scholarly journals Herbal feed additives containing tannins: impact on in vitro fermentation and methane mitigation from total mixed ration

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-58
Author(s):  
Manju WADHWA ◽  
Prabh Kaur SIDHU ◽  
Mohinder Pal Singh BAKSHI
2013 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 1191-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoey Durmic ◽  
Peter J Moate ◽  
Richard Eckard ◽  
Dean K Revell ◽  
Richard Williams ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 888 (1) ◽  
pp. 012074
Author(s):  
W A Hartina ◽  
R Ridwan ◽  
D Diapari ◽  
R Fidriyanto ◽  
A Jayanegara

Abstract The effects of feed additives are increasing feed digestibility, balance of rumen microbial community, stimulating the immune response and livestock productivity. This study aimed to determine the effects of feed additives combination in the rumen fermentation. The method used in this study was a block randomized design with 9 treatments and 3 replications. The experiment using Theodorou In vitro method for 48 hours with parameters such as pH, kinetics gas and methane production, DMD, OMD, NH3, and partial VFA. The treatment were P0; control (Basal Diet 70% Concentrate + 30% Forages), P1; P0 + Premix, P2; P1 + Probiotic, P3; P1 + Enzyme, P4; P1 + Plant Extract, P5; P1 + (Probiotics + Enzyme), P6; P1 + (Probiotics + Plant Extract), P7; P1 + (Probiotic + Enzyme + Plant Extract), and P8; P1 + (Enzyme + Plant Extract). The results showed kinetics gas, methane production, NH3, and partial VFA were significantly affected (P <0.05), while the value of pH, DMD, and OMD was not significant. In conclusion, the addition of mix feed additives can affect the kinetics gas and methane production. However, it does not affect the level of pH, dry matter and organic matter digestibility.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles G. Brooke ◽  
Breanna M. Roque ◽  
Negeen Najafi ◽  
Maria Gonzalez ◽  
Abigail Pfefferlen ◽  
...  

AbstractWith increasing interest in feed based methane mitigation strategies, fueled by local legal directives aimed at methane production from the agricultural sector in California, identifying local sources of biological feed additives will be critical in keeping the implementation of these strategies affordable. In a recent study, the red alga Asparagopsis taxiformis stood out as the most effective species of seaweed to reduce methane production from enteric fermentation. Due to the potential differences in effectiveness based on the location from where A. taxiformis is collected and the financial burden of collection and transport, we tested the potential of A. taxiformis, as well as the brown seaweed Zonaria farlowii collected in the nearshore waters off Santa Catalina Island, CA, USA, for their ability to mitigate methane production during in-vitro rumen fermentation. At a dose rate of 5% dry matter (DM), A. taxiformis reduced methane production by 74% (p ≤ 0.01) and Z. farlowii reduced methane production by 11% (p ≤ 0.04) after 48 hours and 24 hours of in-vitro rumen fermentation respectively. The methane reducing effect of A. taxiformis and Z. farlowii described here make these local macroalgae promising candidates for biotic methane mitigation strategies in the largest milk producing state in the US. To determine their real potential as methane mitigating feed supplements in the dairy industry, their effect in-vivo requires investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document