Faculty Opinions recommendation of Employment status at time of first hospitalization for heart failure is associated with a higher risk of death and rehospitalization for heart failure.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gad Cotter ◽  
Olga Milo
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Employment Status ◽  
Risk Of Death

scholarly journals Employment status at time of first hospitalization for heart failure is associated with a higher risk of death and rehospitalization for heart failure

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmus Rørth ◽  
Emil L. Fosbøl ◽  
Ulrik M. Mogensen ◽  
Kristian Kragholm ◽  
Anna-karin Numé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Employment Status ◽  
Risk Of Death

scholarly journals Interleukin-1 receptor-induced PGE2 production controls acetylcholine-mediated cardiac dysfunction and mortality during scorpion envenomation

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mouzarllem B. Reis ◽  
Fernanda L. Rodrigues ◽  
Natalia Lautherbach ◽  
Alexandre Kanashiro ◽  
Carlos A. Sorgi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Dysfunction ◽  
Acetylcholine Release ◽  
Interleukin 1 ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Prostaglandin E ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Scorpion Envenomation ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Include Heart Failure

Abstract Scorpion envenomation is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among accidents caused by venomous animals. Major clinical manifestations that precede death after scorpion envenomation include heart failure and pulmonary edema. Here, we demonstrate that cardiac dysfunction and fatal outcomes caused by lethal scorpion envenomation in mice are mediated by a neuro-immune interaction linking IL-1 receptor signaling, prostaglandin E2, and acetylcholine release. IL-1R deficiency, the treatment with a high dose of dexamethasone or blockage of parasympathetic signaling using atropine or vagotomy, abolished heart failure and mortality of envenomed mice. Therefore, we propose the use of dexamethasone administration very early after envenomation, even before antiserum, to inhibit the production of inflammatory mediators and acetylcholine release, and to reduce the risk of death.

scholarly journals Catheter ablation can improve survival with the reduction of heart failure in frail patients with atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Joung ◽  
P.S Yang ◽  
J.H Sung ◽  
E Jang ◽  
H.T Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Real World ◽  
Background Characteristics ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Korean National Health Insurance

Abstract Background It is unclear whether catheter ablation is beneficial in frail patients with AF. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate whether catheter ablation reduces death and other outcomes in real-world frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Out of 801,710 patients with AF in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from 2006 to 2015, 1,411 frail patients underwent AF ablations. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score were calculated retrospectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to categorize ablation and non-ablation frail groups. Results After IPTW, the two cohorts had similar background characteristics. During a median follow-up of 4.7 years (interquartile range: 2.2–7.8), the risk of death in frail patients with ablations was reduced by 65% compared to frail patients without ablations (2.0 and 6.4 per 100 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–0.50; P<0.001). Ablations were related with a lower incidence and risk of heart failure admission (1.8 and 3.1 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44–0.98; P=0.042) and acute myocardial infarction (0.2 and 0.6 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15–0.62; P=0.001). However, the risk of stroke did not change after ablation. Conclussion Ablation may be associated with lower incidences of death, heart failure, and acute myocardial infarction in real-world frail patients with AF, supporting the role of AF ablation in these patients. The effect of frailty risk on the outcome of ablation should be evaluated in further studies. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Pulmonary Hypertension Complicating Pregnancy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Krishnan ◽  
Erin M. Fricke ◽  
Marcos Cordoba ◽  
Laurie A. Chalifoux ◽  
Reda E. Girgis
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Severe Heart Failure ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Condition ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial ◽  
Phosphodiesterase Type ◽  
Type V

Abstract Purpose of review This study aims to describe the pathophysiology of pregnancy in pulmonary hypertension (PH) and review recent literature on maternal and fetal outcomes. Recent findings There is an increasing number of pregnant women with PH. Maternal mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) ranges from 9 to 25%, most commonly from heart failure and arrythmias. The highest risk of death is peri-partum and post-partum. Fetal/neonatal morbidity and mortality are also substantial. There are high rates of prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation, and preeclampsia. Women should be referred to expert centers for management. Combination PAH therapy with parenteral prostacyclin and a phosphodiesterase type V inhibitor is recommended. Induced vaginal delivery is preferred, except in cases of severe heart failure or obstetric indications for cesarean section. Summary Despite advances in management, pregnancy in PAH remains a high-risk condition and should be prevented.

Worsening Renal Function during Index Hospitalization Does Not Predict Prognosis in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ravi Rasalingam ◽  
Rachel Parker ◽  
Katherine E. Kurgansky ◽  
Luc Djousse ◽  
David Gagnon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Incidence Density ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Worsening Renal Function ◽  
Group 1

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Worsening renal function (WRF) predicts poor prognosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The effect of WRF in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The objective of this study was to determine whether WRF during index hospitalization for HFpEF is associated with increased death or readmission for heart failure. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> National Veterans Affairs electronic medical data recorded between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2014, were screened to identify index hospitalizations for HFpEF using an iterative algorithm. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on changes in serum Cr (sCr) during this admission. WRF was defined as a rise in sCr ≥0.3 mg/dL. Group 1 had no evidence of WRF, group 2 had transient WRF, and group 3 had persistent WRF at the time of discharge. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 10,902 patients with index hospitalizations for HFpEF were identified (mean age 72, 97% male). Twenty-nine percent had WRF during this hospital admission, with 48% showing recovery of sCr and 52% with no recovery at discharge. The mortality rate over a mean follow-up duration of 3.26 years was 72%. Compared to group 1, groups 2 and 3 showed no significant difference in risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 1.03] and 1.02 [95% CI: 0.93, 1.11], respectively), days hospitalized for any cause (incidence density ratio [IDR] = 1.01 [95% CI: 0.92, 1.11] and 1.01 [95% CI: 0.93, 1.11], respectively), or days hospitalized for heart failure (IDR = 0.94 [95% CI: 0.80, 1.10] and 0.94 [95% CI: 0.81, 1.09], respectively) in analyses adjusted for covariates affecting renal function and outcomes. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> While there is a high incidence of WRF during index hospitalizations for HFpEF, WRF is not associated with an increased risk of death or hospitalization. This suggests that WRF alone should not influence decisions regarding heart failure management.

scholarly journals Comparative effectiveness of bisoprolol and carvedilol among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping-Hsun Wu ◽  
Yi-Ting Lin ◽  
Jia-Sin Liu ◽  
Yi-Chun Tsai ◽  
Mei-Chuan Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Relative Safety ◽  
Dialysis Vintage ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Despite widespread use, there is no trial evidence to inform β-blocker’s (BB) relative safety and efficacy among patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). We herein compare health outcomes associated with carvedilol or bisoprolol use, the most commonly prescribed BBs in these patients. Methods We created a cohort study of 9305 HD patients who initiated bisoprolol and 11 171 HD patients who initiated carvedilol treatment between 2004 and 2011. We compared the risk of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between carvedilol and bisoprolol users during a 2-year follow-up. Results Bisoprolol initiators were younger, had shorter dialysis vintage, were women, had common comorbidities of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and were receiving statins and antiplatelets, but they had less heart failure and digoxin prescriptions than carvedilol initiators. During our observations, 1555 deaths and 5167 MACEs were recorded. In the multivariable-adjusted Cox model, bisoprolol initiation was associated with a lower all-cause mortality {hazard ratio [HR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60–0.73]} compared with carvedilol initiation. After accounting for the competing risk of death, bisoprolol use (versus carvedilol) was associated with a lower risk of MACEs [HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.80–0.91)] and attributed to a lower risk of heart failure [HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77–0.91)] and ischemic stroke [HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.72–0.97)], but not to differences in the risk of acute myocardial infarction [HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93–1.15)]. Results were confirmed in propensity score matching analyses, stratified analyses and analyses that considered prescribed dosages or censored patients discontinuing or switching BBs. Conclusions Relative to carvedilol, bisoprolol initiation by HD patients was associated with a lower 2-year risk of death and MACEs, mainly attributed to lower heart failure and ischemic stroke risk.

Abstract 205: New Onset Heart Failure and Adverse Ischemic Events Associated with Amiodarone and Dronedarone Use among Atrial Fibrillation Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gosia Sylwestrzak ◽  
Jinan Liu ◽  
Alan Rosenberg ◽  
Jeffrey White ◽  
John Barron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
New Onset

Background: Dronedarone is a non-iodinated form of amiodarone that may not cause some of serious adverse effects associated with amiodarone. However, it is less effective than amiodarone in maintaining normal sinus rhythm, and it does not improve success of electrical cardioversion. Additionally, dronedarone use has been associated with new onset or worsening of heart failure (HF), including a doubling of the risk of death in patients with symptomatic heart failure. We aimed to compare the incidence of newly diagnosed HF and HF hospitalizations among dronedarone and amiodarone users. Secondary outcomes of interest included rates of acute ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods: This retrospective study utilized administrative claims data between 1/1/2007-9/30/2011 from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment (HIRE ® ). Patients were required to have at least one claim for atrial fibrillation. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for differences between the cohorts. Incidence rate of HF, HF hospitalizations, IS and TIA events were compared between matched cohorts using Poisson time-to-event model. Results: The cohort consisted of 6,013 amiodarone and 1,534 dronedarone patients. Dronedarone patients were younger, healthier per Deyo-Charlson Index (DCI) and CHADS2 score, and less likely to have underlying heart disease (all p-values<0.05). In the propensity score matching process 838 patients with comparable baseline characteristics were selected in each group. Median follow up was 552 days in the amiodarone cohort and 412 days in the dronedarone cohort. Among patients without HF history, new onset HF incidence rate was 34.6 per 100 person-year in amiodarone cohort and 19.1 per 100 person-year in dronedarone cohort (IRR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.30-2.01, p<0.01). The incidence rate for HF hospitalization was also higher in amiodarone patients-- 10.7 per 100 person-year against 7.8 per 100 person-year for dronedarone (IRR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.02-1.85, p=0.03). For IS, the incidence rate was 1.68 per 100 person-year in amiodarone vs. 0.84 in dronedarone but results did not reach statistical significance (IRR=1.91, 95% CI: 0.84-4.30, p=0.12); for TIA, it was 3.67 vs. 2.35 for amiodarone and dronedarone respectively (IRR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.14-3.57, p=0.02). Conclusions: In a propensity score matched observational cohort study, amiodarone use was associated with higher incidence rate of new onset HF, HF hospitalizations, and TIA as identified from claims. This finding differs from other clinical studies. Future observational cohort studies should incorporate medical record review for validation since information from claims might be insufficient to fully account for underlying patient risk status, or accurately determine if HF was new onset. Key words: amiodarone; dronedarone; atrial fibrillation; heart failure.

Abstract 392: Warfarin Versus Aspirin in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure and Normal Sinus Rhythm: Insights From a Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachit Shah ◽  
George Mueller ◽  
Dhavalkumar Patel ◽  
Janos Molnar ◽  
Kalpesh Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Aspirin Therapy ◽  
Major Hemorrhage ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Aspirin Group

Background: It is unknown whether warfarin or aspirin therapy is superior for the treatment of patients with systolic heart failure who are in sinus rhythm. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search for randomized trials comparing warfarin and aspirin in patients with systolic heart failure which provided the event rates for ischemic stroke, major hemorrhage and death in the two groups. Heterogeneity of the studies was analyzed by Q statistics. The studies were homogeneous for each outcome; therefore the fixed-effect model was used to compute the relative risk based on the number of events and total number of patients in each group. A two-sided alpha error of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Results: We found 4 randomized clinical trials comparing warfarin and aspirin therapy in patients with systolic heart failure with a mean duration of follow up of 2.3 years enrolling a total of 3663 patients. The relative risk for ischemic stroke in patients treated with warfarin was 0.50 with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.33 - 0.75 (P= 0.001) while the relative risk for major hemorrhage was 1.94 with 95% CI of 1.40- 2.71 (P= 0.000) in comparison to the aspirin group. The relative risk of death was 1.01 with 95% CI of 0.89- 1.14 (P= 0.871) in the warfarin group compared to the aspirin group. Conclusion: Although warfarin therapy appears to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with systolic heart failure who are in sinus rhythm, the reduction comes at the cost of higher risk of bleeding and there is no evidence of an overall benefit on mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document