scholarly journals Omental Infarction in a Child—Conservative Management as an Effective and Safe Strategy in Diagnosis and Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 8057
Author(s):  
Mateusz Kozłowski ◽  
Oliwia Piotrowska ◽  
Kaja Giżewska-Kacprzak
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Omental Infarction ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Safe Strategy ◽  
Surgical Treatments ◽  
Time Of Admission ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Omental infarction (OI) is a rare disease occurring in children. Important risk factors include overweight and obesity. The clinical presentation is often non-specific, and the main symptom is acute abdominal pain. In addition, infarcted omentum may present with fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and dysuria. Due to the localisation of the pain, OI should be differentiated from acute appendicitis. The diagnosis of OI is sometimes made intraoperatively, during appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. Hence, it is important to state a correct preoperative diagnosis, which is commonly based on abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography. The treatment of OI is still inconclusive. Both conservative and surgical treatments are used. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. The decision of which treatment to follow should be multifactorial and include the patient’s clinical condition at the time of admission, the progression or regression of symptoms during hospitalization and laboratory and imaging findings. We present a clinical case of a 9-year-old overweight girl with OI, whose diagnosis was based on imaging diagnostics and enabled conservative treatment with no complications. The case we have described confirms that the conservative treatment is an effective and safe therapy.

scholarly journals Abdominal Ultrasound and its diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Fu ◽  
Xu Zhou ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Sheng Lu
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Histopathological Study ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause for abdominal pain encountering unnecessary surgeries in emergency departments. The present meta-analysis aims to assess the accuracy of abdominal ultrasound in suspected acute appendicitis cases in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and post-test odds for positive and negative results. Materials and Methods: An extensive and systematic search was conducted in Medline (via PubMed), Cinahl (via Ebsco), Scopus, and Web of Sciences from 2010 till the end of March 2021. Two authors analyzed studies for inclusion, collected results, and conducted analyses separately. The histopathological study on tissue collected during appendectomy served as the gold standard for determining the final diagnosis. The accuracy was determined by evaluating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic odds ratio. Results: Out of 3193 references, a total of 18 studies were selected. Overall sensitivity of 77.2% (95 % CI – 75.4 – 78.9%) and specificity of 60% (95 % CI – 58% – 62%) were observed. The diagnostic odds ratio of 6.88(95 % CI 1.99 – 23.82) was obtained. Conclusion: Abdominal ultrasound shows significant accuracy of diagnosis in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals Abdominal Ultrasound and Its Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Fu ◽  
Xu Zhou ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Sheng Lu
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause of abdominal pain encountering unnecessary surgeries in emergency departments. The present meta-analysis aims to assess the accuracy of abdominal ultrasound in suspected acute appendicitis cases in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and post-test odds for positive and negative results.Materials and Methods: An extensive and systematic search was conducted in Medline (via PubMed), Cinahl (via Ebsco), Scopus, and Web of Sciences from 2010 till the end of March 2021. Two authors analyzed studies for inclusion, collected results, and conducted analyses separately. Examination of the histopathological tissue collected during appendectomy served as a gold standard for determining the final diagnosis of appendicitis. The accuracy was determined by evaluating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic odds ratio.Results: Out of 3,193 references, a total of 18 studies were selected. Overall sensitivity of 77.2% (95% CI – 75.4–78.9%) and specificity of 60% (95% CI – 58–62%) were observed. The diagnostic odds ratio of 6.88(95% CI 1.99–23.82) was obtained.Conclusion: Abdominal ultrasound shows significant accuracy of diagnosis in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Ultrasound Scanning in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Patients Admitted at Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-139
Author(s):  
Uma Gurung ◽  
Dhiraj Gurung
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency. Both abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography are common diagnostic tools in its diagnosis with each having its own advantages and disadvantages. Methods: Patients of suspected acute appendicitis were evaluated with an ultrasound to see the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of ultrasound for intraoperative appendicitis diagnosis. The study included 113 patients of suspected acute appendicitis presenting in the emergency during a one year duration. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value was calculated from their respective formulae. Results: The majority of the patients were male patients between the age group of 18 to 30. The sensitivity of ultrasound for diagnosis of acute appendicitis was 96% and specificity was 33%. The positive predictive value was 98% and the negative predictive value was 20% Conclusion: Ultrasound has good sensitivity and the low cost along with no radiation exposure makes this an acceptable screening investigative modality though due to low specificity, it would be recommended to go for a computed tomography scan if ultrasound shows negative result for appendicitis.  

Value of Noncontrast Spiral CT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis

1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1165
Author(s):  
Pil Yeob Choi ◽  
Sang Wook Lee ◽  
Jae Soo Kwon ◽  
Young Soon Sung ◽  
Myoung Ho Rho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Spiral Ct ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

EP.FRI.615 Assessing the reliability of the Adult Appendicitis Score in managing patients with suspected acute appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carry Zheng ◽  
Shiela Lee ◽  
Steven Brown ◽  
Venkat Kanakala
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Pathological Finding ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Histological Diagnosis ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Abstract Aims To evaluate the effectiveness of using a clinical prediction tool in the management of suspected acute appendicitis Methods Retrospective data was collected on patients undergoing appendicectomy at a single tertiary centre from November 2019 to June 2020. Inclusion criteria were all patients aged 18 and above undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Exclusion criteria were all patients that had a pathological finding other than appendicitis at laparoscopy. The pre operative AAS score at first presentation was calculated and patients grouped into low(0-10), intermediate(11-15), and high(16 and above) risk. These groups were then compared to the histological findings. Results A total of 74 patients were included, 44 male and 30 female. The age range was from 18 to 83, with a median age of 36. Of 10 patients in the low risk group, 4 (40%) had appendicitis on histology. 36 out of 40 (90%) patients in the intermediate risk group had appendicitis and 100% of the 24 patients in the high risk group. Pearson’s coefficient showed a significant correlation between the AAS risk (low, intermediate, and high) and the histological diagnosis of appendicitis (r = 0.48, p = 0.000016). Conclusions Our study did show a positive correlation between the AAS risk stratification and histological diagnosis. Based on our findings we would recommend the adoption of this score in assessing patients with suspected acute appendicitis and minimising the negative appendicectomy rate.

Sonography of suspected acute appendicitis in children: Evaluation of the progress in performance of senior residents

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 620-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Gerbier ◽  
Aurélien Binet ◽  
Mathilde Etancelin ◽  
Emmanuel Barteau ◽  
Marie Auger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Prospective study of computed tomography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and low Alvarado score

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1597-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang-Yu Wang ◽  
Jen-Feng Fang ◽  
Chien-Hung Liao ◽  
I-Ming Kuo ◽  
Chun-Hsiang Ou Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

scholarly journals ANALISIS PEMERIKSAAN LABORATORIUM PADA KASUS LEPTOSPIROSIS DISERTAI ABSES HATI AMOEBA

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-139
Author(s):  
Donaliazarti Donaliazarti
Keyword(s):  
Liver Abscess ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Amoebic Liver Abscess ◽  
Personal Hygiene ◽  
Serological Examination ◽  
Mild Anemia ◽  
Prolonged Aptt ◽  
The Right ◽  
Time Of Admission

Leptospirosis is a disease caused by spirochaeta microorganism of the genus Leptospira, while the amoebic liver abscess is an extraintestinal complication by Entamoeba Histolytica. Both diseases occurred in a 45-year-old man with poor personal hygiene and environment sanitation. Amoebic liver abscess was found to be a coincidence that was thought to have existed before the patient developed leptospirosis so that the two diseases caused overlapping clinical manifestations in the patient, but the acute symptoms experienced by the patient at the time of admission were more likely to be caused by his leptospirosis. Patient complained of high fever, yellowing of the skin and eyes, urinating like concentrated tea, stiffness in both legs, nausea, vomiting and heartburn. On physical examination found febrile, tachycardia, icteric on skin and sclera, ciliary injection, and hepatomegaly. Laboratory tests showed mild anemia with normocytic normochromic features, leukocytosis with neutrophilia shift to the right, thrombocytosis, increased ESR, prolonged APTT, hyperbilirubinemia, elevated SGOT SGPT, ALP and GGT enzymes, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglobulinemia, and bilirubinuria. Microscopic examination with negative staining of urine samples found Leptospira. Abdominal ultrasound examination showed a solitary space occupying lesion (SOL) in the right lobe of the liver and on serological examination showed positive antiamoeba. Based on the above, this patient was diagnosed as having coincident leptospirosis with amoebic liver abscess.

scholarly journals APPENDICULAR MASS

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 180-184
Author(s):  
SARDAR ALI ◽  
HAFIZ MUHAMMED RAFIQUE
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Surgical Exploration ◽  
Group I ◽  
Variable Extent ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction ◽  
Appendicular Mass

Introduction: Appendicular mass is a common complication of acute appendicitis. The traditional treatment of this is conservative followed by delayed appendectomy. But now with advancement in all the fields of medicine early surgical exploration of the appendicular mass can be done with satisfactory results. Aims and objectives: A comparison of conservative treatment versus early surgical exploration of appendicular mass. Study Design: Experimental study. Material and Method: Two years study from December 2003 to November 2005 at district headquarters hospital Khanewal. Total 60 patients, both males and females between 12 to 65 years of age with symptoms and signs consistent with appendicular mass were included. They were randomly divided into group I (Early exploration) and group II (Conservative treatment) each containing 30 patients. A comparison of outcome between two groups was done statistically by applying studentChi-square test. Results: There was a peak incidence of acute appendicitis in Second and third decades of life. Male to female ratio was 2:1. More than 90% of patients had history of shifting of abdominal pain. 100% of the patients had inflamed appendix to variable extent on exploration. The complications in the form of adhesive intestinal obstruction; failure of treatment; lost follow up; misdiagnosis and re admissionwere less in group I. There was a significant less duration of hospital stay in group I as compared to Group II. The observations and outcome in this study are almost comparable and correspond with other studies done in this regard. Conclusion: Early surgical exploration of appendicular mass is safe and cost effective.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document