scholarly journals Biomarkers for Liquid Biopsies of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Gossing ◽  
Marcus Frohme ◽  
Lars Radke

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET) do not only belong to the most common intracranial neoplasms but seem to be generally more common than has been thought. Minimally invasive liquid biopsies have the potential to improve their early screening efficiency as well as monitor prognosis by facilitating the diagnostic procedures. This review aims to assess the potential of using liquid biopsies of different kinds of biomarker species that have only been obtained from solid pituitary tissues so far. Numerous molecules have been associated with the development of a PitNET, suggesting that it often develops from the cumulative effects of many smaller genetic or epigenetic changes. These minor changes eventually pile up to switch critical molecules into tumor-promoting states, which may be the key regulatory nodes representing the most potent marker substances for a diagnostic test. Drugs targeting these nodes may be superior for the therapeutic outcome and therefore the identification of such pituitary-specific cellular key nodes will help to accelerate their application in medicine. The ongoing genetic degeneration in pituitary adenomas suggests that repeated tumor profiling via liquid biopsies will be necessary for personalized and effective treatment solutions.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 107327482093480
Author(s):  
Ting-Miao Wu ◽  
Ji-Bin Liu ◽  
Yu Liu ◽  
Yi Shi ◽  
Wen Li ◽  
...  

Traditional methods of cancer treatment are usually based on the morphological and histological diagnosis of tumors, and they are not optimized according to the specific situation. Precision medicine adjusts the existing treatment regimen based on the patient’s genomic information to make it most suitable for patients. Detection of genetic mutations in tumors is the basis of precise cancer medicine. Through the analysis of genetic mutations in patients with cancer, we can tailor the treatment plan for each patient with cancer to maximize the curative effect, minimize damage to healthy tissues, and optimize resources. In recent years, next-generation sequencing technology has developed rapidly and has become the core technology of precise targeted therapy and immunotherapy for cancer. From early cancer screening to treatment guidance for patients with advanced cancer, liquid biopsy is increasingly used in cancer management. This is as a result of the development of better noninvasive, repeatable, sensitive, and accurate tools used in early screening, diagnosis, evaluation, and monitoring of patients. Cell-free DNA, which is a new noninvasive molecular pathological detection method, often carries tumor-specific gene changes. It plays an important role in optimizing treatment and evaluating the efficacy of different treatment options in clinical trials, and it has broad clinical applications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17001-e17001
Author(s):  
Catherine Handy Marshall ◽  
Albert E Holler ◽  
Hua-Ling Tsai ◽  
Lukasz Gondek ◽  
Jun Luo ◽  
...  

e17001 Background: Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is a process associated with normal aging and may complicate the interpretation of liquid-biopsy genomic testing in oncology. Little is known about the prevalence of CH in prostate cancer as detected on somatic tumor profiling, or its association with clinical parameters and outcomes in prostate cancer. We sought to estimate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with CH identified from tissue-based prostate cancer specimens. Methods: This was a retrospective study of men with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent clinical somatic tissue-based next-generation sequencing using commercial platforms (n = 364). Patients with known hematologic malignancies (n = 7), and those with only liquid biopsies were excluded (n = 34), leaving 323 cases. Classical CH mutations were defined as those in DNMT3A, TET2 or ASXL1. Additional CH mutations included were defined as those in BCORL1, GNAS, SF3B1, JAK2 or PPM1D. Chi-squared tests were used to compare prevalence by categorical variables, Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare means across groups, and Cox proportional hazards were used for time-to-event analyses. Results: The prevalence of CH mutations in prostate cancer was 9% (30/323), and the prevalence of classical CH mutations was 7% (22/323)(Table). The most common mutations were in DNMT3A (n = 9), TET2 (n = 8) and ASXL1 (n = 5); other less common CH alterations were in GNAS and SF3B1 (n = 3 each), followed by CBL and JAK2 (n = 1 each). The most common site of tumor biopsy was the prostate (N = 266) followed by visceral (n = 19) and lymph node (N = 19) metastases. Men with any CH mutation were not significantly older at age of prostate cancer diagnosis (64 vs 62 years; p = 0.19) than those without; however, men with classical CH mutations were statistically older at diagnosis than those without (66 vs 62 years; p = 0.04). There was no difference in prevalence of CH mutations by Gleason sum (P = 0.67). Among men with localized disease at diagnosis, the median metastasis-free survival was 3.9 years in those with overall CH mutations and 6.6 years in those without CH mutations (HR [adjusted for age and Gleason] 1.3; 95% CI 0.7-2.3; p = 0.4). OS from the time of diagnosis to death was also numerically shorter in those with any CH mutation (median 9.7 years in those with and 14.2 years in those without CH mutations; HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.5; p = 0.6). Conclusions: CH can be detected in about 7-9% of prostate cancer patients from tissue-based tumor samples, is associated with older age, and may be linked to adverse oncological outcomes. The prognostic impact of CH in the context of specific systemic therapies (hormonal, chemotherapeutic) remains to be elucidated.[Table: see text]


2010 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
pp. 877-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Scarpa ◽  
Daniela Prando ◽  
Anna Pozza ◽  
Elisa Degli Esposti ◽  
Carlo Castoro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajnish Nagarkar ◽  
Timothy Crook ◽  
Nicholas Plowman ◽  
Andrew Gaya ◽  
Darshana Patil ◽  
...  

Prior attempts at personalizing anticancer treatments based on univariate tumor profiling (single gene variant) for selection of monotherapy with targeted agents (single drug) have generally yielded poor response rates. We report findings from the LIQUID IMPACT pilot trial where Multi-analyte Liquid Biopsy (MLB) profiling of circulating tumor analytes in peripheral blood was used to inform selection of personalized combination regimens in advanced refractory cancers. Among the 43 patients evaluable as per study protocol, 34 had targetable pathway activations. Partial Response (PR) was observed in 14 (41.1%) of the 34 patients with signaling pathway activation, including 5 (50%) of 10 cases with mTOR activation, 8 (44.4%) of 18 cases with activation of angiogenesis and 4 (50.0%) of 8 cases with EGFR / ERBB2 activation. PR was not reported among the 9 cases with no detectable pathway activation. Toxicities were manageable and there were no treatment related deaths. The study findings suggest that MLB may be able to inform safe and efficacious combination regimens in patients with advanced refractory cancers.


Author(s):  
Bruce Mackay

The broadest application of transmission electron microscopy (EM) in diagnostic medicine is the identification of tumors that cannot be classified by routine light microscopy. EM is useful in the evaluation of approximately 10% of human neoplasms, but the extent of its contribution varies considerably. It may provide a specific diagnosis that can not be reached by other means, but in contrast, the information obtained from ultrastructural study of some 10% of tumors does not significantly add to that available from light microscopy. Most cases fall somewhere between these two extremes: EM may correct a light microscopic diagnosis, or serve to narrow a differential diagnosis by excluding some of the possibilities considered by light microscopy. It is particularly important to correlate the EM findings with data from light microscopy, clinical examination, and other diagnostic procedures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Narjust Duma ◽  
Beatrice Alvarado ◽  
Genevieve Streb ◽  
Andrew Jennis ◽  
Martin Gutierrez

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 110-111
Author(s):  
Franco Grimaldi ◽  
Elda Kara ◽  
Fabio Vanin ◽  
Maria Carpentieri ◽  
Claudia Cipri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document