scholarly journals Public Response on Social Media to a Social Marketing Campaign for Influencing Attitudes towards Boating Safety

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6504
Author(s):  
Jennifer Smith ◽  
Tessa Clemens ◽  
Alison Macpherson ◽  
Ian Pike
Keyword(s):  
Social Marketing ◽  
Recreational Boating ◽  
Safety Practices ◽  
Marketing Campaign ◽  
Public Response ◽  
Social Marketing Campaign ◽  
The People ◽  
Negative Comments ◽  
Multi Media ◽  
Media Formats

The purpose of this research paper is to assess the response on Facebook to a social marketing campaign for recreational boating safety. The campaign ran for the 2018 and 2019 boating seasons in British Columbia, Canada. Messages related to boating safety were delivered in multi-media formats, including ten Facebook posts. All public comments on the campaign Facebook page in response to the ads were included in the analysis. Comments were reviewed for tone and subject; those that related directly to the campaign or boating safety-related topics, such as alcohol use or enforcement, were labeled positive, negative or neutral in tone. Metrics such as likes and shares were also noted. The overall engagement rate (defined as engagements over people reached) was 4.1%. The posts were liked >7000 times and received 901 shares. A total of 219 comments were analysed. Almost half of the comments were positive (n = 106, 48.4%). Fifty comments were off-topic (22.8%), 45 were neutral (20.5%) and 18 were negative (8.2%). The majority of comments were positive, indicating that the campaign performed as planned and was generally well received by the people for whom it was intended. Comments illuminated prevailing attitudes towards risks, injuries and safety practices related to recreational boating. Positive comments valued safety as an aspect of having a pleasant experience, rather than a barrier. Negative comments were about perceiving reduced fun of boating, rather than objecting to the campaign itself. As a component of a multi-media social marketing strategy, Facebook can be a source of instant feedback from the campaign audience.

scholarly journals You Have Options: Implementing and evaluating a contraceptive choice social marketing campaign

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 239920262110034
Author(s):  
Beth Sundstrom ◽  
Andrea L DeMaria ◽  
Merissa Ferrara ◽  
Stephanie Meier ◽  
Kerri Vyge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Marketing ◽  
Survey Design ◽  
Full Range ◽  
The United States ◽  
Student Health Services ◽  
Marketing Campaign ◽  
Social Marketing Campaign ◽  
Campaign Messages ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Social Marketing Campaigns

Background: Up to two-thirds of pregnancies among young, unmarried women in the United States are unintended, despite increased access to highly effective contraceptive options. Aim: This study implemented and evaluated a social marketing campaign designed to increase access to a full range of contraceptive methods among women aged 18–24 years on a southeastern university campus. Methods: Researchers partnered with Choose Well and Student Health Services to design, implement, and evaluate You Have Options, a 10-week multi-media social marketing campaign. The campaign aimed to raise awareness, increase knowledge, and improve access to contraceptive options, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods among college women. A pretest-posttest web-based survey design measured campaign awareness and recognition, as well as attitudes, subjective norms, and behavior. Results: Participants demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge about intrauterine devices (IUDs) between pretest ( M = 2.66, SD = 1.30) and posttest ( M = 3.06; SD = 1.96); t(671) = −2.60, p < .01). Analysis revealed that frequent exposure to the campaign prompted participants to engage in discussions about LARC with friends ( p < .05). In addition, 20- to 24-year-olds who reported seeing the campaign messages were more likely to seek out information ( p < .01) and adopt a LARC method ( p = .001) than 18- or 19-year-olds who saw the campaign messages. Conclusion: Findings from the study offer practical recommendations for implementing social marketing campaigns aimed at increasing access to LARC and reducing unintended pregnancy.

The Science of Goal Setting

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Hayden ◽  
Fangzhou Deng
Keyword(s):  
Goal Setting ◽  
Diffusion Of Innovation ◽  
Social Marketing ◽  
Collective Behavior ◽  
Great Influence ◽  
Environmental Conservation ◽  
Marketing Campaign ◽  
Social Marketing Campaign ◽  
Social Marketing Campaigns ◽  
The Impact

Goal setting within social marketing campaigns is art and science. An analysis of Rare Pride conservation campaigns shows the quantitative, replicable relationship among the impact of these conservation campaigns with diffusion of innovation theory, and collective behavior theory that can guide marketers to set better goals. Rare is an environmental conservation organization that focuses on reducing community-based threats to biodiversity through a social marketing campaign called Pride. Pride campaigns work by removing barriers to change (whether they are technical, social, and political or something else) and inspiring people to make change happen. Based on the analysis of historical Pride campaign survey data, we found that the starting percentage of engagement has a great influence on the percentage change at the end of the campaign: The higher the initial adoption level of knowledge, attitude, and behavior change, the easier these measures are to improve. The result also suggests a difference in the potential of change with different audience segments: It is easiest to change influencer, then general public, and finally resource user who are the target of the social marketing campaign. In this article, we will analyze how to use diffusion of innovation and collective behavior theories to explain the impact of campaigns, as well as how to set more attainable goals. This article is consistent with similar research in the field of public health, which should help marketers set goals more tightly, allocate resources more effectively, and better manage donor expectations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document