scholarly journals Predicting the outcome of H-1B visa using ANN Algorithm

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 2421-2424

H-1B visa allows US employers to employ nonimmi- grant workers on a temporary basis. This visa only allows specialty workers to gain employment in the United States which means people who have a bachelor’s degree or equivalent work experience are eligible. The duration of H-1B visa is 3 years and it may extend to 6 years. The H-1B visa is the most sought after visa in the world, however it has a low approval rate. In 2019, 200000 people applied for the visa worldwide of which only 85000 people were selected which means an approval rate of only 42%. This fight to obtain the visa is getting more competitive as the US Economy improves. This selection depends upon a number of factors such as employer, wage etc. This paper helps to predict whether an individual can gain the H1B visa or not taking in account all the relevant factors. The proposed system secured a high accuracy of 96% by using ANN algorithm.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (196) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
V.N. Minat ◽  

As part of the study of agricultural production, as one of the leading export-oriented sectors of the US economy, the dynamics of foreign trade in American agricultural products, which is objectively recognizable in the categorical and economic evolution of spatial patterns, is considered. The latter are considered in the context of the global regional structure of agricultural exports and imports of the United States in 1946–2019 and the features of stimulating the export of American agricultural products in the context of the main regions and countries of the world for the same period of time. Based on the synthesis of historical/evolutionary and spatial approaches, methodologically filled with methods of abstract-logical and statistical-economic analysis of official American statistics, the provisions on geo-economic conjuncture, expansionism and protectionism of US foreign trade in the world/global agricultural market are empirically proved.


Author(s):  
O. V. Zhuravliov ◽  
О. М. Simachova

The US economy is one of the richest and most diversified economies in the world and keeps its leadership in the global economy for the past 100 years. The United States is a global leader in computer technology, pharmaceuticals and the manufacture of medical, aerospace and military equipment. And although services make up about 80% of GDP, the US remains the second largest producer of industrial goods in the world and is a leader in research and development. President Donald Trump was elected in November 2016, promising a big gap with his predecessor’s regulatory, tax and trade policies. Therefore, the current socio-economic status of the USA and the possible ways of its development in the future are interesting for studying the impact on other economies, in particular, on the Ukrainian economy and the search for new and optimal ways of developing relations between the United States and Ukraine. Key macroeconomic indicators of the US economy in 2011–2018 are analyzed, demonstrating the influence of Donald Tramp’s new policy on changes in the indicators of the economy, the labor market, trade, etc., as well as possible ways of development in the coming years. The review of key macroeconomic indicators gives grounds for classifying the American economy as healthy one. Rates of GDP growth will remain in the range of 2 to 3%. These rates of growth in the world’s largest economy are callable to ensure a substantial increase in the global activity. But uncertainties in the politics may hinder global growth and have clearly negative impact on the investment growth in developed and developing economies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Ghafoor Awan ◽  
Rana Ejaz Ali Khan

Introduction: The economy of the United States is the number one economy of the world on the basis of its GDP size. Many economies of the world depend upon the working upon it. However, US economy has been facing the phenomena of labour productivity slowdown since 1973. The productivity grow was witnessed during 1990s decade due to revolution of information technology but it was proved transitory. To investigate this phenomenon the economists have been actively working and using different theoretical and empirical approaches. But it is still an enigma and its real cause has so far not been detected. The objective of the Study: The objective of this research study is to investigate why US economy has been facing productivity growth slowdown since long, what are its causes and what is its possible solution?. Methodology: The author has used qualitative research approach in which real economy sector and technology economy sector have been studied on the basis of secondary data collected from OECD, IMF, World Bank,etc. The individual share of these sectors in the US GDP has been determined to analyze their effects on productivity growth. The author has also compared goods and services sectors and their contribution into the US GDP. Findings: The results of study shows that no breakthrough or major innovation has occurred in the major sector of US economy. Information technology is a small sector and growth in this sector during 1990s has not brought any signifi cant impact on the US economy. The evidence shows that quality of patents is falling despite increasing number of researchers during the period of 1990-2010 and it refl ects diminishing return on R&D investment in the technology sector. The ratio of input/output is 40/100 which is totally against the concept of constant return to scale.


Upravlenie ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-103
Author(s):  
N. E. Petrovskaya

Based on data from official American statistics, the issue of wages in the United States of America manufacturing industry has been considered. This study is an important area of study of modern social and economic problems of the United States. Manufacturing plays an important role in the economy of the US, because it creates a material basis for all other industries. The trends and problems in this area have been revealed in the article. For a comprehensive analysis a systematic approach, economic-statistical and logical research methods have been used in the paper. A comprehensive study of wages in the most important sectors of the national economy has been carried out, based on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the US Department of Labor. Separate attention has been paid to the category of “production workers”, whose share is about 70%. The statistical data on the average annual wage of production workers by industry according to the NAICS have been adduced. The significance of the manufacturing industry in creating, maintaining and returning jobs for the US economy has been shown.The difference in wages depending on the level of education, work experience and profession has been analyzed. The data on the highest paid industrial professions have been adduced. The uneven distribution of the manufacturing industry by states has been shown. It has been noted, that the reduction in the coverage of the trade union movement of American workers is another factor, affecting the level of wages. The correlation between production volume and Gini Coefficient in the USA in the period from 1947 to 2014 has been presented in the article. It has been noticed, that the growth of inequality in the US income and the decline of the manufacturing industry are interrelated.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Kapic˘ka

I construct measures of technology capital and country openness for the US economy and the rest of the world for 1982–2007. The key identifying assumption is that firms equalize returns on tangible and technology capital. For the US economy, technology capital is about one-third of tangible capital, and the degree of openness is between 0.61 and 0.70. I provide both a two-country estimation and a multicountry estimation, and find that the US estimates are almost identical in both cases. The welfare loss from totally closing the US economy is small, but the welfare gain from totally opening the US economy is large. (JEL E22, F41, O30)


Author(s):  
Judge Glock

Despite almost three decades of strong and stable growth after World War II, the US economy, like the economies of many developed nations, faced new headwinds and challenges after 1970. Although the United States eventually overcame many of them, and continues to be one of the most dynamic in the world, it could not recover its mid-century economic miracle of rapid and broad-based economic growth. There are three major ways the US economy changed in this period. First, the US economy endured and eventually conquered the problem of high inflation, even as it instituted new policies that prioritized price stability over the so-called “Keynesian” goal of full employment. Although these new policies led to over two decades of moderate inflation and stable growth, the 2008 financial crisis challenged the post-Keynesian consensus and led to new demands for government intervention in downturns. Second, the government’s overall influence on the economy increased dramatically. Although the government deregulated several sectors in the 1970s and 1980s, such as transportation and banking, it also created new types of social and environmental regulation that were more pervasive. And although it occasionally cut spending, on the whole government spending increased substantially in this period, until it reached about 35 percent of the economy. Third, the US economy became more open to the world, and it imported more manufactured goods, even as it became more based on “intangible” products and on services rather than on manufacturing. These shifts created new economic winners and losers. Some institutions that thrived in the older economy, such as unions, which once compromised over a third of the workforce, became shadows of their former selves. The new service economy also created more gains for highly educated workers and for investors in quickly growing businesses, while blue-collar workers’ wages stagnated, at least in relative terms. Most of the trends that affected the US economy in this period were long-standing and continued over decades. Major national and international crises in this period, from the end of the Cold War, to the first Gulf War in 1991, to the September 11 attacks of 2001, seemed to have only a mild or transient impact on the economy. Two events that were of lasting importance were, first, the United States leaving the gold standard in 1971, which led to high inflation in the short term and more stable monetary policy over the long term; and second, the 2008 financial crisis, which seemed to permanently decrease American economic output even while it increased political battles about the involvement of government in the economy. The US economy at the beginning of the third decade of the 21st century was richer than it had ever been, and remained in many respects the envy of the world. But widening income gaps meant many Americans felt left behind in this new economy, and led some to worry that the stability and predictability of the old economy had been lost.


Author(s):  
Lance Taylor

Historically, financial crises have been commonplace. Why did the latest episode almost derail the world economy? The macroeconomics developed by John Maynard Keynes and his close followers provides the only plausible set of answers, including rising income inequality that spilled over into debt accumulation at the same time as household consumption rose, low real interest rates, massive expansion of financial assets and liabilities as investors borrowed heavily (increased leverage) to buy assets with rising prices, and an ample supply of imports and capital inflows from the rest of the world to the United States. In an accommodating political economy environment these factors linked the real and financial sides of the US economy to create the crisis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 502-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick W. Mayer ◽  
Nicola Phillips

AbstractSince US President Donald J. Trump took office in January 2017, the future of the global economy has looked distinctly uncertain. This is not because a process of clear and purposeful change can be said to be underway. Instead, it is because of a pattern of piecemeal, inconsistent and contradictory fragments of policy, both domestic and international in orientation, in the arenas of trade, taxation, business relations, finance and banking, social and welfare provision, immigration, and environmental protection, whose cumulative significance remains unclear. The modest task of this essay is therefore to sketch the contours, patterns, inconsistencies and confusions presented by the Trump administration's approach to shaping the US economy and, by extension, the global economic order, and on that basis to offer an interpretation of its emerging implications for inequality both within the United States and across the world.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Valeriy Yarmolatiy

The article presents an expanded understanding of the reasons for the tough struggle for the presidency in the United States of two strategic directions of development of the US economy. The direction that subordinates the development of the country to the global capital base, the world government, the second direction is the development of the country's economy of jobs. An idea of imperialism and its emergence are given. A variant of the organization of the economy without crises, which turns imperialism into a form of a market of free competition, is outlined. The positive prospects of this direction for the country and the world were noted.


Author(s):  
Vladimir Vasiliev

The article critically analyzes the American economic model, focusing on the historical strengths of the US economy. It is pointed out that among American economists there is a different understanding of the specifics of the American economic model, which, along with its strengths, has many weaknesses and vulnerabilities. At the same time, it is stated that the concept of the "American economic model" is predominantly ideological in nature, reflecting the historically formed ideology of the American exceptionalism applied to the economic sphere of society. In the context of globalization, there is a process of leveling out many elements of the American economic system, claiming to be elevated to a certain kind of absolute, which are becoming widespread in the economies of other highly developed countries, since the globalization of the world economy over the past 25-30 years was built on the premises of the maximum possible free movement of capital, labor, goods and services. As a result, many parameters of the American economic system undergo evolutionary changes in which they increasingly become similar to the parameters of the economies of other countries. In addition, the practice of compiling the system of national economic accounts, which has formed over the past 70 years under the auspices of the UN, is based on the idea of their unification and applicability to economies with different levels of economic development without highlighting specific qualitative characteristics inherent in the economies of different countries. In parallel, economic modeling, including using econometric methods, practiced in American universities and think tanks, is also based on abstract models, which are based solely on quantitative indicators omitting the specific qualitative properties of the economy of each country, including the US economy. The parameters of the American economic system that evolve over time are turning into a steady reduction in the dominant role of the United States in the world economy, taken in terms of their share in world GDP, which has almost halved since 1960, from 40% to 24%, and according to the American forecasts will tend to decline further in the near foreseeable future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document