scholarly journals Lessons from Recent Advances in Ischemic Stroke Management and Targeting Kv2.1 for Neuroprotection

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 6107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung-Yang Yeh ◽  
Anthony J. Schulien ◽  
Bradley J. Molyneaux ◽  
Elias Aizenman

Achieving neuroprotection in ischemic stroke patients has been a multidecade medical challenge. Numerous clinical trials were discontinued in futility and many were terminated in response to deleterious treatment effects. Recently, however, several positive reports have generated the much-needed excitement surrounding stroke therapy. In this review, we describe the clinical studies that significantly expanded the time window of eligibility for patients to receive mechanical endovascular thrombectomy. We further summarize the results available thus far for nerinetide, a promising neuroprotective agent for stroke treatment. Lastly, we reflect upon aspects of these impactful trials in our own studies targeting the Kv2.1-mediated cell death pathway in neurons for neuroprotection. We argue that recent changes in the clinical landscape should be adapted by preclinical research in order to continue progressing toward the development of efficacious neuroprotective therapies for ischemic stroke.

Author(s):  
Chung-Yang Yeh ◽  
Anthony Schulien ◽  
Bradley Molyneaux ◽  
Elias Aizenman

Achieving neuroprotection in ischemic stroke patients has been a multi-decade medical challenge. Numerous clinical trials were discontinued in futility and many were terminated in response to deleterious treatment effects. Recently however, several positive reports have generated the much-needed excitement surrounding stroke therapy. In this review, we describe the clinical studies that significantly expanded the time window of eligibility for patients to receive mechanical endovascular thrombectomy. We summarize the results available thus far for nerinetide, which can be considered the most promising neuroprotective agent yet for stroke treatment. Lastly, we reflect upon aspects of these successful trials in our own studies targeting the Kv2.1-mediated cell death pathway in neurons for neuroprotection. We propose that recent changes in the clinical landscape must be adapted by preclinical research in order to continue progressing toward the development of efficacious neuroprotective therapies for ischemic stroke.


2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 298-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paramdeep Singh ◽  
Rupinderjeet Kaur ◽  
Amarpreet Kaur

ABSTRACTEarly recanalization of the occluded artery leads to better clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) through protection of the time-sensitive penumbra. Intravenous administration of pharmacologic thrombolytic agents has been a standard treatment for AIS. To get better rates of recanalization, enhance the time window, and diminish the possibility of intracranial hemorrhage, endovascular thrombectomy was launched, with first authorization of the Merci clot retriever, a corkscrew-like apparatus, followed by approval of the Penumbra thromboaspiration system. Both devices lead to a high rate of recanalization. On the other hand, time to recanalization was on an average of 45 minutes, with most of the patients attaining only partial recanalization. More lately, retrievable stents have shown promise in decreasing the time to recanalization, and attaining a superior rate of complete clot resolution. The retrievable stent can be released within the clot to engage it within the struts of the stent, and afterwards it is taken back by pulling it under flow arrest. Neurointerventional techniques have a persistently ever-increasing and stimulating role in the management of AIS, as indicated by the advent of several important techniques. Stent retrievers have the capability to be ascertained as the most important approach to endovascular stroke treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan Wang ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Longjian Huang ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Yuchen Peng ◽  
...  

Background and Objective: Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries all over the world. The only drug for ischemic stroke approved by FDA is recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA). However, only 2-5% stroke patients receive rtPAs treatment due to its strict therapeutic time window. As ischemic stroke is a complex disease involving multiple mechanisms, medications with multi-targets may be more powerful compared with single-target drugs. Dl-3-n-Butylphthalide (NBP) is a synthetic compound based on l-3-n- Butylphthalide that is isolated from seeds of Apium graveolens. The racemic 3-n-butylphthalide (dl- NBP) was approved by Food and Drug Administration of China for the treatment of ischemic stroke in 2002. A number of clinical studies indicated that NBP not only improved the symptoms of ischemic stroke, but also contributed to the long-term recovery. The potential mechanisms of NBP for ischemic stroke treatment may target different pathophysiological processes, including anti-oxidant, antiinflammation, anti-apoptosis, anti-thrombosis, and protection of mitochondria et al. Conclusion: In this review, we have summarized the research progress of NBP for the treatment of ischemic stroke during the past two decades.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (28) ◽  
pp. 3332-3340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong-Ah Kwak ◽  
Ho-Beom Kwon ◽  
Joo Won Lee ◽  
Young-Seok Park

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Conventional treatment has a limitation of very narrow therapeutic time window and its devastating nature necessitate a novel regenerative approach. Transplanted stem cells resulted in functional recovery through multiple mechanisms including neuroprotection, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and anti-inflammatory effects. Despite the promising features shown in experimental studies, results from clinical trials are inconclusive from the perspective of efficacy. The present review presents a synopsis of stem cell research on ischemic stroke treatment according to cell type. Clinical trials to the present are briefly summarized. Finally, the hurdles and issues to be solved are discussed for clinical application.


Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dolora Wisco ◽  
Christopher Newey ◽  
Pravin George ◽  
James Gebel

Introduction: Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) has been approved for treating strokes up to 3 hours after onset of symptoms and may be beneficial up to 4.5 hours in patients who qualify. Additionally, neuro-intervention, i.e., intra-arterial thrombolysis or thrombectomy, is also an approved treatment option. Population studies show that 6% receive IV tPA within 3 hours of stroke onset. However, in-hospital strokes present challenges to treating within an adequate time. We present here our experience with in-hospital strokes, treatments, and identifiable delays in treatments. Methods: Single, tertiary center retrospective study of 55 in-hospital strokes over a one-year period from January 2009 to January 2010, and strokes in the Emergency Department over 6 month period from January 2010 to June 2010. Results: Twenty-nine in-hospital strokes were evaluated within 3 hours of symptoms onset. Two (6.9%) received IV tPA, and four (13.8%) received neuro-intervention (either intra-arterial thrombolysis or thrombectomy). None of the patients who presented greater than 3 hours after symptom onset was treated with any treatment (n=28). When compared to patients who present to the ED within 3 hours, in-hospital strokes were less likely to get IV tPA (6.9% vs. 20.8%), and they were more likely to receive neuro-intervention (13.8% vs. 10.3%). Neuro-intervention was performed on 9.09% of all in-hospital strokes (1 of 5 presented beyond the 3 hour time window). For in-hospital strokes that receive any treatment within 3 hours, the average time to neurology evaluation, to CT, and to treatment are 35 min, 68 min, and 237 min, respectively. For strokes in the Ed, the average time to evaluation, to CT, and to treatment are 90 min, 28 min, and 66 min respectively. The delay for in-hospital strokes is in obtaining the CT and initiating the treatment. Discussion: In-hospital stroke patients wait longer than their ED counterparts to be taken to CT and to receive stroke treatment. They are also less likely to receive IV tPA, and more likely to receive neuro-intervention. The longer time to neuro-imaging and thrombolytic treatment may reflect the fact that patients suffering in-hospital strokes have more complex medical co-morbidities that must be taken account during the evaluation and administration of thrombolytic therapy.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janhavi M Modak ◽  
Syed Daniyal Asad ◽  
Jussie Lima ◽  
Amre Nouh ◽  
Ilene Staff ◽  
...  

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke treatment has undergone a paradigm shift, with patients being treated in the extended time window (6-24 hours post symptom onset). The purpose of this study is to assess outcomes in stroke patients above 80 years of age undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in the extended time window. Methods: Acute ischemic stroke patients presenting to Hartford Hospital between January 2017 to June 2019 were considered for the study. Stroke outcomes in patients above 80 years of age with anterior circulation ischemic strokes presenting in the extended time window (Group A, n=30) were compared to a younger cohort of patients below 80 years (Group B, n=31). Patients over 80 years treated in the traditional time window (within 6 hours of symptom onset) served as a second set of controls (Group C, n=40). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of 0.05 Results: For angiographic results, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of good outcomes (TICI 2b-3) among patients of Group A, when compared to Groups B or C (p>0.05). For the endovascular procedures, no significant differences were noted in the total fluoroscopy time (Median Group A 44.05, Group B 38.1, Group C 35.25 min), total intra-procedure time (Median Group A 144, Group B 143, Group C 126 min) or total radiation exposure (Median Group A 8308, Group B 8960, Group C 8318 uGy-m 2 ). For stroke outcomes, a good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin score of 0-2 at discharge. Significantly better outcomes were noted in the younger patients in Group B - 35.4%, when compared to 13.3% in Group A (p=0.03). Comparative outcomes differed in the elderly patients above 80 years, Group A -13.3% vs Group C - 25%, although not statistically significant (p=0.23). There was a significant difference in mortality in patients of Group A - 40% as compared to 12% in the younger cohort, Group B (p= 0.01). Conclusions: In the extended time window, patients above 80 years of age were noted to have a higher mortality, morbidity compared to the younger cohort of patients. No significant differences were noted in the stroke outcomes in patients above 80 years of age when comparing the traditional and the extended time window for stroke treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1735-1744
Author(s):  
Yanxia Wang ◽  
Xinmeng Li ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Wenjing Guo ◽  
Jiangpo Chen ◽  
...  

This study analyzed the correlation between the Notch3 mutation and stroke by testing an effective nanoparticle-loaded aspirin in stroke therapy. Fifty patients with ischemic stroke were followed for two years, and fifty healthy persons served as the control group. By RT-PCR, this study revealed that the Notch3 mutation existed in ischemic stroke patients who were more likely to have a family history, small vessel lesions, relatively frequent cerebral hemorrhage, and poor long-term prognosis. Liposome-aspirin-chitosan nanoparticle (LACN) was constructed as a nano-composite for stroke treatment. Notch3 Arg170Cys knock-in mice were prepared as a mutant Notch3 mouse model to test the LACN infiltration efficiency and observe the anti-stroke capacity. We found that LACN could better transport aspirin into brain vessels than the Polyethyleneimine (PEI) delivery system. However, in the Notch3 mutation mouse model, cerebral infarction and hemorrhage often occurred after being treated with aspirin. Still, LACN better prolongs the half-life of aspirin, rescues the pathological alteration of stroke in the brain, and reduces inflammatory reaction and oxidative stress response. In conclusion, the Notch3 mutation is closely related to stroke occurrence, and LACN may be a better choice for stroke therapy in the future.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 571-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Wiesmann ◽  
Johannes Kalder ◽  
Arno Reich ◽  
Marc-Alexander Brockmann ◽  
Ahmed Othman ◽  
...  

BackgroundRapid recanalization of occluded vessels is crucial for good clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Endovascular treatment is usually performed via a transfemoral approach, but catheterization of the carotid arteries can be problematic in cases of difficult anatomy or vascular pathologies in some cases.ObjectiveTo describe our experience with a technique involving surgical access to the carotid artery and consecutive transcarotid endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke.MethodsIn a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained registry we identified 6 patients who underwent acute endovascular thrombectomy via a surgical access to the carotid artery.ResultsAdmission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ranged from 7 to 23. Intracranial recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, TICI≥2b) was achieved in all patients (100%). Recanalization was achieved within 19±5 min after establishing carotid access. One patient developed a small neck hematoma, which was surgically removed without complications. No complications related to endovascular therapy were seen. At 3 months’ follow-up, five patients had survived. Three patients (50%) had regained excellent neurological function (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0–1).ConclusionsSurgical carotid access for endovascular stroke treatment is feasible, with considerable advantages, in patients with expected problematic access or for whom transfemoral endovascular carotid access has failed.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 3055-3063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Lopez-Rivera ◽  
Rania Abdelkhaleq ◽  
Jose-Miguel Yamal ◽  
Noopur Singh ◽  
Sean I. Savitz ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Noncontrast head CT and CT perfusion (CTP) are both used to screen for endovascular stroke therapy (EST), but the impact of imaging strategy on likelihood of EST is undetermined. Here, we examine the influence of CTP utilization on likelihood of EST in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Methods: We identified patients with acute ischemic stroke at 4 comprehensive stroke centers. All 4 hospitals had 24/7 CTP and EST capability and were covered by a single physician group (Neurology, NeuroIntervention, NeuroICU). All centers performed noncontrast head CT and CT angiography in the initial evaluation. One center also performed CTP routinely with high CTP utilization (CTP-H), and the others performed CTP optionally with lower utilization (CTP-L). Primary outcome was likelihood of EST. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether facility type (CTP-H versus CTP-L) was associated with EST adjusting for age, prestroke mRS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, LVO location, time window, and intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator). Results: Among 3107 patients with acute ischemic stroke, 715 had LVO, of which 403 (56%) presented to CTP-H and 312 (44%) presented to CTP-L. CTP utilization among LVO patients was greater at CTP-H centers (72% versus 18%, CTP-H versus CTP-L, P <0.01). In univariable analysis, EST rates for patients with LVO were similar between CTP-H versus CTP-L (46% versus 49%). In multivariable analysis, patients with LVO were less likely to undergo EST at CTP-H (odds ratio, 0.59 [0.41–0.85]). This finding was maintained in multiple patient subsets including late time window, anterior circulation LVO, and direct presentation patients. Ninety-day functional independence (odds ratio, 1.04 [0.70–1.54]) was not different, nor were rates of post-EST PH-2 hemorrhage (1% versus 1%). Conclusions: We identified an increased likelihood for undergoing EST in centers with lower CTP utilization, which was not associated with worse clinical outcomes or increased hemorrhage. These findings suggest under-treatment bias with routine CTP.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Chol Choi ◽  
Renee Y Hsia ◽  
Anthony S Kim

Background: The regional availability of hospitals with expertise in applying endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke is critical to ongoing efforts to develop effective interventions for this time-sensitive indication. We sought to assess the geographic proximity of stroke patients in California to centers that perform endovascular stroke therapy. Methods: We identified all hospitalizations for ischemic stroke at all 366 non-federal acute care hospitals in California from 2009 to 2010, including the subset where endovascular stroke therapy was employed, using data from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. ZIP code centroids were used to estimate the geographic distance between a treating hospital and the patient’s residence. Using these distances, we estimated the proportion of stroke patients that lived within 2-hour (65 mile) transport distance to a hospital that performed certain threshold volumes of endovascular stroke cases each year. Results: From 2009-10, endovascular stroke treatment was used in 643 of 104,350 (0.6%) hospital discharges for ischemic stroke in California. A majority (60%) of these procedures were performed at hospitals that performed at least 12 procedures per year, and 83% of these procedures were performed at hospitals that performed at least 6 procedures per year. Of the 366 hospitals, 54 (15%) performed at least one endovascular stroke procedure per year. The median number of procedures per hospital per year was 3.5 (IQR 1-9). In-hospital mortality for endovascular stroke therapy was 21%, and a higher procedural volume at the hospital level was not associated with lower mortality. Most (86%) stroke patients lived within 65 miles of a center that performed at least 6 procedures per year (median with IQR, 9.5[7-17]), and 97% were within 65 miles of a center that performed at least 1 procedure per year. Conclusion: In 2009-10, less than 1% of ischemic stroke hospitalizations in California involved the use of endovascular stroke therapy. Most patients lived within a 2-hour transport distance from a center that performed at least one endovascular procedure per year.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document