scholarly journals Outcomes of COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients Previously Treated with Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena-Mihaela Cordeanu ◽  
Lucas Jambert ◽  
Francois Severac ◽  
Hélène Lambach ◽  
Jonathan Tousch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Severe Pneumonia ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Harmful Effects ◽  
Observation Period

(1) Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) penetrates respiratory epithelium through angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 binding, raising concerns about the potentially harmful effects of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) on Human Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) evolution. This study aimed to provide insight into the impact of RASi on SARS-CoV-2 outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of hospitalized adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to a university hospital in France. The observation period ended at hospital discharge. (3) Results: During the study period, 943 COVID-19 patients were admitted to our institution, of whom 772 were included in this analysis. Among them, 431 (55.8%) had previously known hypertension. The median age was 68 (56–79) years. Overall, 220 (28.5%) patients were placed under mechanical ventilation and 173 (22.4%) died. According to previous exposure to RASi, we defined two groups, namely, “RASi” (n = 282) and “RASi-free” (n = 490). Severe pneumonia (defined as leading to death and/or requiring intubation, high-flow nasal oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, and/or oxygen flow at a rate of ≥5 L/min) and death occurred more frequently in RASi-treated patients (64% versus 53% and 29% versus 19%, respectively). However, in a propensity score-matched cohort derived from the overall population, neither death (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–1.50), p = 0.76) nor severe pneumonia (HR 1.03 (95%CI 0.73–1.44), p = 0.85) were associated with RASi therapy. (4) Conclusion: Our study showed no correlation between previous RASi treatment and death or severe COVID-19 pneumonia after adjustment for confounders.

scholarly journals Modeling the Molecular Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on the Renin-Angiotensin System

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1367
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Pucci ◽  
Philippe Bogaerts ◽  
Marianne Rooman
Keyword(s):  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 ◽  
Pathogenic Mechanisms ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Ras Blockers ◽  
The Impact

SARS-CoV-2 infection is mediated by the binding of its spike protein to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which plays a pivotal role in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). The study of RAS dysregulation due to SARS-CoV-2 infection is fundamentally important for a better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms and risk factors associated with COVID-19 coronavirus disease and to design effective therapeutic strategies. In this context, we developed a mathematical model of RAS based on data regarding protein and peptide concentrations; the model was tested on clinical data from healthy normotensive and hypertensive individuals. We used our model to analyze the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on RAS, which we modeled through a downregulation of ACE2 as a function of viral load. We also used it to predict the effect of RAS-targeting drugs, such as RAS-blockers, human recombinant ACE2, and angiotensin 1–7 peptide, on COVID-19 patients; the model predicted an improvement of the clinical outcome for some drugs and a worsening for others. Our model and its predictions constitute a valuable framework for in silico testing of hypotheses about the COVID-19 pathogenic mechanisms and the effect of drugs aiming to restore RAS functionality.

scholarly journals Pathological Role of Angiotensin II in Severe COVID-19

TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. e138-e144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Miesbach
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

AbstractThe activated renin–angiotensin system induces a prothrombotic state resulting from the imbalance between coagulation and fibrinolysis. Angiotensin II is the central effector molecule of the activated renin–angiotensin system and is degraded by the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 to angiotensin (1–7). The novel coronavirus infection (classified as COVID-19) is caused by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and is characterized by an exaggerated inflammatory response that can lead to severe manifestations such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, and death in a proportion of patients, mostly elderly patients with preexisting comorbidities. SARS-CoV-2 uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor to enter the target cells, resulting in activation of the renin–angiotensin system. After downregulating the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II is increasingly produced and its counterregulating molecules angiotensin (1–7) reduced. Angiotensin II increases thrombin formation and impairs fibrinolysis. Elevated levels were strongly associated with viral load and lung injury in patients with severe COVID-19. Therefore, the complex clinical picture of patients with severe complications of COVID-19 is triggered by the various effects of highly expressed angiotensin II on vasculopathy, coagulopathy, and inflammation. Future treatment options should focus on blocking the thrombogenic and inflammatory properties of angiotensin II in COVID-19 patients.

Gene variants of the renin–angiotensin system and hypertension: from a trough of disillusionment to a welcome phase of enlightenment?

2010 ◽  
Vol 118 (8) ◽  
pp. 487-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin R. Norton ◽  
Richard Brooksbank ◽  
Angela J. Woodiwiss
Keyword(s):  
Association Studies ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Human Populations ◽  
Incomplete Penetrance ◽  
Gene Variants ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Ras Genes ◽  
The Impact

There is substantial evidence to suggest that BP (blood pressure) is an inherited trait. The introduction of gene technologies in the late 1980s generated a sharp phase of over-inflated prospects for polygenic traits such as hypertension. Not unexpectedly, the identification of the responsible loci in human populations has nevertheless proved to be a considerable challenge. Common variants of the RAS (renin–angiotensin system) genes, including of ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) and AGT (angiotensinogen) were some of the first shown to be associated with BP. Presently, ACE and AGT are the only gene variants with functional relevance, where linkage studies showing relationships with hypertension have been reproduced in some studies and where large population-based and prospective studies have demonstrated these genes to be predictors of hypertension or BP. Nevertheless, a lack of reproducibility in other linkage and association studies has generated scepticism that only a concerted effort to attempt to explain will rectify. Without these explanations, it is unlikely that this knowledge will translate into the clinical arena. In the present review, we show that many of the previous concerns in the field have been addressed, but we also argue that a considerable amount of careful thought is still required to achieve enlightenment with respect to the role of RAS genes in hypertension. We discuss whether the previously identified problems of poor study design have been completely addressed with regards to the impact of ACE and AGT genes on BP. In the context of RAS genes, we also question whether the significance of ‘incomplete penetrance’ through associated environmental, phenotypic or physiological effects has been duly accounted for; whether appropriate consideration has been given to epistatic interactions between genes; and whether future RAS gene studies should consider variation across the gene by evaluating ‘haplotypes’.

scholarly journals Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 Receptor and Regulator of the Renin-Angiotensin System

2020 ◽  
Vol 126 (10) ◽  
pp. 1456-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Gheblawi ◽  
Kaiming Wang ◽  
Anissa Viveiros ◽  
Quynh Nguyen ◽  
Jiu-Chang Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 ◽  
Renin Angiotensin

P1661The myocardial tissue Renin-Angiotensin-System (RAS) of the failing heart

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Pavo ◽  
H Arfsten ◽  
R Wurm ◽  
S Prausmueller ◽  
G Spinka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Myocardial Tissue ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Failing Heart ◽  
End Stage ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Nep Inhibition

Abstract Background Prognosis of patients with HFrEF remains poor despite recent advances in pharmacologic therapy as the introduction of the angiotensin-receptor neprilysin-inhibitor (ARNI). The Renin-Angiotensin-System (RAS) is dysregulated in HF with elevated AngII levels as a central driver of disease progression. The myocardium is capable of synthesizing all RAS components resulting in tissue specific angiotensin levels. Neprilysin (NEP) catalyzes the generation of Ang1–7 which counteracts the deleterious effects of AngII. Myocardial tissue angiotensins of the failing heart and the role of long-lasting RAS-inhibitor therapy and particularly NEP inhibition on tissue RAS have not been investigated yet. Methods Concentrations of AngI, AngII, Ang1–7, AngIII, Ang1–5 and AngIV (RAS-fingerprints) were investigated in myocardial samples of end-stage HFrEF patients undergoing heart transplantation with a mass-spectrometry based method. Patients were stratified according to background therapy with RAS-inhibitors and variables were compared by a non-parametrical test. Results A total of 30 patients were included (n=6 without RAS-blockade, n=16 with ACE-I, n=6 with ARB and n=2 with ARNI). Median age was 55 (IQR 45–63) years and 87% of patients were male. 40% of patients had an ischemic etiology of HF, median NT-proBNP levels were 3498pg/ml (IQR 1761–8400). Tissue RAS patterns were visually similar between all groups (Figure 1). Myocardial AngI, Ang1–7, Ang1–5 and AngIV levels were below the detection limit for all samples. Median tissue AngII and AngIII concentrations across all samples were 83.1pg/ml (IQR 29.3–196.6) and 26.4pg/ml (IQR 5.0–64.5). Despite different background RAS-inhibitor therapy, AngII and AngIII levels were comparable between all groups [median (IQR) in pg/ml – AngII: 51.5 (41.5–123.8) vs. 72.4 (28.5–177.6) vs. 176.1 (22.4–286.8) vs. 266.0 (108.2–423.8); p=ns and 26.4 (5.0–89.2) vs. 23.2 (5.0–59.3) vs. 39.4 (5.0–94.3) vs. 105.9 (46.5–165.3); p=ns for no therapy, ACE-I, ARB and ARNI respectively]. Figure 1. RAS-fingerprints of the failing heart according to RAS-inhibiton. Numbers in brackets indicate the specific angiotensin peptides. Side of spheres and numbers beside represent absolute concentrations of angiotensins (pg/ml, median value). Conclusions Although in the plasma of HFrEF patients only AngI and AngII are detectable at substantial concentrations, the predominant angiotensins of the failing heart are AngII and AngIII. AngII levels are high in the failing heart supporting the hypothesis that excess AngII is involved in disease progression. AngIII similarly increases cardiac sympathetic activity assumedly potentiating further deteoriation. The modality of long established RAS-inhibitor therapy in end-stage HF, particularly the inhibition of NEP, seems to have no (more) influence on myocardial tissue RAS regulation. The impact of NEP inhibition by ARNI on tissue RAS enzymes and mechanism of action need to be further investigated.

scholarly journals Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the renin-angiotensin system: A closer look at angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 339-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalise E Zemlin ◽  
Owen J Wiese
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
World Health ◽  
Atypical Pneumonia ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Wholesale Market ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 ◽  
Renin Angiotensin

Since the first cases of atypical pneumonia linked to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China, were described in late December 2019, the global landscape has changed radically. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, and at the time of writing this review, just over three million individuals have been infected with more than 200,000 deaths globally. Numerous countries are in ‘lockdown’, social distancing is the new norm, even the most advanced healthcare systems are under pressure, and a global economic recession seems inevitable. A novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the aetiological agent. From experience with previous coronavirus epidemics, namely the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in 2004 and 2012 respectively, it was postulated that the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor is a possible port of cell entry. ACE2 is part of the renin-angiotensin system and is also associated with lung and cardiovascular disorders and inflammation. Recent studies have confirmed that ACE2 is the port of entry for SARS-CoV-2. Male sex, advanced age and a number of associated comorbidities have been identified as risk factors for infection with COVID-19. Many high-risk COVID-19 patients with comorbidities are on ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, and this has sparked debate about whether to continue these treatment regimes. Attention has also shifted to ACE2 being a target for future therapies or vaccines against COVID-19. In this review, we discuss COVID-19 and its complex relationship with ACE2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document