scholarly journals Clinicopathological Significance and Prognostic Implications of REG4 Immunohistochemical Expression in Colorectal Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 938
Author(s):  
Guhyun Kang ◽  
Ilhwan Oh ◽  
Jungsoo Pyo ◽  
Dongwook Kang ◽  
Byoungkwan Son
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analysis ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Immunohistochemical Expression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mucinous Component ◽  
Clinicopathological Significance ◽  
Prognostic Implications

Background and objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological significance and prognostic implications of REG4 immunohistochemical expression in colorectal cancer (CRC). Materials and Methods: We performed immunohistochemical analysis for REG4 cytoplasmic expression in 266 human CRC tissues. Correlations between REG4 expression, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival were investigated in CRC. Results: REG4 was expressed in 84 of 266 CRC tissues (31.6%). REG4 expression was significantly more frequent in the right colon than that in the left colon and rectum (p = 0.002). However, we observed no significant correlation between REG4 expression and other clinicopathological parameters. REG4 expression was significantly higher in CRCs with low stroma than in those with high stroma (p = 0.006). In addition, REG4 was more frequently expressed in CRCs with the mucinous component than in those without it (p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between REG4 expression and overall recurrence-free survival (p = 0.132 and p = 0.480, respectively). Patients with REG4 expression showed worse overall and recurrence-free survival in the high-stroma subgroup (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively), but no such correlation was seen in the low stroma subgroup (p = 0.232 and p = 0.575, respectively). Conclusions: REG4 expression was significantly correlated with tumor location, amount of stroma, and mucinous component in CRCs. In patients with high stroma, REG4 expression was significantly correlated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival.

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of YKL-40 Immunohistochemical Expression in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 3139-3149
Author(s):  
Il Hwan Oh ◽  
Jung-Soo Pyo ◽  
Byoung Kwan Son
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Immunohistochemical Expression ◽  
Human Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Stratification

This study aims to examine the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of the YKL-40 immunohistochemical expression of tumor and immune cells through human colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue. We performed immunohistochemistry for YKL-40 and investigated the clinicopathological and prognostic impact of the YKL-40 expression of tumor (T-YKL-40) and immune cells (I-YKL-40) in CRC. We also evaluated the correlation between YKL-40 and PD-L1 expression and the immunoscore. YKL-40 was expressed in 22.6% and 64.2% of T-YKL-40 and I-YKL-40, respectively, out of the 265 CRC tissues. The I-YKL-40 expression significantly correlated with well and moderately differentiated tumors. The PD-L1 expression in immune cells significantly correlated with the I-YKL-40 expression, but not T-YKL-40 expression (p = 0.020 and p = 0.846, respectively). The I-YKL-40 expression significantly correlated with a worse overall survival rate but not recurrence-free survival (p = 0.047 and p = 0.080, respectively). However, there was no significant correlation between the T-YKL-40 expression and survival. In CRCs with a high immunoscore, patients with I-YKL-40 expression demonstrated worse overall and recurrence-free survival than those without I-YKL-40 expression. Our results demonstrated that I-YKL-40 expression significantly correlated with tumor differentiation and PD-L1 expression in immune cells. I-YKL-40 expression can be useful for the prognostic stratification of CRC patients.

scholarly journals Primary tumor location affects recurrence-free survival for patients with colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy: A propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanping Zhang ◽  
Yongjin Wang ◽  
Yichuan Yuan ◽  
Jiliang Qiu ◽  
Yuxiong Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background: Whether primary tumor location of colorectal cancer (CRC) affects survival of patients after resection of liver metastases remains controversial. This study was conducted to investigate the differences in clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between right-sided CRC and left-sided CRC patients with liver metastases after hepatectomy. Methods: From 2002 to 2018, 611 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent hepatectomy at our center were reviewed. Primary tumors located from cecum to transverse colon were defined as right-sided group (n = 141); tumors located from splenic flexure to rectum were defined as left-sided group (n = 470). Patients were compared between two groups before and after a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results: Before PSM, median survival time and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in right-sided group were 77 months and 56.3%, and those in left-sided group were 64 months and 51.1%, respectively. After PSM, median survival time and 5-year OS rate in right-sided group were 77 months and 55.9%, and those in left-sided group were 58.8 months and 47.3%, respectively. The OS rates did not differ between two groups before and after PSM (P = 0.575; P = 0.453). However, significant different recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was found before and after PSM between right-sided and left-sided group (P = 0.028, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Compared to patients with left-sided primary tumors, patients with right-sided primary tumors had a worse RFS but similar OS. Careful preoperative evaluation, intensive preoperative chemotherapy and frequent follow-up to detect early recurrence might be justified for CRLM patients with right-sided primary tumors.

scholarly journals MRN (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) Complex in Human Cancer and Prognostic Implications in Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiling Situ ◽  
Liping Chung ◽  
Cheok Lee ◽  
Vincent Ho
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Treatment Target ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mrn Complex ◽  
Prognostic Implications ◽  
Relationship Of

The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex has been studied in multiple cancers. The identification of MRN complex mutations in mismatch repair (MMR)-defective cancers has sparked interest in its role in colorectal cancer (CRC). To date, there is evidence indicating a relationship of MRN expression with reduced progression-free survival, although the significance of the MRN complex in the clinical setting remains controversial. In this review, we present an overview of the function of the MRN complex, its role in cancer progression, and current evidence in colorectal cancer. The evidence indicates that the MRN complex has potential utilisation as a biomarker and as a putative treatment target to improve outcomes of colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Primary Tumor Location Is a Prognostic Factor for Intrahepatic Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Portal Vein Embolization as Preparation for Major Hepatic Surgery

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1638
Author(s):  
Lea Hitpass ◽  
Daniel Heise ◽  
Maximilian Schulze-Hagen ◽  
Federico Pedersoli ◽  
Florian Ulmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Portal Vein Embolization ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Right Hemihepatectomy

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors affecting intrahepatic progression-free survival (ihPFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) undergoing portal vein embolization (PVE) and subsequent (extended) right hemihepatectomy. A total of 59 patients (mean age: 60.8 ± 9.3 years) with CRCLM who underwent PVE in preparation for right hemihepatectomy were included. IhPFS and OS after PVE were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between the following factors and survival: patient age, laterality of the colorectal cancer (right- versus left-sided), tumor location (colon versus rectal cancer), time of occurrence of hepatic metastases (synchronous versus metachronous), baseline number and size of hepatic metastases, presence or absence of metastases in the future liver remnant (FLR) before PVE, preoperative carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) levels, time between PVE and surgery, history of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and the presence or absence of extrahepatic disease before PVE. Median follow up was 18 months. The median ihPFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval: 6.2–10.2 months), and median OS was 34.1 months (95% confidence interval: 27.3–40.9 months). Laterality of the primary colorectal cancer was the only statistically significant predictor of ihPFS after PVE (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.242; 95% confidence interval: 1.125, 4.465; p = 0.022), with patients with right-sided colorectal cancer having significantly shorter median ihPFS than patients with left-sided cancer (4.0 ± 1.9 months versus 10.2 ± 1.5 months; log rank test: p = 0.018). Other factors, in particular also the presence or absence of additional metastases in the FLR, were not associated with intrahepatic progression-free survival. The presence of extrahepatic disease was associated with worse OS (HR = 3.050, 95% confidence interval: 1.247, 7.459; p = 0.015).

Prognostic impact of K-RAS mutational status and primary tumor location in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases: an update

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (27) ◽  
pp. 3149-3157
Author(s):  
Juan M O´Connor ◽  
Fernando Sanchez Loria ◽  
Victoria Ardiles ◽  
Jorge Grondona ◽  
Pablo Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
Kras Mutation Status

Aim: To determine the impact of KRAS mutation status on survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Patients & methods: Patients with resected CLM and KRAS mutations. Survival was compared between mt-KRAS and wt-KRAS. Results: Of 662 patients, 174 (26.3%) were mt-KRAS and 488 (73.7%) wt-KRAS. mt-KRAS patients had significantly lower recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.10–1.84). There were no differences between the groups for sidedness. Poorer survival was associated with mt-KRAS with positive lymph nodes, >1 metastases, tumors >5 cm, synchronous tumors and R1–R2. Conclusion: KRAS mutation status can help predict recurrence-free survival. Primary tumor location was not a prognostic factor after resection. KRAS mutation status can help design a multidisciplinary approach after curative resection of CLM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document