scholarly journals МЕТОДИЧНИЙ ПІДХІД ДО АНАЛІЗУ СТВОРЕННЯ СТАРТАПІВ СТУДЕНТАМИ

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
Вавдіюк Н.С ◽  
Подолян Д.В.
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
University Rankings ◽  
Business Incubators ◽  
World University Rankings ◽  
Global Innovation ◽  
Global World ◽  
European University

У статті розглянуто методичні підходи до аналізу стартапів, створених студентами: UBI Global World Rankings of Business Incubators & Accelerators (Швеція), методичний підхід сформований на основі моделі «потрійної спіралі» Г. Іцковіца і Л. Лейдесдорффа (Росія), The Female Founders Monitor (FFM) (Німеччина), European University Association EUA Study (Бельгія), The State of European Tech (Великобританія), Startup Ranking (Перу), European Startup Monitor (Німеччина), QS World University Rankings (Великобританія), German Startup Monitor (Німеччина), Global Innovation Index (Швейцарія), Startup Friendliness Index (США). Описано переваги та недоліки використання кожного підходу. У розрізі вищеописаних методичних підходів виокремлено показники, що досліджують стартапи, створені студентами. Здійснено їхній розподіл відповідно до життєвого циклу стартапу та підходів до управління. Їхнє дослідження дозволило сформувати авторський методичний підхід до аналізу створення стартапів студентами. Вона охоплює напрями, вибір яких спирається на наступні визначальні ознаки: аналіз розвитку підприємницьких університетів; аналіз практики розвитку бізнес-інкубаторів при університетах зарубіжних країн; аналіз сфери реалізації та способів фінансування стартапів, створених студентами; аналіз засновників стартапів. Відповідно до 4-х визначальних ознак, здійснено вибір показників для проведення аналізу створення стартапів студентами.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY’S SCIENTIFIC POTENTIAL WITH THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING POSITIONS IN THE GLOBAL RATING

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 127-134
Author(s):  
A. I. BOLVACHEV ◽  
◽  
O. V. ROMANCHENKO ◽  
M. A. SKURATOVA ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
University Rankings ◽  
Important Condition ◽  
University System ◽  
World University Rankings ◽  
The World ◽  
Scientific Potential ◽  
World Ranking

The most important condition of modern world globalization for university system is the position of the uni-versity, its role and place, both in its own country and in the world positioning. Getting into the world ranking in the leading places, universities sharply increase their attractiveness not only for applicants, but also for employers, investors and the state, which can provide additional subsidies. The article considers the position of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics in the QS World University Rankings.

scholarly journals Universities of China: Current Status and Global Development Strategy Until 2035

2020 ◽  
pp. 185-197
Author(s):  
Tatiana Guruleva
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Development Strategy ◽  
The State ◽  
University Rankings ◽  
Global Development ◽  
Chinese Universities ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
World University Rankings ◽  
Current State ◽  
New Strategy

Introduction. Now China is completing the “State program for medium and long-term reform and development of education for 2010–2020.” The results achieved during the implementation of this program and the new strategy for the development of China’s education, including in the field of higher education and higher education institutions, are becoming a new subject of research in domestic science and require careful study. The purpose of the study is to characterize the current state of Chinese universities and identify a strategy for their development until 2035. Methods and materials. As research methods, analysis of open data sources and comparative analysis were used. The source base includes regulatory documents of the People’s Republic of China in the field of education (laws, the state program and state projects), CPC documents related to the development of the education system (reports of the party congress and plenum), information resources of the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (National Statistical Reports on Education Development for 2016–2018), data from QS World University Rankings and Times Higher Education World University Rankings for the period 2016–2020. Analysis. As a result of the reform, the gross enrollment ratio of high school education (10–12 grades) increased from 79.2% (2009) to 88.8% (2018), and higher education from 24.2% (2009) to 48.1% (2018). The fulfillment of the tasks of reforming the higher education system, including the implementation of Projects 211 and 985, by the beginning of the 13th five-year plan (2016) has enabled 85 Chinese universities to enter the world ranking THE (2016–2017). In 2016, China switched to a new strategy for the global development of higher education, embarking on the implementation of the “Project of First-Class Universities and Scientific Disciplines”. At the 19th CPC Congress (2017), this strategy was supplemented by the task of intensive development of higher education. Currently, the global development strategy for higher education and universities in the country is continuing as part of the overall modernization of education, according to which China plans to strengthen the combined power and influence of country’s education in the international arena by 2020, and by 2035 to increase the competitiveness of higher education in the context of transforming the country into a global educational power. Results. The results of the study include the following: 1) the current state of Chinese universities significantly exceeds the state of 2009 in both quantitative and qualitative indicators; 2) the modern strategy for the development of higher education is the strategy of global development of Chinese universities, aimed at their achievement of leading and first positions in the world, as well as strengthening the competitiveness of China’s higher education, contributing to the transformation of China into a world educational power in 2035.

scholarly journals The Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo (FMUSP) Internationalization Strategy

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (spe3) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Talita De Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Latin American ◽  
Public Universities ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
The State ◽  
University Rankings ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Large Community ◽  
World University Rankings ◽  
Internationalization Strategy ◽  
The University

Well established as one of the most prestigious public universities in Brazil, the University of São Paulo (USP) was in 2015, ranked first in the Latin American rankings, 9th in the BRICS ranking and 132nd in the QS World University Rankings 2014/15. With a large community of around 90,000 students, the University of São Paulo is located in São Paulo, Brazil’s most populous city, and has campi placed in seven towns spread throughout the state of São Paulo.[...]

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS’ ACTIVITIES IN UKRAINE

10.23856/4217 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 126-133
Author(s):  
Inna Vlasova ◽  
Olha Palamarchuk
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Financial Economic ◽  
University Rankings ◽  
Teaching Excellence ◽  
World University Rankings ◽  
The World ◽  
The Impact ◽  
European University

The metrics of the European University Association and indicators of other organizations (UK Committee of University Chairs, Teaching Excellence Framework) have been analyzed in the article. Leading international rankings (Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), QS World University Rankings, THE Impact Rankings, THE Europe Teaching Rankings) have been investigated in order to determine the main indicators of higher education institutions. National metrics and indicators have been studied (rating “Top 200 Ukraine 2020”, the formula for the distribution of expenditures under the article “Training of freelancers and ensuring the activities of their bases of practice” for 2020). The approaches and views of domestic and foreign researchers on the problem of efficiency in the field of higher education have been clarified. As a result of the analysis, the urgency of the problem of finding adequate mechanisms for evaluating the effectiveness of higher education institutions in Ukraine have been proved. Based on the study, a system of indicators for assessing the effectiveness of higher education institutions in Ukraine in terms of organizational, academic, research and financial / economic components have been suggested.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF MAJOR HOLDINGS FOR FORMING WORLD RANKINGS OF LEADING UNIVERSITIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (191) ◽  
pp. 190-193
Author(s):  
Iryna Shcherbak ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Educational Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Quality Of Education ◽  
University Rankings ◽  
World University Rankings ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Independent Expert

At the present stage of development of society, institutions of higher education (HEI) strive to occupy stable ranking positions among competitors at the national and global levels. Increasing competition in the field of education has led to the creation of mechanisms for assessing the activities of educational institutions. The assessment of the activities of the HEI should be carried out both at the state level and by independent expert institutions, taking into account the index of academic integrity, the index of the academic reputation of the HEI, the index of employers' satisfaction with university graduates, the achievements of the educational institution, the wishes of students, scientific, scientific and pedagogical workers. Such monitoring is carried out to assure students, administration and the state that the given HEI has a high level of expert assessment. In world practice, independent organizations are engaged in the development and implementation of methods for independent assessment of the quality of education, in particular the ratings of educational institutions, using the results of international comparative research in the field of education. For example, such information holdings, with the help of which world university rankings are formed: THE World University Rankings (an annual publication of university rankings according to the Times Higher Education magazine), QS World University Rankings (a global study and the accompanying ranking of the best higher educational institutions of world significance in terms of their achievements in the field of education and science Calculated according to the methodology of the British consulting company Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), The Academic Ranking of World Universities (affiliated with the Institute of Higher Education, Shanghai Jiaotong University). The indicator of high competitiveness of the HEI is confirmed by joining the international ranking and occupying positions close to the world's leading universities. The methodology for ranking holdings consists in calculating a rating by indicators that assess key criteria. Each indicator has its own percentage of the total score. These rating systems make a significant contribution to the quality of education in countries. With the help of these information holdings, the university can show its strengths in order to have a high rate of competitiveness among the HEIs and attract the attention of prospective students, their parents, scientific and pedagogical workers, teachers and employers.

scholarly journals A Multicriteria Goal Programming Model for Ranking Universities

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 459
Author(s):  
Fernando García ◽  
Francisco Guijarro ◽  
Javier Oliver
Keyword(s):  
Goal Programming ◽  
Programming Model ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
University Rankings ◽  
Central Tendency ◽  
Performance Variables ◽  
World University Rankings ◽  
Goal Programming Model ◽  
Objective Quantification

This paper proposes the use of a goal programming model for the objective ranking of universities. This methodology has been successfully used in other areas to analyze the performance of firms by focusing on two opposite approaches: (a) one favouring those performance variables that are aligned with the central tendency of the majority of the variables used in the measurement of the performance, and (b) an alternative one that favours those different, singular, or independent performance variables. Our results are compared with the ranking proposed by two popular World University Rankings, and some insightful differences are outlined. We show how some top-performing universities occupy the best positions regardless of the approach followed by the goal programming model, hence confirming their leadership. In addition, our proposal allows for an objective quantification of the importance of each variable in the performance of universities, which could be of great interest to decision-makers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document