Investigation and Comparison of Medicine Use in the three Central Referral Hospitals in Sierra Leone

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
P.T. Osahon ◽  
M. Sama ◽  
D.T. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Essential Medicines ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Ethical Considerations ◽  
Prescribing Indicators ◽  
Patient Care Indicators ◽  
Referral Hospitals ◽  
Study Sites

Background: An important goal of National Medicines Policy is to ensure that sufficient quantities of essential medicines are available to health care providers and affordable to patients.Objectives: To investigate and compare the prescribing indicators, patient care indicators and facility indicators in three central referral Hospitals in Sierra Leone.Methods: This was a simple randomized retrospective and prospective study. Three groups were obtained to assess prescribing, patient care and facility indicators in the study sites. About 10% of the prescriptions encountered from January to June 2019, were observed retrospectively. Direct observation of 30 randomly selected patients in each hospital was used to assess patient care. Data collected were organized using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Ethical considerations were observed.Results: The average number of medicines prescribed in the three teaching hospitals (Connaught, PCMH and ODCH) were 4.07, 4.3and 3.3 respectively. Percentage encounter with injections were within standard in PCMT and ODCH. Antibiotics prescribing was slightly higher that WHO recommendation of 30% in all 3 hospitals. Percentage of medicines prescribed by generics were 75.4%, 53% and 77% respectively. The average consultation time was 5.47 minutes while the average dispensing time was 79.7 seconds. Patients that receive their medications at Connaught Hospitals had very little knowledge on how they should take their medicine(s), compared to PCMH and ODCH.Conclusion: This study has shown that irrational use of medicines is a major problem in the three referral hospitals occurring majorly during the prescribing and dispensing processes.

scholarly journals Ethical Considerations on Pediatric Genetic Testing Results in Electronic Health Records

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 755-763
Author(s):  
Shibani Kanungo ◽  
Jayne Barr ◽  
Parker Crutchfield ◽  
Casey Fealko ◽  
Neelkamal Soares
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Genetic Information ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Ethical Considerations ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Genetic Results

Abstract Background Advances in technology and access to expanded genetic testing have resulted in more children and adolescents receiving genetic testing for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. With increased adoption of the electronic health record (EHR), genetic testing is increasingly resulted in the EHR. However, this leads to challenges in both storage and disclosure of genetic results, particularly when parental results are combined with child genetic results. Privacy and Ethical Considerations Accidental disclosure and erroneous documentation of genetic results can occur due to the nature of their presentation in the EHR and documentation processes by clinicians. Genetic information is both sensitive and identifying, and requires a considered approach to both timing and extent of disclosure to families and access to clinicians. Methods This article uses an interdisciplinary approach to explore ethical issues surrounding privacy, confidentiality of genetic data, and access to genetic results by health care providers and family members, and provides suggestions in a stakeholder format for best practices on this topic for clinicians and informaticians. Suggestions are made for clinicians on documenting and accessing genetic information in the EHR, and on collaborating with genetics specialists and disclosure of genetic results to families. Additional considerations for families including ethics around results of adolescents and special scenarios for blended families and foster minors are also provided. Finally, administrators and informaticians are provided best practices on both institutional processes and EHR architecture, including security and access control, with emphasis on the minimum necessary paradigm and parent/patient engagement and control of the use and disclosure of data. Conclusion The authors hope that these best practices energize specialty societies to craft practice guidelines on genetic information management in the EHR with interdisciplinary input that addresses all stakeholder needs.

scholarly journals Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Performance about Disaster Management: A Case of Iran

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 441-446
Author(s):  
Sedighe S. T. Far ◽  
Milad A. Marzaleh ◽  
Nasrin Shokrpour ◽  
Ramin Ravangard
Keyword(s):  
Disaster Management ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Significant Relationships ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Performance

Background: Iran is a disaster-prone country in which many natural and man-made disasters happen every year. Because the health sector is vital due to its nature of treatment and rehabilitation of the injured after the disasters, all health care providers, especially hospital nurses, should be prepared to provide the services they need. Objective: The present study aimed to determine the level of knowledge, attitude, and performance of nurses about disaster management in teaching hospitals affiliated to Iran, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2019. Methods: This cross-sectional and descriptive-analytical study was conducted on a sample of 230 nurses working in the teaching hospitals of Iran, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, who were selected using the stratified sampling proportional to size and simple random sampling methods. The data were collected using a valid and reliable questionnaire containing 20 questions in three dimensions of knowledge, attitude, and performance. Then, the collected data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 through independent samples t-test, ANOVA and Tukey tests at the significance level of 5%. Results: The results showed that the highest and lowest mean scores were related to the attitude (2.38±0.19) and knowledge (1.70±0.50) of the nurses, respectively. However, all three dimensions were at a moderate level. The results showed significant relationships between the mean score of performance and the gender, marital status, age, and work experience of the nurses. In addition, statistically significant relationships were found between the mean score of knowledge and their age and work experience (p<0.05). Conclusion: According to the findings, the following suggestions can be made to increase the knowledge and performance of the nurses for being prepared in critical situations: reducing the duration and increasing the quality of training classes and workshops on disaster preparedness; providing some incentives for nurses, especially female, married, older, and more experienced ones to attend these classes; and improving the methods of training materials related to disaster management.

scholarly journals Examining the role of MEDLINE as a patient care information resource: an analysis of data from the Value of Libraries study

2017 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathel Dunn ◽  
Joanne Gard Marshall ◽  
Amber L. Wells ◽  
Joyce E. B. Backus
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Information Resources ◽  
Information Resource ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Other Information

Objective: This study analyzed data from a study on the value of libraries to understand the specific role that the MEDLINE database plays in relation to other information resources that are available to health care providers and its role in positively impacting patient care.Methods: A previous study on the use of health information resources for patient care obtained 16,122 responses from health care providers in 56 hospitals about how providers make decisions affecting patient care and the role of information resources in that process. Respondents indicated resources used in answering a specific clinical question from a list of 19 possible resources, including MEDLINE. Study data were examined using descriptive statistics and regression analysis to determine the number of information resources used and how they were used in combination with one another.Results: Health care professionals used 3.5 resources, on average, to aid in patient care. The 2 most frequently used resources were journals (print and online) and the MEDLINE database. Using a higher number of information resources was significantly associated with a higher probability of making changes to patient care and avoiding adverse events. MEDLINE was the most likely to be among consulted resources compared to any other information resource other than journals.Conclusions: MEDLINE is a critical clinical care tool that health care professionals use to avoid adverse events, make changes to patient care, and answer clinical questions.

Breaking bad news in the oncologic population: Residents' perspective.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24113-e24113
Author(s):  
Vihitha Thota ◽  
Mahati Paravathaneni ◽  
Sudheer Konduru ◽  
Bohdan Baralo ◽  
Sana Mulla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Confidence Level ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Further Education ◽  
Bad News ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prior Training ◽  
Oncologic Patients ◽  
Delivering Bad News

e24113 Background: Delivering bad news to patients is a delicate but required skill for doctors as part of patient care. There has been evidence that good communication from health care providers can improve patients' compliance to treatment as well as be beneficial emotionally. While many studies have been done in regards to patients' perceptions of receiving bad news, there are limited studies looking at a physicians' perspective, and even more so concerning residents' perceptions. In community hospitals, many patients are diagnosed with cancer, and resident physicians are often responsible for informing the patients and their families regarding the diagnosis. The manner in which the news is delivered is important, however it is unclear how much training is provided to residents before they are required to break bad news to patients. The lack of training can often result in improper delivery and poor patient care. Methods: We surveyed Internal Medicine and General Surgery residents at Mercy Catholic Medical Center, a conglomeration of two community teaching hospitals in Philadelphia, about prior training, confidence level, attitudes, and need for further education on delivering bad news to oncologic patients using a survey created after extensive research. The factors associated with confidence level were analyzed using paired T-test and ANOVA methods. Results: A total of 65 residents (72%) participated. No statistical significance was seen between American versus foreign medical graduates, MD vs. DO residents, or among those in different specialties when assessing their confidence in delivering bad news. Though only 62% of participants reported having had prior training in delivering bad news, residents with previous training (p1) or who have had to deliver bad news previously (p2) reported higher confidence when it came to delivering a new diagnosis of cancer (p1 0.03, p2 0.001), delivering news regarding the progression of cancer (p1 0.03, p2 0.02), delivering news regarding the recurrence of cancer (p1 0.04, p2 0.002), and delivering news regarding end-stage cancer with little to no treatment options left (p1 0.04, p2 0.003). 100% of participants thought communicating bad news is an important skill for a physician, and 92% of participants thought further education would help prepare them for similar scenarios in the future. Simulated patient scenarios (64%), grand rounds lectures/presentations (59%), and feedback from faculty after actual patient scenarios (57%) were the most requested whereas pamphlets/brochures (17%) and online training courses (20%) were less popular. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of prior training or exposure among residents in being able to deliver bad news to patients effectively. We propose that implementing further training in the form of simulated scenarios and lectures can improve residents' confidence at delivering bad news and result in a better physician-patient relationship.

Critical Aspects of a Sustainable Clinical Research Program in the Community-Based Oncology Practice

2019 ◽  
pp. 176-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Ersek ◽  
Stephanie L. Graff ◽  
Francis P. Arena ◽  
Neelima Denduluri ◽  
Edward S. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Research Program ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Technological Infrastructure ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Research Programs

Increasing enrollment into clinical trials is a top priority across the field of oncology. Because the vast majority of those afflicted with cancer receive their care in the community, creating strong clinical research programs in the community-based setting is important. This article comprehensively outlines the most important elements of creating and sustaining a successful community-based research program. Establishing a clear mission and defining the scope of the research program in collaboration with key physicians and administrative leadership are critical to success. Standard operating procedures should detail operational processes. Ensuring sound financial planning and protected physician time are crucial for a healthy program. Providing mentorship opportunities to investigators and other team members will provide necessary guidance for junior investigators and long-term program stability. Prioritizing provider and patient volunteer engagement through education and awareness will potentially improve enrollment and research ownership. Incorporating administrative and clinical research staff and health care providers, including physicians, advanced practice providers, and pharmacists, will result in a multidisciplinary and unified approach and may also promote research as a routine part of patient care. Regular safety and scientific meetings will reduce regulatory complications and, most importantly, improve patient care. Other keys to a successful program include establishing a diverse trial portfolio, collaboration between different institutions, and ensuring appropriate technological infrastructure. Serial programmatic review provides opportunities to refine suboptimal practices and recognize successful strategies. Community-based research programs are critical to improve access to optimal cancer care. Implementation of successful programs is possible with a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach.

Prescribing an App? Oncology Providers’ Views on Mobile Health Apps for Cancer Care

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Callie M. Berkowitz ◽  
Leah L. Zullig ◽  
Bridget F. Koontz ◽  
Sophia K. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Supportive Services ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Oncology Providers

Introduction Although there are over 500 mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) available for download in the field of oncology, little research has addressed their acceptability among health care providers. In addition, the providers’ perspectives regarding patient app use has been largely unexamined. We conducted a qualitative study to explore opportunities and barriers for mHealth app use for oncology care. Methods We developed a structured interview guide focusing on acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability of the use of apps in cancer care. We interviewed 15 oncology providers about their attitudes and preferences. De-identified audio recordings were transcribed and coded for emerging themes. Results Providers interviewed included physicians (n = 8) and advanced practice (n = 3) and supportive services (n = 4) providers who care for a wide range of cancer types; ages ranged from 32 to 68 years. Interviews lasted approximately 30 minutes. Oncology providers reported limited exposure to mHealth apps in patient care, but were generally open to recommending or prescribing apps in the future. Key themes included opportunities for mobile app use (including general health promotion, tracking symptoms, and engaging patients) and barriers to implementation (including access to technology, responsibility, workflow, and the source of the app itself). Conclusion Our results show openness among oncology providers to using mHealth technology as part of patient care, but concerns regarding implementation. Designing acceptable apps may be challenging and require involvement of key stakeholders, partnering with trustworthy institutions, and outcome-based research.

Using On-scene EMS Responders’ Assessment and Electronic Patient Care Records to Evaluate the Suitability of EMD-triaged, Low-acuity Calls for Secondary Nurse Triage in 911 Centers

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Scott ◽  
Jeff Clawson ◽  
Mark C. Fivaz ◽  
Jennie McQueen ◽  
Marie I. Gardett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Vital Sign ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Emergency Medical Dispatch ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Alpha Level ◽  
Nurse Triage

AbstractIntroductionUsing the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) – a systematic 911 triage process – to identify a large subset of low-acuity patients for secondary nurse triage in the 911 center is a largely unstudied practice in North America. This study examines the ALPHA-level subset of low-acuity patients in the MPDS to determine the suitability of these patients for secondary triage by evaluating vital signs and necessity of lights-and-siren transport, as determined by attending Emergency Medical Services (EMS) ambulance crews.ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical status of MPDS ALPHA-level (low-acuity) patients, as determined by on-scene EMS crews’ patient care records, in two US agencies. A secondary objective was to determine which ALPHA-level codes are suitable candidates for secondary triage by a trained Emergency Communication Nurse (ECN).MethodsIn this retrospective study, one full year (2013) of both dispatch data and EMS patient records data, associated with all calls coded at the ALPHA-level (low-acuity) in the dispatch protocol, were collected. The primary outcome measure was the number and percentage of ALPHA-level codes categorized as low-acuity, moderate-acuity, high-acuity, and critical using four common vital signs to assign these categories: systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse rate (PR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). Vital sign data were obtained from ambulance crew electronic patient care records (ePCRs). The secondary endpoint was the number and percentage of ALPHA-level codes that received a “hot” (lights-and-siren) transport.ResultsOut of 19,300 cases, 16,763 (86.9%) were included in the final analysis, after excluding cases from health care providers and those with missing data. Of those, 89% of all cases did not have even one vital sign indicator of unstable patient status (high or critical vital sign). Of all cases, only 1.1% were transported lights-and-siren.ConclusionWith the exception of the low-acuity, ALPHA-level seizure cases, the ALPHA-level patients are suitable to transfer for secondary triage in a best-practices, accredited, emergency medical dispatch center that utilizes the MPDS at very high compliance rates. The secondary nurse triage process should identify the few at-risk patients that exist in the low-acuity calls.ScottG, ClawsonJ, FivazMC, McQueenJ, GardettMI, SchultzB, YoungquistS, OlolaCHO. Using on-scene EMS responders’ assessment and electronic patient care records to evaluate the suitability of EMD-triaged, low-acuity calls for secondary nurse triage in 911 centers. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(1):46–57.

A Novel ICU Hand-Over Tool: The Glass Door of the Patient Room

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 514-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Wessman ◽  
Carrie Sona ◽  
Marilyn Schallom
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Night Shift ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Glass Door ◽  
Patient Handover ◽  
Communication Errors

Background: Poor communication among health-care providers is cited as the most common cause of sentinel events involving patients. Patient care in the critical care setting is incredibly complex. A consistent care plan is necessary between day/night shift teams and among bedside intensive care unit (ICU) nurses, consultants, and physicians. Our goal was to create a novel, easily accessible communication device to improve ICU patient care. Methods: This communication improvement project was done at an academic tertiary surgical/trauma/mixed 36-bed ICU with an average of 214 admissions per month. We created a glass door template embossed on the glass that included 3 columns for daily goals to be written: “day team,” “night team,” and “surgery/consultant team.” Assigned areas for tracking “lines,” “antibiotics,” “ventilator weaning,” and “Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) screening” were included. These doors are filled out/updated throughout the day by all of the ICU providers. All services can review current plans/active issues while evaluating the patient at the bedside. Patient-identifying data are not included. We retrospectively reviewed all ICU safety reported events over a 4-year period (2 years prior/2 years after glass door implementation) for specific handover communication-related errors and compared the 2 cohorts. Results: Information on the glass doors is entered daily on rounds by all services. Prior to implementation, 7.96% of reported errors were related to patient handover communication errors. The post glass-door era had 4.26% of reported errors related to patient handover communication errors with a relative risk reduction of 46.5%. Due to its usefulness, this method of communication was quickly adopted by the other critical care services (cardiothoracic, medical, neurology/neurosurgery, cardiology) at our institution and is now used for over 150 ICU beds. Conclusions: Our glass door patient handover tool is an easily adaptable intervention that has improved communication leading to an overall decrease in the number of handover communication errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document