scholarly journals Rice-Residue Management Practices of Smallholder Farms in Vietnam and Their Effects on Nutrient Fluxes in the Soil-Plant System

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dao Trong Hung ◽  
Harold Hughes ◽  
Markus Keck ◽  
Daniela Sauer

In Vietnam, approximately 39 million tons of rice (Oryza sativa) residues accrue every year. In this study, we quantified soil nutrient balances of paddy rice fields under different crop-residue management practices in northern Vietnam. On twelve farms, we calculated nutrient balances for the four prevalent rice-residue management practices, i.e., (1) direct incorporation of rice residues into the soil, (2) application of rice-residue compost, (3) burning of rice residues on the field, and (4) the use of rice residues as fodder for livestock. Soils under practices (1) to (3) showed a positive nutrient balance, which indicates that soil fertility can be maintained under these practices and that the amounts of chemical fertilizers can be considerably reduced. If not, there is a risk of eutrophication in the surrounding surface waterbodies. Practice (4), in contrast, resulted in a negative nutrient balance, which indicates the need for returning nutrients to the soils. From our findings we conclude that knowledge about the effects of rice-residue management practices on nutrient cycles may help to optimize the use of fertilizers, resulting in a more sustainable form of agriculture.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Hughes ◽  
Dao Trong Hung ◽  
Daniela Sauer

<p>Silicon (Si) is known to have beneficial effects on plants, in particular on rice, which is a strong Si accumulator. Si helps mitigate environmental stresses and nutrient deficits of plants. In some regions, the limited plant-available Si in soils might have detrimental effects on rice cultivation. Crop-residue <span>recycling</span> can help to maintain <span>the</span> amount of plant-available Si in soils. However, the effect of crop-residue management practices on the soil-plant Si cycle<span> and on Si availability to plants</span> <span>remains largely understudied. </span>Here, <span>we contribute to fill this knowledge gap by reporting</span> a study on the effects of three different rice-residue management practices on Si-depleted paddy rice systems from northern Vietnam. The rice-residue management practices <span>were</span> (1) direct incorporation of rice residues into the soils, (2) burning in the field, and (3) use as fodder for animals, followed by composting of the obtained manure, and subsequent application of the composted manure to the field. We analyzed different Si reservoirs in soils and plant-Si contents under these different practices. Our results show a strong correlation between the different soil Si reservoirs and plant Si contents. We found no significant difference with respect to plant-available Si in soils and plant-Si contents between the different management practices. <span>Moreover, our </span>data <span>suggest that</span> Si-depleted rice-cultivation systems proportionally lose Si through grain harvest faster than less Si-depleted systems, because of enhanced relative Si accumulation in the grains. <span>This loss cannot be mitigated by straw recycling. It may be one of the reasons why straw recycling has only a limited effect in the extremely Si-depleted rice-cultivation systems that were analysed in this study. Such information is critical in finding ways to </span>maintain <span>an appropriate level of plant-available </span>Si <span>in cultivated soils. </span></p>


Soil Research ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
DM Freebairn ◽  
WC Boughton

A daily water balance model of catchment behaviour was used with rainfall and runoff data from three 1 ha catchments over the period 1976-1981 inclusive to study the effects of different practices of crop residue management on volumes and peak rates of runoff. The practices studied were stubble burning, stubble incorporation, and stubble mulching. Rainfall and runoff data from the six-year study period were used to calibrate the catchment model to each of the management practices in turn. A 64-year record of daily rainfalls from a nearby meteorological station was used to estimate the long-term effects of the practices on the frequency distributions of runoff. An empirical relationship between peak rates of runoff and daily amounts of runoff was used with the daily water balance model to estimate the effects of the practices on peak rates of runoff. Burning of stubble produced the highest peak rates and amounts of runoff and mulching the lowest.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 1053-1061
Author(s):  
M. Kumar ◽  
◽  
S. Mitra ◽  
A. Bera ◽  
M.R. Naik ◽  
...  

Aim: Assessment of energy input output relationship, greenhouse gases emission and carbon footprint of diversified jute-rice cropping systems under different nutrients and crop residue management practices. Methodology: The inventory was prepared for all inputs required for crop cultivation and outputs of crops in cropping systems. These inputs and outputs were converted into energy by multiplying with energy equivalent coefficient and CO2 emission coefficient following standard procedure. Results: Jute-rice-baby corn cropping system recorded significantly higher net energy (324 GJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (8.02). Among different nutrient and crop management (NCRM) practices, significantly higher energy output (336.9 GJ ha-1) and net energy (291.4 GJ ha-1) recorded 100% NPK with crop residue. The highest carbon footprint recorded with rice-rice (0.44 kg COe kg-1 economic yield) and the lowestwith jute-rice-pea (0.29 kg COe kg-1 economic yield) cropping system. Among different NCRM practices, higher carbon footprint was (0.38 kg COe kg-1 economic yield) recorded with 100% NPK with crop residue. Interpretation: The energy efficient and low input required cropping systems which include legume crops like garden pea and mungbean should be considered for cultivation for diversifying the existing rice-rice cropping system in Eastern India.


1993 ◽  
pp. 525-534
Author(s):  
J.F. Power ◽  
J.E. Gilley ◽  
W.W. Wilhelm ◽  
L.N. Mielke ◽  
J.W. Doran

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document