Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Rapid Tooling

2005 ◽  
Vol 475-479 ◽  
pp. 2873-2876
Author(s):  
Charles Martin ◽  
J.V. Sasutil ◽  
M. Kouhkan ◽  
E. Lorea ◽  
Rafiq Noorani
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Selective Laser Sintering ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Laser Sintering ◽  
Rapid Tooling ◽  
Composite Manufacturing ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Deposition Modeling ◽  
Overall Performance

The purpose of this experiment was to compare different techniques that help improve conventional tooling. The methods investigated were chosen from both the methods of Rapid Tooling: direct and indirect. Six different methods were selected including, Sand Casting, Investment Casting, Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Direct Composite Manufacturing (DCM), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), and Stereolithography (SLA). Several industrial corporations were contacted to help complete all six tests. Five parameters were selected for the comparison of these samples: dimensional accuracy, tensile strength, surface roughness, time for completion, and weight. Through comparison the strengths and weaknesses of each method was determined. It was found that different methods did better in various parameters. However, Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) seemed to have the best overall performance.

scholarly journals USE OF FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING PROCESS IN INVESTMENT PRECISION CASTING AND RISK OF USING SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING PROCESS

2012 ◽  
pp. 226-230
Author(s):  
SIVADASAN M ◽  
N.K SINGH ◽  
ANOOP KUMAR SOOD
Keyword(s):  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Selective Laser Sintering ◽  
Thermal Response ◽  
Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene ◽  
Laser Sintering ◽  
Precision Casting ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Rp Process ◽  
Deposition Modeling ◽  
Metallic Parts

Investment Castings (IC) is one of the most economical ways to produce intricate metallic parts when forging, forming and other casting processes tend to fail. However, high tooling cost and long lead time associated with the fabrication of metal moulds for producing IC wax (sacrificial) patterns result in cost justification problems for customized single casting or small-lot production. Generating pattern using rapid prototyping (RP) process may be one of the feasible alternatives. For this purpose present study assessed the suitability of the fused deposition modeling (FDM) process for creating sacrificial IC patterns by studying FDM fabricated part thermal response at various temperatures. A series of experiments with RP patterns are conducted and a set of test castings are also made in steel for establishing feasibility. The build material used is acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). As an annexe to this work a concurrent attempt is also made to quantify the risk in using Selective Laser Sintering patterns for Investment Castings. Authors hope this work might establish applicability of ABS in IC and also lead the investigations to theoretically tone down the shell cracking tendency with Selective Laser Sintering patterns when Proprietary Duraform is used as the build material.

A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian N. Turner ◽  
Scott A Gold
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Product Design ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Deposition Modeling ◽  
Am Processes

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critically review the literature related to dimensional accuracy and surface roughness for fused deposition modeling and similar extrusion-based additive manufacturing or rapid prototyping processes. Design/methodology/approach – A systematic review of the literature was carried out by focusing on the relationship between process and product design parameters and the dimensional and surface properties of finished parts. Methods for evaluating these performance parameters are also reviewed. Findings – Fused deposition modeling® and related processes are the most widely used polymer rapid prototyping processes. For many applications, resolution, dimensional accuracy and surface roughness are among the most important properties in final parts. The influence of feedstock properties and system design on dimensional accuracy and resolution is reviewed. Thermal warping and shrinkage are often major sources of dimensional error in finished parts. This phenomenon is explored along with various approaches for evaluating dimensional accuracy. Product design parameters, in particular, slice height, strongly impact surface roughness. A geometric model for surface roughness is also reviewed. Originality/value – This represents the first review of extrusion AM processes focusing on dimensional accuracy and surface roughness. Understanding and improving relationships between materials, design parameters and the ultimate properties of finished parts will be key to improving extrusion AM processes and expanding their applications.

scholarly journals Research on 3D printed fixture components

2018 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 02008
Author(s):  
Dragoş-Florin Chitariu ◽  
Adriana Munteanu
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Active Surface ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Deposition Modeling ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Machining Control ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
High Level

Fixtures are used for orientation, positioning and tightening of the workpiece during machining, control and assembly. The main fixture requirements are: orientation, positioning and tightening precision in accordance with the machining requirements. The materials used for fixture components, especially, supports and clamping mechanism are, usually, alloy steel with HRC hardness up to 55-60 HRC. These components are machined to high level of precision thus assuring the overall precision of the fixture. In order to achieve high stiffness and a good dampening capacity the fixture become, usually, very heavy. In the case of manually operated fixtures light weight is an advantage; also there are operations such as inspection, assembly where the operating forces are low. In this case lightweight materials can be used for fixture construction. In this paper the FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) 3D printing technology is used. Support buttons and v-block fixture components were selected and 3D printed. The effect of printing orientation of active surfaces of support was analysed. The dimensional accuracy and surface roughness on the active surface were measured. Experimental results indicate that surface roughness is dependent on the orientation of the printed workpiece.

scholarly journals Additive Manufacturing: A next gen fabrication

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prajakta Subhedar
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Prototyping ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Selective Laser Sintering ◽  
Laser Sintering ◽  
Consumer Products ◽  
Cad Model ◽  
Final Model ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Layer Manufacturing ◽  
Deposition Modeling

A class of technologies referring to Rapid Prototyping (RP) or Additive or Layer Manufacturing or 3D Printing allows designers to quickly create tangible prototype instead of using two dimensional pictures. This technology produces models and prototype parts from 3D CAD model data created from 3D object digitizing systems. Rapid Prototyping forms parts by joining together liquid, powder or sheet materials. Physical models are built using three basic stages: pre-processing, building, post-processing. Pre-processing consists of generation of CAD model, convert into STL format and slice the STL files into cross sectional layers. In building process, construction of model takes place one layer atop another. Post process consists of cleaning and finishing the final model. Common types of Rapid Prototyping technologies popular in industry are: Steriolithography, Fused Deposition Modeling, Selective Laser Sintering, Laminated Object Manufacturing,3 D Printing. The selection of the processes depends upon the material to be cured to build the final model. Rapid Prototyping technologies are used in various industries like Automobiles, Consumer products, Medical, Academics, Aerospace, Government and Military. This poster talks about few challenges to be considered in Rapid Prototyping like shrinkage and distortion of final model, mechanical performance of RP model and limitations to mass quantity. : Layer Manufacturing, CAD Model, STL format, Steriolithography, Fused Deposition Modeling, Selective Laser Sintering.

scholarly journals МЕТОД СОЗДАНИЯ МОДЕЛЕЙ САМОЛЕТОВ С ПОМОЩЬЮ СИСТЕМ CAD/CAM/CAE И АДДИТИВНЫХ ТЕХНОЛОГИЙ

2018 ◽  
pp. 24-34
Author(s):  
Ю. Б. Витязев ◽  
А. Г. Гребеников ◽  
А. М. Гуменный ◽  
А. М. Ивасенко ◽  
А. А. Соболев
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Selective Laser Sintering ◽  
Laser Sintering ◽  
Additive Technologies ◽  
Direct Metal Laser Sintering ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Deposition Modeling ◽  
Laser Stereolithography

The analysis of the most applicable in mechanical engineering additive technologies (fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, laser stereolithography, direct metal laser sintering) have been performed. Method of creating airplane models using CAD/CAM/CAE systems and additive manufacturing is presented. The results of the application of selective laser sintering and fused deposition modeling for the manufacture of training aircraft models are considered.

scholarly journals Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casting Patterns Fabricated Using Consumer 3D Printers

Polymers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2244
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Ishida ◽  
Daisuke Miura ◽  
Taira Miyasaka ◽  
Akikazu Shinya
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Dental Restoration ◽  
Outer Diameter ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
3D Printers ◽  
Deposition Modeling ◽  
Original Size ◽  
Tooth Axis

Consumer 3D printers have improved considerably due to the evolution of additive manufacturing. This study aimed to examine the accuracy of consumer printers in dental restoration. Cylindrical patterns mimicking a full crown were created and enlarged from 100% to 105% of the original size. Two types of consumer 3D printers, including a fused deposition modeling (FDM) device and a stereolithography (SLA) device, and two types of dental 3D printers, including a multi-jet device and an SLA device, were used to fabricate the patterns. Then, the outer and inner diameters and depths, and surface roughness of the patterns were measured. The changing rates of the outer diameter of models created using dental printers were significantly smaller than those of the models created using consumer printers (p < 0.05). Significantly greater surface roughness was obtained in the tooth axis of the model fabricated using the consumer FDM device (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed on the surface roughness of both axes between the consumer SLA device and the dental devices (p > 0.05). However, FDM showed larger surface roughness than dental devices in both axes (p < 0.05). Thus, the SLA consumer printer can be applied to fabricate resin patterns with enlargement editing of 1–3% along the horizontal axis.

Multifactor optimization of FDM process parameters for development of rapid tooling using SiC/Al2O3-reinforced LDPE filament

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyush Bedi ◽  
Rupinder Singh ◽  
IPS Ahuja
Keyword(s):  
Particle Size ◽  
Process Parameters ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Rapid Tooling ◽  
Scanning Calorimetry ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Significant Process ◽  
Deposition Modeling ◽  
Sic Reinforcement

In this work, multifactor optimization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameters has been reported for in-house prepared feedstock filament comprising of SiC/Al2O3 reinforced in recycled low-density polyethylene (LDPE) matrix with different particle sizes (i.e. single particle size (SPS), double particle size (DPS), and triple particle size (TPS) in different proportions). This study has been conducted on Al2O3-based DPS reinforcement in LDPE, which came out as a better solution during pilot experimentation in comparison to SPS, TPS, and SiC reinforcement, for printing of functional prototypes as rapid tooling (RT). The result of study suggests that infill angle in the FDM process is the most significant process parameter (contributing around 93%) for preparation of RT as regards dimensional accuracy and hardness is concerned. The RT so prepared is thermally stable as evident from differential scanning calorimetry analysis. Further, the photomicrographs observed in different planes suggest that, at the proposed settings, RT has a uniform distribution of reinforcement in LDPE matrix and can be gainfully used in light machining applications.

Technical Development of Hybrid Rapid Tooling Technology

2013 ◽  
Vol 664 ◽  
pp. 830-834
Author(s):  
Chil Chyuan Kuo ◽  
Sheng Jie Su ◽  
Shiou Ru Shiu
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Rapid Tooling ◽  
Manufacturing Cost ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Composite Surface ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Deposition Modeling ◽  
Tooling Technology

The surface finish of fused deposition modeling (FDM) processed part is excessively rough due to stair stepping effect. In addition, the tensile strength of rapid tooling fabricated by FDM is inferior to that fabricated by plastic injection molding. A hybrid rapid tooling technology is developed to improve the surface roughness and increase the tensile strength of rapid tooling fabricated by FDM using epoxy-based composite in this work. Improvement rate of tensile strength of rapid tooling is 2.34 times of the add rate of epoxy-based composite. Surface roughness improvement rate of up to 92.94% can be achieved. Hybrid rapid tooling technology owns low manufacturing cost, simple manufacturing process and good flexibility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document