scholarly journals Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4332
Author(s):  
Carlos Bravo-Pérez ◽  
María Sola ◽  
Raúl Teruel-Montoya ◽  
María Dolores García-Malo ◽  
Francisco José Ortuño ◽  
...  

The game-changing outcome effect, due to the generalized use of novel agents in MM, has cre-ated a paradigm shift. Achieving frequent deep responses has placed MM among those neoplasms where the rationale for assessing MRD is fulfilled. However, its implementation in MM has raised specific questions: how might we weight standard measures against deep MRD in the emerging CAR-T setting? Which high sensitivity method to choose? Are current response criteria still useful? In this work, we address lessons learned from the use of MRD in other neoplasms, the steps followed for the harmonization of current methods for comprehensively measuring MRD, and the challenges that new therapies and concepts pose in the MM clinical field.

Author(s):  
Eberhard Gunsilius

SummaryThe meeting focused in particular on new strategies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and bispecific antibodies. Updates of clinical trials regarding induction treatment in transplantable and non-transplantable status were presented. Furthermore, minimal residual disease negativity (MRD) or, in other words, a status characterized by no measurable disease, using standardized multicolor-flow cytometry or next-generation sequencing techniques becomes increasingly important as an endpoint in clinical trials. A subjectively assessed overview of the current contributions to the treatment of multiple myeloma is given here.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1625-1625
Author(s):  
Anwar Khan ◽  
Nagehan Pakasticali ◽  
Omar Fathalla ◽  
Taiga Nishihori ◽  
Mohammad O Hussaini

Abstract Introduction: Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is one of the strongest predictors of outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). Until recently, the most commonly available method to detect MRD in clinical practice has been high sensitivity flow cytometry (FC) which can detect MRD with at 10 -5 sensitivity. In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a viable method to assess the MRD in MM patients with a 10 -6 sensitivity. NGS appears to have some advantages over HC-FC by circumventing subjectivity of analysis. However, real-world comparison between these two methodologies in the literature is limited and is important to inform daily hematopathology and oncology ordering practices. Methods: We retrospectively identified all cases of MM with NGS MRD data from bone marrow specimens at the Moffitt Cancer Center and collated corresponding flow MRD data and clinical data (OS, patient demographics) electronically and via chart review. 10-color flow cytometry was performed on a Gallios System and analyzed on Kaluza (Beckman Coulter, IN). Two million events were collected on all cells. Validated lower limit of detection was at least 0.01%. Antibodies included CD28, CD81, CD56, CD138, CD319, CD20, CD19, CD117, CD38, CD45, CD27, CD200 (BD, Biolegend, Beckman Coulter). clonoSEQ ® (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA) testing was performed which uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and NGS to identify, characterize, and monitor clonotypes of immunoglobulin (Ig) IgH (V-J), IgH (D-J), IgK, and IgL receptor gene sequences, and translocated BCL1/IgH (J) and BCL2/IgH (J) sequences Statistical analysis was performed by Spearman correlation coefficient and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 192 samples from 122 unique patients were identified that had both NGS and FC data performed on the same sample. FC+ values ranged from 1x10 -7 to 0.39. NGS+ values ranged from 2.3 x 10 -7 to 0.15. Spearman correlation coefficient showed moderate concordance between NGS and FC at r=0.67 (p<0.001). Six samples were positive by FC (mean tumor burden (MTB)= 0.0007) but missed by NGS; whereas 59 samples were positive by NGS (MTB= 0.002) but missed by flow cytometry. Two cases by FC were equivocal and these were both definitively designated as MRD+ by NGS. Overall survival was worse for MRD+ (by NGS or FC) vs MRD(-) (Figure 1). Conclusion: Our study confirms the importance of MRD detection in MM and shows the robust utility of NGS for MRD detection in routine hematopathology practice. While both FC and NGS are complementary given that each can potentially detect MRD missed by another method, the data supports the increased sensitivity of NGS over FC. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nishihori: Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Hussaini: Stemeline Therapeutics: Honoraria.


2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 1159-1160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Nicole Gormley ◽  
Danielle Turley ◽  
Roger G. Owen ◽  
Andy Rawstron ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1872
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Krzywdzińska ◽  
Bartosz Puła ◽  
Anna Czyż ◽  
Beata Krzymieniewska ◽  
Jolanta Kiernicka-Parulska ◽  
...  

Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is now considered as one of the most relevant prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM) while MRD negativity became an important endpoint in clinical trials. Here, we report the results of the first study evaluating the reproducibility of high-sensitivity flow cytometry MM MRD assessment in four laboratories in Poland. EuroFlow protocols for instrument setting standardization and sample preparation in MM MRD assessment were implemented in each laboratory. In the inter-laboratory reproducibility study, 12 bone marrow samples from MM patients were distributed and processed in participant laboratories. In the inter-operator concordance study, 13 raw data files from MM MRD measurements were analyzed by five independent operators. The inter-laboratory study showed high 95% overall concordance of results among laboratories. In the inter-operator study, 89% of MRD results reported were concordant, and the highest immunophenotype interpretation differences with regard to expression of CD27, CD45, CD81 were noticed. We confirmed the applicability and feasibility of the EuroFlow protocol as a highly sensitive method of MRD evaluation in MM. Results of our inter-center comparison study demonstrate that the standardization of MM MRD assessment protocols is highly desirable to improve quality and comparability of results within and between different clinical trials.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 929-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunrui Li ◽  
Jue Wang ◽  
Di Wang ◽  
Guang Hu ◽  
Yongkun Yang ◽  
...  

Background: Previous studies indicate that patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who receive BCMA-targeting CAR-T cells may achieve better remission but have a higher relapse rate. Persistence of CAR T cells post-infusion may be one determinant of the duration of response. Moreover, once the disease progresses again, the re-infusion of CAR-T cells is not effective. To solve this dilemma, we have developed a novel BCMA-targeting CAR-T (CT103A) with a lentiviral vector containing a CAR structure with a fully human scFv, CD8a hinger, and transmembrane, 4-1BB co-stimulatory and CD3z activation domains. Methods: ChiCTR1800018137 is a single-center and single-arm trial of CT103A in patients with RRMM (≥ 3 prior lines, including a proteasome inhibitor and an IMiD, or double refractory). The primary objectives are the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The secondary objectives are the duration of clinical response, evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD), progression-free and overall survival, and CAR-T cell persistence in blood. Between September 21, 2018, and August 1st, 2019, sixteen patients (including 4 patients having relapsed after being given a murine BCMA CAR-T and 5 patients having extramedullary disease and/or plasma cell leukemia) received CT103A in 3+3 dose-escalation trial (four doses at 1, 3, 6, 8 ×106/kg) after a conditioning chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Median follow-up after CT103A infusion was 195 days (23 to 314 days) and all 16 patients were evaluable for initial (14 days) clinical response. Results: As of August 1st, 2019, the objective response rate was 100%, 6/16 patients achieved CR/sCR within two weeks post-infusion and all 8 patients surpassing 6 months achieved VGPR/CR/sCR. CR/sCR was 75%, and VGPR was 25% for these 8 patients, according to the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria for MM. In 4 patients who have participated in a prior CAR-T trial, three have achieved sCR, and 1 achieved VGPR. All 15 patients who could be evaluated for minimal residual disease (MRD) had MRD-negative status (≤10-4 nucleated cells by flow). The circulating CT103A cells were detected in the blood by flow and digital polymerase chain reaction, peaking at 14 days (ranging from 9 to 25), and remaining detectable in 12/16 patients, at the time of their last evaluation. Patient #1 (the first patient treated) has now exceeded 314 days of CART persistence, post-infusion. All sixteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (according to ASBMT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurological Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells: 10 Grade 1-2, 5 Grade 3,1 Grade 4). A grade 4 CRS appeared at the 6×106 /kg dose level and was considered as a dose-limiting toxicity DLT. No neurotoxicity was observed in all dose groups. One patient died of a lung infection 19 days post-infusion. Conclusions: Data from this early-stage clinical study showed the unparalleled safety and efficacy of CT103A in heavily pretreated R/R multiple myeloma patients. Highly active (ORR 100%) and rapid response within two weeks, suggests CT103A could be developed as a competitive therapy to treat patients with RRMM. Disclosures Hu: Nanjing Iaso Biotherapeutics Co. Ltd..: Employment. Yang:Nanjing Iaso Biotherapeutics Co.: Employment. Zhou:Nanjing Iaso Biotherapeutics Co. Ltd.: Other: Chairman of Advisory Committee of Science and Medicine .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document