Kajian Potensi Dan Peluang Pembangunan Infrastruktur Di Sektor Sosial Dengan Skema KBPU

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-120
Author(s):  
Towaf Totok Irawan
Keyword(s):  
Fiscal Policy ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructure Investment ◽  
Social Sector ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Investment Planning ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Cooperation Mechanism ◽  
The Social

This study aims to formulate recommendations and opportunities for potential infrastructure development in the social sector by using KPBU scheme. The direct beneficiaries of this activity are the Deputy of Investment Planning as a unit that is directly responsible for formulating the proposed establishment of the Act related KPBU in the field of infrastructure investment. The output of this activity is also expected to be useful for investors in infrastructure and related stakeholders. Model cooperation Public Private Partnership in social infrastructure should take into account the uniqueness of each sector, particularly the constraints, risks and macro conditions, including fiscal policy and commitment to the objective of each sector. So that needs to be made cooperation mechanism Public Private Partnership in the field of social infrastructure by making adjustments to the conditions and limitations in the field of social infrastructure. Results and recommendations are discussed further in the paper. Keywords: Multi Criteria Analysis, infrastructure development

scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT OF STATE-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE UDMURT REPUBLIC

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 783-790
Author(s):  
S.V. x S.V. Radygina
Keyword(s):  
Economic Effect ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
The Social ◽  
Development Institutions ◽  
Udmurt Republic ◽  
Private And Public

The article discloses the essence of the public-private partnership mechanism, various approaches to its definition, both at the level of legislative acts of the Russian Federation and international organizations (UN). Different forms of PPP projects, their peculiarities and distinctive features are described in accordance with federal laws on public-private partnership and concession agreements. Instruments are being considered to support investors implementing investment projects of social infrastructure on the basis of PPPs, from federal and regional development institutions, as well as state authorities. An analysis of the level of PPP development in the Udmurt Republic is carried out, concrete examples of successful cooperation between private and public parties on the organization of financing and implementation of the project on the basis of public-private or municipal-private partnership are given. The use of this mechanism allows to obtain a significant economic effect due to the fact that there is a personal interest of a private person in obtaining income from a built or modernized facility. In addition, the social component plays an important role, PPP allows you to direct funds to those industries that are initially considered not promising enough to conduct business, but are often of key importance for the development of the region and ensuring a comfortable urban environment for the population.

Public–Private Partnership (PPP)

2019 ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
Kuldeep Mathur
Keyword(s):  
Public Goods ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Social Sector ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
The Social ◽  
Physical Infrastructure ◽  
Technical Proficiency ◽  
Governance Reforms

Among the more prominent initiative taken in governance reforms is that of forging public-private partnership both at policy as well as at administrative level. This chapter critically examines its rationale for delivering public goods and services. While accepting its promotion in physical infrastructure sector, where high levels of capital and technology are demanded, the author questions its relevance in the social sector, where distributive policies are an important part of implementation agenda. However, these partnerships are a continuation of the perspective of de-politicization, technical proficiency for increasing performance efficiency.

scholarly journals Public-private partnerships in social services: foreign practices and prospects for implementation in Ukraine

2017 ◽  
pp. 21-37
Author(s):  
Alina Zhukovska
Keyword(s):  
Social Services ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Priority Areas ◽  
The Uk

The article outlines the issues of social infrastructure development in Ukraine. The need of addressing these issues through implementing public-private partnership projects is justified. Some priority areas for introducing public-private partnership in Ukraine are identified. The best foreign practices of attracting private sector to solving problems of social infrastructure development are considered. It is revealed that priority areas where public-private partnerships operate are dependent on the level of socio-economic development of the country. Some practices of public-private partnership projects in education in the UK, Australia, Germany, and Egypt are analyzed in detail and their common characteristics are systematized. Based on the analysis of best foreign practices applied in implementing public-private partnership projects in healthcare, the following key measures are formulated: direct provision of medical services, management of medical assets, development and production of pharmaceuticals, improvement of access to medical services and products. The performance of public-private partnership projects in the healthcare sector in the UK, France, Australia and Sweden is analyzed in detail. The paper describes both more and less successful examples of publicprivate partnership in this sector. The article defines the following reasons for low-level implementation of public-private partnership projects in healthcare: schedule delays in construction, operation-cost overruns, poor hospital and ward layout, use of low-cost medical equipment which requires regular renewal. The research also considers the best foreign practices of introducing public-private partnership projects in the field of culture. Some characteristic features of public-private partnership projects in social services in foreign countries are identified. The national practices of introducing public-private partnership projects are highlighted and priority areas of their operation are singled out. It is found out that the implementation of public-private partnership projects in social services is not popular among domestic investors. Some individual projects of public-private partnership in social services are considered. A particular attention is paid to both more and less successful ones. The main problems of the implementation of public-private partnership projects in the national education, healthcare, culture are outlined and ways for their solution are proposed.

scholarly journals Affordable social infrastructure vs public-private partnership

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-348
Author(s):  
Vitaly Maximov
Keyword(s):  
Social Services ◽  
Private Investment ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
The State ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Economic Mechanism ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Private Investors

The article is devoted to the problems of sustainable development of social infrastructure and social services, which are beyond the effective demand of large cities, cannot develop according to market laws, and provide the necessary level of infrastructure fullness. Despite 45.9% of private companies in the social sectors, the vast majority of real estate objects continue to be owned by the state, forming the need to find economic mechanisms for the development of state social infrastructure, outside of limited budget opportunities. The possibility of attracting private investment in new construction and reconstruction without alienating the ownership right to it makes public-private partnership (PPP) and the economic mechanism based on it have no alternative. However, its practical application suffers from asociality, leading to the appearance of state-owned facilities where private investors conduct exclusively commercial activities. The apparent budget savings lead the state, judicial and supervisory authorities in such territories to a strategic failure, reducing the number of state facilities operating at state prices, ignoring the requests of the population for affordable social infrastructure, increasing social tension in society. This work is aimed at studying the irrational behavior of private investors, the stability of which is provided by the PPP mechanism, where the state determines the necessary level of the sociality of infrastructure objects that best corresponds to the existing stratification of residents of a certain territory through competitive procedures and essential conditions of the future project. It is necessary to continue research on improving federal legislation, whose social neutrality leads to conflicting expectations of the parties from PPP, adding sensitivity to a wide range of risks, repelling private investment and investors, limiting infrastructure development only to budget opportunities. The development of an economic mechanism that ensures finding a balance of accessibility and market rationality of social facilities is not an easy task, which has many solutions taking into account the characteristics of a particular territory and its population

Budget Subsidies + “Private Concession Initiative” = Stopper for Social Infrastructure Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 152 (6) ◽  
pp. 30-39
Author(s):  
Vitaly V. Maximov ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Behavior ◽  
Private Investment ◽  
State Ownership ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Commercial Activities ◽  
Budgetary Participation

The overwhelming majority of social infrastructure facilities remain in state ownership, requiring special formats for attracting private investment without possibility of disposition and loss of their destination. Mechanism of public-private partnership doesn't leave any other option for such projects, and the "private concession initiative", which has become widespread in recent years, is best suited for projects focused on commercial activities, although this limits its application to social facilities. Non-competitive basis of this format relies on the market offer of the investor, whose rationality does not imply social behavior and whose activity is obviously not intended for budgetary participation. Recently, there has been an increase in cases of government authorities taking commitments on budgetary co-financing of agreements concluded as a result of such initiatives, which is often fraught with systemic violations of budgetary legislation. Connivance of the control-supervisory and judicial authorities results in formation of skewed law enforcement practice, in 36.2% of projects investors receive additional rental income from the budget, objectively not justified. This not only results in budget overpayments, but also devalues competitive formats that were previously quite successful — at present only 1/5 of social projects are concluded through a competitive process.

PRINSIP DAN STRATEGI PENERAPAN “PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP” DALAM PENYEDIAAN INFRASTRUKTUR TRANSPORTASI

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwinanta Utama
Keyword(s):  
Life Time ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructure Investment ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Government Budget ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Toll Road ◽  
Electricity Power ◽  
Technology Capability

Public Private Partnership (PPP), recently is becoming popular issue among stakeholders in infrastructure development in Indonesia. In other countries, infrastructure facilities such as Toll Road, Water Supply Network, Electricity Power,  Harbour, Airport, Health Services, and Education have already been using PPP scheme. PPP is needed due to the limitation of government budget, infrastructure life time based on the quantity and the quality, and also the private sector skill/technology capability. In term of infrastructure quality competitiveness, based on the survey resulted in the World Competitiveness Report 2008-2009, showed that Indonesia is on the 96th rank among 134 countires surveyed. It can be argued that Indonesian infrastructure quality is still low in comparison to the other South East Asian Countries, even from its neighborhood countries. Government budget for infrastructure investment including transportation in 2010-2014 is very limited namely around 32% including from bilateral and multilateral loan. Therefore the 62% government budget remains must be fulfilled by another scheme such as Public Private Partnership.  

scholarly journals A rationale for choosing the mechanism of public-private partnership for the sustainable development of social infrastructure facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 01056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alissa Dubgorn ◽  
Irina Zaychenko ◽  
Nadezhda Grashhenko
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Life Cycle Cost ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Sustainable Development ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Face ◽  
Budget Shortfalls

Using the mechanism of public-private partnership (PPP) is an effective way to attract investment for the modernization of urban infrastructure in the face of budget shortfalls, which is especially important for the sustainable development of the social infrastructure of the territories. The aim of the study is to analyze the models of public-private partnership (PPP) and substantiate the choice of the model to ensure sustainable development of the social sphere. The life-cycle cost (LLC) model is represented as the most effective one for realizing municipal facilities development projects.

scholarly journals A Global Review of Public Private Partnerships Trends and Challenges for Social Infrastructure

2018 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 06001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrianto Oktavianus ◽  
Iris Mahani ◽  
Meifrinaldi
Keyword(s):  
The Elderly ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Limited Budget ◽  
Economic Infrastructure ◽  
The Government ◽  
Implementation Models

In developing countries, the government which has limited budget for public infrastructure development should choose which infrastructure should be developed. Most countries decided to build more economic infrastructure than social infrastructure because former have direct economic impact for society. The involvement of private sector in public infrastructure financing has been accomplished for decades in the form of Public Private Partnership (PPP). However, the implementation is also more often for economic infrastructure, but some countries have started to implement PPP for social infrastructure (education, healthcare, care of the elderly, etc.) when they think to add human capital and improve quality of life. This study attempts to review a set of public private partnership implementation models relevant for social infrastructure development in some countries. Moreover, this study also more explores to the challenges and issues in different areas of social infrastructure. The outcome is to show a trend public-private partnership for social infrastructure in some successful projects from different countries. The challenges and issues about implementation public-private partnership for social infrastructure also be a part of the results from this study. Finally, the study has a valuable input for implementation of PPP on social infrastructure in Indonesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document