scholarly journals New Frontiers in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Are We Ready for Drug Combinations with Novel Agents?

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1522
Author(s):  
Gaetano Aurilio ◽  
Alessia Cimadamore ◽  
Matteo Santoni ◽  
Franco Nolè ◽  
Marina Scarpelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Drug Combinations ◽  
Clinical Approach ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Keywords Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant

Medical treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients has progressively been evolving from a nonspecific clinical approach to genomics-oriented therapies. The scientific community is in fact increasingly focusing on developing DNA damage repair (DDR) defect-driven novel molecules, both as single-agent therapy and in combined treatment strategies. Accordingly, research is under way into combined drug therapies targeting different pathways, e.g. androgen receptor signaling (ARS) and poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes, immune checkpoint (IC) and PARP, IC, and ARS, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). In an attempt to formulate evolving treatment paradigms in mCRPC patients, here we selected clinical research into patients undergoing therapies with emerging molecules, with particular emphasis towards PARP-, IC-, and PSMA-inhibitors. In order to focus on those molecules and drug combinations most likely to be translated into routine clinical care in the near future, we selected only those clinical studies currently recruiting patients. A PubMed search focusing on the keywords “prostate cancer”, “metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer”, “DDR pathways”, “ARS inhibitors”, “PARP inhibitors”, “IC inhibitors”, “PSMA-targeting agents”, and “drug combinations” was performed.

scholarly journals Crosstalk Between Nuclear MET and SOX9/β-Catenin Correlates with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1629-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingqiu Xie ◽  
Wenfu Lu ◽  
Shenji Liu ◽  
Qing Yang ◽  
Brett S. Carver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ablation Therapy ◽  
Androgen Ablation ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Activate Cell ◽  
Androgen Ablation Therapy

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) (CRPC) is relapse after various forms of androgen ablation therapy and causes a major mortality in PCa patients, yet the mechanism remains poorly understood. Here, we report the nuclear form of mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (nMET) is essential for CRPC. Specifically, nMET is remarkably increased in human CRPC samples compared with naïve samples. Androgen deprivation induces endogenous nMET and promotes cell proliferation and stem-like cell self-renewal in androgen-nonresponsive PCa cells. Mechanistically, nMET activates SRY (sex determining region Y)-box9, β-catenin, and Nanog homeobox and promotes sphere formation in the absence of androgen stimulus. Combined treatment of MET and β-catenin enhances the inhibition of PCa cell growth. Importantly, MET accumulation is detected in nucleus of recurrent prostate tumors of castrated Pten/Trp53 null mice, whereas MET elevation is predominantly found in membrane of naïve tumors. Our findings reveal for the first time an essential role of nMET association with SOX9/β-catenin in CRPC in vitro and in vivo, highlighting that nuclear RTK activate cell reprogramming to drive recurrence, and targeting nMET would be a new avenue to treat recurrent cancers.

scholarly journals Clinicopathologic Diagnostic Approach to Aggressive Variant Prostate Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varsha Manucha ◽  
John Henegan
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
English Language ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Current Review ◽  
Pathologic Features ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas ◽  
Aggressive Variant

Context.— Aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPCa) develops in a subset of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The clinical and histologic overlap of AVPCa with other neuroendocrine carcinomas of the prostate has resulted in a lack of consensus on its terminology and treatment. Objective.— To review AVPCa to familiarize pathologists with this entity so they can actively participate in the detection, ongoing research, and evolving management of AVPCa. Data Sources.— The English language literature was reviewed. Conclusions.— The current review summarizes the pathologic features of AVPCa, describes how it has been defined clinically, and discusses how biomarkers may inform treatment strategies in the future.

Modern Management of Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Heidenreich ◽  
David Pfister ◽  
Axel Merseburger ◽  
Georg Bartsch ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223

The approval or clinical evaluation of several new agents – cabazitaxel, enzalutamide, sipuleucel-T, radium-223 and abiraterone acetate – has significantly changed the management of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) prior to or after docetaxelbased chemotherapy. All of these agents have resulted in a significant survival benefit compared with their control group. However, treatment responses might differ depending on the associated comorbidities and the extent and the biological aggressiveness of the disease. Furthermore, treatment-associated side effects differ between the various drugs. As new drugs are approved, new treatment strategies and markers to best select which patients will best respond to which drug are needed. It is the aim of this article to (1) summarise the data of established treatment options in mCRPC, (2) highlight new developments of medical treatment, (3) provide clinically useful algorithms for the daily routine and to (4) point out future developments of medical treatment.

A phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of single agent IMC A12, a monoclonal antibody (MAb), against the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR), as monotherapy in patients with metastastic, asymptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5142-5142 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Higano ◽  
J. Alumkal ◽  
C. J. Ryan ◽  
E. Y. Yu ◽  
T. M. Beer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiologic Evaluation ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Human Igg1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Transient Elevation

5142 Background: IGF-IR-mediated signaling contributes to prostate cancer carcinogenesis and pathogenesis and may be associated with hormone resistance. IMC-A12 is a fully human IgG1 MAb that specifically targets the IGF-IR and inhibits ligand binding and signaling. In xenografts, IMC-A12 inhibits growth of both androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer. This phase 2, multicenter study was designed to assess the safety and antitumor activity of IMC-A12 in asymptomatic pts with metastatic CRPC who were chemotherapy-naive. Methods: Pts received IMC-A12 10 mg/kg IV every 2 wks; until evidence of progressive disease (PD), intolerable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. Radiologic evaluation was performed every 8 wks. PD by bone scan required at least 2 new lesions with confirmation at subsequent imaging per PCWG2. Results: 19 of 31 pts treated have discontinued IMC-A12, 12 due to PD. 9 of 31 pts experienced disease stabilization for ≥6 mos (range: 7.4–12.5 mos), 5 pts (3 with PSA reduction) continue on IMC-A12. The most common AEs possibly or probably related to IMC-A12, were fatigue (25.8%) and hyperglycemia (19.4%). In 4 pts cases of Grade 3 hyperglycemia was treatment related none requiring discontinuation of IMC-A12; 1 pt required insulin but continued on study. Approximately 70% of pts experienced at least transient elevation of nonfasting glucose to above normal range. Other AEs grade ≥3 at least possibly related to IMC-A12 were one case each of thrombocytopenia (requiring IMC-A12 discontinuation), hyperkalemia, fatigue, pneumonia (resulting in death), and Grade 4 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analayses are pending leukoencephalopathy (probably related; requiring IMC-A12 discontinuation). Pharmakinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses are pending. Conclusions: IMC-A12 monotherapy appears well tolerated in pts with metastatic asymptomatic CRPC. As in phase I, hyperglycemia was largely asymptomatic and manageable. Disease stabilization for > 6 months in 9 of 31 pts suggests that IMC- A12 may have modest antitumor activity. Additional studies of IMC-A12 in CRPC are planned. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Understanding Treatment Strategies and Preferences in Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer From the Japanese Physician Perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 302-310
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Suzuki ◽  
Vince Grillo ◽  
Yirong Chen ◽  
Shikha Singh ◽  
Dianne Athene Ledesma
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Treatment Characteristics ◽  
Hypothetical Treatment ◽  
Preference Weights

PURPOSE Sixteen percent (16%) of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) show no bone metastasis at diagnosis. However, 33% will become metastatic within 2 years. The goal of treatment in patients with nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC), therefore, is to delay symptomatic metastases without undue toxicity. With novel antiandrogen treatments of different strengths and limitations available, physician preferences for nmCRPC treatment in Japan should be understood. METHODS A discrete choice experiment was conducted. Physicians chose between two hypothetical treatments in nmCRPC defined by six attributes: risk of fatigue, falls or fracture, cognitive impairment, hypertension, rashes as side effects of treatment, and extension of time until cancer-related pain occurs. Relative preference weights and relative importance were estimated by hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression. Physicians were also asked to make treatment decisions based on four hypothetical patient profiles to understand the most important factors driving decision making. RESULTS A total of 151 physicians completed the survey. Extension of time until cancer-related pain occurs was the most important attribute (relative importance, 32.3%; CI, 31.3% to 33.3%). Based on summed preference weights across all attributes, preferences for hypothetical treatment profiles I, II, and III were compared. A hypothetical treatment profile with better safety though shorter extension time was preferred (I: mean [standard deviation] = 1.7 [1.6 to 2.1]) over treatment profiles with lower safety but longer extension time (II: −2.7 [−2.8 to −2.6] and III: −0.2 [−0.3 to −0.1]). Treatment characteristics were more important factors for physicians' decision making than patient characteristics in prescribing treatment. CONCLUSION Physicians preferred a treatment with better safety profile, and treatment characteristics were the most important factors for decision making. This might have implications in physicians' decision making for nmCRPC treatment in the future in Japan.

scholarly journals Drug Repurposing of Pantoprazole and Vitamin C Targeting Tumor Microenvironment Conditions Improves Anticancer Effect in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhoulei Li ◽  
Peng He ◽  
Yali Long ◽  
Gang Yuan ◽  
Wanqing Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Drug Repurposing ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
18F Fdg

The effective and economical therapeutic strategy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is still requested from patients, who are not available for Lu-177 or Ra-223 treatment. Drug repurposing as a cost-effective and time-saving alternative to traditional drug development has been increasingly discussed. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) such as pantroprazole, which are commonly used as antacids, have also been shown to be effective in cancer chemoprevention via induction of apoptosis in multiple cancer cell lines. Vitamin C is an essential micronutrient for human body, has been proposed as a potential anti-cancer agent. In this context, have we investigated the combination of vitamin C and pantoprazole for the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Six chosen human adenocarcinoma cell lines were used to investigate the influence of pantoprazole on the microenvironment of cancer cells (extracellular pH and production of exosomes). Tumor growth and tumor 18F-FDG uptake in PC3 xenografts were analyzed following varied treatment. Our in vitro Results have suggested that pantoprazole enhanced the cytotoxic activity of vitamin C by regulating pH values and production of exosomes in cancer cells. Moreover, the synergistic effect of pantoprazole and vitamin C was pH-dependent since pantoprazole was more effective at a slightly acidic pH. In vivo, the combined treatment using pantoprazole and vitamin C produced better therapeutic outcomes than treatment with vitamin C or pantoprazole alone, as demonstrated via tumor growth and uptake of 18F-FDG. Therefore, we suggest that pantoprazole combined with vitamin C could be as a possible strategy to manage mCRPC.

Eltanexor (KPT-8602), a second-generation selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 197-197
Author(s):  
Jingsong Zhang ◽  
David D. Chism ◽  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Paul Monk ◽  
Robert S. Alter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Anticancer Activity ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Resistant Cell ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

197 Background: Overexpression of exportin 1 (XPO1) in malignant cells increases the nuclear export/inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (eg. p53), and promotes the translation of eIF4E-bound oncoprotein mRNAs (eg. c-MYC). XPO1 inhibition reduces total androgen receptor levels, including ARv7, and may re-sensitize prostate cancer (PC) cells to androgen deprivation therapy. Selinexor, the first-in-human SINE compound, showed anticancer activity in patients (pts) with mCRPC. Eltanexor (ELTA), a second-generation SINE compound, showed promising anticancer activity in preclinical models of PC, including in abiraterone (ABI) resistant cell lines. Therefore, ELTA ± ABI was evaluated in mCRPC. Methods: This was part of a phase 1/2 study to determine the safety, preliminary efficacy, and recommended phase 2 doseof ELTA in pts with advanced cancers. Pts with mCRPC received oral ELTA once daily for 5 days per week over a 28-day cycle in 4 cohorts: single-agent (20 mg; n=7 or 30 mg; n=6) or in combination with ABI (20 mg; n=13 or 30 mg; n=4). Pts may have prior exposure to chemotherapy. Pts receiving ELTA + ABI had prior response to ABI then progressed. Response was evaluated by PCWG3 / RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 17 Sept 2018, 30 pts were treated with ELTA ± ABI with a median age of 71 and a median of 4 prior regimens; (87% ABI, 60% enzalutamide, and 57% chemotherapy). Twenty-one pts with mCRPC were evaluable for efficacy: 2 partial response (10%), 15 stable disease (71%), and 4 progressive disease (19%). The median treatment duration is 75.5 days; 4 pts still on treatment. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in ≥30% of the pts: fatigue (67%; 13% Gr≥3), nausea (63.3%; 0% Gr≥3), decreased appetite (57%; 0% Gr≥3), diarrhea (47%; 3% Gr≥3), weight decreased (43%; 3% Gr≥3), vomiting (37%; 7% Gr≥3), anemia (33%; 7% Gr≥3), and dysgeusia (33%; 0% Gr≥3). The 2 Gr4 TRAEs were neutropenia and elevated AST. Conclusions: ELTA± ABI is well-tolerated with AEs mostly limited to Gr 1/2 and demonstrates preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with mCRPC. With enrollment complete, these results warrant further investigation of ELTA ± ABIin mCPRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02649790.

scholarly journals Genomic Resistance Patterns to Second-Generation Androgen Blockade in Paired Tumor Biopsies of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Celine Han ◽  
Justin Hwang ◽  
Stephanie A.M. Wankowicz ◽  
Zhenwei Zhang ◽  
David Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Purpose Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receive second-generation androgen-deprivation therapy, but frequently experience relapse or do not respond. Understanding the genetic mechanisms of resistance will help to identify strategies and biomarkers that are essential for the next line of therapy. Patients and Methods We analyzed whole exomes of patient-matched pre- and post-treatment tumors from patients with CRPC. These patients had received the secondary androgen-deprivation therapy agent, abiraterone, which suppresses androgens to below castration levels, or enzalutamide, which competitively inhibits the key androgen signaling effector, androgen receptor. Results We observed that abiraterone-resistant tumors harbored alterations in AR and MYC, whereas enzalutamide-resistant tumors gained alterations in cell-cycle pathway genes, such as mutation in cyclin-dependent kinase N2A ( CDKN2A) or amplification of CDK6. Experimentally, overexpressing cell-cycle kinases promoted enzalutamide resistance in androgen-sensitive LnCAP cells that was mitigated via CDK4/6 blockade—palbociclib and ribociclib. Conclusion CDK4/6-mediated resistance observed in preclinical experiments suggests that CDK4/6 amplifications may sufficiently promote enzalutamide resistance in CRPC, and that these patients may respond to palbociclib or ribociclib. The overall observations suggest that, in genomically selected advanced CRPC, clinical strategies against abiraterone- or enzalutamide-resistant tumors may require treatment strategies that are tailored to the resistance mechanisms that are specific to those patient subpopulations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document