scholarly journals Features of political discourse In Russian language

2016 ◽  
Vol 219 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Dr.Ghada Tariq Sabri
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Public Policy ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Complex Object ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Purpose

    Political discourse is a complex object of studying, "it is the intersection of different fields like: political science, social psychology, linguistics. It has the analysis of form, objectives and content of used in certain (" political ") situations." According to researchers AN Baranov and EG Kazakevich, political discourse forms a "total speeches, acts used in political discussions, as well as rules of public policy expertise." The public purpose of political discourse - to convince recipients with a "political corrects" political evaluations.

scholarly journals Features of political discourse In Russian language

2018 ◽  
Vol 215 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
Dr.Ghada Tariq Sabri
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Public Policy ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Complex Object ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Purpose

     Political discourse is a complex object of studying, "it is the intersection of different fields like: political science, social psychology, linguistics. It has the analysis of form, objectives and content of used in certain (" political ") situations." According to researchers AN Baranov and EG Kazakevich, political discourse forms a "total speeches, acts used in political discussions, as well as rules of public policy expertise." The public purpose of political discourse - to convince recipients with a "political corrects" political evaluations.

Using Community Resources to Teach Public Policy

1984 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Keith J. Mueller
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Community Resources ◽  
Alternative Instruction ◽  
Policy Studies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Energy Environment ◽  
Science Departments ◽  
Specific Health

The recent growth in policy studies curricula in political science departments affords increased opportunities for experimentation with alternative instruction modes. This article describes one innovation found to be appropriate for courses for which the instructor has access to experts in the policy being studied. In this example, community experts in health policy issues were used as resource persons to assist in discussion of specific health policy concerns. Other policy courses should be amenable to this format, including energy, environment, and economic development courses. Even without using community experts, the general format of weekly colloquiums could be replicated for other policy courses.The courses described herein is an upper division/graduate level course in American Health Policy. It is taught for one semester every other year as one of several topical courses in the public policy track within political science.

Monitoring discriminatory political discourse on immigration: A pilot study in Catalonia

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gema Rubio-Carbonero ◽  
Ricard Zapata-Barrero
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Comparative Research ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
And Linguistics

The aim of this article is to present the findings of an analytical framework we have designed to monitor discriminatory political discourse on immigration. Through the understanding of how some of the most relevant studies in three disciplines (political science, social psychology and linguistics) have framed racism, we try to infer how such racism may manifest in discourse through particular discriminatory tendencies. The combination of these tendencies has contributed to the designing of the proposed analytical framework that aims, by means of 12 standards, to systematically certify political discourse as discriminatory, quantify how much discriminatory discourse is and assess how such discrimination is legitimised or justified. By implementing such a framework within the context of Catalonia, this pilot study offers a global picture of how Catalan political discourse on immigration is constructed and how each of the standards appears (or does not appear) in discourse. Once the viability of this framework is proven, we conclude it could be the basis of comparative research in other contexts.

Defending Government: Why Big Government Works. By Max Neiman. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000. 260p. $27.00 paper.

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-218
Author(s):  
John C. Pierce
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Public Policy ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Goal Achievement ◽  
Graduate Courses ◽  
The Public

Max Neiman provides a concise, well-written, and compre- hensive critical analysis of "the conservative attack on the public sector, especially its explanation for and evaluation of the size and growth of the public sector in the United States" (p. viii). In doing so, however, he only partially fulfills what is promised in the subtitle, namely, explaining why big govern- ment works. Rather than explicitly assess the reasons for goal achievement in a variety of policy areas, as the title implied to me, Neiman focuses on why we have big government and on the various critiques of that size. To be sure, the book is appropriate for upper division and graduate courses in political science, public policy, or public administration.

From Public Law to Public Policy, or The “Public” in “Public Law”

1972 ◽  
Vol 5 (04) ◽  
pp. 410-418
Author(s):  
Martin Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Judicial Behavior ◽  
Private Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Forward Looking

In a self-consciously forward looking survey recently published inPS, Glendon Schubert continues to employ the phrase “public law” as roughly synonymous with the legal concerns of political science. The recent publication of Murphy and Tanenhaus'The Study of Public Lawalso reaffirms that, in spite of the movement toward “judicial behavior,” which it might have been anticipated would change the boundaries of the field, the “public” in public law is still very much with those political scientists particularly concerned with things legal. There does not seem to me to be any valid reason why political scientists should maintain the public law—private law distinction and then proceed to exclude themselves from the “private” law sphere.

scholarly journals The Case for Public Policy Expertise in Political Science

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 476-480
Author(s):  
Veronica Herrera ◽  
Alison E. Post
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Public Sphere ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Research Area ◽  
The Public ◽  
Innovative Work ◽  
The Public Sphere ◽  
Academic Positions

ABSTRACTThe politics of public policy is a vibrant research area increasingly at the forefront of intellectual innovations in the discipline. We argue that political scientists are best positioned to undertake research on the politics of public policy when they possess expertise in particular policy areas. Policy expertise positions scholars to conduct theoretically innovative work and to ensure that empirical research reflects the reality they aim to analyze. It also confers important practical advantages, such as access to a significant number of academic positions and major sources of research funding not otherwise available to political scientists. Perhaps most importantly, scholars with policy expertise are equipped to defend the value of political science degrees and research in the public sphere.

scholarly journals Doctoring the Afflicted and Demythifying Public Policy

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry D. Sanders
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Political Debate ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Purpose

“The ultimate test of a set of economic ideas… is whether it illuminates the anxieties of the time. Does it explain problems that people find urgent? Does it bear on the current criticism of economic performance? … Does it bear upon the issues of political debate? For these, though many have always preferred to believe otherwise, do not ignite spontaneously or emerge maliciously from the mouths of agitators to afflict the comfortable.“—John Kenneth Galbraith, Economics & the Public Purpose, 1973

Alzheimer's Disease — Perspective from Political Science: Public Policy Issues

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 724-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Blank
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Policy Decisions ◽  
Policy Issues ◽  
The Public ◽  
Policy Initiatives ◽  
Policy Context

The paper outlines the policy context and summarizes the numerous policy issues that AD raises from the more generic to the unique. It posits that strong public fears of AD and its future prevalence projections and costs, raise increasingly difficult policy dilemmas. After reviewing the costs in human lives and money and discussing the latest U.S. policy initiatives, the paper presents two policy areas as examples the demanding policy decisions we face. The first focuses on the basic regulatory function of protecting the public from those who would exploit these fears. The second centers on the well-debated issues of advance directives and euthanasia that surround AD. Although more dialogue, education and research funding are needed to best serve the interests of AD patients and families as well as society at large, this will be challenging because of the strong feelings and divisions AD engenders.

Beyond “who pays?”: stadium development and urban governance

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Friedman ◽  
Adam S. Beissel
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Urban Governance ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Dominant Mode ◽  
Sports Facilities ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Purpose ◽  
Purpose Centered

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to reframe analyses of stadium and arena subsidization policies from perspectives centered upon economic and financial issues toward a perspective focused on broader issues of urban governance and the public purposes of sports facilities. Such assessments would provide a better understanding of whether such use of public resources represents good public policy.Design/methodology/approachTo demonstrate this, the paper uses an integrated literature review to offer a historical analysis of sport facility development within the context of the broader assumptions that shape public policy and how sports have been used toward achieving particular public goals. This history provides a foundation for an analysis of sports facility development within the current moment as cities require team owners to invest in redevelopment activities in the neighborhoods surrounding sports facilities.FindingsThis paper asserts that focusing on the economic and financial aspects of sports facility development is a perspective that is too narrow. Instead, this paper shows that a more holistic approach, beginning with the dominant mode of urban governance and how its assumptions underlie the public purposes for which stadiums and arenas are used, provides a better explanatory framework and a deeper understanding of the issue in the contemporary moment.Originality/valueMoving beyond the question of economic efficacy, the public purpose-centered approach of this paper seeks to place subsidization policies into a broader dialog with other priorities toward maximizing the public good among the broadest population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document