scholarly journals Intercomparison of Global Sea Surface Salinity from Multiple Datasets over 2011–2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 811
Author(s):  
Hao Liu ◽  
Zexun Wei
Keyword(s):  
Time Scales ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Dominant Mode ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Ocean Data Assimilation ◽  
Multiple Datasets ◽  
Different Time Scales

The variability in sea surface salinity (SSS) on different time scales plays an important role in associated oceanic or climate processes. In this study, we compare the SSS on sub-annual, annual, and interannual time scales among ten datasets, including in situ-based and satellite-based SSS products over 2011–2018. Furthermore, the dominant mode on different time scales is compared using the empirical orthogonal function (EOF). Our results show that the largest spread of ten products occurs on the sub-annual time scale. High correlation coefficients (0.6~0.95) are found in the global mean annual and interannual SSSs between individual products and the ensemble mean. Furthermore, this study shows good agreement among the ten datasets in representing the dominant mode of SSS on the annual and interannual time scales. This analysis provides information on the consistency and discrepancy of datasets to guide future use, such as improvements to ocean data assimilation and the quality of satellite-based data.

scholarly journals Small-Scale Variability in Sea Surface Salinity and Implications for Satellite-Derived Measurements

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 2689-2694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadya T. Vinogradova ◽  
Rui M. Ponte
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Error ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Ocean Data Assimilation ◽  
Ocean Salinity ◽  
Mean Square Difference

Abstract Calibration and validation efforts of the Aquarius and Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite missions involve comparisons of satellite and in situ measurements of sea surface salinity (SSS). Such estimates of SSS can differ by the presence of small-scale variability, which can affect the in situ point measurement, but be averaged out in the satellite retrievals because of their large footprint. This study quantifies how much of a difference is expected between in situ and satellite SSS measurements on the basis of their different sampling of spatial variability. Maps of sampling error resulting from small-scale noise, defined here as the root-mean-square difference between “local” and footprint-averaged SSS estimates, are derived using a solution from a global high-resolution ocean data assimilation system. The errors are mostly <0.1 psu (global median is 0.05 psu), but they can be >0.2 psu in several regions, particularly near strong currents and outflows of major rivers. To examine small-scale noise in the context of other errors, its values are compared with the overall expected differences between monthly Aquarius SSS and Argo-based estimates. Results indicate that in several ocean regions, small-scale variability can be an important source of sampling error for the in situ measurements.

scholarly journals Validation of Aquarius sea surface salinity with in situ measurements from Argo floats and moored buoys

2014 ◽  
Vol 119 (9) ◽  
pp. 6171-6189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenqing Tang ◽  
Simon H. Yueh ◽  
Alexander G. Fore ◽  
Akiko Hayashi
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Argo Floats

Sea surface salinity reemergence in an updated North Atlantic in-situ salinity data set

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-49
Author(s):  
Claude Frankignoul ◽  
Elodie Kestenare ◽  
Gilles Reverdin
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Cold Season ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Salinity Data ◽  
Deep Mixed Layer ◽  
Geostrophic Advection

AbstractMonthly sea surface salinity (SSS) fields are constructed from observations, using objective mapping on a 1°x1° grid in the Atlantic between 30°S and 50°N in the 1970-2016 period in an update of the data set of Reverdin et al. (2007). Data coverage is heterogeneous, with increased density in 2002 when Argo floats become available, high density along Voluntary Observing Ship lines, and low density south of 10°S. Using lag correlation, the seasonal reemergence of SSS anomalies is investigated between 20°N and 50°N in 5°x5° boxes during the 1993-2016 period, both locally and remotely following the displacements of the deep mixed-layer waters estimated from virtual float trajectories derived from the daily AVISO surface geostrophic currents. Although SSS data are noisy, local SSS reemergence is detected in about half of the boxes, notably in the northeast and southeast, while little reemergence is seen in the central and part of the eastern subtropical gyre. In the same period, sea surface temperature (SST) reemergence is found only slightly more frequently, reflecting the short data duration. However, taking geostrophic advection into account degrades the detection of remote SSS and even SST reemergence. When anomalies are averaged over broader areas, robust evidence of a second and third SSS reemergence peak is found in the northeastern and southeastern parts of the domain, indicating long cold-season persistence of large-scale SSS anomalies, while only a first SST reemergence is seen. An oceanic reanalysis is used to confirm that the correlation analysis indeed reflects the reemergence of subsurface salinity anomalies.

scholarly journals Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR) Benefits for the Copernicus Level 4 Sea-Surface Salinity Processing Chain

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Ciani ◽  
Rosalia Santoleri ◽  
Gian Luigi Liberti ◽  
Catherine Prigent ◽  
Craig Donlon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Ocean Surface ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Optimal Interpolation ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Processing Chain

We present a study on the potential of the Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR) mission for the global monitoring of Sea-Surface Salinity (SSS) using Level-4 (gap-free) analysis processing. Space-based SSS are currently provided by the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellites. However, there are no planned missions to guarantee continuity in the remote SSS measurements for the near future. The CIMR mission is in a preparatory phase with an expected launch in 2026. CIMR is focused on the provision of global coverage, high resolution sea-surface temperature (SST), SSS and sea-ice concentration observations. In this paper, we evaluate the mission impact within the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) SSS processing chain. The CMEMS SSS operational products are based on a combination of in situ and satellite (SMOS) SSS and high-resolution SST information through a multivariate optimal interpolation. We demonstrate the potential of CIMR within the CMEMS SSS operational production after the SMOS era. For this purpose, we implemented an Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) based on the CMEMS MERCATOR global operational model. The MERCATOR SSSs were used to generate synthetic in situ and CIMR SSS and, at the same time, they provided a reference gap-free SSS field. Using the optimal interpolation algorithm, we demonstrated that the combined use of in situ and CIMR observations improves the global SSS retrieval compared to a processing where only in situ observations are ingested. The improvements are observed in the 60% and 70% of the global ocean surface for the reconstruction of the SSS and of the SSS spatial gradients, respectively. Moreover, the study highlights the CIMR-based salinity patterns are more accurate both in the open ocean and in coastal areas. We conclude that CIMR can guarantee continuity for accurate monitoring of the ocean surface salinity from space.

Validation and correction of sea surface salinity retrieval from SMAP

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sisi Qin
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Tropical Regions ◽  
Ocean Salinity ◽  
Forecast Models ◽  
Level 3

<p>In this study, Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) Level 3 (L3) daily product derived from Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) during the year 2016, was validated and compared with SSS daily products derived from Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and in-situ measurements. Generally, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the daily SSS products is larger along the coastal areas and at high latitudes and is smaller in the tropical regions and open oceans. Comparisons between the two types of daily satellite SSS product revealed that the RMSE was higher in the daily SMOS product than in the SMAP, whereas the bias of the daily SMOS was observed to be less than that of the SMAP when compared with Argo floats data. In addition, the latitude-dependent bias and RMSE of the SMAP SSS were found to be primarily influenced by the precipitation and the Sea Surface Temperature (SST).Then, aregression analysis method which has adopted the precipitation and SST data was used to correct the larger bias of the daily SMAP product. It was confirmed that the corrected daily SMAP product could be used for assimilation in high-resolution forecast models, due to the fact that it was demonstrated to be unbiased and much closer to the in-situ measurements than the original uncorrected SMAP product.</p>

High-resolution sea surface salinity and temperature in coastal areas from Sentinel-2 and Copernicus Marine in situ data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Encarni Medina-Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Global Ocean ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
The Neural Network ◽  
Sentinel 2

<p>The aim of this work is to obtain high-resolution values of sea surface salinity (SSS) and temperature (SST) in the global ocean by using raw satellite data (i.e., without any band data pre-processing or atmospheric correction). Sentinel-2 Level 1-C Top of Atmosphere (TOA) reflectance data is used to obtain accurate SSS and SST information. A deep neural network is built to link the band information with in situ data from different buoys, vessels, drifters, and other platforms around the world. The neural network used in this paper includes shortcuts, providing an improved performance compared with the equivalent feed-forward architecture. The in situ information used as input for the network has been obtained from the Copernicus Marine In situ Service. Sentinel-2 platform-centred band data has been processed using Google Earth Engine in areas of 100 m x 100 m. Accurate salinity values are estimated for the first time independently of temperature. Salinity results rely only on direct satellite observations, although it presented a clear dependency on temperature ranges. Results show the neural network has good interpolation and extrapolation capabilities. Test results present correlation coefficients of 82% and 84% for salinity and temperature, respectively. The most common error for both SST and SSS is 0.4 C and 0.4 PSU. The sensitivity analysis shows that outliers are present in areas where the number of observations is very low. The network is finally applied over a complete Sentinel-2 tile, presenting sensible patterns for river-sea interaction, as well as seasonal variations. The methodology presented here is relevant for detailed coastal and oceanographic applications, reducing the time for data pre-processing, and it is applicable to a wide range of satellites, as the information is directly obtained from TOA data.</p>

scholarly journals First regional SMOS Sea Surface Salinity products over the Baltic Sea and its oceanographic added-value

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Gonzalez-Gambau ◽  
Estrella Olmedo ◽  
Cristina Gonzalez-Haro ◽  
Antono Turiel ◽  
Justino Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Baltic Sea ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Added Value ◽  
The Baltic Sea ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Validation Data ◽  
The Baltic

<p>Accurate satellite-based sea surface salinity (SSS) fields would address some gaps of knowledge and benefit the understanding of Baltic Sea salinity dynamics.  In particular, these fields can contribute to the monitoring of long-term salinity changes and to the detection of periods with anomalous salinity. These products can also be very useful as initial fields and validation data for improving the existing numerical models.</p><p><br>The Baltic Sea is one of the most challenging regions for the retrieval of SSS from L-band satellite measurements. Nowadays, available EO-based SSS products are quite limited over this region both in terms of spatio-temporal coverage and quality. This is mainly due to several technical limitations that strongly affect the SMOS TB particularly over semi-enclosed seas, such as the high contamination by Radio-Frequency Interference (RFI) sources and the contamination close to land and ice edges. Besides, the sensitivity of TB to SSS changes is very low in cold waters and much larger errors are expected compared to temperate oceans. Salinity and temperature values are very low in this basin, which implies that dielectric constant models are not fully tested in such conditions. In the recent years, the Barcelona Expert Center team has been working on the development of innovative algorithms for improving the quality of SMOS TB and SSS retrievals dealing with the main processing issues. </p><p><br>In the context of the ESA Baltic+ Salinity Dynamics project (https://balticsalinity.argans.co.uk/), these methodologies have been adapted and consolidated towards the generation of the first  regional SMOS SSS product (2011-2020) that would suit to the needs of the Baltic research community. Very recently, the first version of the Baltic+ SSS product has been produced (3-year series) and is currently under validation against in-situ measurements. The quality assessment of the SSS product in the Baltic Sea is also an issue and its representativeness must be carefully assessed. The basin is strongly stratified and then, the differences between SMOS measurements (first centimeters) and in-situ observations (few meters depth) can be noticeable. Differences are more probable during ice melting and high runoff events in spring where there might be a freshwater layer at the top shallow surface. Feedback from the users will help identifying the limitations of the product. Additional technical developments will be addressed to meet the requirements of the communities working in the study of Baltic processes. </p><p><br>We will present at the conference the Baltic+ SSS v1 product and its added-value with respect to other existing EO-based datasets. The potential scientific impact of this satellite SSS product in advancing on-going regional research initiatives like the Baltic Earth Working Group on Salinity dynamics will be discussed.</p>

scholarly journals Intercomparison of Salinity Products in the Beaufort Gyre and Arctic Ocean

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Hall ◽  
Bulusu Subrahmanyam ◽  
James H. Morison
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Satellite Observations ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Beaufort Gyre ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Salinity is the primary determinant of the Arctic Ocean’s density structure. Freshwater accumulation and distribution in the Arctic Ocean have varied significantly in recent decades and certainly in the Beaufort Gyre (BG). In this study, we analyze salinity variations in the BG region between 2012 and 2017. We use in situ salinity observations from the Seasonal Ice Zone Reconnaissance Surveys (SIZRS), CTD casts from the Beaufort Gyre Exploration Project (BGP), and the EN4 data to validate and compare with satellite observations from Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP), Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), and Aquarius Optimally Interpolated Sea Surface Salinity (OISSS), and Arctic Ocean models: ECCO, MIZMAS, HYCOM, ORAS5, and GLORYS12. Overall, satellite observations are restricted to ice-free regions in the BG area, and models tend to overestimate sea surface salinity (SSS). Freshwater Content (FWC), an important component of the BG, is computed for EN4 and most models. ORAS5 provides the strongest positive SSS correlation coefficient (0.612) and lowest bias to in situ observations compared to the other products. ORAS5 subsurface salinity and FWC compare well with the EN4 data. Discrepancies between models and SIZRS data are highest in GLORYS12 and ECCO. These comparisons identify dissimilarities between salinity products and extend challenges to observations applicable to other areas of the Arctic Ocean.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document