New drugs in acute myeloid leukemia

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Theo De Witte ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Sergio Amadori ◽  
Roel Willemze
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasko Graklanov

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia in elderly patients. Over the past four decades the basic therapeutic armamentarium was the standard cytotoxic treatment. The new insights in understanding the pathogenesis of AML was the momentum that revolutionized the treatment landscape in AML. The last five years unprecedented growth has been seen in the number of target therapy drugs for the treatment of AML. These new drugs did not just have a clinical benefit as single agents but also have improved AML patient outcomes if combined with conventional cytotoxic therapy. Here, we review recent advances in target-based therapy for patients with AML focusing on their mechanism of action and the results from already published clinical trials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 903-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ing S. Tiong ◽  
Andrew H. Wei

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmelo Gurnari ◽  
Maria Teresa Voso ◽  
Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski ◽  
Valeria Visconte

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders characterized by abnormal proliferation of undifferentiated myeloid progenitors, impaired hematopoiesis, and variable response to therapy. To date, only about 30% of adult patients with AML become long-term survivors and relapse and/or disease refractoriness are the major cause of treatment failure. Thus, this is an urgent unmet clinical need and new drugs are envisaged in order to ameliorate disease survival outcomes. Here, we review the latest therapeutic approaches (investigational and approved agents) for AML treatment. A specific focus will be given to molecularly targeted therapies for AML as a representation of possible agents for precision medicine. We will discuss experimental and preclinical data for FLT3, IDH1, BCL-2, Hedgehog pathway inhibitors, and epitherapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072091301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Vey

Treatment options for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain limited. In this age group, AML is frequently associated with poor-risk features, while patients’ present comorbidities and reduced functional reserves. As such, intensive chemotherapy (ICT) is frequently too toxic or ineffective in elderly patients and is restricted to a select minority, though it is standard therapy for the youngest and fittest patients or for those belonging to either the favorable or intermediate-risk groups. The use of hypomethylating agents represent an effective alternative for patients who are unfit for ICT, yet the results remain unsatisfactory. In recent years, prognostic scores were developed that include geriatric assessment tools and improved risk-stratification. In addition, several effective new drugs have emerged. The combination of these drugs with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine has produced encouraging preliminary results that may change standard practices and offer an alternative to the dilemma of ICT versus low-intensity therapies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 961-972
Author(s):  
Khalil Saleh ◽  
Nadine Khalifeh-Saleh ◽  
Hampig Raphael Kourie

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous neoplasm characterized by the monoclonal proliferation of immature progenitors. It is the most common acute leukemia in adults and its incidence increases with age. The standard traditional treatment in fit patients was the ‘3 + 7’ regimen and cytarabine consolidation followed or not with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Recently, several targeted therapies such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin targeting the CD33+ AML, midostaurin, gilteritinib and crenolanib inhibiting FLT3-positive AML and ivosidenib and enasidenib blocking IDH-mutated AML have been approved. These new drugs led to the change of the landscape of the treatment of AML and transforming this disease to a targetable one. We aimed in this paper to review the implications of each new target, the mechanisms of action of these new drugs and we discuss all the studies leading to the approval of these new drugs in their indications according to each target.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (24) ◽  
pp. 4838-4841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob M. Rowe ◽  
Bob Löwenberg

Abstract Despite living in an era of unprecedented progress in the understanding of the genetic and molecular biology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), this has not translated into significant advances in therapy. Never before have so many potential targets been studied. Yet most have not advanced beyond the phase 1 and, occasionally, phase 2 studies. The few ongoing phase 3 studies seem unlikely to have more than a marginal benefit, if at all. Thus, it is not surprising that in past few decades almost no new drugs for AML have received regulatory approval. In 2000, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration based on promising phase 2 data in relapsed older adults with AML. GO held promise as a new agent that also could be efficacious in newly diagnosed AML with acceptable toxicity. Several phase 3 studies were designed to test GO in this setting. The results of a randomized study by the Southwest Oncology Group led in 2010 to the voluntary withdrawal of this agent when improved efficacy could not be demonstrated and toxicity appeared excessive. Since then, 4 randomized studies have been completed that, in aggregate, strongly support the efficacy of this agent in newly diagnosed AML with acceptable toxicity. There is a very plausible explanation for this discrepancy, making a compelling case for reapproval of GO in AML.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Lai ◽  
Kimberley Doucette ◽  
Kelly Norsworthy

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults, with an incidence that increases with age, and a generally poor prognosis. The disease is clinically and genetically heterogeneous, and recent advances have improved our understanding of the cytogenetic abnormalities and molecular mutations, aiding in prognostication and risk stratification. Until recently, however, therapeutic options were mostly limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Since 2017, there has been an explosion of newly approved treatment options both nationally and internationally, with the majority of new drugs targeting specific gene mutations and/or pivotal cell survival pathways. In this review article, we will discuss these new agents approved for the treatment of AML within the last 2 years, and will outline the mechanistic features and clinical trials that led to their approvals.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4384-4384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Etienne ◽  
Aude Charbonnier ◽  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Diane Coso ◽  
Anne-Marie Stoppa ◽  
...  

Abstract New international recommendations of response for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) include morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). This response criteria was defined following evaluation of new drugs used for the treatment of AML in first relapse (Sievers et al., JCO2001;19:3244–3254). The objective of our study was to determine the outcome of elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML achieving CRi. Between 1995 and 2006, 240 patients aged 65 years or older with previously untreated acute non promyelocytic leukemia received a conventional anthracycline and cytarabine induction chemotherapy at a single institution. Median age was 71 years (range, 65–85). One hundred and nineteen patients achieved a complete response (CR) (50%), 15 patients achieved CRi (6%), 69 patients had persisting leukemia (29%), and 37 died during remission induction therapy (15%). Patients who reached a CR or CRi after 1 or 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy proceeded to consolidation. Only 9 patients in CRi received this consolidation chemotherapy course (60%) and none had intensification (intermediate-dose cytarabine and/or autologous stem cell transplantation) whereas for patients achieving CR, 88% (n=104) and 69% (n=82) had consolidation and intensification, respectively (p=0,01 and p=0,03). The median overall survival (OS) was respectively 9 and 18 months for patients in CRi and CR (p=0,08). OS was significantly lower for patients in CRi younger than 70 years (5 versus 17 months for CR, p=0,02). By landmark analysis, there was no difference in OS between patients in CRi and a group of 67 patients with induction failure surviving at less 40 days (p=0,14). Disease-free survival (DFS) and remission duration were not significantly different between patients in CRi and CR overall (5 and 8 months, and 5 and 7 months, respectively), but we found a difference for patients younger than 70 years (p=0,004 and p=0,009 for DFS and remission duration, respectively). There was significantly more multilineage dysplasia in patients achieving CRi (8 versus 33, p=0,009) and platelet count at diagnosis were lower (44 G/L versus 82 G/L). Cytogenetic did not differ between the two groups. Our results show that the outcome of elderly patients who achieved CRi is inferior to patients in CR, especially for patients younger than 70 years. Although this response criteria seems to indicate activity, we were not able to found a difference with patients who did not achieve CR. This result will be revaluated in a larger study. Our data also suggest that patients with CRi have different initial disease characteristics. Figure Figure


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document