scholarly journals Identification of Novel Mutations by Targeted NGS Panel in Patients with Hyperferritinemia

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1778
Author(s):  
Giulia Ravasi ◽  
Sara Pelucchi ◽  
Francesca Bertola ◽  
Martina Maria Capelletti ◽  
Raffaella Mariani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iron Overload ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Novel Mutation ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Novel Mutations ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
Ion Torrent Pgm ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Or Gene

Background. Several inherited diseases cause hyperferritinemia with or without iron overload. Differential diagnosis is complex and requires an extensive work-up. Currently, a clinical-guided approach to genetic tests is performed based on gene-by-gene sequencing. Although reasonable, this approach is expensive and time-consuming and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology may provide cheaper and quicker large-scale DNA sequencing. Methods. We analysed 36 patients with non-HFE-related hyperferritinemia. Liver iron concentration was measured in 33 by magnetic resonance. A panel of 25 iron related genes was designed using SureDesign software. Custom libraries were generated and then sequenced using Ion Torrent PGM. Results. We identified six novel mutations in SLC40A1, three novel and one known mutation in TFR2, one known mutation and a de-novo deletion in HJV, and a novel mutation in HAMP in ten patients. In silico analyses supported the pathogenic role of the mutations. Conclusions. Our results support the use of an NGS-based panel in selected patients with hyperferritinemia in a tertiary center for iron metabolism disorders. However, 26 out of 36 patients did not show genetic variants that can individually explain hyperferritinemia and/or iron overload suggesting the existence of other genetic defects or gene-gene and gene-environment interactions needing further studies.

Transfusion History, Iron Chelation Practices and Status of Iron Overload across Various Transfusion-Dependent Anemias: Data from the Large- Scale, Prospective, 1-Year EPIC Trial

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3880-3880
Author(s):  
Maria Domenica Cappellini ◽  
Norbert Gattermann ◽  
Vip Viprakasit ◽  
Jong Wook Lee ◽  
John B Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iron Overload ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Chelation Therapy ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Iron Chelation ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Thalassemia Major ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Transfusion History

Abstract Background: The prospective, 1-yr multicenter EPIC trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral deferasirox (Exjade®) in more than 1700 patients (pts) with transfusion-dependent anemias. Data were collected from each patient at enrollment, providing an insight into transfusion history, body iron burden, and the nature and success of previous chelation therapy in a large group of pts with iron overload previously treated with chelation therapy. Methods: Enrolled pts were aged ≥2 yrs, had transfusion-dependent anemia and serum ferritin (SF) levels of ≥1000 ng/mL, or <1000 ng/mL with a history of multiple transfusions (>20 transfusions or >100 mL/kg of RBCs) and MRI-assessed liver iron concentration (LIC) >2 mg Fe/g dry weight (dw). Baseline assessments included transfusion history, previous chelation therapy, SF levels and LIC (if carried out) in the previous yr. Results: 1744 pts (901 M, 843 F) were enrolled. Underlying anemias were: thalassemia major (TM; n=937), thalassemia intermedia (TI; n=84), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n=341), aplastic anemia (AA; n=116), sickle cell disease (SCD; n=80), rare anemias (red cell aplasia and anemias mostly hemolytic in nature; n=43), Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA; n=14), and various other conditions associated with anemias requiring transfusion (n=129). Baseline characteristics for key underlying anemias are presented in Table 1. Median SF levels were >2500 ng/mL and mean LIC in the previous yr was >7 mg Fe/g dw in all groups (except DBA for SF levels). MDS pts had received the most transfusions in the previous yr, although they had also spent a smaller proportion of their lifetime, and less total time, receiving transfusions than any other cohort. Together with AA pts, the MDS cohort also contained the highest proportion of pts who were chelation-naïve (68% and 48%). SCD pts were the least-transfused group in terms of amount of blood given, but had been receiving transfusions for more than 13 yrs. As expected, TM pts had spent the greatest proportion of their lifetime on transfusions and received the greatest volume of blood per kg in the previous yr. The group labeled by investigators as TI were relatively heavily transfused for this patient population. Table 1. Baseline characteristics for key underlying anemias All (n=1744) TM (n=937) TI (n=84) MDS (n=341) AA (n=116) SCD (n=80) Rare (n=43) DBA (n=14) *Mean ± SD; **Median Age, yrs* 30.6±23.3 18.4±10.8 19.2±14.4 67.9±11.4 33.3±17.1 23.9±13.2 39.5±22.7 17.3±13.2 Transfusions in last yr* 17.8±12.5 17.5±8.8 13.5±7.1 24.3±17.7 12.5±13.0 10.7±8.2 21.0±18.7 19.0±18.7 Total transfused in last yr, mL/kg* 159±136 190±139 155±87 116±123 116±179 84±57 153±142 185±148 Total yrs on transfusions* 12.3±10.4 16.8±10.4 10.2±7.8 3.6±4.6 6.1±5.7 13.0±9.6 10.9±11.8 13.3±10.0 % of lifetime on transfusions* 62.9±39.4 89.8±15.2 61.2±28.8 5.7±8.4 27.1±29.3 59.5±30.1 44.3±41.5 87.5±23.2 LIC in last yr, mg Fe/g dw* 10.7±9.0 9.5±7.8 9.7±5.5 14.4±8.5 12.0±4.3 11.8±8.4 – 8.8±4.2 SF, ng/mL** 3135 3157 3493 2730 3254 3163 3161 2289 Prior chelation, % DFO 58.6 66.7 78.6 40.2 26.7 62.5 55.8 71.4 Deferiprone 1.6 1.3 – 4.1 – 1.3 2.3 – DFO/deferiprone 16.7 25.0 4.8 7.0 5.2 12.5 11.6 14.3 Other 0.3 0.4 – 0.3 – – – – None 23.0 7.0 16.7 48.4 68.1 23.8 30.2 14.3 Conclusions: Data from this study population show that, although most pts with thalassemia, SCD, DBA and rare anemias had received previous chelation therapy, LIC and SF levels were above levels associated with significant negative outcomes (>7 mg Fe/g dw and >2500 ng/mL, respectively), which suggests that previous chelation practices were sub-optimal. Many pts with MDS and AA were chelation-naïve despite being heavily iron overloaded, highlighting that the risks of iron overload are still underestimated. These data highlight the need to carefully monitor iron levels in pts at risk of iron overload and initiate chelation therapy to avoid serious clinical sequelae.

scholarly journals Hepatocellular Carcinoma in β-Thalassemia Patients: Review of the Literature with Molecular Insight into Liver Carcinogenesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 4070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Finianos ◽  
Charbel Matar ◽  
Ali Taher
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Iron Overload ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Iron Chelation ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Major Life ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Personalized Approach

With the continuing progress in managing patients with thalassemia, especially in the setting of iron overload and iron chelation, the life span of these patients is increasing, while concomitantly increasing incidences of many diseases that were less likely to show when survival was rather limited. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major life-threatening cancer that is becoming more frequently identified in this population of patients. The two established risk factors for the development of HCC in thalassemia include iron overload and viral hepatitis with or without cirrhosis. Increased iron burden is becoming a major HCC risk factor in this patient population, especially in those in the older age group. As such, screening thalassemia patients using liver iron concentration (LIC) measurement by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and liver ultrasound is strongly recommended for the early detection of iron overload and for implementation of early iron chelation in an attempt to prevent organ-damaging iron overload and possibly HCC. There remain lacking data on HCC treatment outcomes in patients who have thalassemia. However, a personalized approach tailored to each patient’s comorbidities is essential to treatment success. Multicenter studies investigating the long-term outcomes of currently available therapeutic options in the thalassemia realm, in addition to novel HCC therapeutic targets, are needed to further improve the prognosis of these patients.

Myocardial iron overload

2018 ◽  
pp. 364-374
Author(s):  
John P Carpenter ◽  
John C Wood ◽  
Dudley J Pennell
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Iron Overload ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
Cardiac Iron ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Developing Heart ◽  
Cost Efficient

The heart is the target lethal organ in thalassaemia major. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measures iron using the magnetic relaxation time T2*. This allows comparison with the left ventricular function and conventional iron measurements such as liver iron and serum ferritin. The single breath-hold cardiac-gated CMR acquisition takes only 15 seconds, making it cost-efficient and relevant to developing countries. Myocardial T2* of <20 ms (increased iron) correlates with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, but poor correlation exists with ferritin and liver iron, indicating poor capability to assess future risk. Myocardial T2* of <10 ms is present in >90% of thalassaemia patients developing heart failure, and approximately 50% of patients with T2* of <6 ms will develop heart failure within 1 year without intensified treatment. The technique is validated and calibrated against human heart iron concentration. The treatment for iron overload is iron chelation, and three major trials have been performed for the heart. The first trial showed deferiprone was superior to deferoxamine in removing cardiac iron. The second trial showed a combination therapy of deferiprone with deferoxamine was more effective than deferoxamine monotherapy. The third trial showed that deferasirox was non-inferior to deferoxamine in removing cardiac iron. Each drug in suitable doses can be used to remove cardiac iron, but their use depends on clinical circumstances. Other combination regimes are also being evaluated. Use of T2*, intensification of chelation treatment, and use of deferiprone are associated with reduced mortality (a reduction in deaths by 71% has been shown in the United Kingdom). The use of T2* and iron chelators in the heart has been summarized in recent American Heart Association guidelines.

Consequences and management of iron overload in sickle cell disease

Hematology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 447-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Porter ◽  
Maciej Garbowski
Keyword(s):  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Iron Overload ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Thalassemia Major ◽  
Iron Loading ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Liver Iron Concentration ◽  
Liver Iron

Abstract The aims of this review are to highlight the mechanisms and consequences of iron distribution that are most relevant to transfused sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and to address the particular challenges in the monitoring and treatment of iron overload. In contrast to many inherited anemias, in SCD, iron overload does not occur without blood transfusion. The rate of iron loading in SCD depends on the blood transfusion regime: with simple hypertransfusion regimes, rates approximate to thalassemia major, but iron loading can be minimal with automated erythrocyte apheresis. The consequences of transfusional iron overload largely reflect the distribution of storage iron. In SCD, a lower proportion of transfused iron distributes extrahepatically and occurs later than in thalassemia major, so complications of iron overload to the heart and endocrine system are less common. We discuss the mechanisms by which these differences may be mediated. Treatment with iron chelation and monitoring of transfusional iron overload in SCD aim principally at controlling liver iron, thereby reducing the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Monitoring of liver iron concentration pretreatment and in response to chelation can be estimated using serum ferritin, but noninvasive measurement of liver iron concentration using validated and widely available MRI techniques reduces the risk of under- or overtreatment. The optimal use of chelation regimes to achieve these goals is described.

scholarly journals Characteristics and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in multi-transfused patients with thalassemia major. Experience of a single tertiary center.

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e2020013
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Papadopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios Kountouras ◽  
Katerina Malagari ◽  
Maria Tampaki ◽  
Maria Theochari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Median Survival Time ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Thalassemia Major ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Tertiary Center

Background: In this retrospective study, records of patients with thalassemia major (TM) diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from 2008‐2018 were reviewed in order to determine the survival rate and evaluate possible etiological factors associated with survival. Methods: Forty-two TM patients who were diagnosed with HCC have been included in the study. Most of our patients (78.5%) were anti-HCV positive, while 16.5% had evidence of resolved HBV infection. At the time of HCC diagnosis, 78.5% of our patients were diagnosed with cirrhosis, while the vast majority (98%) had normal or mild elevated liver iron concentration (LIC) values. According to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) grading system patients were classified as 0-A: 28.5%, B: 57% and as C-D: 14.5%.  HCC has been treated with loco-regional treatment in 78.5% of our patients, while the rest have been treated with sorafenib. Results: Twenty-eight patients (66.5%) have eventually died with a median survival time of 6 months (range: 2-60). Using the Cox proportional hazard model, the only factors who have been associated with poor survival were BCLC stages C and D. Conclusions: In conclusion, BCLC staging is the main prognostic factor of survival in patients with TM who develop HCC, with a median survival time of six months.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Deferiprone in Iron-Overloaded Patients with Sickle Cell Disease or Other Anemias

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 618-618
Author(s):  
Janet L. Kwiatkowski ◽  
Mohsen Saleh Elalfy ◽  
Caroline Fradette ◽  
Mona Hamdy ◽  
Amal El-Beshlawy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Iron Overload ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
Cardiac Iron ◽  
Upper Limit ◽  
Iron Load ◽  
The Difference

Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) or other rare anemias whose care includes chronic blood transfusions must receive iron chelation to prevent the morbidity of iron overload. Currently, only deferoxamine (DFO) and deferasirox (DFX) are approved chelators in these patient populations. This randomized open-label trial evaluated if the efficacy of deferiprone (DFP) was non-inferior to DFO. DFO was used as the comparator product since DFX was not approved as first-line treatment for SCD at trial initiation. Methods: Participants at 27 sites in 8 countries were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either DFP or DFO for up to 12 months. Those with lower transfusional iron input and/or less severe iron load were prescribed either DFP 25 mg/kg of body weight t.i.d. or DFO 20 mg/kg (children) or 40 mg/kg (adults); those with higher iron input and/or more severe iron load received either DFP 33 mg/kg t.i.d. or DFO up to 40 mg/kg (children) or 50 mg/kg (adults). Dosages could be adjusted over the course of the trial if necessary. Efficacy endpoints were the changes from baseline in liver iron concentration (LIC), cardiac iron, and serum ferritin (SF) at Month 12. The primary endpoint was based on LIC, and for the demonstration of non-inferiority of DFP to DFO, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference between treatments had to be no more than 2 mg/g dry weight (dw). All patients had their neutrophil count monitored weekly, whereas other safety assessments and compliance with study therapy were evaluated monthly. Acceptable compliance was defined as taking 80% to 120% of the prescribed dosage. Results: A total of 228 of the targeted 300 patients were dosed with 152 receiving DFP and 76 receiving DFO, to assess non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between the groups in any demographic measures: in each treatment group, 84% of patients had SCD and the remainder had other, rarer forms of transfusion-dependent anemia. Mean age at enrollment was 16.9 years (± 9.6); 53.1% of patients were male; and 77.2% were white, 16.2% black, and 6.6% multi-racial. Over the course of the study, 69% of patients in the DFP group and 79% in the DFO group had acceptable compliance with treatment. Based on the Pocock's α spending function, a more stringent confidence level of 96.01% was applied to the calculation of confidence interval for the evaluation of non-inferiority. For the primary efficacy endpoint, the least squares (LS) mean change in LIC (measured as mg/g dw) was -4.04 for DFP, -4.45 for DFO; the upper limit of the 96.01% confidence interval for the difference was 1.57, thereby demonstrating non-inferiority of DFP to DFO. The upper limit for the subpopulation of patients with SCD also met the non-inferiority criterion. For the secondary endpoints, the change in cardiac iron (measured as ms on MRI T2*, log-transformed) was approximately -0.02 for both; and for SF (measured as μg/L), it was -415 vs. -750 for DFP vs. DFO, respectively. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant for both endpoints. With respect to safety, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the overall rate of adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs, serious AEs, or withdrawals from the study due to AEs. Agranulocytosis was seen in 1 DFP patient vs. no DFO patients, while events of less severe episodes of neutropenia occurred in 4 vs. 1, respectively. All episodes of agranulocytosis and neutropenia resolved. There was no significant treatment group difference in the rates of any of the serious AEs. Conclusion: The efficacy of DFP for the treatment of iron overload in patients with SCD or other rare anemias is not inferior to that of DFO, as assessed by changes in liver iron concentration. non-inferiority was supported by the endpoints on cardiac iron load and SF. The safety profile of DFP was acceptable and was similar to that previously seen in thalassemia patients, and its use was not associated with unexpected serious adverse events. The results of this study support the use of DFP for the treatment of iron overload in patients with SCD or other rare transfusion-dependent anemias. Note: The authors listed here are presenting these findings on behalf of all investigators who participated in the study. Disclosures Kwiatkowski: Terumo: Research Funding; Imara: Consultancy; bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Apopharma: Research Funding. Fradette:ApoPharma: Employment. Kanter:Sangamo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Imara: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; GLG: Consultancy; Cowen: Consultancy; Jeffries: Consultancy; Medscape: Honoraria; Rockpointe: Honoraria; Peerview: Honoraria; SCDAA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHLBI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy; Modus: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tsang:Apotex Inc.: Employment. Stilman:ApoPharma: Employment. Rozova:ApoPharma: Employment. Sinclair:ApoPharma: Employment. Shaw:ApoPharma: Employment. Chan:ApoPharma: Employment. Toiber Temin:ApoPharma: Employment. Lee:ApoPharma: Employment. Spino:ApoPharma: Employment. Tricta:ApoPharma: Employment. OffLabel Disclosure: Deferiprone is an oral iron chelator.

Safety and Efficacy of Alternate Desferrioxamine and Deferiprone Compared to Desferrioxamine Alone in the Treatment of Iron Overload in Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia Patients.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3611-3611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renzo Galanello ◽  
Antonios Kattamis ◽  
Antonio Piga ◽  
Fernando Tricta
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Iron Overload ◽  
Serum Ferritin ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Alternate Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Wet Weight

The safety and efficacy of alternating desferrioxamine and deferiprone for the treatment of iron overload in patients with transfusion-dependent anemias was studied in 60 thalassemia patients regularly treated with desferrioxamine. Patients were randomized to continue desferrioxamine alone (20–60 mg/kg/day, 5–7 days/week) or to alternate desferrioxamine (20–60 mg/kg/day, 2 days/week) with oral deferiprone (25 mg/kg tid, 5 days/week). Both treatment groups were similar for age (19.8 ± 6.1 years for desferrioxamine alone and 18.7 ± 4.8 years for alternate therapy) as was gender distribution and mean standard dose of desferrioxamine at the time of study initiation. Over the following 12 months, all patients were monitored weekly for adverse events and for their white blood cell count. Efficacy of the chelation was evaluated by measurement of the serum ferritin, liver iron concentration (magnetic susceptometry by SQUID), and by Non-Transferrin Bound Iron (NTBI). Compliance was comparable for both arms (96.1 ± 5.0% for alternate therapy vs 95.7 ± 5.7 % for desferrioxamine alone; p=0.7883). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with adverse events in the two therapy groups but the chelation regimens were associated with distinct adverse events. The alternate therapy was associated with transient gastrointestinal symptoms, such as vomiting in 5 patients (17%), abdominal pain in 3 patients (10%), or diarrhea in one patient (3%), or transient increase of serum ALT levels in one patient (3%), occurring mainly in the first weeks of therapy and were mild/moderate in severity. Daily infusions of desferrioxamine were associated with abscess at the site of infusion in one patient (3%), and allergic reactions in another patient (3%). Mean serum ALT levels were not significantly different between the two therapies. There were no episodes of agranulocytosis and only one patient, treated with desferrioxamine alone, experienced milder neutropenia. Both therapies resulted in similar decreases of serum ferritin (−349 ± 573 mg/L for the desferrioxamine arm; −248 ± 791 for the alternate arm; p=0.5802), and of liver iron concentrations (−239 ± 474 μg/g wet weight for the desferrioxamine arm; −65 ± 615 μg/g wet weight for the alternate therapy arm; p=0.2263) by the end of the treatment period. No significant changes in NTBI were observed between the two treatment arms (1.10 ± 7.19 μmol/L for the desferrioxamine arm; −0.03 ± 8.13 μmol/L for the alternate arm; p=0.5775). In conclusion, this 12 month study in transfusion-dependent thalassemia demonstrated that the alternating therapy with deferiprone and desferrioxamine is not associated with a significant increase in the incidence of adverse events and that it has comparable efficacy to desferrioxamine alone in controlling iron overload.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document