis during TLV and rib development. Further analysis of cell-type-specific and strand-specific expression uncovered the extremely high levels of HOXA10 3'-UTR sequence specific to osteoblast of LV cells, which may function as anti-HOXA10-antisense by counteracting the HOXA10-antisense effect to determine TLV transition. Thus, this work provides a valuable resource for understanding embryonic osteogenesis and angiogenesis underlying vertebrate TLV and RP development at the cell-type-specific resolution, which serves as a comprehensive view on the transcriptional profile of animal embryo development.

scholarly journals Dynamics of gene expression in single root cells ofA. thaliana

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Jean-Baptiste ◽  
José L. McFaline-Figueroa ◽  
Cristina M. Alexandre ◽  
Michael W. Dorrity ◽  
Lauren Saunders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Developmental Trajectories ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Root Cells ◽  
Cell Lineages ◽  
Cell Type Specific Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific

ABSTRACTSingle-cell RNA-seq can yield high-resolution cell-type-specific expression signatures that reveal new cell types and the developmental trajectories of cell lineages. Here, we apply this approach toA. thalianaroot cells to capture gene expression in 3,121 root cells. We analyze these data with Monocle 3, which orders single cell transcriptomes in an unsupervised manner and uses machine learning to reconstruct single-cell developmental trajectories along pseudotime. We identify hundreds of genes with cell-type-specific expression, with pseudotime analysis of several cell lineages revealing both known and novel genes that are expressed along a developmental trajectory. We identify transcription factor motifs that are enriched in early and late cells, together with the corresponding candidate transcription factors that likely drive the observed expression patterns. We assess and interpret changes in total RNA expression along developmental trajectories and show that trajectory branch points mark developmental decisions. Finally, by applying heat stress to whole seedlings, we address the longstanding question of possible heterogeneity among cell types in the response to an abiotic stress. Although the response of canonical heat shock genes dominates expression across cell types, subtle but significant differences in other genes can be detected among cell types. Taken together, our results demonstrate that single-cell transcriptomics holds promise for studying plant development and plant physiology with unprecedented resolution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document