scholarly journals Differential iNKT and T Cells Activation in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Estefanía Caballano-Infantes ◽  
Alberto García-García ◽  
Carlos Lopez-Gomez ◽  
Alejandro Cueto ◽  
Mercedes Robles-Diaz ◽  
...  

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) could share molecular mechanisms involving the immune system. We aimed to identify activation immunological biomarkers in invariant natural killer T (iNKT) and CD4/CD8+ T cells in NAFLD and DILI. Methods: We analyzed the activation profile (CD69, CD25, and HLA-DR) and natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) on iNKT cells, and CD4/CD8 T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from NAFLD, with or without significant liver fibrosis, and DILI patients. Results: There was an increase in iNKT cells in NAFLD patients compared to DILI or control subjects. Regarding the cellular activation profile, NAFLD with significant liver fibrosis (F ≥ 2) displayed higher levels of CD69+iNKT cells compared to NAFLD with none or mild liver fibrosis (F ≤ 1) and control patients. CD69+iNKT positively correlated with insulin resistance, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, liver fibrosis-4 index (FIB4) and AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI). DILI patients showed an increase in CD69+ and HLA-DR+ in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, detecting the most relevant difference in the case of CD69+CD8+ T cells. Conclusions: CD69+iNKT may be a biomarker to assess liver fibrosis progression in NAFLD. CD69+CD8+ T cells were identified as a potential distinctive biomarker for distinguishing DILI from NAFLD.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3944-3944
Author(s):  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
Maria Victoria Mateos ◽  
Lucía López-Corral ◽  
María-Belén Vidriales ◽  
Miguel T. Hernandez ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3944 Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent that enhances T and NK cell activation, being this consideration as a major player in its anti-myeloma effect. However, in MM lenalidomide is usually combined with the immunosuppressant dexamethasone, which has raised questions regarding a potential abrogation of this immunomodulatory effect. In fact, this may be a dilemma upon treating early stage MM patients with lenalidomide +/− dexamethasone. Moreover, our current knowledge of the immune system in SMM is limited. Herein we evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) immunophenotyping peripheral blood (PB) T and NK cells from high-risk SMM patients (N=33), treated according to the QUIREDEX trial (NCT 00480363): an induction phase of 9 four-week cycles of LenDex followed by maintenance with lenalidomide until disease progression. To evaluate the immune status of T and NK cells of SMM patients, we compared them at baseline vs healthy adults (HA) aged over 60 years (N=10). To assess the effect of LenDex on T and NK cells of SMM patients, we compared baseline samples vs those studied after 3 and 9 cycles of LenDex. To address the question whether dexamethasone antagonizes the immunomodulatory properties of lenalidomide, we compared in 11 of the 33 patients, the PB T and NK cells at the end of induction (9th cycle of LenDex) vs during maintenance (lenalidomide alone and at least 3 months after dexamethasone discontinuation). The percentage of PB T cells in high-risk SMM patients at baseline was increased when compared to HA (23% vs 17%; P=.02), mainly due to expansion of CD8 T cells (P=.03). Of note, γδ T cells were also increased in SMM (0.8% vs 0.3%; P=.003). In turn, no differences (P>.05) were noted for both the CD56dim and CD56bright NK cell compartments. However, when a more detailed immunophenotypic characterization was carried out, CD4 and/or CD8 T cells from SMM patients showed decreased expression of activation markers (CD25, P≤.04; CD54, P<.001 and CD154, P=.002), as well as decreased production of the Th1 related cytokines (IFNγ, P=.03; TNFα, P≤.003; and IL-2, P=.02). We then investigated the effect of LenDex treatment. After 3 and 9 cycles of LenDex both CD4 and/or CD8 T cells showed up-regulation of Th1related chemokines (CCR5; p<.001) and cytokine production (IFNγ, P=.03; TNFα, P=.03 and IL-2, P=.02), as well as increased expression of activation markers (CD69, P≤.005; CD25, P<.001; CD28, P≤.04; CD54, P<.001 and HLA-DR, P<.001). Similarly, CD56dim and CD56bright NK cells showed up-regulation of HLA-DR (P<.001), the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity associated receptor CD16 (p≤.005), and the adhesion molecules CD11a (p≤.001) and CD11b (p≤.005). Concerning cell cycle analysis, the percentage of cells in S-phase was significantly increased from baseline vs. 3 vs. 9 cycles of LenDex for T CD4 (0.04% vs 0.13% vs 0.13%; p<.001), CD8 (0.05% vs 0.13% vs 0.18%; p<.001) and NK cells (0.07% vs 0.16% vs 0.15%; p<.001). Interestingly, an unsupervised cluster analysis of the overall immunophenotypic expression profile obtained after 9 cycles of LenDex was able to discriminate two groups of patients with different activation profiles particularly on T CD8 cells, with differences (P<.05) in both their percentage in PB and expression of activation, Th1 and maturation markers. Patients displaying a higher activation profile showed a trend towards increased depth of response after 9 cycles of LenDex (sCR+CR: 31% vs 15%; p=.229), as well as time-to progression (TTP) to symptomatic MM (TTP at 2-years: 100% vs 79%; P=.177). Finally, we explored whether the immunomodulatory properties of lenalidomide could be increased when dexamethasone was removed for the maintenance phase. Regarding T and NK cell distribution, only an increase in the percentage of CD4 T cells was found (9% vs. 12%, P=.04), whereas no differences (P>.05) were noted regarding the immunophenotypic expression profile of T and NK cells studied. In summary, we show that in high-risk SMM patients at baseline CD8 and γδ T cells are increased but overall T cells show an impaired activation profile. Treatment with LenDex induces an activation and proliferation of T and NK cells which may contribute to disease control. Finally, our results do not show an inhibition of the immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide by the concomitant use of dexamethasone. Disclosures: Paiva: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Off Label Use: lenalidomide is not approved for smoldering myeloma. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Rosiñol:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. San Miguel:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-520
Author(s):  
Karina L. Raikhelson ◽  
Elina A. Kondrashina ◽  
Ekaterina V. Pazenko

In this review, we discussed the epidemiological and pathogenetic aspects of mixed steatohepatitis (SH), developed due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic associated fatty liver disease, drug-induced liver injury. We discussed the mechanisms of the mutually aggravating influence of etiological factors. Drugs can cause steatosis and SH, as well as contribute to the progressive course of existing SH, primarily of metabolic origin. The issues of interaction of pathogenetic factors, peculiarities of diagnostics and perspectives of pathogenetic and symptomatic treatment are considered. Therapy of mixed SH is based on avoidance of hepatotoxic drugs and lifestyle modification, medications with demonstrated efficacy (such as ademetionine) in certain SH might be used.


Author(s):  
Sanjiv Saigal ◽  
Dharmesh Kapoor ◽  
Dyotona Sen Roy

The aim of the present review is to have an in-depth analysis of the published scientific literature relating to the clinical use of ademetionine in various etiologies of liver disease. Literature search was performed using electronic databases like Pubmed/Medline/others to identify studies on ademetionine in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, drug induced liver injury and viral hepatitis. Ademetionine has been studied in various etiologies of liver disease with varying dosing and durations. In patients with chronic and alcoholic liver disease, ademetionine was found to be beneficial in improving liver enzyme levels, increasing glutathione levels, improving signs and symptoms of fatigue, pruritus and jaundice. Positive effects of ademetionine therapy have also been documented in multiple studies in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, with improvements observed in triglyceride, total cholesterol, alanine transaminase and asprtate transaminase levels and ultrasound grading of fatty change. In patients with drug induced liver injury, improvements were observed in liver biochemical markers and symptoms such as pruritus, fatigue and jaundice. Ademetionine has also been studied in patients with viral hepatitis with improvement in laboratory markers and signs and symptoms. Published data suggest that there is clinical evidence to substantiate the use of ademetionine across indications. Its use has resulted in sustained improvement in biochemical markers; signs and symptoms of liver disease has been observed in both acute and chronic liver disease. Further data is warranted through clinical studies to focus on specific end points of therapy areas, in existing and new indications.


Choonpa Igaku ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 241-248
Author(s):  
Hirohito TAKEUCHI ◽  
Katsutoshi SUGIMOTO ◽  
Hisashi OSHIRO ◽  
Kunio IWATSUKA ◽  
Shin KONO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document