scholarly journals An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot Study

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1890
Author(s):  
Kyle Davey ◽  
Paul Read ◽  
Joseph Coyne ◽  
Paul Jarvis ◽  
Anthony Turner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
American Football ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Hop Test ◽  
Ground Contact Time ◽  
Limb Asymmetry ◽  
Multiple Metrics

The aims of the present study are to: (1) determine within- and between-session reliability of multiple metrics obtained during the triple hop test; and (2) determine any systematic bias in both the test and inter-limb asymmetry scores for these metrics. Thirteen male young American football athletes performed three trials of a triple hop test on each leg on two separate occasions. In addition to the total distance hopped, manual detection of touch down and toe-off were calculated via video analysis, enabling flight time (for each hop), ground contact time (GCT), reactive strength index (RSI), and leg stiffness (between hops) to be calculated. Results showed all coefficient of variation (CV) values were ≤ 10.67% and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged from moderate to excellent (0.53–0.95) in both test sessions. Intrarater reliability showed excellent reliability for all metrics (CV ≤ 3.60%, ICC ≥ 0.97). No systematic bias was evident between test sessions for raw test scores (g = −0.34 to 0.32) or the magnitude of asymmetry (g = −0.19 to 0.43). However, ‘real’ changes in asymmetry (i.e., greater than the CV in session 1) were evident on an individual level for all metrics. For the direction of asymmetry, kappa coefficients revealed poor-to-fair levels of agreement between test sessions for all metrics (K = −0.10 to 0.39), with the exception of the first hop (K = 0.69). These data show that, given the inherent limitations of distance jumped in the triple hop test, practitioners can confidently gather a range of reliable data when computed manually, provided sufficient test familiarization is conducted. In addition, although the magnitude of asymmetry appears to show only small changes between test sessions, limb dominance does appear to fluctuate between test sessions, highlighting the value of also monitoring the direction of the imbalance.

scholarly journals Valid and Reliable Barbell Velocity Estimation Using an Inertial Measurement Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 9170
Author(s):  
Steffen Held ◽  
Ludwig Rappelt ◽  
Jan-Philip Deutsch ◽  
Lars Donath
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Reliability Indicators

The accurate assessment of the mean concentric barbell velocity (MCV) and its displacement are crucial aspects of resistance training. Therefore, the validity and reliability indicators of an easy-to-use inertial measurement unit (VmaxPro®) were examined. Nineteen trained males (23.1 ± 3.2 years, 1.78 ± 0.08 m, 75.8 ± 9.8 kg; Squat 1-Repetition maximum (1RM): 114.8 ± 24.5 kg) performed squats and hip thrusts (3–5 sets, 30 repetitions total, 75% 1RM) on two separate days. The MCV and displacement were simultaneously measured using VmaxPro® and a linear position transducer (Speed4Lift®). Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (0.91 < ICC < 0.96) with a small systematic bias (p < 0.001; ηp2 < 0.50) for squats (0.01 ± 0.04 m·s−1) and hip thrusts (0.01 ± 0.05 m·s−1) and a low limit of agreement (LoA < 0.12 m·s−1) indicated an acceptable validity. The within- and between-day reliability of the MCV revealed good ICCs (0.55 < ICC < 0.91) and a low LoA (<0.16 m·s−1). Although the displacement revealed a systematic bias during squats (p < 0.001; ηp2 < 0.10; 3.4 ± 3.4 cm), no bias was detectable during hip thrusts (p = 0.784; ηp2 < 0.001; 0.3 ± 3.3 cm). The displacement showed moderate to good ICCs (0.43 to 0.95) but a high LoA (7.8 to 10.7 cm) for the validity and (within- and between-day) reliability of squats and hip thrusts. The VmaxPro® is considered to be a valid and reliable tool for the MCV assessment.

Measuring Physical Activity in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Activity Diary Versus Accelerometer

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1249-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wineke Armbrust ◽  
G.J.F. Joyce Bos ◽  
Jan H.B. Geertzen ◽  
Pieter J.J. Sauer ◽  
Pieter U. Dijkstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Accelerometer Data ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Activity Diary

Objective.(1) To determine convergent validity of an activity diary (AD) and accelerometer (Actical brand/Phillips-Respironics) in measuring physical activity (PA) in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). (2) To determine how many days give reliable results. (3) To analyze effects of correcting accelerometer data for non-wear.Methods.Patients with JIA (8–13 yrs) were recruited from 3 Dutch pediatric rheumatology centers. PA was assessed for 7 days with an AD and accelerometer, and was expressed as mean min/day of rest, light PA (LPA), moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), and PA level (PAL). To analyze convergent validity, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated and paired sample Student t tests were performed. The required number of days to achieve reliable results was calculated using the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula.Results.Convergent validity between AD and accelerometer was moderate for rest and PAL (ICC 0.41). ICC for LPA and MVPA were < 0.24. AD overestimated PAL and MVPA compared with the accelerometer. Wearing the accelerometer 7–19 days gave reliable PA estimates on group and individual levels. For the AD, 13–36 days were needed. Adjusting accelerometer data for non-wear resulted in a clinically relevant higher mean number of min/day spent in LPA (effect size 1.12), but not in MVPA (effect size 0.44).Conclusion.Convergent validity between AD and accelerometer is moderate to poor. In children with JIA, 1-week assessment with an accelerometer is sufficient to measure PA (all levels) reliably. On an individual level and for clinical use, 3 weeks are required. Additional use of AD enables correction for non-wear of accelerometer data.

scholarly journals The 10/5 Repeated Jumps Test: Are 10 Repetitions and Three Trials Necessary?

Biomechanics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Callum Stratford ◽  
Thomas Dos’Santos ◽  
John J. McMahon
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Pairwise Comparisons ◽  
Strength Index ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
Repeated Measures Analysis ◽  
Ground Contact Time

The purpose of this study was to identify whether ten repetitions and three trials were necessary to achieve stability in peak reactive strength index (RSI) during the 10/5 repeated jumps test (RJT). Twenty-five males, from multiple sports, performed three trials of the RJT on an in-ground force plate, with 90 seconds’ rest between trials. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.916–0.986) and coefficients of variation (CV ≤ 14.5%) were considered acceptable for all variables. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Freidman’s tests revealed large and significant differences (p ≤ 0.006, η2 = 0.159–0.434, power ≥ 0.859) in ground contact time (GCT), jump height (JH), and subsequently RSI both between trials and repetitions. Pairwise comparisons revealed that repetitions 1–3 produced longer GCTs (p ≤ 0.05, d = 0.41–1.40), lower JHs (p ≤ 0.05, d = 0.31–0.56), and lower RSI values (p ≤ 0.05, d = 0.35–1.24). The shortest GCTs, greatest JHs and greater RSIs occurred between repetitions 7 and 10, with approximately 60% of peak RSIs occurring during these ranges. The sequential estimate technique revealed that seven repetitions were needed to attain stability in mean peak RSI. Non-significant (p = 0.554) and negligible differences (d ≤ 0.09) in the five best RSIs between trials were noted. One trial of the 10/5 RJT is sufficient to evaluate peak RSI in athletes and should reduce data collection time and fatigue.

Test–Retest Reliability of Soccer Dribbling Tests in Children

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Michael J. Duncan ◽  
Darren Richardson ◽  
Rhys Morris ◽  
Emma Eyre ◽  
Neil D. Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Coefficient Of Variation ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The present study examined the test–retest reliability of the Ghent University dribbling test and short dribble test in a pediatric population. Fifty-four boys aged 9–14 years (mean ± SD = 11 ± 2 years) undertook the Ghent University and dribbling tests on two occasions separated by 2 weeks. Intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficient of variation, and 95% limits of agreement were conducted for each test. Intraclass correlation coefficients and coefficient of variation indicated good to excellent reliability, and relatively small variability for both dribbling tests. The 95% limits of agreement indicated relatively little bias Ghent University dribbling test for both running alone and running with the ball components, and the Bangsbo and Mohr short dribble test. The results of the present study suggest both dribbling tests examined in the present study demonstrate good reliability and low levels of systematic bias.

Reliability of ultrasound-measured muscle thickness of the longissimus dorsi muscle in Thoroughbreds

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Abe ◽  
C.F. Kearns ◽  
B. Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Muscle Thickness ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Longissimus Dorsi ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Longissimus Dorsi Muscle ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Dorsi Muscle ◽  
T1 And T2

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of B-mode ultrasound measured muscle thickness of the longissimus dorsi muscle in horses. Thirteen Thoroughbreds (5 colts, 5 fillies and 3 mares) had their muscle thickness measured by B-mode ultrasound at four sites; the longissimus dorsi (LD at 30%, 50% and 70% of back length) and extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle on two separate test sessions (T1 and T2). Paired t-tests revealed that there was no systematic bias in any of the muscle thickness measures. There were high intraclass correlation coefficients between the LD muscle thickness at 30, 50 and 70% of back length obtained at the T1 and T2 measurements (range: 0.95-0.98). The ECR muscle thickness was positively correlated to body weight and fat-free mass while LD muscle thickness at 50% and 70% of back length did not correlate to body dimensions. Our results suggest that ultrasound measures of muscle thickness of the LD and ECR muscles are reliable and repeatable when taken with the horse standing in a relaxed and evenly balanced position.

Are Unilateral Devices Valid for Power Output Determination in Cycling? Insights From the Favero Assioma Power Meter

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Pedro L. Valenzuela ◽  
Almudena Montalvo-Perez ◽  
Lidia B. Alejo ◽  
Mario Castellanos ◽  
Jaime Gil-Cabrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Output ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Bilateral Asymmetry ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Power Meter ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Economical Alternative

Purpose: Some power meters are available in both bilateral and unilateral versions. However, despite the popularity of the latter, their validity remains unknown. We aimed to analyze the validity of a unilateral pedal power meter for estimating actual (“bilateral”) power output (PO). Methods: Thirty-three male cyclists were assessed at different POs (steady cycling at 100–500 W, as well as all-out sprints), pedaling cadences (70, 85, and 100 repetitions·min−1), and cycling positions (seated and standing). The PO estimated by a left-only power meter (Favero Assioma Uno) was compared with the actual PO computed by a bilateral power meter (Favero Assioma Duo), and the level of bilateral asymmetry (most- vs least-powerful leg) with the latter system was also computed. Results: Nonsignificant differences, high intraclass correlation coefficients (≥.90), and low coefficients of variation (consistently ≤5% except for low PO levels, ie, 5%–7% at 100 W) were found between Favero Assioma Uno and Favero Assioma Duo. However, although a strong intraclass correlation coefficient (.995) was found between both legs, asymmetry values of 4% to 6% were found for all conditions except when pedaling at the lowest PO (100 W), in which asymmetry increased up to 10% to 13%. Conclusions: Although cyclists tend to present some level of bilateral asymmetry during cycling (particularly at low PO), Favero Assioma Uno provides overall valid estimates of actual PO and is, therefore, an economical alternative to bilateral power meters. Caution is needed, however, when interpreting data at the individual level in cyclists with high levels of asymmetry.

scholarly journals Pilot Evaluation of Aggregate Plate Waste as a Measure of Students' School Lunch Consumption (OR13-08-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Chapman ◽  
Scott Richardson ◽  
Lori Mcleod ◽  
Eric Rimm ◽  
Juliana Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Food Waste ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
School Level ◽  
Plate Waste ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Objectives Weighing individual plate waste provides reliable estimates of food intake by physically weighing individual food components to the nearest gram before and after a meal. Weighing aggregate, school-level food waste may be an inexpensive and less time-consuming alternative. However, it has not been determined whether aggregate plate waste is an accurate measure of individual plate waste. This pilot study therefore aimed to evaluate the accuracy of aggregate plate waste for quantifying food waste in a school cafeteria setting in comparison to individual weighed plate waste. Methods This study took place in an urban, low-income school district in Massachusetts. Four elementary schools that shared two identical cafeterias and served the same foods each day participated in the study. Participating students in the four schools had similar demographic characteristics. Cafeterias were randomly assigned to either individual or aggregate plate waste measurements. Plate waste was collected for 4 days from approximately n = 850 students in each cafeteria on the same days. For individual plate waste, the % consumed was calculated for each food item on each student's tray. In the cafeteria with aggregate-level measurements, waste was separated by component (entrée, vegetable, fruit, and milk), and weighed to calculate the % consumed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess the agreement between aggregate plate waste and individual-level plate waste. Results Agreement was excellent for entrées (ICC = 0.90) and vegetables (ICC = 0.78), but poor for milk (ICC = 0.22) and fruits (ICC = 0.23). The overall agreement for all four components combined was excellent (ICC = 0.75). Conclusions Results suggest that aggregate plate waste may be a reasonable measure of individually weighed plate waste, but additional research is warranted. Funding Sources A grant from Arbella Insurance funded the data collection. The current analysis had no funding or support. Supporting Tables, Images and/or Graphs

scholarly journals Reproducibility of Static and Dynamic Postural Control Measurement in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edem Korkor Appiah-Dwomoh ◽  
Steffen Müller ◽  
Frank Mayer
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Dynamic Tests ◽  
Adolescent Athletes ◽  
Control Measurement ◽  
Static Test ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients

Static (one-legged stance) and dynamic (star excursion balance) postural control tests were performed by 14 adolescent athletes with and 17 without back pain to determine reproducibility. The total displacement, mediolateral and anterior-posterior displacements of the centre of pressure in mm for the static, and the normalized and composite reach distances for the dynamic tests were analysed. Intraclass correlation coefficients, 95% confidence intervals, and a Bland-Altman analysis were calculated for reproducibility. Intraclass correlation coefficients for subjects with (0.54 to 0.65), (0.61 to 0.69) and without (0.45 to 0.49), (0.52 to 0.60) back pain were obtained on the static test for right and left legs, respectively. Likewise, (0.79 to 0.88), (0.75 to 0.93) for subjects with and (0.61 to 0.82), (0.60 to 0.85) for those without back pain were obtained on the dynamic test for the right and left legs, respectively. Systematic bias was not observed between test and retest of subjects on both static and dynamic tests. The one-legged stance and star excursion balance tests have fair to excellent reliabilities on measures of postural control in adolescent athletes with and without back pain. They can be used as measures of postural control in adolescent athletes with and without back pain.

scholarly journals The use of a portable metabolic monitoring device for measuring RMR in healthy adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1229-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suey S. Y. Yeung ◽  
Marijke C. Trappenburg ◽  
Carel G. M. Meskers ◽  
Andrea B. Maier ◽  
Esmee M. Reijnierse
Keyword(s):  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Monitoring Device ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Metabolic Monitoring ◽  
Absolute Agreement ◽  
Highly Correlated

AbstractObjective measurement of RMR may be important for optimal nutritional care but is hindered by the price and practicality of the metabolic monitoring device. This study compared two metabolic monitoring devices for measuring RMR and VO2 and compared the measured RMR with the predicted RMR calculated from equations. RMR was measured using QUARK RMR (reference device) and Fitmate GS (COSMED) in a random order for 30 min, each on fasted participants. In total, sixty-eight adults participated (median age 22 years, interquartile range 21–32). Pearson correlation showed that RMR (r 0·86) and VO2 (r 0·86) were highly correlated between the two devices (P < 0·05). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) showed good relative agreements regarding RMR (ICC = 0·84) and VO2 (ICC = 0·84) (P < 0·05). RMR measured by QUARK RMR was significantly higher (649 (sd 753) kJ/d) than Fitmate GS. Equations significantly overpredicted RMR. Accurate RMR (i.e. within ±10 % of the RMR measured by QUARK RMR) was found among 38 % of the participants for Fitmate GS and among 46–68 % depending on the equations. Bland–Altman analysis showed a low absolute agreement with QUARK RMR at an individual level for both Fitmate GS (limits of agreement (LOA): −828 to +2125 kJ/d) and equations (LOA ranged from −1979 to +1879 kJ/d). In conclusion, both Fitmate GS and predictive equations had low absolute agreements with QUARK RMR at an individual level. Therefore, these limitations should be considered when determining RMR using Fitmate GS or equations.

Interobserver Reliability Using the Phonetic Level Evaluation With Severely and Profoundly Hearing-Impaired Children

1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 989-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Shaw ◽  
Truman E. Coggins
Keyword(s):  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Assessment Measure ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Speech Assessment ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

This study examines whether observers reliably categorize selected speech production behaviors in hearing-impaired children. A group of experienced speech-language pathologists was trained to score the elicited imitations of 5 profoundly and 5 severely hearing-impaired subjects using the Phonetic Level Evaluation (Ling, 1976). Interrater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Overall, the magnitude of the coefficients was found to be considerably below what would be accepted in published behavioral research. Failure to obtain acceptably high levels of reliability suggests that the Phonetic Level Evaluation may not yet be an accurate and objective speech assessment measure for hearing-impaired children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document