Developing an Urban Residential District Plan Competition Assessment System for China

2013 ◽  
Vol 807-809 ◽  
pp. 1815-1818
Author(s):  
Xiao Peng Zhang ◽  
Bo Yang Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation System ◽  
Sustainability Assessment ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
The Status ◽  
Residential District ◽  
Sustainability Assessment Tools ◽  
Selection Of

The purpose of this research is to combine the sustainability evaluation system of China and put forward a sustainability assessment system based on urban residential district plan competition program. In this research, the status quo of the evaluation process was studied. As the core of the research, the establishment of URDPAS complements the assessment technology of residential district plan competition. The existing area scale sustainability assessment tools were analyzed. With the application of ANP method to determine the evaluation items and weighting system in urban residential district plan, decision-makers can use this evaluation process and assessment system to assess the residential district plans more comprehensively and rationally than using traditional methods and the selection of the best plan becomes relatively easier.

Developing an Urban Design Competition Proposals Evaluation System Based on the Sustainability Assessment at Area Scale for China

2013 ◽  
Vol 357-360 ◽  
pp. 1847-1850
Author(s):  
Bo Yang Zhao ◽  
Xiao Peng Zhang ◽  
Wei Qin
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Sustainability Assessment ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Brownfield Redevelopment ◽  
The Status ◽  
Design Competition ◽  
Sustainability Assessment Tools ◽  
Core Part

The purpose of this research is to develop an Urban Design Competition Proposals Evaluation System (UDCPES) based on the sustainability assessment at area scale, together with the evaluation process for China. The research studied the status quo and designed the evaluation process. And as core part of the research, UDCPES for an urban brownfield redevelopment design competition are established. Analysis of existing sustainability assessment tools for area scale and AHP method are applied here to define the evaluation items and the weighting system. The research adopted the concepts of sustainability assessment in urban competition proposals evaluation. Such an evaluation process and system can assist the decision maker evaluate urban design proposals more comprehensively and rationally than the traditional way, and easier to find the best one.

scholarly journals Evaluation System at School Level in Nepal: Major Pitfalls and Considerations

2021 ◽  
pp. 60-66
Author(s):  
Yadu Prasad Gyawali
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Students ◽  
Portfolio Management ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Formative Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
School Level ◽  
Project Work ◽  
Continuous Assessment

This paper aims to explore the pitfalls of the current evaluation system at the school level in Nepal focusing on the major consequences of educational practices as the output of the evaluation system. Although the provisions of formative assessment tools such as portfolio management and project work were included in the curriculum framework and policy documents, the evaluation process was based on a theoretical basis. Similarly, the judgmental written examination for assessing theoretical aspects and Continuous Assessment System (CAS) with backward-looking nature were involved in the evaluation process. The paper suggests to the educational stakeholders for the practical application and evaluation of soft-skills associated methods such as communication, creativity, cooperation and collaboration of basic and secondary students to promote formative evaluation and the curriculum concept of 'assessment for learning in Nepal.

Research on the Scale and Platform of Sustainability Assessment for Area Scale Residential Development in China

2013 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 119-122
Author(s):  
Xiao Peng Zhang ◽  
Bo Yang Zhao ◽  
Wei Qin
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Sustainability Assessment ◽  
Urban System ◽  
Residential Development ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
The Sustainable Development ◽  
The Status ◽  
Residential District ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Regulatory Plan

It is the aim of this paper to discuss and search for the suitable scale and platform of sustainability assessment of area scale residential development in China, to contribute to the research of sustainability assessment and thus to promote the sustainable development in Chinese urbanization. The status quo of sustainability assessment in China and the scale definition of globe assessment tools for area scale are reviewed firstly to define the problem. And then, an analysis of Chinese urban system, land ownership and market and residential development are made to establish the combined hierarchical structure. Finally based on the previous research, residential district and regulatory plan are chosen by this research as the implement scale and platform of sustainability assessment for area scale residential development, together with the benefits analysis. The suggested assessment scale and platform could connect the existing sustainability assessment on city & building scale and promote sustainable development realize from targets to measures.

scholarly journals Social criteria to develop an in use holistic urban sustainable assessment tool: UHU2SAT

2021 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 04031
Author(s):  
Antonio Sánchez Cordero ◽  
Marta Videras Rodríguez ◽  
Sergio Gómez Melgar ◽  
José Manuel Andujar Márquez
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Sustainability Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Urban Spaces ◽  
Urban Mobility ◽  
Human Comfort ◽  
Operation And Maintenance ◽  
Holistic Assessment ◽  
Sustainability Assessment Tools

Recently, several urban sustainability assessment tools (USAT) have appeared to reduce the human impact provided by the built environment. Few of them focus on the assessment of urban spaces like squares, streets, and parks, etc., but they don’t operation and maintenance (OM) phase is not considered. It would be necessary to develop an in use holistic urban sustainable assessment tool (UHU2SAT) to specifically assess urban spaces under OM phase. This paper provides a qualitative research among 188 studies, with the aim to classify them according to the impacts they pursue: environmental (ENV), social (SOC) economic (ECO) and Others. Finally, the SOC criteria are reduced up to 21 and arranged into 4 different groups: Human comfort, Urban mobility, SOC Cohesion, and Health & safety. These SOC criteria have been discussed and revised according to the literature review to identify the most suitable indicators for the UHU2SAT. Finally, it can be concluded that this methodology could also be useful to obtain ENV and ECO criteria to provide a holistic assessment of the sustainability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document