Creation of the trade and sanitary control system and prerequisites for its reformation in the Russian Empire in the late XIX - early XX centuries (on the example of St. Petersburg and Moscow)

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-45
Author(s):  
Y.V. Mitlina
2020 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-14
Author(s):  
Anatolii Hrynzovskyi

In this paper we considered the establishment and development of na-tional and local authorities, whose task was to provide and implement a na-tional policy for the prevention of the emergence and spread of infectious diseases. We studied the powers of state and local governments in the structure of the control system of the spread of infectious diseases in the Russian Em-pire until the early twentieth century. Shown is the relative impact of the development of medical science, in-ternational trade on the adoption of international sanitary conventions and the development of new legal documents in the field of preventive medicine, and their implementation in the structure of the legislation of the Russian Empire. The value of rural and urban reforms (1864) for the development of preventive medicine. Creation of the conditions for the formation in the structure of local government professional institutions responsible for the sanitation and anti-epidemic work at the territorial (rural and urban) level, as well as with provincial governments and the central government. It is shown that with the creation of new forms of self-governing, ways of developing infection control in rural and urban medicine are relatively dif-ferent, primarily, to the specific conditions of life and labor of the rural and urban populations, as well as to the severity of the actions of those risk fac-tors which influenced the sanitary-epidemiological welfare of the population.


2020 ◽  
pp. 120-139
Author(s):  
T. N. Belova

Foreign trade policy and its role in the economic growth of the national economy are considered through the prism of history and comparison of the formation of the industrial economy in the Russian Empire and the North American United States. The author compares the protectionism of D. I. Mendeleev, described in his economic works, and the free trade thinking of the American scholar W. Sumner, who formulated the “misconceptions” of protectionism. Mendeleev’s proper protectionism is grounded on the basic principles (incentivizing internal competition, growth of consumption, bringing up of new industries ), which are relevant for contemporary Russia. The author gives a typical example of the formation and decline of the factory industry using the case of mirror factories in the Ryazan province. These historical analogies, the paper argues, are necessary for the correct assessment of the current situation and for coming up with valid solutions aimed at the development of the Russian economy.


2020 ◽  
pp. 17-27
Author(s):  
D. Meshkov

The article presents some of the author’s research results that has got while elaboration of the theme “Everyday life in the mirror of conflicts: Germans and their neighbors on the Southern and South-West periphery of the Russian Empire 1861–1914”. The relationship between Germans and Jews is studied in the context of the growing confrontation in Southern cities that resulted in a wave of pogroms. Sources are information provided by the police and court archival funds. The German colonists Ludwig Koenig and Alexandra Kirchner (the resident of Odessa) were involved into Odessa pogrom (1871), in particular. While Koenig with other rioters was arrested by the police, Kirchner led a crowd of rioters to the shop of her Jewish neighbor, whom she had a conflict with. The second part of the article is devoted to the analyses of unty-Jewish violence causes and history in Ak-Kerman at the second half of the 19th and early years of 20th centuries. Akkerman was one of the southern Bessarabia cities, where multiethnic population, including the Jews, grew rapidly. It was one of the reasons of the pogroms in 1865 and 1905. The author uses criminal cases` papers to analyze the reasons of the Germans participation in the civilian squads that had been organized to protect the population and their property in Ackerman and Shabo in 1905.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 235-246
Author(s):  
Alexey L. Beglov

The article examines the contribution of the representatives of the Samarin family to the development of the Parish issue in the Russian Empire in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The issue of expanding the rights of the laity in the sphere of parish self-government was one of the most debated problems of Church life in that period. The public discussion was initiated by D.F. Samarin (1827-1901). He formulated the “social concept” of the parish and parish reform, based on Slavophile views on society and the Church. In the beginning of the twentieth century his eldest son F.D. Samarin who was a member of the Special Council on the development the Orthodox parish project in 1907, and as such developed the Slavophile concept of the parish. In 1915, A.D. Samarin, who took up the position of the Chief Procurator of the Most Holy Synod, tried to make his contribution to the cause of the parish reforms, but he failed to do so due to his resignation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document