scholarly journals Blood-Based Detection of BRAF V600E in Gliomas and Brain Tumor Metastasis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1227
Author(s):  
Keiko M. Kang ◽  
Koushik Muralidharan ◽  
Anudeep Yekula ◽  
Julia L. Small ◽  
Zachary S. Rosh ◽  
...  

Liquid biopsy provides a minimally invasive platform for the detection of tumor-derived information, including hotspot mutations, such as BRAF V600E. In this study, we provide evidence of the technical development of a ddPCR assay for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in the plasma of patients with glioma or brain metastasis. In a small patient cohort (n = 9, n = 5 BRAF V600E, n = 4 BRAF WT, n = 4 healthy control), we were able to detect the BRAF V600E mutation in the plasma of 4/5 patients with BRAF V600E-tissue confirmed mutant tumors, and none of the BRAF WT tumors. We also provide evidence in two metastatic patients with longitudinal monitoring, where the plasma-based BRAF V600E mutation correlated with clinical disease status. This proof of principle study demonstrates the potential of this assay to serve as an adjunctive tool for the detection, monitoring, and molecular characterization of BRAF mutant gliomas and brain metastasis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15547-e15547
Author(s):  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
Cailu Shen ◽  
Jianxia Li ◽  
Zehua Wu ◽  
Huabin Hu ◽  
...  

e15547 Background: BRAF V600E mutation is associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), while the non-V600E mutation mCRC patients showed better prognosis than that of V600E mutation. The clinicopathologic features between V600E and non-V600E mutation has not yet been fully evaluated. And the impact of metastasectomy for patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC was not well-known. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC. Next generation sequencing (22-gene panel) was performed in some of the patients. Survival was also analyzed in the cohort of BRAF V600E and non-V600E mutation with or without metastasectomy. Results: Between December 2014 and August 2020, 116 patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC were enrolled, including 94 patients with BRAF V600E mutation and 22 patients with non-V600E mutation. Significant difference was observed in the prevalence of peritoneal metastasis (69.1% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.001) and lung metastasis (11.7% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.009) between BRAF V600E mutation and non-V600E mutations. In genomic profile, SMAD4 mutation (30.7% vs. 13.7%) showed higher prevalence in patients with BRAF V600E mutation than that of non-V600E mutations, while RAS mutation (18.2% vs. 6.4%) and FBXW7 mutation (13.7% vs 3.1%) had higher incidence in BRAF non-V600E mutations than that of V600E mutation. Patients with BRAF V600E mutation showed a poorer overall survival than those with non-V600E mutations (13.9 vs. 26.8 months, P = 0.038). Totally, 46 patients received metastasectomy after systemic treatment. The median survival for BRAF V600E patients with or without metastasectomy was not reach (42.3+ months) vs. 8.3 months, respectively ( P < 0.001), and for non-V600E patients with or without metastasectomy was not reach (64.2+ months) vs. 23.3 months, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status (0-1 vs. 2) ( P = 0.001), Staging (IVa-b vs. IVc) ( P = 0.01) and metastasectomy ( P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Conclusions: BRAF V600E mutation defines a subgroup of mCRC with worse prognosis. Metastasectomy might improve the survival benefit in carefully selected BRAF-mutant mCRC patients after systemic treatment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. S2282
Author(s):  
S. Schwab ◽  
U. Setinek ◽  
D. Krenbek ◽  
S. Watzka ◽  
S. Gasser ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21076-e21076
Author(s):  
Tomas Lyons ◽  
Odharnaith O'Brien ◽  
Sandra Murphy ◽  
Richard Bambury ◽  
Deirdre O'Mahony ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21017-e21017
Author(s):  
Xue Bai ◽  
Lu Si ◽  
Zhihong Chi ◽  
Xinan Sheng ◽  
Chuanliang Cui ◽  
...  

e21017 Background: Vemurafenib has substantially impressive clinical efficacy in cutaneous melanoma (CM). However, compared with their cutaneous counterpart, acral melanoma (AM) and mucosal melanoma (MM) have distinct genetic patterns and worse prognosis. The efficacy and safety profiles of vemurafenib in AM and mm remain unclear. Methods: Clinical, pathological, and therapeutic data were collected and reviewed of patients (pts) with metastatic or unresectable BRAF-mutant AM and mm hospitalized and administrated vemurafenib during January 2011 and January 2017. Responses were evaluated by RECIST v1.1, survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and adverse effects were assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results: 24 pts were identified, 13 (54.2%) with AM, 11 (45.8%) with mm (1 patient without available radiology data). All 13 AM pts harbored BRAF V600E mutation (1 with simultaneous C-KIT E861K mutation); 10/11 (90.9%) mm pts carried BRAF V600E mutation (1 with simultaneous PDGFRA V824I mutation), 1/11 (9.1%) had BRAF D594N mutation. Median PFS were 5.4 (95%CI 3.5-8.7) and 4.5 (95%CI 1.5-15.0) months, median OS were 11.7 (95%CI 8.1-23.6) and 7.9 (95%CI 4.6-26.2) months; ORRs were 61.5% (8/13) and 40.0% (4/10), DCRs were 92.3% (12/13) and 90.0% (9/10) in AM and MM, respectively. Vemurafenib was well tolerated. The most common adverse effects (AEs) were hand-foot syndrome in AM and elevation of total cholesterol in MM, with the incidence of 23.1% (3/13) and 18.2% (2/11), respectively. Grade 3/4 AEs have not been observed. No patient discontinued vemurafenib because of treatment related toxicity. Conclusions: Vemurafenib yields substantial response in pts with AM and MM. Compared with in CM, vemurafenib has similar efficacy and safety profiles in BRAF-mutant AM and MM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i32-i32
Author(s):  
Claudia K. Petritsch ◽  
Anne Marie Barrette ◽  
Jong-Whi Park

Abstract Background The BRAF V600E mutation occurs in ~ twenty percent of histologically diverse pediatric gliomas and is the second most common mutation in pediatric low-grade gliomas (LGG). BRAF V600E expression in LGG with balanced CDKN2A is associated with a higher rate for progression than for BRAF V600E wildtype tumors, and despite adjuvant therapy, consisting of resection, radiation and chemotherapy. Progression invariably occurs in BRAF V600E mutant CDKN2A deleted gliomas, marking a high-risk group. Here, we aim to overcome the lack BRAF V600E mutant glioma models that allow for studies of stem and progenitor cells and the immune system ability to understand progression. Methods We develop novel immunocompetent, stem and progenitor cell-based mouse models for BRAF mutant gliomas, including genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), orthotopic glioma models derived from gliomas in GEMMs as well as in vitro models of those tumors. BRAF mutant mouse brains and cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining, flow cytometry, mass cytometry and RNA sequencing. Results Ongoing model development studies indicate that BRAF V600E mutant gliomas in murine brain exhibit very similar neuroanatomical preferences to human gliomas. The BRAF V600E mutation exacerbates the heterogenous cell cycling pattern of normal neural stem and progenitors and expands a symmetrically dividing progenitor population. Cellular plasticity rather than cellular lineage hierarchy drives the generation of a therapy resistant stem cell pool. Transcriptomic analyses of neuroglial stem cells with induced BRAF V600E expression provide insights into mechanisms for neoplastic transformation and progression. Conclusion Analyses of two independent BRAF V600E mutant mouse models provide novel insights into the role for tumor intrinsic factors, such as plasticity and stemness, and the tumor microenvironment in progression.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2326-2326
Author(s):  
Aakanksha Prasad Asija ◽  
Alina E. Dulau Florea ◽  
Xianguo Kong ◽  
Douglass A. Drelich ◽  
Srikanth Nagalla ◽  
...  

Abstract TAR is a rare bone marrow failure syndrome comprised of thrombocytopenia and a spectrum of bony abnormalities, the most common being bilateral radial aplasia in the presence of thumbs. Recent research has implicated alterations in the RBM8A gene in the pathogenesis of this disorder. Diffuse LCH is a neoplasm of mature Langerhans cells, a subset of dendritic cells, that has now been demonstrated to be clonal in nature. The co-occurrence of these two rare disorders has only been reported twice (Ingram, BMT 2006; Guastadisegni EJMG 2012). We report the third case of a patient with TAR and LCH and present the molecular and genetic characterization of this patient. A 52 year woman with TAR presented with abdominal mass, splenomegaly and left axillary adenopathy. CT scan showed a right pelvic mass measuring 11.5 x 8.6 cm, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, enlarged spleen and patchy areas of radiolucency throughout the spine, pelvis and left femoral head. Excisional biopsy of the left axillary lymph node revealed complete effacement of the normal lymph node architecture by an atypical proliferation of Langerhans cell histiocytes. Bone marrow involvement was documented as well. On immunohistochemistry, these cells were positive for CD1a (membrane staining) and S-100 (nuclear and cytoplasmic staining). As part of the diagnostic evaluation, CGH microarray (Signature Genomics) was performed. A diagnosis of diffuse LCH was made. She was treated with vinblastine and prednisone for a year and remains in complete remission from her disease 14 months later. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood (normal mononuclear cells) and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, with written informed consent following the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Thomas Jefferson University. The CGH result on the patient's uninvolved tissue as well as the tumor sample showed a hemizygous deletion of 1q21.1 encompassing the RBM8A gene, consistent with recent TAR literature (Albers, Nat Genet 2012). Sequence analysis of the other RBM8A allele revealed minor allele A at SNP rs139428292 at position chr1:145,507,646 (hg19) in the 5'UTR of RBM8A and nt G at chr1:145,507,777 in the first intron (int1 +44). The coding sequence was normal. Minor allele A at the 5'UTR SNP has been associated with TAR syndrome, along with minor allele C at intronic SNP (rs 201779890, int1 +32) which was major allele G in our patient. However, nt G at intron 1 +44 is a novel variant that has not been reported before in dbSNP137, HapMap or 1000 Genomes (UCSC Genome Browser, August 1, 2013). The CGH result on the patient's tumor sample showed a 1.82 Kb deletion within the MAF gene. We identified in normal and tumor DNA one intact MAF gene and one deleted of all of the coding sequences of MAF isoform 1 (alternatively, complete deletion of exon 1 of MAF isoform 2). In addition, a copy loss in the 14q32.2 region was found in the tumor sample but not in the uninvolved tissue. This region contains the BCL11b gene. Finally, we identified a tumor-specific missense mutation (GTG to GAG) resulting in a change in amino acid from valine to glutamine at codon 600. This is the BRAF V600E mutation previously described in LCH and other malignancies. In summary, we report the third ever reported case of the co-occurrence of two rare disorders, TAR and LCH, in a single patient and identify novel molecular changes. We have found the patient to have the recently reported RBM8A genetic alterations of TAR (microdeletion of 1q21 for one allele, minor 5’UTR SNP on the other allele), plus a novel RBM8A intronic SNP. We found a somatic MAF deletion in our patient, possibly a predisposing factor towards LCH. In addition, BRAF V600E mutation is a tumor-specific mutation in our patient. Whether BRAF inhibitors will be of therapeutic benefit in primary or relapsed LCH is currently unknown. Future research is needed to elucidate the function, if any, of the novel RBM8A SNP, the mechanism(s) by which the identified SNPs lead to reduced Y14 levels, and the potential contribution of Y14 deficiency in tumorigenesis. The authors wish to acknowledge the invaluable role of Dr. Elena Gitelson in the care of this patient. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


MD-Onco ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
M. M. Davydov ◽  
P. A. Zeynalova ◽  
A. A. Fedenko ◽  
D. A. Chekiny ◽  
E. K. Ibragimov ◽  
...  

Per the majority of authors, melanoma is the most common tumor diagnosed during pregnancy (31 % of all malignant neoplasms). In approximately 1/3 of women melanoma developed in child-bearing age is diagnosed during pregnancy or in the postpartum period. However, only some retrospective studies analyzed the effect of pregnancy on melanoma development, and conclusive data on development, progression and treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma is lacking. In this subpopulation of patients, BRAF status supposedly can negatively affect disease outcome irrespective of treatment methods.The article presents a clinical case of recurrence of melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation during pregnancy. The patient underwent lymph node dissection during pregnancy prolongation, after labor she received antitumor drug therapy with МЕК and ВRAF inhibitors. Melanoma recurrence during pregnancy did not worsen treatment outcomes for the mother and embryo.


2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. 239-239
Author(s):  
Dr. Susanne Krome

BRAF-mutierte nicht kleinzellige Bronchialkarzinome (NSCLC) sind besonders aggressiv. Gezielte Antikörpertherapien verbesserten die Behandlungsergebnisse. Bei einem ALK-Rearrangement ging eine lange progressionsfreie Zeit nicht zu Lasten der Post-Progressionsphase. Die Sekundäranalyse einer nicht randomisierten Phase-II-Studie zeigt dies nun auch für Patienten mit einer BRAF-V600E-Mutation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document