scholarly journals Different Impact of Definitions of Sarcopenia in Defining Frailty Status in a Population of Older Women with Early Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Andrea Bellieni ◽  
Domenico Fusco ◽  
Alejandro Martin Sanchez ◽  
Gianluca Franceschini ◽  
Beatrice Di Capua ◽  
...  

Sarcopenia is a geriatric syndrome characterized by losses of quantity and quality of skeletal muscle, which is associated with negative outcomes in older adults and in cancer patients. Different definitions of sarcopenia have been used, with quantitative data more frequently used in oncology, while functional measures have been advocated in the geriatric literature. Little is known about the correlation between frailty status as assessed by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and sarcopenia in cancer patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from 96 older women with early breast cancer who underwent CGAs and Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scans for muscle mass assessment before cancer treatment at a single cancer center from 2016 to 2019 to explore the correlation between frailty status as assessed by CGA and sarcopenia using different definitions. Based on the results of the CGA, 35 patients (36.5%) were defined as frail. Using DXA Appendicular Skeletal Mass (ASM) or the Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI=ASM/height^2), 41 patients were found to be sarcopenic (42.7%), with no significant difference in prevalence between frail and nonfrail subjects. Using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) definition of sarcopenia (where both muscle function and mass are required), 58 patients were classified as “probably” sarcopenic; among these, 25 were sarcopenic and 17 “severely” sarcopenic. Only 13 patients satisfied both the requirements for being defined as sarcopenic and frail. Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities (according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) were more common in sarcopenic and frail sarcopenic patients. Our data support the use of a definition of sarcopenia that includes both quantitative and functional data in order to identify frail patients who need tailored treatment.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 535-535
Author(s):  
Gregory Sampang Calip ◽  
Colin Hubbard ◽  
Nadia Azmi Nabulsi ◽  
Alemseged Ayele Asfaw ◽  
Inyoung Lee ◽  
...  

535 Background: Frail health status impacts clinical decision making for older cancer patients and their families, and frailty is independently associated with increased risks of mortality. Our objective was to describe differences in treatment and rates of recurrence by frailty status among older women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer. Methods: We performed a large, population-based retrospective cohort study of women aged 65 years and older diagnosed with first primary stage I-III HR+/HER2-breast cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database between 2007 and 2015. Using administrative health claims, we ascertained information on breast cancer treatment and utilized validated claims-based algorithms to determine frailty status (robust, pre-frail, and frail) and identify subsequent invasive breast cancer recurrences. Relative hazards of recurrence were determined using Fine and Gray competing risks regression models with estimated subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) and robust 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: From an overall cohort of 46,027 women, most women (56%) were classified as robust at breast cancer diagnosis, whereas 37% and 7% were identified as pre-frail and frail, respectively. Compared to robust patients, frail patients were more likely to have stage III disease (10% vs. 7%) and receive mastectomy (27% vs. 18%), and less likely to receive radiation (35% vs. 57%) or chemotherapy (5% vs. 9%). Five-year cumulative incidences of recurrence were 15%, 18% and 22% among robust, pre-frail, and frail women, respectively. In multivariable competing risks models adjusted for age, race, stage, and treatment, frail (SHR 1.28, 95%CI 1.17-1.41) and pre-frail (SHR 1.15, 95%CI 1.09-1.21) women had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer recurrence. Conclusions: Independent of differences in treatment, frailty was associated with increased breast cancer recurrence risk in this population-based cohort of older women. However, the vast majority of older women living with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer were not identified as frail. These study results suggest that age alone is not an adequate indicator of physical resilience and underscores the need to consider additional factors when assessing the benefits and risks of treatments for the prevention of recurrence among HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2268-2275 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Margaret Kemeny ◽  
Bercedis L. Peterson ◽  
Alice B. Kornblith ◽  
Hyman B. Muss ◽  
Judith Wheeler ◽  
...  

Purpose: Although 48% of breast cancer patients are 65 years old or older, these older patients are severely underrepresented in breast cancer clinical trials. This study tested whether older patients were offered trials significantly less often than younger patients and whether older patients who were offered trials were more likely to refuse participation than younger patients. Patients and Methods: In 10 Cancer and Leukemia Group B institutions, using a retrospective case-control design, breast cancer patients eligible for an open treatment trial were paired: less than 65 years old and ≥ 65 years old. Each of the 77 pairs were matched by disease stage and treating physician. Patients were interviewed as to their reasons for participating or refusing to participate in a trial. The treating physicians were also given questionnaires about their reasons for offering or not offering a trial. Results: Sixty-eight percent of younger stage II patients were offered a trial compared with 34% of the older patients (P = .0004). In multivariate analyses, disease stage and age remained highly significant in predicting trial offering (P = .0008), when controlling for physical functioning and comorbidity. Of those offered a trial, there was no significant difference in participation between younger (56%) and older (50%) patients (P = .67). Conclusion: In a multivariate analysis including comorbid conditions, age and stage were the only predictors of whether a patient was offered a trial. The greatest impediment to enrolling older women onto trials in the setting of this study was the physicians’ perceptions about age and tolerance of toxicity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14182-e14182
Author(s):  
Takahiro Takahiro ◽  
Tadahiko Shien ◽  
Naruto Taira ◽  
Mariko Kochi ◽  
Takayuki Iwamoto ◽  
...  

e14182 Background: Metformin is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs for type 2 diabetes, and some reports have suggested that metformin may reduce cancer risk. Diabetics treated with metformin have a 23% reduction in the risk of cancer, including breast cancer. In addition, it is reported that the breast cancer patients with metformin treatment for diabetes showed favorable prognosis compared with those without metformin treatment. However, the mechanism underlying the positive effects of metformin on cancer treatment remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the effect of preoperative metformin on early breast cancer patients. The patients took a daily dose of metformin orally for 7 to 21 days before surgery. We evaluated the effects on immunological factors (TILs, CD4+, CD8+, PD-L1 and ALDH1) by comparing core needle biopsies (CNB) obtained before surgery with surgical specimens. Results: Seventeen breast cancer patients were enrolled in this prospective study and administered metformin before surgery, during the period from January to December 2016. We analyzed 59 patients who received surgery during the same period as a control group. In the control group, there was no significant difference in TILs between CNB and surgical specimens (Rs = 0.63). In the metformin group, TILs were negative in CNB and surgical specimens of 15 (88%) and 8 (48%) cases, low in 2 (12%) and 8 (48%), and intermediate in 0 and 1 (6%), respectively. These TILs increases were confirmed in 5 (29%) patients (p = 0.09), while a decrease was confirmed in 2 (12%). The expressions of CD4+ and CD8+ by TILs were increased in 41% and 18% of surgical specimens, respectively. (p = 0.02, p = 0.09) However, there was no statistically significant difference in these immunological factors and PD-L1 or ALDH1 expression between before and after metformin. Conclusions: In our small cohort, preoperative metformin administration shows positive impact on CD4 positive lymphocytes significantly and has tendency of increasing both TILs and CD8 positive lymphocytes. However, we should keep in mind that our sample size is small. Further study is necessary to uncover the mechanisms of favorable effects of metformin on breast cancer patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 233372141771363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Stoever ◽  
Anke Heber ◽  
Sabine Eichberg ◽  
Klara Brixius

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the variables which show the highest association with muscle mass and to identify the most important predictors for muscle mass in elderly men with and without sarcopenia. Methods: A total of 71 men participated, aged ≥65 years. Sarcopenia was assessed using the definition of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People with determining skeletal muscle index (SMI), hand-grip strength (HGS), and Short Physical Performance Battery. In addition, maximum strength at upper and lower extremities and physical activity were measured. Results: Strong correlations existed between SMI and gait speed, HGS, maximum isometric strength at leg and chest press. Physical activity showed low correlations with muscle strength. Regression analysis revealed HGS and gait speed as key predictors for SMI. Discussion: The recommendation is measuring gait speed and HGS in clinical practice at first followed by measuring muscle mass for determining sarcopenia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (9) ◽  
pp. 903-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Gui ◽  
Xunzhou Liu ◽  
Xianchun Chen ◽  
Xi Yang ◽  
Shichao Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In early breast cancer treatment, the preferred surgical regimen remains a topic of controversy, and conventional pairwise meta-analysis cannot provide a hierarchy based on clinical trial evidence. Therefore, a network meta-analysis was performed both for direct and indirect comparisons and to assess the survival outcomes of surgical regimens. Methods Randomized clinical trials comparing different surgical regimens for the treatment of early breast cancer were identified. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free-survival (DFS) were analyzed using random-effects network meta-analysis on the hazard ratio (HR) scale and calculated as combined HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results The network meta-analysis compared 11 different surgical regimens that consisted of 13 and 17 direct comparisons between strategies for OS (34 trials; n = 23 587 patients) and DFS (32 trials; n = 22 552 patients), respectively. The values of surface under the cumulative ranking for OS and DFS after mastectomy (M)+radiotherapy (RT) were observed to be the largest. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS)+axillary node sampling+RT almost achieved the threshold for inferiority compared with the other surgical treatment arms and was statistically significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.94; HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.92; HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.96). No statistically significant difference between BCS+sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)+RT vs BCS+SLNB+intraoperative RT was observed in carrying out network meta-analysis (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.36). Conclusions M+RT is safer than other surgical regimens for the treatment of early breast cancer patients because of the favorable balance between the survival outcomes. Early breast cancer patients who receive BCS should be given SLNB and not axillary node sampling. Intraoperative RT is no better than postoperative RT in patients who receive SLNB.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1806
Author(s):  
Byung Min Lee ◽  
Yeona Cho ◽  
Jun Won Kim ◽  
Sung Gwe Ahn ◽  
Jee Hung Kim ◽  
...  

There are no means to predict patient response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); the impact of skeletal muscle loss on the response to NAC remains undefined. We investigated the association between response to chemotherapy and skeletal muscle loss in breast cancer patients. Patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer who were treated with NAC, surgery, and radiotherapy were analyzed. We quantified skeletal muscle loss using pre-NAC and post-NAC computed tomography scans. The response to treatment was determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We included 246 patients in this study (median follow-up, 28.85 months). The median age was 48 years old (interquartile range 42–54) and 115 patients were less than 48 years old (46.7%). Patients showing a complete or partial response were categorized into the responder group (208 patients); the rest were categorized into the non-responder group (38 patients). The skeletal muscle mass cut-off value was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve; it showed areas under the curve of 0.732 and 0.885 for the pre-NAC and post-NAC skeletal muscle index (p < 0.001 for both), respectively. Skeletal muscle loss and cancer stage were significantly associated with poor response to NAC in locally advanced breast cancer patients. Accurately measuring muscle loss to guide treatment and delaying muscle loss through various interventions would help enhance the response to NAC and improve clinical outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document