Music Emotions Recognition by Machine Learning With Cognitive Classification Methodologies

2020 ◽  
pp. 1028-1041
Author(s):  
Junjie Bai ◽  
Kan Luo ◽  
Jun Peng ◽  
Jinliang Shi ◽  
Ying Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Affective Computing ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Classification Problem ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Cognitive Computing ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Neuro Fuzzy

Music emotions recognition (MER) is a challenging field of studies addressed in multiple disciplines such as musicology, cognitive science, physiology, psychology, arts and affective computing. In this article, music emotions are classified into four types known as those of pleasing, angry, sad and relaxing. MER is formulated as a classification problem in cognitive computing where 548 dimensions of music features are extracted and modeled. A set of classifications and machine learning algorithms are explored and comparatively studied for MER, which includes Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neuro-Fuzzy Networks Classification (NFNC), Fuzzy KNN (FKNN), Bayes classifier and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). Experimental results show that the SVM, FKNN and LDA algorithms are the most effective methodologies that obtain more than 80% accuracy for MER.

Music Emotions Recognition by Machine Learning With Cognitive Classification Methodologies

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 80-92
Author(s):  
Junjie Bai ◽  
Kan Luo ◽  
Jun Peng ◽  
Jinliang Shi ◽  
Ying Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Affective Computing ◽  
Classification Problem ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Cognitive Computing ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Neuro Fuzzy

Music emotions recognition (MER) is a challenging field of studies addressed in multiple disciplines such as musicology, cognitive science, physiology, psychology, arts and affective computing. In this article, music emotions are classified into four types known as those of pleasing, angry, sad and relaxing. MER is formulated as a classification problem in cognitive computing where 548 dimensions of music features are extracted and modeled. A set of classifications and machine learning algorithms are explored and comparatively studied for MER, which includes Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neuro-Fuzzy Networks Classification (NFNC), Fuzzy KNN (FKNN), Bayes classifier and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). Experimental results show that the SVM, FKNN and LDA algorithms are the most effective methodologies that obtain more than 80% accuracy for MER.

scholarly journals PigLeg: prediction of swine phenotype using machine learning

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e8764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siroj Bakoev ◽  
Lyubov Getmantseva ◽  
Maria Kolosova ◽  
Olga Kostyunina ◽  
Duane R. Chartier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Average Daily Gain ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
The State ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Leg Weakness

Industrial pig farming is associated with negative technological pressure on the bodies of pigs. Leg weakness and lameness are the sources of significant economic loss in raising pigs. Therefore, it is important to identify the predictors of limb condition. This work presents assessments of the state of limbs using indicators of growth and meat characteristics of pigs based on machine learning algorithms. We have evaluated and compared the accuracy of prediction for nine ML classification algorithms (Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Artificial Neural Networks, C50Tree, Support Vector Machines, Naive Bayes, Generalized Linear Models, Boost, and Linear Discriminant Analysis) and have identified the Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbors as the best-performing algorithms for predicting pig leg weakness using a small set of simple measurements that can be taken at an early stage of animal development. Measurements of Muscle Thickness, Back Fat amount, and Average Daily Gain were found to be significant predictors of the conformation of pig limbs. Our work demonstrates the utility and relative ease of using machine learning algorithms to assess the state of limbs in pigs based on growth rate and meat characteristics.

scholarly journals Using Machine Learning to Grade the Mango’s Quality Based on External Features Captured by Vision System

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 5775
Author(s):  
Nguyen Truong Minh Long ◽  
Nguyen Truong Thinh
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Vision System ◽  
Human Perception ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Internal Quality ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Length Width

Nowadays, mangoes and other fruits are classified according to human perception of low productivity, which is a poor quality of classification. Therefore, in this study, we suggest a novel evaluation of internal quality focused on external features of mango as well as its weight. The results show that evaluation is more effective than using only one of the external features or weight combining an expensive nondestructive (NDT) measurement. Grading of fruits is implemented by four models of machine learning as Random Forest (RF), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Models have inputs such as length, width, defect, weight, and outputs being mango classifications such as grade G1, G2, and G3. The unstructured data of 4983 of captured images combining with load-cell signals are transferred to structured data to generate a completed dataset including density. The data normalization and elimination of outliers (DNEO) are used to create a better dataset which prepared for machine learning algorithms. Moreover, an unbiased performance estimate for the training process carried out by the nested cross-validation (NCV) method. In the experiment, the methods of machine learning have high accurate over 87.9%, especially the model of RF gets 98.1% accuracy.

scholarly journals APTITUDE Framework for Learning Data Classification Based on Machine Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Data Classification ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Course Content ◽  
Applied Model ◽  
Vector Machines ◽  
Learning Data

Learning analytics refers to the machine learning to provide predictions of learner success and prescriptions to learners and teachers. The main goal of paper is to proposed APTITUDE framework for learning data classification in order to achieve an adaptation and recommendations a course content or flow of course activities. This framework has applied model for student learning prediction based on machine learning. The five machine learning algorithms are used to provide learning data classification: random forest, Naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression and support vector machines

scholarly journals APLICAÇÃO DE MACHINE LEARNING NA IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE E-MAILS COMO SPAM

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
Michelle Tais Garcia Furuya ◽  
Danielle Elis Garcia Furuya
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
The Other ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Mail Service ◽  
E Mail

The e-mail service is one of the main tools used today and is an example that technology facilitates the exchange of information. On the other hand, one of the biggest obstacles faced by e-mail services is spam, the name given to the unsolicited message received by a user. The machine learning application has been gaining prominence in recent years as an alternative for efficient identification of spam. In this area, different algorithms can be evaluated to identify which one has the best performance. The aim of the study is to identify the ability of machine learning algorithms to correctly classify e-mails and also to identify which algorithm obtained the greatest accuracy. The database used was taken from the Kaggle platform and the data were processed bythe Orange software with four algorithms: Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes (NB). The division of data in training and testing considers 80% of the data for training and 20% for testing. The results show that Random Forest was the best performing algorithm with 99% accuracy.

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis and Predicting for Breast Cancer Detection Based on Data Mining Models

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-59
Author(s):  
Shler Farhad Khorshid ◽  
Adnan Mohsin Abdulazeez ◽  
Amira Bibo Sallow
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Data Mining ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Wide Range

Breast cancer is one of the most common diseases among women, accounting for many deaths each year. Even though cancer can be treated and cured in its early stages, many patients are diagnosed at a late stage. Data mining is the method of finding or extracting information from massive databases or datasets, and it is a field of computer science with a lot of potentials. It covers a wide range of areas, one of which is classification. Classification may also be accomplished using a variety of methods or algorithms. With the aid of MATLAB, five classification algorithms were compared. This paper presents a performance comparison among the classifiers: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistics Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Weighted K-Nearest Neighbors (Weighted K-NN), and Gaussian Naïve Bayes (Gaussian NB). The data set was taken from UCI Machine learning Repository. The main objective of this study is to classify breast cancer women using the application of machine learning algorithms based on their accuracy. The results have revealed that Weighted K-NN (96.7%) has the highest accuracy among all the classifiers.

scholarly journals Miss Predicting Readability of Health Educational Resources for Children Using Semantic Features

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. p10
Author(s):  
Yanmeng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Ensemble Classifier ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Semantic Features ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Education Resources

The success of health education resources largely depends on their readability, as the health information can only be understood and accepted by the target readers when the information is uttered with proper reading difficulty. Unlike other populations, children feature limited knowledge and underdeveloped reading comprehension, which poses more challenges for the readability research on health education resources. This research aims to explore the readability prediction of health education resources for children by using semantic features to develop machine learning algorithms. A data-driven method was applied in this research:1000 health education articles were collected from international health organization websites, and they were grouped into resources for kids and resources for non-kids according to their sources. Moreover, 73 semantic features were used to train five machine learning algorithms (decision tree, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors algorithm, ensemble classifier, and logistic regression). The results showed that the k-nearest neighbors algorithm and ensemble classifier outperformed in terms of area under the operating characteristic curve sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and achieved good performance in predicting whether the readability of health education resources is suitable for children or not.

scholarly journals Tutorial: Applying Machine Learning in Behavioral Research

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Turgeon ◽  
Marc Lanovaz
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Behavior Analysis ◽  
Gradient Descent ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Stochastic Gradient Descent ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Research Questions

Machine learning algorithms hold promise in revolutionizing how educators and clinicians make decisions. However, researchers in behavior analysis have been slow to adopt this methodology to further develop their understanding of human behavior and improve the application of the science to problems of applied significance. One potential explanation for the scarcity of research is that machine learning is not typically taught as part of training programs in behavior analysis. This tutorial aims to address this barrier by promoting increased research using machine learning in behavior analysis. We present how to apply the random forest, support vector machine, stochastic gradient descent, and k-nearest neighbors algorithms on a small dataset to better identify parents who would benefit from a behavior analytic interactive web training. These step-by-step applications should allow researchers to implement machine learning algorithms with novel research questions and datasets.

scholarly journals Predicting hospitalization following psychiatric crisis care using machine learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthijs Blankers ◽  
Louk F. M. van der Post ◽  
Jack J. M. Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Ensemble Model ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Crisis Care

Abstract Background Accurate prediction models for whether patients on the verge of a psychiatric criseis need hospitalization are lacking and machine learning methods may help improve the accuracy of psychiatric hospitalization prediction models. In this paper we evaluate the accuracy of ten machine learning algorithms, including the generalized linear model (GLM/logistic regression) to predict psychiatric hospitalization in the first 12 months after a psychiatric crisis care contact. We also evaluate an ensemble model to optimize the accuracy and we explore individual predictors of hospitalization. Methods Data from 2084 patients included in the longitudinal Amsterdam Study of Acute Psychiatry with at least one reported psychiatric crisis care contact were included. Target variable for the prediction models was whether the patient was hospitalized in the 12 months following inclusion. The predictive power of 39 variables related to patients’ socio-demographics, clinical characteristics and previous mental health care contacts was evaluated. The accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the machine learning algorithms were compared and we also estimated the relative importance of each predictor variable. The best and least performing algorithms were compared with GLM/logistic regression using net reclassification improvement analysis and the five best performing algorithms were combined in an ensemble model using stacking. Results All models performed above chance level. We found Gradient Boosting to be the best performing algorithm (AUC = 0.774) and K-Nearest Neighbors to be the least performing (AUC = 0.702). The performance of GLM/logistic regression (AUC = 0.76) was slightly above average among the tested algorithms. In a Net Reclassification Improvement analysis Gradient Boosting outperformed GLM/logistic regression by 2.9% and K-Nearest Neighbors by 11.3%. GLM/logistic regression outperformed K-Nearest Neighbors by 8.7%. Nine of the top-10 most important predictor variables were related to previous mental health care use. Conclusions Gradient Boosting led to the highest predictive accuracy and AUC while GLM/logistic regression performed average among the tested algorithms. Although statistically significant, the magnitude of the differences between the machine learning algorithms was in most cases modest. The results show that a predictive accuracy similar to the best performing model can be achieved when combining multiple algorithms in an ensemble model.

scholarly journals Predicting Hospitalization following Psychiatric Crisis Care using Machine Learning

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthijs Blankers ◽  
Louk F. M. van der Post ◽  
Jack J. M. Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Predictor Variables ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Psychiatric Crisis ◽  
Crisis Care

Abstract Background: It is difficult to accurately predict whether a patient on the verge of a potential psychiatric crisis will need to be hospitalized. Machine learning may be helpful to improve the accuracy of psychiatric hospitalization prediction models. In this paper we evaluate and compare the accuracy of ten machine learning algorithms including the commonly used generalized linear model (GLM/logistic regression) to predict psychiatric hospitalization in the first 12 months after a psychiatric crisis care contact, and explore the most important predictor variables of hospitalization. Methods: Data from 2,084 patients with at least one reported psychiatric crisis care contact included in the longitudinal Amsterdam Study of Acute Psychiatry were used. The accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the machine learning algorithms were compared. We also estimated the relative importance of each predictor variable. The best and least performing algorithms were compared with GLM/logistic regression using net reclassification improvement analysis. Target variable for the prediction models was whether or not the patient was hospitalized in the 12 months following inclusion in the study. The 39 predictor variables were related to patients’ socio-demographics, clinical characteristics and previous mental health care contacts. Results: We found Gradient Boosting to perform the best (AUC=0.774) and K-Nearest Neighbors performing the least (AUC=0.702). The performance of GLM/logistic regression (AUC=0.76) was above average among the tested algorithms. Gradient Boosting outperformed GLM/logistic regression and K-Nearest Neighbors, and GLM outperformed K-Nearest Neighbors in a Net Reclassification Improvement analysis, although the differences between Gradient Boosting and GLM/logistic regression were small. Nine of the top-10 most important predictor variables were related to previous mental health care use. Conclusions: Gradient Boosting led to the highest predictive accuracy and AUC while GLM/logistic regression performed average among the tested algorithms. Although statistically significant, the magnitude of the differences between the machine learning algorithms was modest. Future studies may consider to combine multiple algorithms in an ensemble model for optimal performance and to mitigate the risk of choosing suboptimal performing algorithms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document