scholarly journals The Relevance of Insomnia in the Diagnosis of Perinatal Depression: Validation of the Italian Version of the Insomnia Symptom Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (23) ◽  
pp. 12507
Author(s):  
Lavinia De Chiara ◽  
Cristina Mazza ◽  
Eleonora Ricci ◽  
Alexia Emilia Koukopoulos ◽  
Georgios D. Kotzalidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Insomnia Symptom ◽  
Symptom Questionnaire ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background. Sleep disorders are common in perinatal women and may underlie or trigger anxiety and depression. We aimed to translate and validate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Insomnia Symptom Questionnaire (ISQ), in a sample of women during late pregnancy and 6-months postpartum according to the DSM-5 criteria. Methods. The ISQ was administered to 292 women prenatally along with other measures of sleep quality, depression, and anxiety, to examine its construct and convergent validity. Women were readministered the ISQ six months postdelivery to assess test–retest reliability. Women were divided into DSM-5 No-Insomnia (N = 253) and Insomnia (N = 39) groups. Results. The insomnia group had received more psychopharmacotherapy, had more psychiatric family history, increased rates of medically assisted reproduction, of past perinatal psychiatric disorders, and scored higher on almost all TEMPS-A dimensions, on the EPDS, HCL-32, PSQI, and on ISQ prenatally and postnatally. ISQ scores correlated with all scales, indicating adequate convergent and discriminant validity; furthermore, it showed antenatal–postnatal test–retest reliability, 97.5% diagnostic accuracy, 79.5% sensitivity, 94.9% specificity, 70.5% positive predictive power, and 92.8% negative predictive power. Conclusions. The ISQ is useful, valid, and reliable for assessing perinatal insomnia in Italian women. The Italian version showed equivalent properties to the original version.

scholarly journals The 2014 Ontario Child Health Study Emotional Behavioural Scales (OCHS-EBS) Part I: A Checklist for Dimensional Measurement of Selected DSM-5 Disorders

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Duncan ◽  
Katholiki Georgiades ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Jinette Comeau ◽  
Mark A. Ferro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Conduct Disorder ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Dimensional Measurement ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objectives: To describe the development and psychometric properties of the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study Emotional Behavioural Scales (OCHS-EBS) for dimensional measurement of 7 disorders based on criteria from the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM-5). Methods: Scale items were selected by agreement among 19 child psychologists and psychiatrists rating the correspondence between item descriptions and DSM-5 symptoms. Psychometric evaluation of the item properties and parent/caregiver and youth scales came from a general population study of 10,802 children and youth aged 4 to 17 years in 6537 families. Test-retest reliability data were collected from a subsample of 280 children and their caregivers who independently completed the OCHS-EBS checklist on 2 occasions 7 to 14 days apart. Structural equation modelling was used to assess internal and external convergent and discriminant validity—the latter tested against the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). Results: Confirmatory factor analyses exhibited adequate item fit to all scales. Except for conduct disorder and youth-assessed separation anxiety disorder, internal (Cronbach’s α) and test-retest reliability (Pearson’s r) for scale scores were 0.70 or above. Except for youth-assessed conduct disorder, the OCHS-EBS met criteria for internal and convergent and discriminant validity. Compared with the MINI-KID, the OCHS-EBS met criteria for external convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusions: The OCHS-EBS provide reliable and valid dimensional measurement of 7 DSM-5 disorders assessed by caregivers and youth in the general population. Part II describes use of the OCHS-EBS as a categorical (present/absent) measure of disorder.

Psychometric Properties of a Structured Diagnostic Interview for DSM-5 Anxiety, Mood, and Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders

Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Tolin ◽  
Christina Gilliam ◽  
Bethany M. Wootton ◽  
William Bowe ◽  
Laura B. Bragdon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Reliability Data ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Structured Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Three hundred sixty-two adult patients were administered the Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and OCD and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders (DIAMOND). Of these, 121 provided interrater reliability data, and 115 provided test–retest reliability data. Participants also completed a battery of self-report measures that assess symptoms of anxiety, mood, and obsessive-compulsive and related disorders. Interrater reliability of DIAMOND anxiety, mood, and obsessive-compulsive and related diagnoses ranged from very good to excellent. Test–retest reliability of DIAMOND diagnoses ranged from good to excellent. Convergent validity was established by significant between-group comparisons on applicable self-report measures for nearly all diagnoses. The results of the present study indicate that the DIAMOND is a promising semistructured diagnostic interview for DSM-5 disorders.

scholarly journals An Indonesian Version of Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Short Form 19 (COHIP-SF19): Assessing Validity and Reliability

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti L. Nuraini ◽  
◽  
Anton Rahardjo ◽  
Diah Ayu Maharan ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Health ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
P Value ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Child Oral Health

Previous surveys have indicated that the majority of Indonesian children have poor oral health. However, scant information is available on children’s oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL). The purpose of this study was to assess reliability as well as discriminant and convergent validity of Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Short Form 19 (COHIP-SF 19) Indonesian version. Methods: The Indonesian version of COHIP-SF 19 was developed according to the guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation process. The instrument was tested among 529 children between 12 – 15 years old who were randomly selected from six junior high schools in Jakarta. The psychometric testing included internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity, and convergent validity. Results: Mean age of the participants was 13.3±0.9 years and 54% of the participants were female. The mean COHIP-SF 19 score was 57.8±8.8 and the median was 58 (range 27 – 75). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability was excellent for COHIP-SF 19 score with Chronbach’s alpha 0.83 and intra-class correlation coefficient 0.81. Children with active decay, untreated caries with pulpal involvement, and gingivitis had significantly lower COHIP-SF 19 scores (p-value ≤ 0.030). Correlation between COHIP-SF 19 score, subscale scores and clinical severity as well as self-rated general or oral health were very low to low (rs = 0.04 – 0.27, p-value ≤ 0.028), after adjustment for children’s age and gender. Conclusions: The Indonesian version of COHIP-SF 19 was successfully developed to be used as an OHRQoL instrument for Indonesian school-age children. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity, and convergent validity of COHIP-SF 19 Indonesian version were confirmed

scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of the Italian Version of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in Bipolar Disorder

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Francesca Moro ◽  
Francesc Colom ◽  
Francesca Floris ◽  
Elisa Pintus ◽  
Mirra Pintus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Short Test ◽  
Bipolar Patients ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Functioning Assessment

Background:Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) is a brief instrument designed to assess the main functioning problems experienced by psychiatric patients, specifically bipolar patients. It includes 24 items assessing impairment or disability in six domains of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time. The aim of this study is to measure the validity and reliability of the Italian version of this instrument.Methods:Twenty-four patients with DSM-IV TR bipolar disorder and 20 healthy controls were recruited and evaluated in three private clinics in Cagliari (Sardinia, Italy). The psychometric properties of FAST (feasibility, internal consistency, concurrent validity, discriminant validity (patients vs controls and eutimic patients vs manic and depressed), and test-retest reliability were analyzed.Results:The internal consistency obtained was very high with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.955. A highly significant negative correlation with GAF was obtained (r = -0.9; p < 0.001) pointing to a reasonable degree of concurrent validity. FAST show a good test-retest reliability between two independent evaluation differing of one week (mean K =0.73). The total FAST scores were lower in controls as compared with Bipolar Patients and in Euthimic patients compared with Depressed or Manic.Conclusion:The Italian version of the FAST showed similar psychometrics properties as far as regard internal consistency and discriminant validity of the original version and show a good test retest reliability measure by means of K statistics.

scholarly journals Reliability and Structural and Construct Validity of the Functional Strength Measurement in Children Aged 4 to 10 Years

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 888-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy F.M. Aertssen ◽  
Gillian D. Ferguson ◽  
Bouwien C.M. Smits-Engelsman
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Exploratory Factor Analysis ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Structural Validity ◽  
Strength Measurement ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background Adequate muscle strength, power, and endurance are important in children's daily activities and sports. Various instruments have been developed for the assessment of muscle function; each measures different aspects. The Functional Strength Measurement (FSM) was developed to measure performance in activities in which strength is required. Objective The study objective was to establish the test-retest reliability and structural and construct validity of the FSM. Design A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Methods The performance of 474 children with typical development on the FSM was examined. Test-retest reliability (n=47) was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (2.1A) for agreement. Structural validity was examined with exploratory factor analysis, and internal consistency was established with the Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was determined by calculating correlations between FSM scores and scores obtained with a handheld dynamometer (HHD) (n=252) (convergent validity) and between FSM scores and scores on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children–2 (MABC-2) (n=77) (discriminant validity). Results The test-retest reliability of the FSM total score ranged from .91 to .94. The structural validity revealed one dimension, containing all 8 FSM items. The Cronbach alpha was .74. The convergent validity with the HHD ranged from .42 to .74. The discriminant validity with MABC-2 items revealed correlations that were generally lower than .39, and most of the correlations were not significant. Exploratory factor analysis of a combined data set (FSM, HHD, and MABC-2; n=77) revealed 2 factors: muscle strength/power and muscle endurance with an agility component. Limitations Discriminant validity was measured only in children aged 4 to 6 years. Conclusions The FSM, a norm-referenced test for measuring functional strength in children aged 4 to 10 years, has good test-retest reliability and good construct validity.

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale (PSS): measurement invariance between athletes and non-athletes and construct validity

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsiang Chiu ◽  
Frank Jing-Horng Lu ◽  
Ju-Han Lin ◽  
Chiao-Lin Nien ◽  
Ya-Wen Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Perceived Stress Scale ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Stress Scale ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: Although Perceived Stress Scale (PSS, Cohen, Kamarack, Mermelstein, 1983) has been validated and widely used in many domains, there is still no validation in sports by comparing athletes and non-athletes and examining related psychometric indices. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of PSS between athletes and non-athletes, and examine construct validity and reliability in the sports contexts. Methods: Study 1 sampled 359 college student-athletes (males = 233; females = 126) and 242 non-athletes (males=124; females=118) and examined factorial structure, measurement invariance and internal consistency. Study 2 sampled 196 student-athletes (males = 139, females = 57, Mage =19.88 yrs, SD = 1.35) and examined discriminant validity and convergent validity of PSS. Study 3 sampled 37 student-athletes to assess test-retest reliability of PSS. Results: Results found that 2-factor PSS-10 fitted the model the best and had appropriate reliability. Also, there was a measurement invariance between athletes and non-athletes; and PSS positively correlated with athletic burnout and life stress but negatively correlated with coping efficacy provided evidence of discriminant validity and convergent validity. Further, the test-retest reliability for PSS subscales was significant (r=.66 and r=.50). Discussion: It is suggested that 2-factor PSS-10 can be a useful tool in assessing perceived stress either in sports or non-sports settings. We suggest future study may use 2-factor PSS-10 in examining the effects of stress on the athletic injury, burnout, and psychiatry disorders.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties of the Italian Version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Questionnaire

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 1036-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Cacchio ◽  
Stefano Necozione ◽  
Joy C. MacDermid ◽  
Jan Dirk Rompe ◽  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Tennis Elbow ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire is a tool designed for self-assessment of forearm pain and disability in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET). However, an Italian version of this questionnaire has not been available. Objective The aims of this study were: (1) to translate and cross-culturally adapt the PRTEE questionnaire into Italian and (2) to evaluate its measurement properties. Design This was a longitudinal, observational measurement study. Methods The PRTEE questionnaire was cross-culturally adapted to Italian according to established guidelines. Ninety-five individuals (41 women, 54 men) with unilateral, imaging-confirmed, chronic LET were selected consecutively to assess the measurement properties of the PRTEE questionnaire. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were estimated. Results The Italian version of the PRTEE displayed a high degree of internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of .95. The test-retest reliability was high for both short-term and medium-term, with intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) of .95 and .93, respectively. The PRTEE exhibited a strong correlation (r=.77–.91, P&lt;.0001) with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) at the baseline and a moderate correlation (r=.58–.74, P&lt;.0001) at discharge. The responsiveness was higher for the PRTEE than for the DASH. Limitations A methodological limitation of the study is that due to the small sample size, a factor analysis was not performed to assess convergent validity. Conclusions The Italian version of the PRTEE questionnaire is internally consistent, demonstrates expected correlations with other measures, and is more responsive than the DASH in Italian patients with chronic LET.

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): measurement invariance between athletes and non-athletes and construct validity

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsiang Chiu ◽  
Frank Jing-Horng Lu ◽  
Ju-Han Lin ◽  
Chiao-Lin Nien ◽  
Ya-Wen Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Perceived Stress Scale ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Stress Scale ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

BackgroundAlthough Perceived Stress Scale (PSS, Cohen, Kamarack & Mermelstein, 1983) has been validated and widely used in many domains, there is still no validation in sports by comparing athletes and non-athletes and examining related psychometric indices.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of PSS between athletes and non-athletes, and examine construct validity and reliability in the sports contexts.MethodsStudy 1 sampled 359 college student-athletes (males = 233; females = 126) and 242 non-athletes (males = 124; females = 118) and examined factorial structure, measurement invariance and internal consistency. Study 2 sampled 196 student-athletes (males = 139, females = 57,Mage = 19.88 yrs, SD = 1.35) and examined discriminant validity and convergent validity of PSS. Study 3 sampled 37 student-athletes to assess test-retest reliability of PSS.ResultsResults found that 2-factor PSS-10 fitted the model the best and had appropriate reliability. Also, there was a measurement invariance between athletes and non-athletes; and PSS positively correlated with athletic burnout and life stress but negatively correlated with coping efficacy provided evidence of discriminant validity and convergent validity. Further, the test-retest reliability for PSS subscales was significant (r = .66 andr = .50).DiscussionIt is suggested that 2-factor PSS-10 can be a useful tool in assessing perceived stress either in sports or non-sports settings. We suggest future study may use 2-factor PSS-10 in examining the effects of stress on the athletic injury, burnout, and psychiatry disorders.

scholarly journals HIV-Dementia Scale as a screening tool for the detection of subcortical cognitive deficits: validation of the Italian version

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Montanucci ◽  
E. Chipi ◽  
N. Salvadori ◽  
R. Rinaldi ◽  
P. Eusebi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Deficits ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Hiv Dementia ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
State Examination

AbstractMini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) lacks of sensitivity in detecting cognitive deficits associated with subcortical damage. The HIV-Dementia Scale (HDS), a screening tool originally created for detecting cognitive impairment due to subcortical damage in HIV + patients, has proved to be useful in other neurological diseases. Until now, an Italian version of the HDS is not available. We aimed at: (1) validating the HDS Italian version (HDS-IT) in a cohort of cognitively healthy subjects (CN); (2) exploring the suitability of HDS-IT in detecting cognitive impairment due to subcortical damage (scCI). The psychometric properties of the HDS-IT were assessed in 180 CN (mean age 67.6 ± 8.3, range 41–84) with regard to item-total correlation, test–retest reliability and convergent validity with MMSE. Item-total correlations ranged 0.44–0.72. Test–retest reliability was 0.70 (p < 0.001). The HDS-IT scores were positively associated with MMSE score (rS = 0.49, p < 0.001). Then, both the HDS-IT and the MMSE were administered to 44 scCI subjects (mean age 64.9 ± 10.6, range 41–84). Mean HDS-IT total score was close to the original version and significantly lower in the scCI group compared to CN (8.6 ± 3.6 vs. 12.6 ± 2.5, p < 0.001). ROC analysis yielded an optimal cutoff value of 11, with sensitivity of 0.70 and specificity of 0.82. Patients showed poorer scores on HDS-IT compared to CN (12.6 ± 2.5 vs. 8.6 ± 3.6, p < 0.001). Our results support the use of HDS-IT as a screening tool suitable for detecting cognitive deficits with prevalent subcortical pattern, being complementary to MMSE in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Psychometric Validation of a Novel PRO MEASURE for Assessing Patient-reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond C. Rosen ◽  
Jeremiah J. Trudeau ◽  
Steven Silverstein ◽  
David C. Henderson ◽  
Adam Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Initial Development ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) can be a distressing feature that contributes to the burden of the disorder, as well as being a strong predictor of functional impairment. To fully assess the burden to patients living with this illness, there is a need to develop a specific measure of patient-reported outcomes . Methods Following initial development of the Patient-Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) instrument, the domain structure, reliability (inter-item consistency and test–retest reliability), and validity (discriminant validity, divergent, and convergent validity) of the tool were assessed in patients (aged 18–55 years) with CIAS participating in a 12-week, Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BI 409306. Healthy control subjects were recruited separately. The PRECIS instrument was completed at baseline, Week 6, Week 9, and Week 12. Results The questionnaire responses of 410 patients with schizophrenia and 88 control subjects were compared. Of the original 35 items included in the draft PRECIS instrument, 11 were eliminated due to poor performance against pre-defined criteria, resulting in a 24-item questionnaire that loaded well onto 5 domains (Attention, Memory, Executive Function, Communication, and Bother). The revised 24-item PRECIS instrument demonstrated adequate discriminant validity between patient and control groups in each of the 5 domains (p<0.0001), convergent validity as shown by a significant correlation between PRECIS scores and the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (p<0.0001), good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha score: 0.942), and adequate test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.78). A simplified, user-friendly scoring method was identified, which assigned scores to each of the 5 domains using a five-category Likert scale. PRECIS did not correlate with MATRICS or CANTAB composite scores. Conclusions PRECIS is a novel self-completed sensitive instrument designed to measure the subjective experience of cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia. The test development process included patient input, perceptions, and feedback, and strong evidence for the validity and reliability of the instrument was demonstrated. The scale provides a patient-based perspective to complement existing objective measures of cognition and serves to define key patient-based endpoints for use in future clinical studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document