scholarly journals Maternity Care Preferences for Future Pregnancies Among United States Childbearers: The Impacts of COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa E. Gildner ◽  
Zaneta M. Thayer
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Maternity Care ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Perceived Safety ◽  
Predominately White ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Future Care

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted maternity care decisions, including plans to change providers or delivery location due to pandemic-related restrictions and fears. A relatively unexplored question, however, is how the pandemic may shape future maternity care preferences post-pandemic. Here, we use data collected from an online convenience survey of 980 women living in the United States to evaluate how and why the pandemic has affected women’s future care preferences. We hypothesize that while the majority of women will express a continued interest in hospital birth and OB/GYN care due to perceived safety of medicalized birth, a subset of women will express a new interest in out-of-hospital or “community” care in future pregnancies. However, factors such as local provider and facility availability, insurance coverage, and out-of-pocket cost could limit access to such future preferred care options. Among our predominately white, educated, and high-income sample, a total of 58 participants (5.9% of the sample) reported a novel preference for community care during future pregnancies. While the pandemic prompted the exploration of non-hospital options, the reasons women preferred community care were mostly consistent with factors described in pre-pandemic studies, (e.g. a preference for a natural birth model and a desire for more person-centered care). However, a relatively high percentage (34.5%) of participants with novel preference for community care indicated that they expected limitations in their ability to access these services. These findings highlight how the pandemic has potentially influenced maternity care preferences, with implications for how providers and policy makers should anticipate and respond to future care needs.

scholarly journals Abortion attempts without clinical supervision among transgender, nonbinary and gender-expansive people in the United States

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2020-200966
Author(s):  
Heidi Moseson ◽  
Laura Fix ◽  
Caitlin Gerdts ◽  
Sachiko Ragosta ◽  
Jen Hastings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Clinical Supervision ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Health Insurance Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Physical Trauma ◽  
Abortion Care ◽  
And Gender

BackgroundTransgender, nonbinary and gender-expansive (TGE) people face barriers to abortion care and may consider abortion without clinical supervision.MethodsIn 2019, we recruited participants for an online survey about sexual and reproductive health. Eligible participants were TGE people assigned female or intersex at birth, 18 years and older, from across the United States, and recruited through The PRIDE Study or via online and in-person postings.ResultsOf 1694 TGE participants, 76 people (36% of those ever pregnant) reported considering trying to end a pregnancy on their own without clinical supervision, and a subset of these (n=40; 19% of those ever pregnant) reported attempting to do so. Methods fell into four broad categories: herbs (n=15, 38%), physical trauma (n=10, 25%), vitamin C (n=8, 20%) and substance use (n=7, 18%). Reasons given for abortion without clinical supervision ranged from perceived efficiency and desire for privacy, to structural issues including a lack of health insurance coverage, legal restrictions, denials of or mistreatment within clinical care, and cost.ConclusionsThese data highlight a high proportion of sampled TGE people who have attempted abortion without clinical supervision. This could reflect formidable barriers to facility-based abortion care as well as a strong desire for privacy and autonomy in the abortion process. Efforts are needed to connect TGE people with information on safe and effective methods of self-managed abortion and to dismantle barriers to clinical abortion care so that TGE people may freely choose a safe, effective abortion in either setting.

The Impact of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansions on the Sources of Health Insurance Coverage of Undergraduate Students in the United States

2021 ◽  
pp. 107755872110158
Author(s):  
Priyanka Anand ◽  
Dora Gicheva
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Health Insurance Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Percentage Points ◽  
The Affordable Care Act ◽  
Medicaid Expansions

This article examines how the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansions affected the sources of health insurance coverage of undergraduate students in the United States. We show that the Affordable Care Act expansions increased the Medicaid coverage of undergraduate students by 5 to 7 percentage points more in expansion states than in nonexpansion states, resulting in 17% of undergraduate students in expansion states being covered by Medicaid postexpansion (up from 9% prior to the expansion). In contrast, the growth in employer and private direct coverage was 1 to 2 percentage points lower postexpansion for students in expansion states compared with nonexpansion states. Our findings demonstrate that policy efforts to expand Medicaid eligibility have been successful in increasing the Medicaid coverage rates for undergraduate students in the United States, but there is evidence of some crowd out after the expansions—that is, some students substituted their private and employer-sponsored coverage for Medicaid.

scholarly journals Union Effects on Health Insurance Provision and Coverage in the United States

ILR Review ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Buchmueller ◽  
John Dinardo ◽  
Robert G. Valletta
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Health Benefits ◽  
Union Density ◽  
Health Insurance Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Private Sector Union

During the past two decades, union density has declined in the United States and employer provision of health benefits has changed substantially in extent and form. Using individual survey data spanning the years 1983–97 combined with employer survey data for 1993, the authors update and extend previous analyses of private-sector union effects on employer-provided health benefits. They find that the union effect on health insurance coverage rates has fallen somewhat but remains large, due to an increase over time in the union effect on employee “take-up” of offered insurance, and that declining unionization explains 20–35% of the decline in employee health coverage. The increasing union take-up effect is linked to union effects on employees' direct costs for health insurance and the availability of retiree coverage.

scholarly journals FSMB Census of Licensed Physicians in the United States, 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Young ◽  
Humayun J. Chaudhry ◽  
Xiaomei Pei ◽  
Katie Arnhart ◽  
Michael Dugan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Census Data ◽  
Medical Schools ◽  
The United States ◽  
Geographic Region ◽  
Physician Workforce ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
State Medical Boards

ABSTRACT There are 985,026 physicians with Doctor of Medicine (MD) and Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) degrees licensed to practice medicine in the United States and the District of Columbia, according to physician census data compiled by the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB). These qualified physicians graduated from 2,089 medical schools in 167 countries and are available to serve a U.S. national population of 327,167,434. While the percentage of physicians who are international medical graduates have remained relatively stable over the last eight years, the percentage of physicians who are women, possess a DO degree, have three or more licenses, or are graduates of a medical school in the Caribbean have increased by varying degrees during that same period. This report marks the fifth biennial physician census that the FSMB has published, highlighting key characteristics of the nation's available physician workforce, including numbers of licensees by geographic region and state, type of medical degree, location of medical school, age, gender, specialty certification and number of active licenses per physician. The number of licensed physicians in the United States has been growing steadily, due in part to an expansion in the number of medical schools and students during the past two decades, even as concerns of a physician shortage to meet health care demands persist. The average age of licensed physicians continues to increase, and more licensed physicians appear to be specialty certified, though the latter finding may reflect more comprehensive reporting. This census was compiled using the FSMB's Physician Data Center (PDC), which collects, collates and analyzes physician data directly from the nation's state medical and osteopathic boards and is uniquely positioned to provide a comprehensive snapshot of information about licensed physicians. A periodic national census of this type offers useful demographic and licensure information about the available physician workforce that may be useful to policy makers, researchers and related health care organizations to better understand and address the nation's health care needs.

scholarly journals Healthy Birth Practice #4: Avoid Interventions Unless They Are Medically Necessary

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-103
Author(s):  
Judith A. Lothian
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Maternity Care ◽  
Fetal Monitoring ◽  
The United States ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Intravenous Fluids ◽  
Electronic Fetal Monitoring ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Maternity care in the United States continues to be intervention intensive. The routine use of intravenous fluids, restrictions on eating and drinking, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, epidural analgesia, and augmentation of labor characterize most U.S. births. The use of episiotomy has decreased but is still higher than it should be. These interventions disturb the normal physiology of labor and birth and restrict women's ability to cope with labor. The result is a cascade of interventions that increase risk, including the risk of cesarean surgery, for women and babies. This paper describes the use and effect of routine interventions on the physiologic process of labor and birth and identifies the unintended consequences resulting from the routine use of these interventions in labor and birth.

End-of-Life Care for an Undocumented Mexican Immigrant

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilit Karapetyan ◽  
Om Dawani ◽  
Heather S. Laird-Fick
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Access ◽  
Limited English Proficiency ◽  
Undocumented Immigrants ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Poverty Line ◽  
The United States ◽  
Immigrant Population ◽  
Long Term Treatment

The immigrant population in the United States has grown over the past years. Undocumented immigrants account for 14.6% of the uninsured population in the United States. Decisions about end-of-life treatment are often difficult to reach in the best of situations. We present a 43-year-old undocumented Mexican female immigrant with metastatic sarcomatoid squamous cell cervical cancer and discuss the barriers that she faced during her treatment. Limited English proficiency, living below the poverty line, low level of education, and lack access to Medicare, Medicaid, or other insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act are major causes of decreased health-care access and service utilization by the immigrant population. Latinos are less likely to be referred to hospice by oncologists, and nearly a third of hospice agencies offer limited or no services to undocumented immigrants. Undocumented immigrants with terminal diagnoses generally do not have access to comprehensive or multidisciplinary follow-up treatment. Instead, one of their few options is to return to their home countries without any long-term treatment. This article discusses the many barriers and proposes areas for reform.

Insurance coverage and care affordability in cancer survivors in 2016-2019.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1520-1520
Author(s):  
Justin Michael Barnes ◽  
Eric Adjei Boakye ◽  
Mario Schootman ◽  
Evan Michael Graboyes ◽  
Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
Medicaid Expansion ◽  
Poverty Level ◽  
Linear Probability

1520 Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) led to improvements in insurance coverage and care affordability in cancer patients. However, the uninsured rate for the general US reached its nadir in 2016 and has been increasing since. We aimed to quantify the changes in insurance coverage and rate of care unaffordability in cancer survivors from 2016 to 2019. Methods: We queried data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2016-2019) for cancer survivors ages 18-64 years. Outcomes of interest were the percentage of cancer survivors reporting insurance coverage and the percentage reporting cost-driven lack of care in the previous 12 months. Survey-weighted linear probability models adjusted for covariates (age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, marital status, and state Medicaid expansion status) were utilized to estimate the average yearly change (AYC) in the outcomes across 2016-2019. Mediation analyses evaluated the mediating effect of insurance coverage changes on changes in cost-driven lack of care. Results: A total of 178,931 cancer survivors were identified among the survey respondents. The percentage of insured cancer survivors between 2016 and 2019 decreased from 92.4% to 90.4% (AYC: -0.54, 95% CI = -1.03 to -0.06, P =.026). This translates to an estimated 164,638 cancer survivors in the United States who lost insurance coverage in the study period. There were decreases in private insurance coverage (AYC: -1.66, 95% CI = -3.1 to -0.22, P =.024) but increases in Medicaid coverage (AYC: 1.14, 95% CI = 0.03 to 2.25, P =.043). The decreases in any coverage were largest in individuals with income < 138% federal poverty level (FPL) (AYC: -1.14, 95% CI = -2.32 to 0.04, P =.059; compared to > 250% FPL, Pinteraction=.03). Cost-driven lack of care in the preceding 12 months among cancer survivors increased from 17.9% in 2016 to 20% in 2019 (AYC: 0.67, 95% CI = 0.06 to 1.27, P =.03), which translates to an estimated 167,184 survivors in the US who skipped care due to costs. Changes in insurance coverage mediated 27.5% of the observed change in care unaffordability overall (p =.028) and 65.7% in individuals with income < 138% FPL relative to > 250% FPL (p =.045). Conclusions: Between 2016 and 2019, about 165,000 cancer survivors in the United States lost their insurance coverage and a similar number may have skipped needed care due to cost. Loss of insurance coverage was mostly among individuals with low socioeconomic status. Interventions to improve health insurance coverage among cancer survivors, such as the recent executive order to strengthen the ACA and further efforts promoting Medicaid expansion in additional states, may be important factors to mitigate these trends.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document