Explaining the link between agentivity and non-culminating causation
This paper offers an account for why, cross-linguistically, denying the whole change of state encoded by causative verbs is easier with agent than with causer subjects. It does so by extending Varasdi's theory of the progressive to non-culminating reading sof causative verbs, not only in progressive but also in perfective sentences. It additionally sustains two claims about the difference between agentive and nonagentive ongoing causation events: only the former (a) can in principle start before their potential effects start and (b) are systematically `indicative' of these potential effects.
Keyword(s):
2001 ◽
Vol 17
(2)
◽
pp. 144-194
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
1936 ◽
Vol 155
(886)
◽
pp. 558-570
◽
Keyword(s):
2017 ◽
Vol 6
(1)
◽
pp. 21
◽
Keyword(s):