Utility in Clinical Trials of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Report from the GRAPPA 2014 Annual Meeting

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1044-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkel Østergaard ◽  
Daniel Glinatsi ◽  
Susanne Juhl Pedersen ◽  
Inge Juul Sørensen

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous disease that involves both peripheral and axial joints and entheses. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows visualization of the inflammatory components (synovitis, tenosynovitis, enthesitis, periarticular inflammation, and bone marrow edema) as well as structural damage (bone erosion, bone proliferation) in PsA. However, MRI has not been validated as an outcome measure in PsA clinical trials to the same extent as in rheumatoid arthritis. Recently, further validation of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) PsA MRI score (PsAMRIS) was presented at the 2014 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA). In this review, we present the current knowledge within MRI assessment of PsA, particularly peripheral manifestations, as well as different imaging methods and scoring systems, and we discuss future research perspectives.

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 408-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD ◽  
RENÉ PANDURO POGGENBORG

The potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for use in clinical practice and research has gained increasing interest over the last decade. International collaborative initiatives from GRAPPA (Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) and/or OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) may contribute to facilitating research, identifying appropriate areas for use, and reaching consensus on the optimal examination technique. Accordingly, GRAPPA, a primary driver of international research in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), has focused on the current use and future development of MRI and other modern imaging modalities in PsA. This review, presented at the GRAPPA 2010 annual meeting, describes the current status of MRI in PsA, with a focus on its use in diagnosis, monitoring, and prediction of the disease course and treatment response. Important areas for future research are also outlined.


2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Strydom ◽  
Angela Hassiotis ◽  
Zuzana Walker

AbstractObjectives: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been used to assist the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in adults with Down's syndrome (DS). However, the interpretation of the scans is difficult and clinical usefulness is uncertain. We aimed to summarise the current knowledge of MRI studies in adults with Down's syndrome with and without dementia and to discuss its implications for clinical practice.Method: We identified MRI studies in DS by a computerised literature search with Medline, Embase, and Psychlit from 1986 to 2001. We examined the references of identified articles and hand searched relevant journals. Structural MRI studies were selected as this type of imaging is most frequently used in clinical practice.Results: We included eight volumetric studies in adults with DS. Four of these included adults with DS and dementia. Overall, the size of brain structures such as cerebellum, hippocampus and cortex of adults with DS without dementia was significantly smaller than in normal controls. The basal ganglia were similar in size, and ventricles were enlarged. Furthermore, the size of brain structures in adults with DS and dementia was significantly different than in DS without dementia. In particular, ventricular and hippocampal volumes were affected.Conclusions: The change in brain structure associated with dementia can be detected on MRI of adults with DS. However, these may be difficult to interpret given the extent to which brain appearance in DS differs from that in the general population. Implications for clinical practice and future research directions are discussed.


2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.201676
Author(s):  
Walter P. Maksymowych ◽  
Mikkel Østergaard

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) presents with diverse features of musculoskeletal inflammation that affect both axial and peripheral joints as well as entheses, tenosynovium, and bursae. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality that is uniquely capable of identifying pathology in all these structures. The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Working Group has increasingly explored diverse MRI methodologies for the purposes of quantifying inflammatory and structural abnormalities in clinical trials and research. The 2020 GRAPPA virtual workshop presented an opportunity to review progress in the field, summarize the status of MRI scoring systems developed for PsA, and review representative patient cases.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Paolo Compagnucci ◽  
Giovanni Volpato ◽  
Umberto Falanga ◽  
Laura Cipolletta ◽  
Manuel Antonio Conti ◽  
...  

Myocardial inflammation is an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and sudden cardiac death in athletes. The relationship between sports practice and myocardial inflammation is complex, and recent data from studies concerning cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and endomyocardial biopsy have substantially added to our understanding of the challenges encountered in the comprehensive care of athletes with myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy (ICM). In this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of myocarditis, ICM, and myopericarditis/perimyocarditis in athletes, with a special emphasis on arrhythmias, patient-tailored therapies, and sports eligibility issues.


2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 854-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Tasca ◽  
Mauro Monforte ◽  
Pierfrancesco Ottaviani ◽  
Marco Pelliccioni ◽  
Roberto Frusciante ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Abrar ◽  
Christoph Schleich ◽  
Anja Müller-Lutz ◽  
Miriam Frenken ◽  
K. Ludger Radke ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1607-1611

There is a very important difference between “Consumer neuroscience” and “Neuromarketing”. While the first field deals in research on subjects like neuroscience, psychology and marketing; the latter is linked to the functionality of neurophysiological tools, namely eye tracking, skin conductance, electroencephalography (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Neuromarketing is interested in carrying out market research which is specific to a particular company. This article covers topics like recent methods in neuroscience used by consumer researchers, basic ideas in consumer neuroscience derived on the basis of initial findings. The article also suggests ideas for future research in the field of consumer neuroscience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document