scholarly journals Risk Analysis for Patient Safety in Surgical Departments: Cross-Sectional Design Usefulness

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2516
Author(s):  
Verónica Aranaz Ostáriz ◽  
María Teresa Gea Velázquez de Castro ◽  
Francisco López Rodríguez-Arias ◽  
José Lorenzo Valencia Martín ◽  
Carlos Aibar Remón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Improve Health Care Quality ◽  
Health Organization

(1) Background: Identifying and measuring adverse events (AE) is a priority for patient safety, which allows us to define and prioritise areas for improvement and evaluate and develop solutions to improve health care quality. The aim of this work was to determine the prevalence of AEs in surgical and medical-surgical departments and to know the health impact of these AEs. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study determining the prevalence of AEs in surgical and medical-surgical departments was conducted and a comparison was made among both clinical areas. A total of 5228 patients were admitted in 58 hospitals in Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru, within the Latin American Study of Adverse Events (IBEAS), led by the Spanish Ministry of Health, the Pan American Health Organization, and the WHO Patient Safety programme. (3) Results: The global prevalence of AEs was 10.7%. However, the prevalence of AEs in surgical departments was 11.9%, while in medical-surgical departments it was 8.9%. The causes of these AEs were associated with surgical procedures (38.6%) and nosocomial infections (35.4%). About 60.6% of the AEs extended hospital stays by 30.7 days on average and 25.8% led to readmission with an average hospitalisation of 15 days. About 22.4% resulted in death, disability, or surgical reintervention. (4) Conclusions: Surgical departments were associated with a higher risk of experiencing AEs.

scholarly journals Physicians’ Attitude towards Electronic Medical Record Systems: An Input for Future Implementers

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Mulugeta Hayelom Kalayou ◽  
Berhanu Fikadie Endehabtu ◽  
Habtamu Alganeh Guadie ◽  
Zeleke Abebaw ◽  
Kassahun Dessie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Computer Literacy ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Improve Health Care Quality

Background. Electronic medical record (EMR) systems offer the potential to improve health care quality by allowing physicians real-time access to patient healthcare information. The endorsement and usage of EMRs by physicians have a significant influence on other user groups in the healthcare system. As a result, the purpose of this study was to examine physicians’ attitudes regarding EMRs and identify the elements that may influence their attitudes. Method. An institutional-based cross-sectional study design supplemented with a qualitative study was conducted from March 1 to April 30, 2018, among a total of 403 physicians. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data. The validity of the prediction bounds for the dependent variable and the validity of the confidence intervals and P values for the parameters were measured with a value of less than 0.05 and 95 percent of confidence interval. For the supplementary qualitative study, data were collected using semistructured in-depth interviews from 11 key informants, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Result. Physicians’ computer literacy (CI: 0.264, 0.713; P : 0001) and computer access at work (CI: 0.141, 0.533, P : 0.001) were shown to be favorable predictors of their attitude towards EMR system adoption. Another conclusion from this study was the inverse relationship between physicians’ prior EMR experience and their attitude about the system (CI: -0.517, -0.121; P : 0.002). Conclusion. According to the findings of this study, physicians’ attitudes regarding EMR were found moderate in the studied region. There was a favorable relationship between computer ownership, computer literacy, lack of EMR experience, participation in EMR training, and attitude towards EMR. Improving the aforementioned elements is critical to improving physicians’ attitudes regarding EMR.

scholarly journals Attitudes Towards and Compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in China: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Tan ◽  
James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi ◽  
Zhaohan Ding ◽  
Yufa Zhou ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
World Health ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Local Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Surgical Safety Checklist ◽  
Surgical Safety

Abstract Background: Ten years after the introduction of Chinese Ministry of Health (MoH) version of Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) we wished to assess the ongoing influence of the World Health Organisation (WHO) SSC by observing all three sections during elective surgical procedures in China, as well as to survey operating room staff more widely about the WHO SSC.Methods: A questionnaire was designed to gain authentic views on the WHO SSC. We also conducted a prospective cross-sectional study at five level 3 hospitals. Local data collectors were trained to document specific item performance. Adverse events which delayed the operation were recorded as well as the professionals leading or participating in the three SSC phases.Results: A total of 846 operating room professionals from 138 hospitals representing every mainland province responded to the survey. There was widespread acceptance of the checklist and its value in improving patient safety. 860 operations were observed for SSC compliance. Overall compliance was 79.8%. The ‘time-out’ phase compliance in surgeon-dependent items reduced when it was nurse-led (p<0.0001). WHO SSC interventions which are omitted from the MoH SSC continued to be discussed over half the time. Overall adverse events rate was 2.7%. One site had near 100% compliance in association with a circulating inspection team which had power of sanction.Conclusion: The WHO SSC remains a powerful tool for patient safety in China. Changes in behaviour for nurses (assertiveness) and surgeons (teamwork) could improve compliance. Random checks of compliance may have merit.

scholarly journals Association of Working Hours and Patient Safety Competencies with Adverse Nurse Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (21) ◽  
pp. 4083
Author(s):  
Youn-Jung Son ◽  
Eun Kyoung Lee ◽  
Yukyung Ko
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Working Hours ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nursing Leaders ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Nurse Outcomes

The environment of health organizations can determine healthcare quality and patient safety. Longer working hours can be associated with nurses’ health status and care quality, as well as work-related hazards. However, little is known about the association of hospital nurses’ working hours and patient safety competencies with adverse nurse outcomes. In this cross-sectional descriptive study, convenience sampling was employed to recruit 380 nurses from three tertiary care hospitals in South Korea. Data were collected using structured questionnaires from May to June 2016. Hierarchical linear regression analysis was used to identify the association of working hours and patient competencies with adverse nurse outcomes among 364 participants selected for analysis. Most nurses worked over 40 h/week. Working hours (β = 0.202, p < 0.001) had the strongest association with adverse nurse outcomes. Low perceived patient safety competencies (β = −0.179, p = 0.001) and frequently reporting patient safety accidents (β = 0.146, p = 0.018) were also correlated with adverse nurse outcomes. Nursing leaders should encourage work cultures where working overtime is discouraged and patient safety competencies are prioritized. Further, healthcare managers must formulate policies that secure nurses’ rights. The potential association of overtime with nurse and patient outcomes needs further exploration.

scholarly journals Evaluation of short-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis from Latin America

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 205521732110615
Author(s):  
Ricardo Alonso ◽  
Aníbal Chertcoff ◽  
Felisa del V Leguizamón ◽  
Lorna Galleguillos Goiry ◽  
Maria B Eizaguirre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Adenovirus Vector ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Patient Organizations ◽  
Latin American Countries

Background To date, there are no data available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin American patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Objective Characterize safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin American (LATAM) patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Methods A cross-sectional study between February 1, 2021, and April 30, 2021. Individuals with MS from LATAM countries were invited to participate in a self-administered web-based survey, through MS patient organizations from the region. Results 393 vaccinated pwMS from 10 different Latin American countries were included. The vaccines administered were: inactivated virus vaccines (IVV) in 38.2% of patients, adenovirus vector vaccines (AdV) in 48.8% and mRNA vaccines 13%. All patients received at least one dose of any of the COVID-19 vaccines and 123 (31.3%) declared receiving a second dose. Mean (SD) age 41.5 (11.8) years, 82.4% female, MS disease duration: 8.4 (8.2) years. No serious adverse events were reported with any of the COVID-19 vaccines after either the first or second dose. A lower frequency of adverse events was found with IVV (22%) in comparison with AdV (46.4%) and mRNA (35.3%) ( p < 0.01). Five participants reported having an MS relapse after IVV first dose. Conclusion COVID-19 vaccines applied in LATAM proved safe for MS patients.

Cross-Sectional Study on Patient Safety Culture, Patient Safety Competency, and Adverse Events

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghee Han ◽  
Ji-Su Kim ◽  
YeJi Seo
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nurses Perceptions

This study aims to examine the associations between nurses’ perceptions of patient safety culture, patient safety competency, and adverse events. Using convenience sampling, we conducted a cross-sectional study from February to May 2018 in two university hospitals. Furthermore, we performed multiple logistic regression to examine associations between patient safety culture, patient safety competency, and adverse events. Higher mean scores for “communication openness” in patient safety culture were significantly correlated with lower rates for pressure ulcers and falls; furthermore, higher mean scores for “working in teams with other health professionals” in patient safety competency were significantly correlated with reductions in ventilator-associated pneumonia. We recommend that a well-structured hospital culture emphasizing patient safety and continuation of in-service education programs for nurses to provide high-quality, clinically safe care is required. Moreover, further research is required to identify interventions to improve patient safety culture and competency and reduce the occurrence of adverse events.

scholarly journals The Health Tourists' Satisfaction Level of Services Provided: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Mohammad Varzi ◽  
Koroush Saki ◽  
Khalil Momeni ◽  
Ghasem Rajabi Vasokolaei ◽  
Zahra Khodakaramifard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Satisfaction Level ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction

<p><strong>INTRODUCTION:</strong> Patient satisfaction with provided services is used as an indicator of health care quality. Patient satisfaction is defined as patient perception of provided care compared to expected care. This study was administered to evaluate the health tourists' satisfaction of provided services in Lorestan University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospitals in 2015. </p><p><strong>METHOD:</strong> In this descriptive case study, 1800 (696 (54.4 %) men and 812 (45.6 % ) women, 74.5 province native) patients were selected by random sampling from among the patients of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospitals in 2015 spring. The data collection instrument is a semi-structured questionnaire in this study. The questionnaire has 62 general and specific items. Each of the specific items is scaled on four points; satisfied, fairly satisfied, dissatisfied and O.K.. In order to analyze the data both descriptive and inferential statistics were used.</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> Poldokhtar Imam Khomeini Hospital had the highest Level of satisfaction of 68 percent in all aspects (hoteling, discharge, paramedical, nurses, medical and admission) among the studied hospitals. Kuhdasht Imam Khomeini hospital had the lowest level of satisfaction of 53 percent. The overall satisfaction level in all hospitals was 61%.<strong> </strong><strong></strong></p><p><strong>DISCUSSION &amp; CONCLUSION:</strong> Despite the shortcomings observed in different areas, the results of the present study are in an intermediate status compared to other studies. While treating patients, patient-centered issue and patients ‘need and preferences should be focused on to enhance health care quality. Considering Patients preferences not only are morally good but also lead to improved care and access to sustainable care practices. Therefore it is needed to drive organizational management approach toward the customer preferences management and needs.</p>

scholarly journals Economic sanctions against Iran as an important factor in threatening the health of patients with multiple sclerosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali Sahraian ◽  
Abdorreza Naser Moghadas ◽  
Sharareh Eskandarieh
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Stress Level ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Economic Sanctions ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Services

Background: After intensified economic sanctions against Iran, decreased welfare of patients were more recognizable. The present study was aimed at identifying the challenges and stress level experienced by patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) regarding treatment and health care services in 2018-2019 after strengthening of economic sanctions against Iran. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on MS patients in Tehran, Iran. A structured questionnaire was designed to measure the main variables addressing the challenges and stress level of MS patients with respect to receiving care and treatment services. Results: In total, 1039 MS patients were enrolled into the study. Among the patients who answered yes to the questions, 873 (85.8%) and 837 (86%) were concerned about medicine unavailability and supply and purchase of internationally branded medicine, respectively. Moreover, 671 (70.3%) subjects were concerned about replacing their medicines with cheaper alternatives due to financial problems and 427 (41.4%) were unwilling to continue their treatment due to the economic burden of MS. In total, 795 (82%) were concerned about the effectiveness of Iranian drugs in comparison with internationally branded drugs. Generally, 970 (93.53%) subjects had experienced increased current living costs and 711 had experienced (68.82%) reduced nutrition quality, which (OR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.99, 3.60) was significantly higher among subjects who had an income of less than or equal to 250 US$ per month. Conclusion: The sanctions can impose greater stress and hardship on patients due to the unavailability and costs of medicines. Iran should manage health care quality and provide services to prevent the adverse effects of sanctions on MS patients and guarantee patients’ right to receive well-established medication and health services.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document