scholarly journals Model-Based Design of Experiments for High-Dimensional Inputs Supported by Machine-Learning Methods

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Philipp Seufert ◽  
Jan Schwientek ◽  
Michael Bortz

Algorithms that compute locally optimal continuous designs often rely on a finite design space or on the repeated solution of difficult non-linear programs. Both approaches require extensive evaluations of the Jacobian Df of the underlying model. These evaluations are a heavy computational burden. Based on the Kiefer-Wolfowitz Equivalence Theorem, we present a novel design of experiments algorithm that computes optimal designs in a continuous design space. For this iterative algorithm, we combine an adaptive Bayes-like sampling scheme with Gaussian process regression to approximate the directional derivative of the design criterion. The approximation allows us to adaptively select new design points on which to evaluate the model. The adaptive selection of the algorithm requires significantly less evaluations of Df and reduces the runtime of the computations. We show the viability of the new algorithm on two examples from chemical engineering.

Author(s):  
Anchit Dutta ◽  
Adhip Gupta ◽  
Sharath Sathish ◽  
Aman Bandooni ◽  
Pramod Kumar

Abstract The paper presents modeling and Design of Experiments (DOE) analysis for a simple recuperated s-CO2 closed loop Brayton cycle operating at a maximum temperature of 600°C and a compressor inlet temperature of 45°C. The analysis highlights the impact of isentropic efficiencies of the turbine and compressor, decoupled in this case, on other equipment such as recuperator, gas cooler and heater, all of which have a bearing on the overall performance of the s-CO2 Brayton cycle. A MATLAB program coupled with REFPROP is used to perform the thermodynamic analysis of the cycle. A design space exploration with a Design of Experiments (DOE) study is undertaken using I-sight™ (multi-objective optimization software), which is coupled with the MATLAB code. The outcome of the DOE study provides the optimal pressure ratios and high side pressures for maximum cycle efficiency in the design space. By varying pressure ratios along with a floating high side pressure, the analysis reveals that the cycle performance exhibits a peak around a pressure ratio of 2.5, with cycle efficiency being the objective function. A further interesting outcome of the DOE study reveals that the isentropic efficiencies of the compressor and turbine have a strong influence not only on the overall cycle efficiency, but also the optimum pressure ratio as well as the threshold pressures (low as well as high side pressure). An important outcome of this exercise shows that the isentropic efficiency of the turbine has a much greater impact on the overall cycle performance as compared to that of the compressor.


1982 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 282-286
Author(s):  
T.K. Mitra ◽  
B.R. Das ◽  
S.C. Bera ◽  
P.C. Dhara

2020 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 104002
Author(s):  
Diane Manzon ◽  
Magalie Claeys-Bruno ◽  
Sophie Declomesnil ◽  
Christophe Carité ◽  
Michelle Sergent

2014 ◽  
Vol 575 ◽  
pp. 311-314
Author(s):  
Divyanshu Sharma ◽  
Prahlad Kumar ◽  
Prashant P. Date ◽  
Prakash R. Apte

Acceptable variations in the length of the valve stem, in a conventionally manufactured valve, give room to the possibility of the stem to buckle and get jammed in the guide. Salvaging such a situation is expensive and time consuming. The present paper addresses this problem by increasing the compliance of the valve stem by introducing holes in it. The desired elastic deformation along the length, however, causes transverse deformation, which needs to be minimized. The use of multiple holes helps achieve this. Taguchi Method based Design of Experiments using L25 orthogonal array has been used for performing the parametric design to arrive at the best settings of the 5 parameters. The optimal settings eliminate the buckling and thus make the operation of the valve stem robust against manufacturing variabilities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuekun Du ◽  
Chang Jiang You ◽  
Jingye Cai ◽  
Mohamed Helaoui ◽  
Fadhel M. Ghannouchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document