Virus Yellows in sugar beet – possibilities to achieve virus resistance

2021 ◽  
pp. 696-701
Author(s):  
Roxana Hossain ◽  
Mark Varrelmann

Virus yellows in sugar beet is caused by different virus species. Monitoring has shown that Beet yellows virus (BYV), Beet mild yellowing virus (BMYV), Beet chlorosis virus (BChV) are common and widespread, while Beet mosaic virus (BtMV) is less prevalent. The green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) is considered the main vector of these viruses. Sugar beet varieties with resistance or tolerance traits are currently not available to practical growers, therefore it is imperative to support breeding efforts with improved strategies to achieve virus resistance. For this purpose, a field test was established in which yield differences between susceptible and tolerant varieties can be generated by a 3% inoculation with BMYV-carrying aphids. A greenhouse bioassay has also been developed to distinguish susceptible and tolerant genotypes following BYV infection. Both assays pave the way for future use of natural resources such as wild forms and other breeding material to screen for virus resistance. In addition, molecular biology approaches are used to identify plant susceptibility factors of the plant-virus interaction, which will be knocked out via modern precision breeding methods to generate recessive virus resistance. Consequently, genotypes with naturally occurring mutations in the appropriate factors can be used for crossbreeding processes into elite breeding material.

Author(s):  
B. D. Harrison

SynopsisSome of the most successful early applications of genetic engineering in crop improvement have been in the production of virus-resistant plants. This has been achieved not by the transfer of naturally occurring resistance genes from one plant species or variety to another but by transformation with novel resistance genes based on nucleotide sequences derived from the viruses themselves or from virus-associated nucleic acids. Transformation of plants with a DNA copy of the particle protein gene of viruses that have positive-sense single-stranded RNA genomes typically confers resistance to infection with the homologous and closely related viruses. Transformation with a gene that is transcribed to produce a benign viral satellite RNA can confer virus-specific tolerance of infection. In addition, recent work with viral poly-merase gene-related sequences offers much promise, and research is active on other strategies such as the use of virus-specific ribozymes.Already the field trialling of plants incorporating transgenic virus resistance has begun, with encouraging results, and effects on virus spread are being studied. Deployment strategies for the resistant plants must now be devised and the conjectural hazards of growing them assessed. Genetically engineered virus resistance promises to make a major contribution to the control of plant virus diseases by non-chemical methods.


Plant Disease ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rubies Autonell ◽  
C. Ratti ◽  
R. Resca ◽  
M. De Biaggi ◽  
J. Ayala García

Beet virus Q (BVQ) is a member of the genus Pomovirus that is transmitted by Polymyxa betae Keskin. Initially described as the Wierthe serotype of Beet soilborne virus (BSBV), BVQ is now considered a distinct virus species based on its genomic properties (1). BVQ is commonly found in fields where BSBV and the causal agent of rhizomania disease, Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV), are also present. Simultaneous infection of sugar beet plants with multiple virus species could affect disease symptom expression (4). For this reason, the pathogenicity of BVQ and its role in the epidemiology of rhizomania disease remain a subject of study. During 2004, six soil samples were collected from different sites in the Castilla-La Mancha Region in Spain (Albacete and Ciudad Real provinces) where rhizomania symptoms were observed in BNYVV-tolerant sugar beet cultivars. Soil from the Hainaut Region of Belgium, infected with BNYVV, BSBV, and BVQ and supplied by Prof. C. Bragard (Unité de Phytopathologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium) was used as a positive control. Sugar beet plants (cv. Asso) were grown in the soil samples for 45 days at 24°C and then root tissue was harvested. All samples were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with commercial BNYVV antiserum (BIOREBA AG, Reinach, Switzerland) and BSBV/BVQ antisera (IC10 and 6G2) supplied by R. Koenig (Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Braunschweig, Germany). Total RNA extracted from sugar beet roots as previously described (3) was tested using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Primers BVQ3F (5′-GTT TTC AAA CTT GCC ATC CT-3′) and BVQ3R2 (5′-CCA CAA TGG GCC AAT AGA-3′), which amplify a 690-bp fragment of the triple gene block region of BVQ RNA 3, were designed based on the published sequence (GenBank Accession No. AJ223598). The presence of BSBV and BNYVV was assayed using RT-PCR with previously described primers (2,3). BVQ was detected from plants grown in soil collected from La Roda (Albacete) in Spain and from Hainaut in Belgium. The fragments amplified from Spanish sample with BVQ3F and BVQ3R2 (GenBank Accession No. AY849375) showed 95.9% nucleotide sequence identity with the previously published sequence of BVQ (1). The La Roda BVQ isolate was mechanically transmitted to Chenopodium quinoa from infected sugar beet root tissue. BVQ was detected using RT-PCR in local lesions that appeared approximately 5 days after inoculation and subsequently spread along veins. To our knowledge, this is the first report of BVQ in soil from Spain, although it has been previously reported in Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, and the Netherlands (2). BSBV and BNYVV (type A) were detected in all six Spanish samples, as well as in the Belgian soil. References: (1) R. Koenig et al. J. Gen. Virol. 79:2027, 1998. (2) A. Meunier et al. Appl. Environ Microbiol. 69:2356, 2003. (3) C. Ratti et al. J. Virol. Methods 124:41, 2005. (4) C. Rush Annu. Rev Phytopathol 41:567, 2003.


Author(s):  
Yasutsugu Suzuki ◽  
Artem Baidaliuk ◽  
Pascal Miesen ◽  
Lionel Frangeul ◽  
Anna B. Crist ◽  
...  

SummaryEndogenous viral elements (EVEs) are viral sequences integrated in host genomes. A large number of non-retroviral EVEs was recently detected in Aedes mosquito genomes, leading to the hypothesis that mosquito EVEs may control exogenous infections by closely related viruses. Here, we experimentally investigated the role of an EVE naturally found in Aedes aegypti populations and derived from the widespread insect-specific virus, cell-fusing agent virus (CFAV). Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, we created an Ae. aegypti line lacking the CFAV EVE. Absence of the EVE resulted in increased CFAV replication in ovaries, possibly modulating vertical transmission of the virus. Viral replication was controlled by targeting of viral RNA by EVE-derived piRNAs. Our results provide evidence that antiviral piRNAs are produced in the presence of a naturally occurring EVE and its cognate virus, demonstrating a functional link between non-retroviral EVEs and antiviral immunity in a natural insect-virus interaction.


2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A. Berlandier ◽  
M. W. Sweetingham

The impact of infestation by bluegreen aphid, Acyrthosiphon kondoi, cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora, and/or green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, on grain production of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) and yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus) was assessed at 4 sites in the Western Australian grainbelt. Yield losses caused by naturally occurring aphids on 4 cultivars of narrow-leafed and 2 cultivars of yellow lupins were measured by applying the systemic insecticide imidacloprid as a seed dressing and/or as foliar sprays throughout the plant growth phase and compared with untreated control plots. The extent of damage caused by aphids varied greatly but was significantly influenced by lupin cultivar, and yields for the same treatment combination varied between geographical locations. Bluegreen aphid was the most abundant species wherever large colonies of aphids developed. Yellow lupin Wodjil was the most infested and suffered severe losses in grain yield, whereas narrow-leafed lupin Kalya was largely resistant to aphids and there were negligible losses in grain production from plots not treated for aphids. In a fifth experiment, a single foliar spray of the insecticide pirimicarb controlled abundant aphids and increased yield by as much as 95% (0.65 t/ha) in Wodjil. Lupin growers need to be aware of the potential losses aphids can cause and that applying foliar insecticidal sprays to susceptible cultivars can prevent such losses.


Pathogens ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 991
Author(s):  
Jonas Johansson Wensman ◽  
Maria Stokstad

The current pandemic of COVID-19 has highlighted the importance of basic studies on coronaviruses (CoVs) in general, and severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in particular. CoVs have for long been studied in veterinary medicine, due to their impact on animal health and welfare, production, and economy. Several animal models using coronaviral disease in the natural host have been suggested. In this review, different animal models are discussed, with the main focus on bovine CoV (BCoV). BCoV is endemic in the cattle population worldwide and has been known and studied for several decades. SARS-CoV-2 and BCoV are both betacoronaviruses, where BCoV is highly similar to human coronavirus (HCoV) OC43, encompassing the same virus species (Betacoronavirus 1). BCoV causes respiratory and gastrointestinal disease in young and adult cattle. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the similarities and dissimilarities between BCoV and SARS-CoV-2, as well as discussing the usage of BCoV as a model for human CoVs, including SARS-CoV-2.


Plant Disease ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Westphal

Heterodera schachtii is managed by rotation with non-hosts, resistant cover crops, and resistant and tolerant sugar beet cultivars. Microplots 60 cm deep and 30 cm in diameter containing steamed field soil were (i) noninfested or infested with 550 H. schachtii eggs per 100 g at (ii) 0 to 60 cm, (iii) 0 to 30 cm or (iv) 30 to 60 cm in depth. Plots were planted to susceptible, resistant, and tolerant sugar beets. Five weeks later, the sugar beet canopy was largest in condition i, smallest in condition ii, and intermediate in conditions iii and iv. White sugar yield (WSY) was highest in condition i, second in condition iv, lowest in condition ii, and intermediate in condition iii. Cultivar-specific final nematode numbers were independent of the level of infestation. In two experiments utilizing 1-m2 microplots, naturally occurring H. schachtii populations were suppressed with fosthiazate at depth layers in reverse to those infested in the first experiment, and planted to susceptible, resistant, and tolerant sugar beets. In one experiment, WSY was highest in soil treated with fosthiazate at 0 to 60 cm in depth, lowest in nontreated, unaffected in soil treated at 30 to 60 cm in depth, and somewhat lower in soil treated at 0 to 30 cm in depth. In all cultivars, early root penetration predicted canopy diameter; only in the susceptible cultivar did the canopy diameter predict WSY. Deep-occurring H. schachtii can impact productivity in sugar beet cropping.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Jaime Jiménez ◽  
Aránzazu Moreno ◽  
Alberto Fereres

The green peach aphid Myzus persicae Sulzer is the main vector of the semipersistently transmitted and phloem-limited Beet yellows virus (BYV, Closterovirus). Studies monitoring the M. persicae probing behavior by using the Electrical penetration graphs (EPG) technique revealed that inoculation of BYV occurs during unique brief intracellular punctures (phloem-pds) produced in companion and/or sieve element cells. Intracellular stylet punctures (or pds) are subdivided in three subphases (II-1, II-2 and II-3), which have been related to the delivery or uptake of non-phloem limited viruses transmitted in a non-persistent or semipersistent manner. As opposed to non-phloem limited viruses, the specific pd subphase(s) involved in the successful delivery of phloem limited viruses by aphids remain unknown. Therefore, we monitored the feeding process of BYV-carrying M. persicae individuals in sugar beet plants by the EPG technique and the feeding process was artificially terminated at each phloem-pd subphase. Results revealed that aphids that only performed the subphase II-1 of the phloem-pd transmitted BYV at similar efficiency than those allowed to perform subphase II-2 or the complete phloem-pd. This result suggests that BYV inoculation occurs during the first subphase of the phloem-pd. The specific transmission mechanisms involved in BYV delivery in phloem cells are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document