scholarly journals A Validation Study of Homeopathic Prescribing and Patient Care Indicators

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munmun Koley ◽  
Subhranil Saha ◽  
Shubhamoy Ghosh ◽  
Goutam Nag ◽  
Monojit Kundu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
P.T. Osahon ◽  
M. Sama ◽  
D.T. Thomas

Background: An important goal of National Medicines Policy is to ensure that sufficient quantities of essential medicines are available to health care providers and affordable to patients.Objectives: To investigate and compare the prescribing indicators, patient care indicators and facility indicators in three central referral Hospitals in Sierra Leone.Methods: This was a simple randomized retrospective and prospective study. Three groups were obtained to assess prescribing, patient care and facility indicators in the study sites. About 10% of the prescriptions encountered from January to June 2019, were observed retrospectively. Direct observation of 30 randomly selected patients in each hospital was used to assess patient care. Data collected were organized using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Ethical considerations were observed.Results: The average number of medicines prescribed in the three teaching hospitals (Connaught, PCMH and ODCH) were 4.07, 4.3and 3.3 respectively. Percentage encounter with injections were within standard in PCMT and ODCH. Antibiotics prescribing was slightly higher that WHO recommendation of 30% in all 3 hospitals. Percentage of medicines prescribed by generics were 75.4%, 53% and 77% respectively. The average consultation time was 5.47 minutes while the average dispensing time was 79.7 seconds. Patients that receive their medications at Connaught Hospitals had very little knowledge on how they should take their medicine(s), compared to PCMH and ODCH.Conclusion: This study has shown that irrational use of medicines is a major problem in the three referral hospitals occurring majorly during the prescribing and dispensing processes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasha R. Wyatt ◽  
Elena A. Wood ◽  
Jennifer L. Waller ◽  
Sarah C. Egan ◽  
Lara M. Stepleman

Abstract Background: Psychological Ownership is the cognitive-affective state individuals experience when they come to feel they own something. The construct is context-dependent reliant on what is being owned and by whom. In medical education, this feeling translates to what has been described as “Patient Care Ownership,” which includes the feelings of responsibility that physicians have for patient care. The construct was originally validated with business employees, then recently translated into residency education where ownership behavior is expected. We adapted this instrument for a medical student population where patient ownership skills begin.Methods: Guiding our validation study was Downing’s framework, which combines theory, predicted relationships, and empirical evidence to propose the use of newly created instruments. Downing argues that assessments are not valid in and of themselves; they are the result of researchers’ evidence gathered in support of a specific interpretation. We chose to adapt this instrument because, like employees who feel that various projects belong to them, physicians share similar feelings about patients and their care. Results: The results show that the initial subscales proposed by Avey et al. (i.e. Territoriality, Accountability, Belongingness, Self-efficacy, and Self-identification) did not account for item responses in the revised instrument when administered to medical students. Instead, four subscales (Team Inclusion, Accountability, Territoriality, and Self-Confidence) better described patient care ownership for medical students, and the internal reliability of these subscales was found to be good. Using Cronbach’s alpha, the internal consistency among items for each subscale, includes: Team Inclusion (.91), Accountability (.78), Territoriality (.78), and Self-Confidence (.82). The subscales of Territoriality, Team Inclusion, and Self-Confidence were negatively correlated with the 1-item Burnout measure (P=0.01). The Team Inclusion subscale strongly correlated with the Teamwork Assessment Scale (TSA), while the subscales of Accountability correlated weakly, and Self-Confidence and Territoriality correlated moderately.Conclusions: Our study provides strong preliminary validity evidence for an adapted version of Avey et al.’s psychological ownership survey, specifically designed to measure patient care ownership in a medical student population. We expect this revised instrument to be a valuable tool to medical educators evaluating and monitoring students as they learn how to engage in patient care ownership.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
MM Alam ◽  
F Parveen ◽  
MJU Iqbal ◽  
N Noor ◽  
SA Begum

A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out among individuals attending the Out Patient Department (OPD) of Medicine, Surgery and Gynaecology & Obstetrics from February 1, 2010 to April 30, 2010 in Sir Salimullah Medical College and Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh to see the patterns of drug dispensing using World Health Organization core patient care indicators. The result of the study showed that the overall average consultation time and dispensing time were too short (2.5 minutes and 30 seconds per patient respectively). Of the drugs prescribed, only 20.15% were actually dispensed, whereas no appropriate labeling (0%) was observed and 37.3% of patients knew how to administer drugs correctly after receiving the drugs from the dispenser. So the finding from current study shows a trend towards inappropriate dispensing practice. Hence, there is a need for effective intervention programme to encourage the physicians and dispensing pharmacists in promoting patient care as well as health care facilities. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v41i1.18776 Bangladesh Medical Journal 2012 Vol. 41 No. 1; 21-24


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document