scholarly journals Rectal cancer: An evidence-based update for primary care providers

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (25) ◽  
pp. 7659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang B Gaertner
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers

scholarly journals Engaging primary care providers in managing pediatric eating disorders: a mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Lebow ◽  
Cassandra Narr ◽  
Angela Mattke ◽  
Janna R. Gewirtz O’Brien ◽  
Marcie Billings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment

Abstract Background The primary care setting offers an attractive opportunity for, not only the identification of pediatric eating disorders, but also the delivery of evidence-based treatment. However, constraints of this setting pose barriers for implementing treatment. For interventions to be successful, they need to take into consideration the perspectives of stakeholders. As such, the purpose of this study was to examine in-depth primary care providers’ perspective of challenges to identifying and managing eating disorders in the primary care setting. Methods This mixed methods study surveyed 60 Pediatric and Family Medicine providers across 6 primary care practices. Sixteen of these providers were further interviewed using a qualitative, semi-structured interview. Results Providers (n = 60, response rate of 45%) acknowledged the potential of primary care as a point of contact for early identification and treatment of pediatric eating disorders. They also expressed that this was an area of need in their practices. They identified numerous barriers to successful implementation of evidence-based treatment in this setting including scarcity of time, knowledge, and resources. Conclusions Investigations seeking to build capacities in primary care settings to address eating disorders must address these barriers.

scholarly journals IMPROVING PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER EDUCATION AND SATISFACTION VIA THE CATCH-ON LEARNING COMMUNITIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S36-S36
Author(s):  
Erin Emery-Tiburcio ◽  
Magdalena Bednarcyzk ◽  
Febe Wallace ◽  
Michelle Newman
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Learning Communities ◽  
Cost Model ◽  
Healthcare Access ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Provider Education

Abstract Nationally, there is a shortage of geriatric trained healthcare providers caring for older adults. As the population of older adults grows, health care systems and primary care providers struggle to provide high quality, cost effective care for older adults. Time for training is also limited in busy community health centers. The CATCH-ON Learning Communities (LCs) are telehealth educational interventions based on the ECHO model, modified to be less time intensive, thus decreasing cost to participating clinics. In the LC, geriatric specialists provide evidence-based, best practice training utilizing case discussions to illustrate pertinent learning points via monthly one hour video conferences. Practical, specific behavioral recommendations are offered for immediate implementation in each session. LCs are provided to interprofessional primary care teams. The first LC with a federally-qualified health center (FQHC) yielded consistently high satisfaction from participants, along with a 17% decrease in high risk medication prescriptions and 22% increase in falls screenings. Training the primary care workforce in evidence based geriatric interventions can improve the care of all older adults within each health system, improving healthcare access to help mitigate healthcare inequalities, slow adoption of best practices and rising costs of caring for complex older adults. The CATCH-ON Learning Community is an effective, low cost model of training the primary care work force without geographical or financial constraints that frequently limit access to specialized care.

scholarly journals Variation in Diabetes Management: A National Assessment of Primary Care Providers

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
John W. Peabody ◽  
Enrico de Belen ◽  
Jeffrey R. Dahlen ◽  
Maria Czarina Acelajado ◽  
Mary T. Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Glycemic Variability ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Simulated Patients ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers

Background:Glucose control is monitored primarily through ordering HbA1c levels, which is problematic in patients with glycemic variability. Herein, we report on the management of these patients by board-certified primary care providers (PCPs) in the United States.Methods:We measured provider practice in a representative sample of 156 PCPs. All providers cared for simulated patients with diabetes presenting with symptoms of glycemic variability. Provider responses were reviewed by trained clinicians against evidence-based care standards and accepted standard of care protocols.Results:Care varied widely—overall quality of care averaged 51.3%±10.6%—with providers performing just over half the evidence-based practices necessary for their cases. More worryingly, provider identified the underlying etiology of the poor glycemic control only 36.3% of the time. HbA1c was routinely ordered in 91.3% of all cases but often (59.5%) inappropriately. Ordering other tests of glycemic control (done in 15% of cases) led to significant increases in identifying the etiology of the hyperglycemia. Correctly modifying their patient’s treatment was more likely to occur if doctors first identified the underlying etiology (65.9% vs 49.0%, P<0.001). We conservatively estimated a US $65/patient/visit in unnecessary testing and US $389 annually in additional care costs when the etiology was missed, translating potentially into millions of dollars of wasteful spending.Conclusion:Despite established evidence that HbA1c misses short-term changes in diabetes, we found PCPs consistently ordered HbA1c, rarely using other available blood tests. However, if the factors leading to poor glycemic control were recognized, PCPs were more likely to correctly alter their patient’s hypoglycemic therapy.

scholarly journals Technology and implementation science to forge the future of evidence-based psychotherapies: the PRIDE scale-up study

2020 ◽  
pp. ebmental-2020-300199
Author(s):  
Milton L Wainberg ◽  
Maria Lídia Gouveia ◽  
Melissa Ann Stockton ◽  
Paulino Feliciano ◽  
Antonio Suleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mobile Applications ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Systems Of Care ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
The Future

ObjectiveTo report the interim results from the training of providers inevidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) and use of mobile applications.Design and SettingThe Partnerships in Research to Implement and Disseminate Sustainable and Scalable Evidence (PRIDE) study is a cluster-randomised hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial comparing three delivery pathways for integrating comprehensive mental healthcare into primary care in Mozambique. Innovations include the use of EBPs and scaling-up of task-shifted mental health services using mobile applications.Main outcome measuresWe examined EBP training attendance, certification, knowledge and intentions to deliver each component. We collected qualitative data through rapid ethnography and focus groups. We tracked the use of the mobile applications to investigate early reach of a valid screening tool (Electronic Mental Wellness Tool) and the roll out of the EBPsParticipantsPsychiatric technicians and primary care providers trained in the EBPs.ResultsPRIDE has trained 110 EBP providers, supervisors and trainers and will train 279 community health workers in upcoming months. The trainings improved knowledge about the EBPs and trainees indicated strong intentions to deliver the EBP core components. Trained providers began using the mobile applications and appear to identify cases and provide appropriate treatment.ConclusionsThe future of EBPs requires implementation within existing systems of care with fidelity to their core evidence-based components. To sustainably address the vast mental health treatment gap globally, EBP implementation demands: expanding the mental health workforce by training existing human resources; sequential use of EBPs to comprehensively treat mental disorders and their comorbid presentations and leveraging digital screening and treatment applications.

Reduction in Schedule II opioid prescribing by primary care providers, orthopedic and general surgeons, and pain management specialists following the implementation of a State House Bill and an Institutional Controlled Substance Task Force

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-167
Author(s):  
Lisa B. E. Shields, MD ◽  
Timothy A. Johnson, BS ◽  
Michael W. Daniels, MS ◽  
Alisha Bell, MSN, RN, CPN ◽  
Diane M. Siemens, PharmD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prescription Opioid ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
General Surgeons

Objective: Prescription opioid misuse represents a social and economic challenge in the United States. We evaluated Schedule II opioid prescribing practices by primary care providers (PCPs), orthopedic and general surgeons, and pain management specialists.Design: Prospective evaluation of prescribing practices of PCPs, orthopedic and general surgeons, and pain management specialists over 5 years (October 1, 2014-September 30, 2019) in an outpatient setting.Methods: An analysis of Schedule II opioid prescribing following the implementation of federal and state guidelines and evidence-based standards at our institution. Results: There were significantly more PCPs, orthopedic and general surgeons, and pain management specialists with a significantly increased number who prescribed Schedule II opioids, whereas there was a simultaneous significant decline in the average number of Schedule II opioid prescriptions per provider, Schedule II opioid pills prescribed per provider, and Schedule II opioid pills prescribed per patient by providers. The average number of Schedule II opioid prescriptions with a quantity 90 and Opana/Oxycontin prescriptions per PCP, orthopedic surgeon, and pain management specialist significantly decreased. The total morphine milligram equivalent (MME)/day of Schedule II opioids ordered by PCPs, orthopedic and general surgeons, and pain management specialists significantly declined. The ages of the providers remained consistent throughout the study. Conclusions: This study reports the implementation of federal and state regulations and institutional evidence-based guidelines into primary care and medical specialty practices to reduce the number of Schedule II opioids prescribed. Further research is warranted to determine alternative therapies to Schedule II opioids that may alleviate a patient’s pain without initiating or exacerbating a potentially lethal opioid addiction.

scholarly journals What do primary care providers think about implementing breast cancer survivorship care?

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 196 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Luctkar-Flude ◽  
A. Aiken ◽  
M.A. McColl ◽  
J. Tranmer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Educational Preparation ◽  
Care Guidelines

Purpose As cancer centres move forward with earlier discharge of stable survivors of early-stage breast cancer (bca) to primary care follow-up, it is important to address known knowledge and practice gaps among primary care providers (pcps). In the present qualitative descriptive study, we examined the practice context that influences implementation of existing clinical practice guidelines for providing such care. The purpose was to determine the challenges, strengths, and opportunities related to implementing comprehensive evidence-based bca survivorship care guidelines by pcps in southeastern Ontario.Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 pcps: 10 physicians and 9 nurse practitioners.Results Thematic analysis revealed 6 themes within the broad categories of knowledge, attitudes, and resources. Participants highlighted 3 major challenges related to providing bca survivorship care: inconsistent educational preparation, provider anxieties, and primary care burden. They also described 3 major strengths or opportunities to facilitate implementation of survivorship care guidelines: tools and technology, empowering survivors, and optimizing nursing roles.Conclusions We identified several important challenges to implementation of comprehensive evidence-based survivorship care for bca survivors, as well as several strengths and opportunities that could be built upon to address those challenges. Findings from our research could inform targeted knowledge translation interventions to provide support and education for pcps and bca survivors.

scholarly journals Measuring and Improving Evidence-Based Patient Care Using a Web-Based Gamified Approach in Primary Care (QualityIQ): Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trever Burgon ◽  
Linda Casebeer ◽  
Holly Aasen ◽  
Czarlota Valdenor ◽  
Diana Tamondong-Lachica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Physician Satisfaction ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Decisions ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based Care

BACKGROUND Unwarranted variability in clinical practice is a challenging problem in practice today, leading to poor outcomes for patients and low-value care for providers, payers, and patients. OBJECTIVE In this study, we introduced a novel tool, QualityIQ, and determined the extent to which it helps primary care physicians to align care decisions with the latest best practices included in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). METHODS We developed the fully automated QualityIQ patient simulation platform with real-time evidence-based feedback and gamified peer benchmarking. Each case included workup, diagnosis, and management questions with explicit evidence-based scoring criteria. We recruited practicing primary care physicians across the United States into the study via the web and conducted a cross-sectional study of clinical decisions among a national sample of primary care physicians, randomized to continuing medical education (CME) and non-CME study arms. Physicians “cared” for 8 weekly cases that covered typical primary care scenarios. We measured participation rates, changes in quality scores (including MIPS scores), self-reported practice change, and physician satisfaction with the tool. The primary outcomes for this study were evidence-based care scores within each case, adherence to MIPS measures, and variation in clinical decision-making among the primary care providers caring for the same patient. RESULTS We found strong, scalable engagement with the tool, with 75% of participants (61 non-CME and 59 CME) completing at least 6 of 8 total cases. We saw significant improvement in evidence-based clinical decisions across multiple conditions, such as diabetes (+8.3%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001) and osteoarthritis (+7.6%, <i>P</i>=.003) and with MIPS-related quality measures, such as diabetes eye examinations (+22%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001), depression screening (+11%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001), and asthma medications (+33%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001). Although the CME availability did not increase enrollment in the study, participants who were offered CME credits were more likely to complete at least 6 of the 8 cases. CONCLUSIONS Although CME availability did not prove to be important, the short, clinically detailed case simulations with real-time feedback and gamified peer benchmarking did lead to significant improvements in evidence-based care decisions among all practicing physicians. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03800901; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03800901

Grace and Glory: How One Free Clinic Can Make a Difference

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-152
Author(s):  
Johnny Ng
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Oklahoma City ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Free Clinic ◽  
Access To Medical Care ◽  
Financial Burdens ◽  
The Impact

In 2010, a free clinic in northeast Oklahoma City opened its doors and began seeing nonemergent patients. This evidence-based article illustrates the impact of the clinic on its community. It discusses the benefits and financial implications and the operation of the free clinic through contributions and volunteerism, and highlights strengths and limitations. A survey conducted over a period of three months on 50 clinic patients concluded that one free clinic can make a difference by providing much-needed access to medical care, decreasing financial burdens on area hospitals, and enhancing public opinion of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) as primary care providers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document