scholarly journals Breast Cancer Drug Resistance: Overcoming the Challenge by Capitalizing on MicroRNA and Tumor Microenvironment Interplay

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3691
Author(s):  
Giulia Cosentino ◽  
Ilaria Plantamura ◽  
Elda Tagliabue ◽  
Marilena V. Iorio ◽  
Alessandra Cataldo

The clinical management of breast cancer reaches new frontiers every day. However, the number of drug resistant cases is still high, and, currently, this constitutes one of the major challenges that cancer research has to face. For instance, 50% of women affected with HER2 positive breast cancer presents or acquires resistance to trastuzumab. Moreover, for patients affected with triple negative breast cancer, standard chemotherapy is still the fist-line therapy, and often patients become resistant to treatments. Tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in this context. Indeed, cancer-associated stromal cells deliver oncogenic cues to the tumor and vice versa to escape exogenous insults. It is well known that microRNAs are among the molecules exploited in this aberrant crosstalk. Indeed, microRNAs play a crucial function both in the induction of pro-tumoral traits in stromal cells and in the stroma-mediated fueling of tumor aggressiveness. Here, we summarize the most recent literature regarding the involvement of miRNAs in the crosstalk between tumor and stromal cells and their capability to modulate tumor microenvironment characteristics. All up-to-date findings suggest that microRNAs in the TME could serve both to reverse malignant phenotype of stromal cells, modulating response to therapy, and as predictive/prognostic biomarkers.

Author(s):  
Rupert Bartsch

SummaryOne year into the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) was another large congress held in a virtual format. Despite these circumstances, clinically relevant data were presented, and this short review focuses on developments in the fields of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. A quality-of-life (QoL) analysis from IMPassion031 showed that adding atezolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a detrimental effect on QoL, while the burden of treatment-induced side effects increased with each cycle of neoadjuvant therapy in both treatment arms. KEYNOTE-355 evaluated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment in metastatic TNBC (mTNBC); a significant improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) was reported in the pembrolizumab arm. At the 2020 SABCS, results with respect to different chemotherapy backbones were reported and the benefit of pembrolizumab was maintained irrespective of the type of taxane. Disappointingly, the phase III IPATunity130 study could not confirm a PFS improvement with the AKT inhibitor ipatasertib when added to paclitaxel as first-line treatment in mTNBC. A biomarker analysis from the phase III ASCENT study showed that the antibody–drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan was superior to chemotherapy by investigator’s choice independent of Trop‑2 expression and BRCA mutation status. In HER2-positive breast cancer, the PRECIOUS trial suggested a small albeit significant benefit with reinduction of pertuzumab in later treatment lines in patients progressing on prior dual HER2-blockade in the first- or second-line setting. The HER2-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor tucatinib when added to trastuzumab and capecitabine was shown to improve PFS and overall survival (OS) over trastuzumab and capecitabine alone in pretreated patients in the randomized HER2CLIMB trial; this benefit was apparently independent of hormone-receptor expression. An update from the DESTINY-Breast01 trial reported a median PFS of 19.4 months with trastuzumab deruxtecan in heavily pretreated patients. Finally, an analysis from the PERTAIN trial with > 6 years median follow-up showed excellent OS in patients with luminal B/HER2-positive receiving first-line trastuzumab/pertuzumab in combination with endocrine therapy suggesting that chemotherapy-free treatment is an option in highly selected patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. R485-R498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Pietri ◽  
Vincenza Conteduca ◽  
Daniele Andreis ◽  
Ilaria Massa ◽  
Elisabetta Melegari ◽  
...  

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor, and its effects on breast range from physiological pubertal development and age-related modifications to cancer onset and proliferation. The prevalence of AR in early breast cancer is around 60%, and AR is more frequently expressed in ER-positive than in ER-negative tumors. We offer an overview of AR signaling pathways in different breast cancer subtypes, providing evidence that its oncogenic role is likely to be different in distinct biological and clinical scenarios. In particular, in ER-positive breast cancer, AR signaling often antagonizes the growth stimulatory effect of ER signaling; in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), AR seems to drive tumor progression (at least in luminal AR subtype of TNBC with a gene expression profile mimicking luminal subtypes despite being negative to ER and enriched in AR expression); in HER2-positive breast cancer, in the absence of ER expression, AR signaling has a proliferative role. These data represent the rationale for AR-targeting treatment as a potentially new target therapy in breast cancer subset using androgen agonists in some AR-positive/ER-positive tumors, AR antagonists in triple-negative/AR-positive tumors and in combination with anti-HER2 agents or with other signaling pathways inhibitors (including PI3K/MYC/ERK) in HER2-positive/AR-positive tumors. Only the ongoing and future prospective clinical trials will allow us to establish which agents are the best option in every specific condition, keeping in mind that there is evidence of opposite androgens and AR agonist/antagonist drug effects on cell proliferation particularly in AR-positive/ER-positive tumors.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11061-11061
Author(s):  
Sibylle Loibl ◽  
Carsten Denkert ◽  
Sherene Loi ◽  
Fabrice Andre ◽  
Berit Mueller ◽  
...  

11061 Background: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway aberrations are common in breast cancer (BC), PIK3CA mutations being the most common. Mutations are frequently found in hot-spots located in the helical and kinase domains (exons 9 and 20). Reported data is discrepant with regard to prognostic or predictive value of PIK3CA mutations especially in HER2+ve BC. We therefore investigated the frequency and prognostic associations of PIK3CA mutations in HER2+ve and triple negative (TN) primary BC by treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: We prospectively evaluated PIK3CA mutations in the 595 participants of the neoadjuvant Geparsixto study (NCT01426880). The study investigates the effect of adding carboplatin to a liposomal doxorubicin/taxane combination for the treatment of patients with HER2+ve and TN primary BC. All HER2+ve patients received trastuzumab and lapatinib, the TN patients received bevacizumab. HER2, hormone receptors (HR), and Ki67 were centrally assessed. PIK3CAwas genotyped in tumor material from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded core biopsies taken before therapy using classical Sanger sequencing of exon 9 and 20. Results: From 09/2011 to 11/2012, 595 patients with HER2+ve or TN primary BC have been randomized in the Geparsixto study. Median age was 47 years (range 21-78); most tumors were cT2 (65%); cN0 (57%); ductal invasive (93%), grade 3 (65%); within the HER2+ve group 28% were HR positive. So far, PIK3CA genotype was evaluated in 395 randomized patients - 176 with HER2+ve and 219 with TN disease. Overall, 11.1% were found to have at least one mutation, in HER2+ve: 18.2% and TN BC: 5.5%. An exon 9 mutation was detected in 6.3% of the HER2+ve and 2.7% of the TNBC cases and an exon 20 mutation in 11.9% of the HER2+ve and 3.6% of the TN cases. A mutation in both exons was detected in 2 TN cases. PIK3CAmutations were more frequent in the HER2+ve/HR+ve compared to the HER2+ve/HR-ve group: 22.8% vs 10.6% respectively (p=0.047). Conclusions: PIK3CAmutations are more frequent in HER2+ve then in TN BC which is in line with previous reports. Results on all 595 patients and the correlation with response to therapy (pCR) will be presented at the meeting. The project has been funded within the EU-FP7 project RESPONSIFY No 278659. Clinical trial information: NCT01426880.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Johnson ◽  
Paula D Strassle ◽  
Guilherme C de Oliveira ◽  
Chris B. Agala ◽  
Philip M. Spanheimer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To assess potential disparities in guideline-concordant care delivery among women with early stage triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy. Methods Women ≥40 years old diagnosed with pT2N0M0 triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with primary surgery and axillary staging between 2012 and 2017 were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy and radiation concordant with current guidelines. Multivariable log binomial regression was used to assess the prevalence of optimal therapy use across patient and cancer characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess 5-year overall survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the impact of optimal therapy on 5-year mortality. Results 11,785 women were included with 7,843 receiving optimal therapy. Receipt of optimal therapy decreased with age even after adjusting for comorbidities and cancer characteristics; other sociodemographic factors were not associated with differences in receipt of optimal therapy. Among patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, most were not offered the treatment (49%) or refused (40%). Overall 5-year survival was higher among women who received optimal therapy (89% [95% CI 88.0-89.3] vs. 66% [95% CI 62.9-68.5]). Patients who received suboptimal therapy were over twice as likely to die within 5-years of their diagnosis (adjusted HR 2.44, 95% CI 2.12-2.82). Conclusion Age is the primary determinant of the likelihood of a woman to receive optimal adjuvant therapies in high-risk early stage breast cancer. Patients who did not receive optimal therapy had significantly diminished survival.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5198
Author(s):  
Simona Duranti ◽  
Alessandra Fabi ◽  
Marco Filetti ◽  
Rosa Falcone ◽  
Pasquale Lombardi ◽  
...  

Breast cancer represents the first cause of cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer mortality for women. Therefore, new therapies are needed to improve the prognosis of women diagnosed with this disease. In this review, we summarize the new drug indications for the treatment of breast cancer approved by European Medicines Agency between January 2015 and June 2021. In particular, we analyzed the clinical trials results leading to approvals and their update (when available), according to setting (localized and locally advanced or metastatic) and clinical features (hormone receptor positive, HER2 positive, triple negative, BRCA 1/2 mutation). The aim of this paper is to describe the clinical benefit obtained with the new indications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document