scholarly journals BERTAHAN DI TENGAH PANDEMI: DAYA HIDUP KAFE KOMUNITAS TANPA JAMINAN KESELAMATAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Asmuni Asmuni ◽  
Rohim Rohim ◽  
Hendri Suparto
Keyword(s):  
Social Entrepreneurship

Sebuah kafe komunitas memilih untuk tetap membuka usaha di tengah pandemi. Kafe tersebut bisa disebut sebagai kewirausahaan sosial karena kepemilikan usaha bersifat kolektif dan mempekerjakan karyawan yang berasal dari kelompok marjinal.Tulisan ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yaitu observasi partisipatoris dan wawancara mendalam terhadap sumber utama untuk menggambarkan alasan kafe komunitas yang tetap membuka usahanya sebagai bentuk survival dari kalangan social enterprenuership.Alasan tetap membuka usaha selama masa pandemi adalah: Pertama, memberdayakan karyawan yang tidak memiliki penghasilan dari usaha lain. Kedua, sebagaimana usaha mikro lainnya, kafe komunitas tersebut, rentan mengalami kebangkrutan karena tidak adanya asuransi usaha. Ketiga, kafe komunitas tersebut harus mempertahankan usaha berdasarkan prinsip rugi-laba untuk mencapai surplus penghasilan.Sesungguhnya, daya hidup kafe komunitas di tengah pandemi tidak memiliki jaminan keselamatan karena mereka hanya menerapkan protokol kesehatan yang sangat minim, seperti penggunaan masker yang tidak memenuhi standar dan fasilitas cuci tangan yang seadanya. Pada level makro, daya survival dari kafe tersebut merupakan sinyal ketidakseriusan stakeholders menjaga keberlangsungan hidup social entrepreneurship di masa pandemi.

High Technology Entrepreneurship

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Harjyot Kaur ◽  
Manjit Kaur
Keyword(s):  
Social Entrepreneurship ◽  
New Products ◽  
High Technology ◽  
Asset Ownership ◽  
Technology Entrepreneurship ◽  
Self Employment ◽  
Development Section ◽  
Value Of Firm ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Selection Of

High Technology entrepreneurship is very important aspect in many debates, including those which are regarding launching new firms and development, regional economic development, section of stakeholders, selection of markets, educating managers and scientists.The purpose of this article is to define the high technology entrepreneurship, and identify its various aspects in relation with economics, entrepreneurship and management.High technology entrepreneurship is an investment in a project that uses various specialized individuals and various assets to create and capture the value of firm. Collaborative experiments and production of new products, assets and their attributes, which related to advances in scientific and technological knowledge and the firm’s asset ownership rights are the various factors which distinguishes Technology entrepreneurship from other entrepreneurship types (e.g. Social entrepreneurship, Small business and Self employment).

INNOVATIVE SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP WITH YOUTH ENGAGEMENT Needs Analysis in Poland, Italy, North Macedonia and Jordan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorota Murzyn ◽  
◽  
Marta Czyżewska ◽  
Iwona Lupa-Wójcik ◽  
Wojciech Maciejewski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Entrepreneurship ◽  
Needs Analysis ◽  
Youth Engagement

THE IMPACT OF DECENTRALIZATION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN UKRAINE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyudmyla Mishchenko ◽  
◽  
Dmytro Mishchenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Entrepreneurship ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Poverty Reduction ◽  
Social Protection ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Economic Incentives ◽  
Social Enterprises ◽  
Infrastructural Support ◽  
The Impact

The actualization of the results of financial decentralization in Ukraine as part of the reform of decentralization of power and the development of proposals for its improvement is explained by the fact that a clear division of functions, powers and financial resources between national and regional levels is the basis for the well-being of our citizens. opportunities for its sustainable socio- economic development on a democratic basis. It is noted that financial decentralization is a process of giving authority to mobilize revenues and expenditures of local governments in order to increase the effectiveness of the implementation of these powers and better management of community budgets. It is established that unlike traditional entrepreneurship, which focuses on profit generation, the purpose of social entrepreneurship is to create and accumulate social capital. Abroad, social enterprises operate successfully in the fields of education, the environment, human rights, poverty reduction and health care, and their development and dissemination is one way to improve the living conditions of citizens. A similar mission is entrusted to local governments, which allows us to consider the revival of social entrepreneurship as an important element in improving self-government policy. It is determined that in modern conditions social entrepreneurship is one of the tools to ensure the ability of the local community to provide its members with an appropriate level of education, culture, health, housing and communal services, social protection, etc., as well as plan and implement programs efficient use of available natural and human resources, investment and infrastructural support of territorial communities. Due to financial decentralization, local governments have received additional resources that can be used to create economic incentives to promote social entrepreneurship in small and medium-sized businesses at the community level.

Scoping Social Entrepreneurship in India: Organisation, Technology, and Collaboration

GIS Business ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47
Author(s):  
Sunita Kumari ◽  
Bino Paul G.D.
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Human Development ◽  
Social Entrepreneurship ◽  
Social Stratification ◽  
Poverty Reduction ◽  
Social Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
The Core ◽  
Lock In

We explore emerging contexts of social entrepreneurship in India. Social entrepreneurship is emerging as an important option in poverty reduction and social change wherein organizing societal responses to scenarios like entrenched deprivation, cumulative disadvantages, long extant institutional lock-in, and vulnerabilities enmeshed in social stratification, hiatus emanating from segmentation of labour market and inadequate coverage of social protection form the core of strategies/collectives/organisation. In this paper, first, drawing cues from the literature, we outline basic typology of social entrepreneurship while delineating pivotal role technology and collaboration play in social entrepreneurship. Second, we provide a glimpse of not profit organisations in India, based on the secondary data. We juxtapose select patterns from the data on non profit organisations with human development. Third, we discuss select cases of social entrepreneurship that diverge in characteristics and contexts, in particular how these initiatives work towards poverty reduction and social development.

An Epistemological Criticism of Social Entrepreneurship: Is Social Entrepreneurship a Sound Scientific Field of Research

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Forouharfar
Keyword(s):  
Social Entrepreneurship ◽  
Social Constructivism ◽  
Social Epistemology ◽  
American English ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Knowledge Structure ◽  
Scientific Field ◽  
The Other ◽  
First Time

The paper was shaped around the pivotal question: Is SE a sound and scientific field of research? The question has given a critical tone to the paper and has also helped to bring out some of the controversial debates in the realm of SE. The paper was organized under five main discussions to be able to provide a scientific answer to the research question: (1)<b> </b>is “social entrepreneurship” an oxymoron?, (2) the characteristics of SE knowledge, (3) sources of social entrepreneurship knowledge, (4) SE knowledge: structure and limitations and (5) contributing epistemology-making concepts for SE.<b> </b>Based on the sections,<b> </b>the study relied on the relevant philosophical schools of thought in <i>Epistemology </i>(e.g. <i>Empiricism</i>, <i>Rationalism</i>, <i>Skepticism</i>, <i>Internalism</i> vs. <i>Externalism</i>,<i> Essentialism, Social Constructivism</i>, <i>Social Epistemology, etc.</i>) to discuss these controversies around SE and proposes some solutions by reviewing SE literature. Also, to determine the governing linguistic discourse in the realm of SE, which was necessary for our discussion,<i> Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)</i> for the first time in SE studies was used. Further, through the study, SE buzzwords which constitute SE terminology were derived and introduced to help us narrowing down and converging the thoughts in this field and demarking the epistemological boundaries of SE. The originality of the paper on one hand lies in its pioneering discussions on SE epistemology and on the other hand in paving the way for a construction of sound epistemology for SE; therefore in many cases after preparing the philosophical ground for the discussions, it went beyond the prevalent SE literature through meta-analysis to discuss the cases which were raised. The results of the study verified previously claimed embryonic pre-paradigmatic phase in SE which was far from a sound and scientific knowledge, although the scholarly endeavors are the harbingers of such a possibility in the future which calls for further mature academic discussion and development of SE knowledge by the SE academia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document