A novel hybrid two-step group multi-attribute assessment model of stairs shape for two-story individual dwelling houses

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenonas Turskis ◽  
Birutė Juodagalvienė
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hybrid Model ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The article deals with a novel hybrid two-step group multi-attribute assessment model of stairs shape for two-story individual dwelling houses. There exist many available shapes of stairs for two-story dwelling houses. Selection among shapes and construction of stairs is a multi-attribute decision making problem in nature. It depends on a lot of different conflicting attributes, that have different optimisation direction, different measurement units. A determinated set of the main attributes to assess the alternatives includes the following: Stairwell Area, The Total Area of Climbing, “Climbing Lane" Area, The Cost of Stairs, and Ergonomics. The values of attributes and importance of attributes are determined by grey numbers. The paper presents a novel original hybrid model, which is based on two different multi-attribute decision making methods: ARAS-G (Additive Ratio Assessment) and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process).

Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application to E-Marketplace Selection

2013 ◽  
pp. 26-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beyza Ahlatcioglu Ozkok ◽  
Elisa Pappalardo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Linguistic Variables ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Electronic Parts ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Making decisions is a part of daily life. The nature of decision-making includes multiple and usually conflicting criteria. Multi Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problems are handled under two main headings: Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) and Multi Objective Decision Making (MODM). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a widely used multi-criteria decision making approach and has successfully been applied to many practical problems. Traditional AHP requires exact or crisp judgments (numbers). However, due to the complexity and uncertainty involved in real world decision problems, decision makers might be more reluctant to provide crisp judgments than fuzzy ones. Furthermore, even when people use the same words, individual judgments of events are invariably subjective, and the interpretations that they attach to the same words may differ. This is why fuzzy numbers and fuzzy sets have been introduced to characterize linguistic variables. Here, the authors overview the most known fuzzy AHP approaches and their application, and they present a case study to select an e-marketplace for a firm, which produces and sells electronic parts of computers in Turkey.

Assessment for Safety Capability of Mine Team Leader Based on AHP and GRA

2014 ◽  
Vol 522-524 ◽  
pp. 1452-1456
Author(s):  
Can Liu ◽  
Shui Cheng Tian ◽  
Jie Liu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Team Leader ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Team Leaders ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Assessment Index ◽  
Assessment Index System ◽  
Grey Relational ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Assessment index system for safety capability of mine team leaders is established to assess their safety capability accurately, after defining its concept. The system is comprised of two layers, with 5 indexes in the first-layer and 14 indexes in the second-layer. Furthermore, the relative weights of indexes are determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The grey relational assessment model for safety capability of mine team leader is constructed based on the indexes system. The safety capability of 4 mine team leaders are assessed by the model, according to the sequences in their safety capabilities. Assessment for safety capability based on AHP and GRA could be a tool for evaluation and decision-making in mining enterprises.

scholarly journals FAHPSort: A Fuzzy Extension of the AHPSort Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 1119-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Krejčí ◽  
Alessio Ishizaka
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pairwise Comparisons ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Powerful Method ◽  
Linguistic Terms ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Analytic Hierarchy process (AHP) is a powerful method belonging to the full aggregation family of multi-criteria decision-making methods based on pairwise comparisons of objects. Since the information about the problem is usually not complete in real decision-making problems, it is difficult to express precisely the preferences on pairs of compared objects. This problem has been handled in the literature by introducing fuzziness into AHP. However, neither AHP nor its fuzzy extensions can deal with sorting decision-making problems, which form a significant part of decision-making problems. This paper presents the FAHPSort method — a fuzzy extension of the AHPSort method, which is an adaptation of the AHP method for sorting decision-making problems. The FAHPSort method handles the vagueness in the meaning of linguistic terms expressing the intensity of preference of one object over another one. Key properties of the FAHPSort method are described in the paper, and the method is illustrated in a decision-making problem.

scholarly journals Decision-Making on Choosing a Railway Line Option

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-151
Author(s):  
V. V. Kazarina ◽  
V. A. Podverbniy
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Initial Data ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Residential Buildings ◽  
Additional Analysis ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Railway Line ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
The Village

This article proposes a solution to the problem of choosing an option for routing of a railway line among two previously developed options. As initial data, materials were used for designing Elegest–Kyzyl–Kuragino railway line. On this section, two routing options are considered, which must be compared in order to choose the best one. The first option of the line (Eastern) takes place in a recess outside the village of Podgorny, which excludes the cost of demolition of residential buildings and relocation of residents, but provides for a large amount of earthwork. In the second option (Western), the line is laid through the village of Podgorny. With this development of the line, the volume of earthwork is much smaller, but it is necessary to take into account demolition of residential buildings, relocation of residents, as well as installation of noise barriers.The conclusion drawn by the designers of CJSC Vostsibtransproekt was reviewed and analyzed. During the study, the applied decision-making method required some refinement with regard to this problem and additional analysis. To select the best option, the analytic hierarchy process was used.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN FUZZY AHP-SAW DENGAN FUZZY AHP-VIKOR UNTUK MENINGKATKAN DAYA SERAP POLITEKNIK TERHADAP INDUSTRI

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Dani Anggoro ◽  
Nawindah Nawindah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Office Management ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Peningkatan daya serap Politeknik terhadap industri sangat dipengaruhi oleh lulusannya salah satunya dipengaruhi oleh pemilihan jurusan yang merupakan awal untuk menciptakan mahasiswa yang ahli dibidangnya. Penentuan kriteria, subkriteria dan alternatif menggunakan Cochran Q Test. Untuk mendapatkan bobot digunakan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Kriteria yaitu jurusan sekolah asal, subkriteria yaitu IPA, IPS, AK, PJ/PM. Kriteria hasil tes bakat minat yaitu sanguinis, melankolis, korelis dan plegmatis. Alternatif diantaranya Computerized Accounting (CA), Office Management (OM), Informatics Computer (IC). Pada pemilihan jurusan ini peneliti membandingkan metode yang sesuaidengan Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making metode Analytic HierarchyProcess (AHP)- Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan metode Analytic Hierarchy VIKOR (Visekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje). Daya serap terhadap industri menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan alat ukur service quality hasilnya industri puas terhadap lulusan yang berkerja pada industri baik dari hardskill dan softskill. Metode Fuzzy AHP-SAW urut peringkat 1,2 dan 3 yaitu alternatif IC dengan nilai V1 1.76144, alternatif CA dengan nilai V2=1.56974, alternatif V3 dengan nilai OM =1.33618 . Menggunakan metode Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR dengan urut peringkat 1 sampai 3 yaitu alternatif IC dengan nilai Q1=0, alternatif CA dengan nilai Q2=1, alternatif OM dengan nilai Q3=1. Kedua metode tersebut dapat digunakan untuk rekomendasi pemilihan jurusan untuk politeknik LP3I kampus Karang Tengah.

scholarly journals A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Approach for Evaluation and Selection of Sustainable Suppliers in the Avionics Industry of Pakistan

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noor Muhammad ◽  
Zhigeng Fang ◽  
Syed Ahsan Ali Shah ◽  
Muhammad Azeem Akbar ◽  
Ahmed Alsanad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supply Chain ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Important Criterion ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

Reliability and quality are the two ultimate objectives in the avionics industry. The risk of counterfeit electronics and the unavailability of screening facilities for 100% components are the most concerning areas in the supply chain of the avionics industry. Unlike most public procurement, the cost is not the only significant criterion. Unbiased decision-making criteria to accommodate all the important factors without compromising on quality, reliability, and maintainability are essential for the evaluation and selection of sustainable suppliers. Therefore, this study proposes an unbiased decision methodology based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS). In the first phase, six main and twenty-one sub-criteria are selected from the literature and empirically validated by experts of the avionics industry. FAHP is used to evaluate the weight of the main criteria and sub-criteria. FTOPSIS is used to prioritize eight alternatives (suppliers) concerning their effectiveness and superiority in finding the best alternatives. The results of the FAHP reveal that traceability (T) is the most important criterion, followed by quality (Q), and cost (C), which rank as the second and third most significant criteria. The results of the FTOPSIS rate supplier 8, supplier 2, and supplier 1 as the first, second, and third most effective suppliers, respectively.

scholarly journals Analytic Hierarchy Process in Multiple–Criteria Decision–Making: A Model Example

2021 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 01019
Author(s):  
Anna Siekelova ◽  
Ivana Podhorska ◽  
Jorma J. Imppola
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Financial Indicators ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Business Partners ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Managers have to make decisions several times a day. The decision-making process can be defined as an essential activity realized by managers every day. Decisions can be implemented intuitively, or by using relevant decision-making methods. This depends on the nature of the decision, as well as the intensity of its possible future effects. The theory of decision-making can be defined as a relatively young discipline. It can be stated that decision-making is no longer an intuitive process. Most decision-making situations are of a multiple criteria character. In this contribution, the authors focus on multiple-criteria decision-making, to which several methods can be applied. In the practical part, the authors use Saaty's method, also known as the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Saaty is considered to be the most important researcher dealing with the issue of multiple-criteria decision-making. The set multiple-criteria decision-making problem was to choose one business partner out of eight under consideration. The decision-making criteria included selected financial indicators and non-financial criteria. The aim of the contribution is to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assess potential business partners and to select an optimal candidate.

scholarly journals Analytic Hierarchy Process Application for the Selection of a Metal Matrix Composite

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
Baragetti Sergio
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Composite Material ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Metal Matrix Composite ◽  
Matrix Composite ◽  
Metal Matrix ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

The multi-attribute decision-making methods allow to solve arbitrary problems governed by several parameters. In this paper, the choice of a composite material was analyzed, by considering the availability from four companies. The multi-attribute decision Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) procedure was used to select the best levels for different attributes, both parametric and non-parametric, and to select the best company.

On Moderate Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Pairwise Comparison Model With Subcriteria

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
G. Marimuthu ◽  
G. Ramesh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Decision Models ◽  
Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Comparison Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Decisions usually involve the getting the best solution, selecting the suitable experiments, most appropriate judgments, taking the quality results etc., using some techniques.  Every decision making can be considered as the choice from the set of alternatives based on a set of criteria.  The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is a multi-criteria decision making and is dealing with decision making problems through pairwise comparisons mode [10].  The weight vectors from this comparison model are obtained by using extent analysis method.  This paper concern with an alternate method of finding the weight vectors from the original fuzzy AHP decision model (moderate fuzzy AHP model), that has the same rank as obtained in original fuzzy AHP and ideal fuzzy AHP decision models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document