scholarly journals Oral Manifestations in Children and Young Adults with Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5408
Author(s):  
Maria Contaldo ◽  
Rossella Santoro ◽  
Antonio Romano ◽  
Francesca Loffredo ◽  
Dario Di Stasio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Oral Manifestations ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Candida Spp ◽  
Children And Young Adults ◽  
Prevalent Species

Down syndrome (DS) is an autosomal disorder associated with mental and physical involvement. The typical craniofacial phenotype and the dental anomalies in DS subjects have been widely described, but a systematic report on the manifestations affecting the oral mucosae in children with DS is still lacking. This systematic review aimed to establish the prevalence of oral mucosal manifestations in children/young adults with DS. Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus were investigated in September 2020. Documents in English on DS children/young adults (up to 25 years) reporting oral mucosal findings were considered. Study quality was assessed with ROBIN-I. Of the 150 references retrieved, 14 studies were considered eligible. The risk of bias ranged from low to unclear. Fissured tongue appeared to increase with age and was more prevalent in DS children than in the general population. Lip fissures and cheilitis were heterogeneously reported. Candida spp. carriage with and without active candidiasis was more frequent in DS children/young adults than in controls. C. albicans was the most prevalent species. Few other oral mucosal conditions have been reported sporadically. The heterogeneity of the works revealed the need for more appropriate oral examination to intercept the oral manifestations of oral mucosa and prevent recurrent candidiasis.

Incidence and mortality rates of intracranial hemorrhage in hemophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Fleur Zwagemaker ◽  
Samantha C Gouw ◽  
Julie J Jansen ◽  
Caroline Vuong ◽  
Michiel Coppens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Normal Model ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Children And Young Adults

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe complication that is relatively common among hemophilia patients. This systematic review aimed to obtain more precise estimates of ICH incidence and mortality in hemophilia, which may be important for patients, caregivers, researchers and health policy-makers. PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched using terms related to "hemophilia" and "intracranial hemorrhage" or "mortality". Studies that allowed calculation of ICH incidence or mortality rates in a hemophilia population of at least 50 patients were included. We summarized evidence on ICH incidence and calculated pooled ICH incidence and mortality in three age groups: (1) persons of all ages with hemophilia, (2) children and young adults below 25 years of age with hemophilia and (3) neonates with hemophilia. Incidence and mortality were pooled with a Poisson-Normal model or a Binomial-Normal model. We included 45 studies that represented 54 470 patients, 809 151 person-years and 5326 live births of hemophilia patients. In persons of all ages, the pooled ICH incidence and mortality rates were 2.3 (95% CI 1.2-4.8) and 0.8 (95% CI 0.5-1.2) per 1000 person-years, respectively. In children and young adults, the pooled ICH incidence and mortality rates were 7.4 (95% CI 4.9-11.1) and 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9) per 1000 person-years, respectively. In neonates, the pooled cumulative ICH incidence was 2.1% (95% CI 1.5-2.8) per 100 live births. ICH was classified as spontaneous in 35-58% of cases. Our findings suggest that ICH is an important problem in hemophilia that occurs among all ages, requiring adequate preventive strategies.

scholarly journals Pregnancy and Breastfeeding During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Published Pregnancy Cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Rodrigues ◽  
Inês Baía ◽  
Rosa Domingues ◽  
Henrique Barros
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Neonatal Deaths ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
The Impact

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is an emerging concern regarding the potential adverse effects during pregnancy. This study reviews knowledge on the impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy and describes the outcome of published cases of pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19.Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed®, Scopus®, Web of Science®, and MedRxiv® up to 26th June 2020, using PRISMA standards, to identify original published studies describing pregnant women at any gestational age diagnosed COVID-19. There were no date or language restrictions on the search. All identified studies were included irrespective of assumptions on study quality.Results: We identified 161 original studies reporting 3,985 cases of pregnant women with COVID-19 (1,007 discharged while pregnant). The 2,059 published cases with pregnancy outcomes resulted in 42 abortions, 21 stillbirths, and 2,015 live births. Preterm birth occurred in 23% of cases. Around 6% of pregnant women required admission to an intensive care unit and 28 died. There were 10 neonatal deaths. From the 163 cases with amniotic fluid, placenta, and/or cord blood analyzed for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, 10 were positive. Sixty-one newborns were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Four breast milk samples from 92 cases showed evidence of SARS-CoV-2.Conclusion: Emerging evidence suggests that vertical transmission is possible, however, there is still a limited number of reported cases with intrapartum samples. Information, counseling and adequate monitoring are essential to prevent and manage adverse effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.

scholarly journals Harms of Antipsychotics in Children and Young Adults: A Systematic Review Update

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 661-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Pillay ◽  
Khrista Boylan ◽  
Amanda Newton ◽  
Lisa Hartling ◽  
Ben Vandermeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Extrapyramidal Symptoms ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Cholesterol Levels ◽  
Children And Young Adults ◽  
Meta Analyses

Objective: To update and extend our previous systematic review on first- (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for treatment of psychiatric and behavioral conditions in children, adolescents, and young adults (aged ≤24 years). This article focuses on the evidence for harms. Method: We searched (to April 2016) 8 databases, gray literature, trial registries, Food and Drug Administration reports, and reference lists. Two reviewers conducted study screening and selection independently, with consensus for selection. One reviewer extracted and another verified all data; 2 reviewers independently assessed risk of bias. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate and network meta-analysis across conditions for changes in body composition. Two reviewers reached consensus for ratings on the strength of evidence for prespecified outcomes. Results: A total of 135 studies (95 trials and 40 observational) were included, and 126 reported on harms. FGAs caused slightly less weight gain and more extrapyramidal symptoms than SGAs. SGAs as a class caused adverse effects, including weight gain, high triglyceride levels, extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, and somnolence. They appeared to increase the risk for high cholesterol levels and type 2 diabetes. Many outcomes for individual drug comparisons were of low or insufficient strength of evidence. Olanzapine caused more short-term gains in weight and body mass index than several other SGAs. The dose of SGAs may not make a difference over the short term for some outcomes. Conclusions: Clinicians need to weigh carefully the benefit-to-harm ratio when using antipsychotics, especially when treatment alternatives exist. More evidence is needed on the comparative harms between antipsychotics over the longer term.

scholarly journals The efficacy of functional gait training in children and young adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 866-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam T C Booth ◽  
Annemieke I Buizer ◽  
Pieter Meyns ◽  
Irene L B Oude Lansink ◽  
Frans Steenbrink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gait Training ◽  
Children And Young Adults ◽  
Functional Gait

Mental Health among Children and Young Adults with Visual Impairments: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liv Berit Augestad
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Longitudinal Design ◽  
Visual Impairments ◽  
Emotional Problems ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Children And Young Adults ◽  
Over Time

Introduction The purpose of this study was to summarize current scientific knowledge relating to the occurrence of mood disorders among children with visual impairments. Methods A systematic review was conducted of articles published between January 1998 and July 2016, inclusive. A total of 17 publications met the inclusion criteria, of which 15 reported studies with a cross-sectional design. The 17 publications represent 13 countries. Results The majority of the studies suggested that children and young adults with visual impairments had more emotional problems than did their sighted peers. In addition, girls with visual impairments more often experienced serious symptoms of depression and anxiety than did boys with visual impairments, a finding that was in line with results for the general population. Two studies with a longitudinal design suggested that emotional problems among children and young adults with visual impairments might lessen over time. Discussion Due to the different research purposes, study designs, definitions of visual impairment, participants’ age ranges, cultures, countries, small sample sizes, measurements, and analyses of mental health, the overall results of the reviewed studies were inconsistent. To give children the best opportunities for good mental health, there is a need for more knowledge and for further longitudinal and randomized studies of high quality. Implications for practitioners Social support, friendship, and independence in mobility seem to be important for enhancing the mental health of all children. Children with earlier onset and more severe visual impairments may be less likely to experience a reduction in their mental health problems over time.

scholarly journals Household and area-level social determinants of multimorbidity: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. jech-2020-214691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Ingram ◽  
Sarah Ledden ◽  
Sarah Beardon ◽  
Manuel Gomes ◽  
Sue Hogarth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
North America ◽  
General Population ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Household Composition ◽  
Living Alone ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Household Level

BackgroundNo clear synthesis of evidence examining household and area-level social determinants of multimorbidity exists. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on associations between household and area-level social determinants of health (SDoH) and multimorbidity prevalence or incidence in the general population.MethodsSix databases (MedLine, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus and Scopus) were searched. The search was limited to peer-reviewed studies conducted in high-income countries and published in English between 2010 and 2019. A second reviewer screened all titles with abstracts and a subset of full texts. Study quality was assessed and protocol pre-registered (CRD42019135281).Results41 studies spanning North America, Europe and Australasia were included. Household income and area-level deprivation were the most explored with fairly consistent findings. The odds of multimorbidity were up to 4.4 times higher for participants with the lowest level of income compared with the highest level. Those living in the most deprived areas had the highest prevalence or incidence of multimorbidity (pooled OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.42). Associations between deprivation and multimorbidity differed by age and multimorbidity type. Findings from the few studies investigating household tenure, household composition and area-level rurality were mixed and contradictory; homeownership and rurality were associated with increased and decreased multimorbidity, while living alone was found to be associated with a higher risk of multimorbidity and not associated.ConclusionImproving our understanding of broader social determinants of multimorbidity—particularly at the household level—could help inform strategies to tackle multimorbidity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document