scholarly journals Multi-Objective Joint Optimal Operation of Reservoir System and Analysis of Objectives Competition Mechanism: A Case Study in the Upper Reach of the Yangtze River

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mufeng Chen ◽  
Zengchuan Dong ◽  
Wenhao Jia ◽  
Xiaokuan Ni ◽  
Hongyi Yao

The multi-objective optimal operation and the joint scheduling of giant-scale reservoir systems are of great significance for water resource management; the interactions and mechanisms between the objectives are the key points. Taking the reservoir system composed of 30 reservoirs in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River as the research object, this paper constructs a multi-objective optimal operation model integrating four objectives of power generation, ecology, water supply, and shipping under the constraints of flood control to analyze the inside interaction mechanisms among the objectives. The results are as follows. (1) Compared with single power generation optimization, multi-objective optimization improves the benefits of the system. The total power generation is reduced by only 4.09% at most, but the water supply, ecology, and shipping targets are increased by 98.52%, 35.09%, and 100% at most under different inflow conditions, respectively. (2) The competition between power generation and the other targets is the most obvious; the relationship between water supply and ecology depends on the magnitude of flow required by the control section for both targets, and the restriction effect of the shipping target is limited. (3) Joint operation has greatly increased the overall benefits. Compared with the separate operation of each basin, the benefits of power generation, water supply, ecology, and shipping increased by 5.50%, 45.99%, 98.49%, and 100.00% respectively in the equilibrium scheme. This study provides a widely used method to analyze the multi-objective relationship mechanism, and can be used to guide the actual scheduling rules.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1488
Author(s):  
Yueqiu Wu ◽  
Liping Wang ◽  
Yanke Zhang ◽  
Jiajie Wu ◽  
Qiumei Ma ◽  
...  

For reservoirs with combined storage capacity for flood control and beneficial purposes, there tends to be potential benefit loss when the flood control limited water level is used in medium and small floods. How to find the optimal water level scheme for profit-making and pursue the optimization of comprehensive benefits has always been a difficult problem in multi-objective reservoir optimal operation. Based on the principle of the maximum benefit obtained by the product conversion curve and the isorevenue line in microeconomics, taking flood control and power generation as two products of a reservoir, a multi-objective optimal operation scheme decision-making model is established to seek the highest water level scheme that can produce the maximum comprehensive benefits of flood control and power generation. A case study of the Three Gorges reservoir in the early flood season of a dry year shows that on the one hand, under the condition of deterministic inflow, the model can work out the optimal water level and the corresponding best equilibrium point for both flood control and power generation, and it can increase the total power output by 4.48% without reducing the flood control benefits; on the other hand, it can also obtain the dynamic control area of the maximum allowable water level for power generation considering inflow forecast error, which provides a theoretical reference for determining the starting water level in medium and small floods and utilizing flood resources.


2020 ◽  
Vol 590 ◽  
pp. 125264
Author(s):  
Juan Chen ◽  
Ping-an Zhong ◽  
Weifeng Liu ◽  
Xin-Yu Wan ◽  
William W.-G. Yeh

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1918-1928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-qi Bian ◽  
Zeng-chuan Dong ◽  
Yi-fei Jia ◽  
Dun-yu Zhong

Abstract The reservoirs (hydro plants) along the upper Yellow River are typical cascade reservoirs, with multiple objectives regarding flood control, ice control, water supply, power generation, and ecological security. The competition among these multiple objectives reflects the competition among various agencies with different interests. There has been a certain degree of conflict between ‘power scheduling’, which aims at obtaining greater power generation from the cascade reservoirs, and ‘water regulation’, which is currently being implemented. Questions of how to reasonably use the comprehensive regulation capacity of the cascade reservoirs, in order to relieve the conflicts among multiple objectives, and understand the nature of the competition between ‘power scheduling’ and ‘water regulation’, require urgent research and solutions. Based on an analysis of the current situation regarding water supply, electricity demand, flood control, ice control, and ecology, a multi-objective optimal operation model for the cascade reservoirs in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River has been constructed to reveal the relationships between power generation and other objectives. This study provides theoretical evidence for the informed operation of the cascade reservoirs and will be of great significance for coordinating the relationship between power generation and water regulation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 03048
Author(s):  
Rongchang Chen ◽  
Chen Liu ◽  
Xiaofeng Luo ◽  
Wei Shen

In the downstream tidal section of the Yangtze River, nine kinds of combinations of hydrological environmental conditions are considered, including the annual average runoff flow, the annual average peak flow and the flood control design flow, as well as the three conditions of spring, medium and neap tides. By means of the numerical simulation method, the effective performance parameter values for conventional intercepting boom under different environmental conditions are obtained by simulating 9 kinds of maximum current speed to withstand, Max.CS, respectively. The results show that, in the downstream fast current tidal section of the Yangtze River, for the boom performance index of Max.CS, the relatively extensive applicability value should be 3.0kn under the condition of the annual average runoff flow; 4.0Kn should be selected under the condition of the annual average peak flow; and 4.5Kn should be selected under the flood control design flow. This study can provide technical support for the design, selection and use of booms in downstream waters of the Yangtze River.


Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanjun Liu ◽  
Hui Qin ◽  
Qin Shen ◽  
Rui Tian ◽  
Yongqi Liu

Reservoirs play a significant role in water resources management and water resource allocation. Traditional flood limited water level (FLWL) of reservoirs is set as a fixed value which over-considers the reservoir flood control and limits the benefits of reservoirs to a certain extent. However, the dynamic control of the reservoir FLWL is an effective solution. It is a method to temporarily increase the water level of the reservoir during the flood season by using forecast information and discharge capacity, and it can both consider flood control and power generation during the flood season. Therefore, this paper focuses on multi-objective optimal scheduling of dynamic control of FLWL for cascade reservoirs based on multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to get the trade-off between flood control and power generation. A multi-objective optimal scheduling model of dynamic control of FLWL for cascade reservoirs which contains a new dynamic control method is developed, and the proposed model consists of an initialization module, a dynamic control programming module and an optimal scheduling module. In order to verify the effectiveness of the model, a cascade reservoir consisting of seven reservoirs in the Hanjiang Basin of China were selected as a case study. Twenty-four-hour runoff data series for three typical hydrological years were used in this model. At the same time, two extreme schemes were chosen for comparison from optimized scheduling schemes. The comparison result showed that the power generation can be increased by 9.17 × 108 kW·h (6.39%) at most, compared to the original design scheduling scheme, while the extreme risk rate also increased from 0.1% to 0.268%. In summary, experimental results show that the multi-objective optimal scheduling model established in this study can provide decision makers with a set of alternative feasible optimized scheduling schemes by considering the two objectives of maximizing power generation and minimizing extreme risk rate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document