scholarly journals Sequential Alliance Portfolios, Partner Reconfiguration and Firm Performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 5904
Author(s):  
Jie Liang ◽  
Peng Shao
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Moderating Effect ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Tie Strength ◽  
Alliance Portfolio ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Alliance Portfolios

This study develops multi-dimensional partner reconfiguration strategies and addresses how they affect firm performance in a series of alliance portfolios by applying the dynamic sustainable perspective. Using data collected from 565 fund product alliance portfolios initiated by 61 Chinese fund firms during a five-year period from 2007 to 2011, the empirical results indicate that both dropping active partners and adding new ones will reduce firm performance. By contrast, reintroducing previous partners will increase firm performance. The average tie strength of the last alliance portfolio moderates the influences of partner reconfigurations on firm performance. Specifically, it negatively moderates the effect of dropping active partners and positively moderates the effect of adding new partners. However, its moderating effect on the influence of reintroducing previous partners is insignificant. These findings have positive theoretical and practical significance for firms pursuing sustainable development by clarifying when and how partner reconfiguration strategies influence firm performance.

A jack-of-all-trades or a master of none: the performance effects of balancing exploration and exploitation within vs across alliance portfolio domains

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Penney ◽  
James G. Combs ◽  
Nolan Gaffney ◽  
Jennifer C. Sexton
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Value Chain ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Exploration And Exploitation ◽  
Specific Domain ◽  
Alliance Portfolio ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Alliance Portfolios

Purpose Theory predicts that balancing exploratory and exploitative learning (i.e., ambidexterity) across alliance portfolio domains (e.g. value chain function, governance modes) increases firm performance, whereas balance within domains decreases performance. Prior empirical work, however, only assessed balance/imbalance within and across two domains. The purpose of this study is to determine if theory generalizes beyond specific domain combinations. The authors investigated across multiple domains to determine whether alliance portfolios should be imbalanced toward exploration or exploitation within domains or balanced across domains. The authors also extended prior research by exploring whether the direction of imbalance matters. Current theory only advises managers to accept imbalance without helping with the choice between exploration and exploitation. Design/methodology/approach Hypotheses are tested using fixed-effects generalized least squares (GLS) regression analysis of a large 13-year panel sample of Fortune 500 firms from 1996 to 2008. Findings With respect to the balance between exploration and exploitation within each of the five domains investigated, imbalanced alliance portfolios had higher firm performance. No evidence was found that balance across domains relates to performance. Instead, for four of the five domains, imbalance toward exploration related positively to firm performance. Originality/value An alliance portfolio that allows for exploration in some domains and exploitation in other domains appears more difficult to implement than prior theory suggests. Firms benefit mostly from using the alliance portfolio for exploratory learning.

scholarly journals Green entrepreneurship and SME performance: the moderating effect of firm age

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenli Yin ◽  
Maria Paz Salmador ◽  
Dan Li ◽  
M. Begoña Lloria
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Moderating Effect ◽  
Environment Protection ◽  
Utility Model ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Green Innovation ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Green Entrepreneurship ◽  
Scholarly Attention

AbstractGreen entrepreneurship has been increasing with growing attention to environment protection by a variety of stakeholders. Green innovation, as the essence of green entrepreneurship, has attracted a broad range of scholarly attention with yet inconclusive findings regarding its effect on firm performance. According to our analyses of 1667 firms listed on SME board and GEM in China during the period from 2010 to 2019, we find interesting results regarding the type of green innovation involved and the moderating effect of firm age on the link between green innovation and SME performance. More precisely, we find green utility-model innovation positively influences firm performance for SMEs, whereas green invention innovation does not contribute to firm performance overall. More interesting, our empirical results suggest that older firms benefit more from both green invention innovation and green utility-model innovation than younger firms. This research contributes to the literature on green entrepreneurship as well as green innovation.

scholarly journals Managerial ownership, capital expenditures, and firm performance: evidence from the Taiwan stock exchange

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-426
Author(s):  
Ching-Hai Jiang ◽  
Kuei-yuan Wang ◽  
Yen-Sheng Huang
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
Capital Expenditures ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Taiwan Stock Exchange ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Relationship

This paper examines the relationship among managerial ownership, capital expenditures and firm performance using data of 359 firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange over the period 1998-2005. The empirical results indicate a concave relationship between managerial ownership and future firm performance and a positive relationship between managerial ownership and capital expenditures. Moreover, for firms with larger capital expenditures, the interactive effect of managerial ownership and capital expenditures is significantly positively related to firm performance

scholarly journals Alliance Portfolios

Management ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pek-Hooi Soh ◽  
Annapoornima M. Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Strategic Alliances ◽  
Capability Development ◽  
Performance Impact ◽  
Alliance Portfolio ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
New Business ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Alliance Portfolios

The field of alliance portfolio research has grown significantly since 2007, and much research has focused on the impact of alliance portfolios on firm performance. An alliance portfolio is a collection of alliances established by a firm with different partners over a certain number of years. The term has also been referred to as a network of direct ties or bilateral relationships of the firm. In management research, some researchers use the term to account for all alliances that remain actively involved in focal firm’s business when assessing the competitive positioning of the firm in an industry, whereas others include both existing and past alliances when focal firm’s alliance experience and capability development is concerned. In strategic management and innovation studies, scholars have investigated alliance portfolios that are typically made up of a variety of strategic partners who may possess specialized knowledge, capabilities, and other valuable resources required by focal firms. Thus, there exist variations in how alliance portfolios are defined in academic studies, especially depending on the research disciplines and the objectives of alliance formation in a particular industry context. Furthermore, management scholars have argued that a portfolio-level approach toward investigating the performance impact of strategic alliances is more appropriate than a dyadic view. The prime reason is that management cannot ignore the interdependence that exists between alliance activities, the trade-offs in resource allocation and the synergies that arise from across the alliance projects. Alliance portfolios will likely offer a larger scope of opportunities for new combinations than individual bilateral alliances do. In understanding the relationship between alliance portfolios and firm performance, scholarly works have branched into these broad research inquiries: (i) the configuration of alliance portfolios, (ii) the management of alliance portfolios, and (iii) the role of alliance portfolios from a knowledge-based view. More recently, a new theme has emerged to study whether and how small and young ventures benefit from alliance portfolios. Above all, across these lines of alliance portfolios research inquiry, growing attention has been drawn to the antecedents and consequence of learning and value creation among portfolio partners, which would predict a firm’s performance in profitability, innovation, and new business development.

Internationalization of exploitation alliance portfolios and firm performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Rossmannek ◽  
Olaf Rank
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Panel Regression ◽  
Alliance Portfolio ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Marketing Alliances ◽  
High Degree ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Alliance Portfolios

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of alliance portfolio internationalization (API) on firm performance in the context of exploitation alliances. Design/methodology/approach The hypothesis is tested by applying a panel regression using a sample of 64 airlines over a nine years period. Findings As a result, the study finds a U-shaped relationship between API and firm performance. Research limitations/implications The results are particularly relevant for firms using many exploitation (e.g. marketing) alliances. Practical implications In the context of exploitation alliances, managers should focus either on local partners or to take advantage of partners with a high degree of foreignness. Stuck in the middle seems to be not advantageous. Originality/value Previous work found an S-shaped relationship between portfolio internationalization and firm performance while concentrating on exploration alliances. In contrast, this study shows that exploitation alliance portfolios do not experience a decline of firm performance at high levels of portfolio internationalization.

Editor’s Pick: Regulatory and Ethical Issues in the New Era of Radiomics and Radiogenomics

EMJ Radiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Pesapane
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Medical Images ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Innovative Technology ◽  
New Era ◽  
Naked Eye ◽  
Disease Characteristics ◽  
The Future ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Relationship

Radiomics is a science that investigates a large number of features from medical images using data-characterisation algorithms, with the aim to analyse disease characteristics that are indistinguishable to the naked eye. Radiogenomics attempts to establish and examine the relationship between tumour genomic characteristics and their radiologic appearance. Although there is certainly a lot to learn from these relationships, one could ask the question: what is the practical significance of radiogenomic discoveries? This increasing interest in such applications inevitably raises numerous legal and ethical questions. In an environment such as the technology field, which changes quickly and unpredictably, regulations need to be timely in order to be relevant.  In this paper, issues that must be solved to make the future applications of this innovative technology safe and useful are analysed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document