EFFECT OF THE D GENOME ON THE PROTEIN OF THREE CULTIVARS OF HARD RED SPRING WHEAT

1970 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. L. DRONZEK ◽  
P. J. KALTSIKES ◽  
W. BUSHUK
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Insoluble Residue ◽  
Insoluble Protein ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Quantitative Distribution ◽  
Electrophoretic Patterns ◽  
Soluble Fractions

The protein compositions of the AABB tetraploid wheats derived from three common wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) cultivars, Prelude, Rescue and Thatcher, were compared with those of their hexaploid counterparts. Quantitative distribution of the soluble protein fractions showed that all wheats contained similar quantities of albumins and globulins. Tetraploids of Rescue and Thatcher contained more gliadin, more glutenin and less insoluble residue protein than the corresponding hexaploids. In contrast, the tetraploid of Prelude contained similar amounts of gliadin, glutenin and insoluble protein residue as its hexaploid. Amino acid compositions of the flour and the solubility fractions for all wheats examined were essentially the same. Electrophoretic patterns of the proteins in the four soluble fractions showed that significant qualitative differences existed among the cultivars studied. The patterns for each extracted tetraploid and its hexaploid counterpart were essentially the same.

The genomic inheritance of aluminum tolerance in 'Atlas 66' wheat

Genome ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Berzonsky
Keyword(s):  
Root Growth ◽  
Aluminum Tolerance ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Nuclear Genes ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Al Stress ◽  
Soft Red Winter Wheat ◽  
B Genome ◽  
Segregation Ratios

Toxicity to aluminum (Al) limits wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) yields. 'Atlas 66', a soft red winter wheat classified as tolerant (root growth ≥ 0.5 cm after Al stress) to 0.44 mM Al, was hybridized with tetraploid (4x) and hexaploid (6x) 'Canthatch', a hard red spring wheat classified as sensitive (root growth < 0.5 cm after Al stress) to 0.44 mM Al. Progenies produced from these hybridizations were tested for tolerance to 0.44 mM Al in solution to ascertain the number of genes and the genomes of 'Atlas 66', which determine tolerance to aluminum. Tests of 'Atlas 66', 6x-'Canthatch', and the F1's resulting from hybridizations between the parents indicated that dominant, nuclear genes carried by 'Atlas 66' determine tolerance to 0.44 mM Al. Segregation ratios for the F2 significantly differed from ratios expected for a dominant, duplicate genetic mechanism. F1 backcross segregation ratios did not significantly differ from ratios expected for dominant, duplicate nuclear genes for tolerance to aluminum. The expression of genes for tolerance to 0.44 mM Al for 'Atlas 66' appears to be more complex than is predicted by the existence of two dominant genes. A crossing scheme, which involved hybridizing 4x-'Canthatch' with 'Atlas 66', was executed to produce 42-chromosome plants having recombinant A- and B-genome chromosomes and D-genome chromosomes derived exclusively from 'Atlas 66'. Eleven F6 and F7 lines, developed from these plants, were selfed and plants in the F6 generation were backcrossed to 'Atlas 66' and 6x-'Canthatch'. The F6 and F7 lines were subjected to 0.44 mM Al in solution as were the backcrosses. While none of the lines had more than 50% of their seedlings classified as sensitive to Al in the F6 generation, four lines exhibited such a response in the F7 generation. In general, backcrossing the F6 lines to 6x-'Canthatch' increased sensitivity to Al, while backcrossing to 'Atlas 66' increased tolerance. Results suggest that genes for tolerance to Al in 'Atlas 66' wheat are not all located on D-genome chromosomes.Key words: aluminum tolerance, genomic inheritance, Triticum.

scholarly journals Trace Elements in Western Canadian Hard Red Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Levels and Quality Assurance

2001 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 1953-1963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene J Gawalko ◽  
Robert G Garrett ◽  
Thomas W Nowicki
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Trace Elements ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Canadian Prairie ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Major Factors

Abstract A monitoring program was conducted for trace elements in Western Canadian Hard Red Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Samples were selected from harvest survey samples submitted by producers from crop districts in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta for 1996, 1997, and 1998 crops. The analytical quality control measures used in these surveys are described along with the results for Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Se, and Zn. Accuracy and precision for the analyses fell within the acceptable control limits. Year-to-year variations in grain chemistry were small for Cd, Mn, Se, and Zn, but Cu and Fe contents showed 12 and 9% decreases, respectively, over the 3 years. The overall variability for the plant-essential trace elements—Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn—was low compared with that for Cd and Se. The spatial variation in crop chemistry across the Canadian Prairie wheat-producing region was greater than the year-to-year variations. Soil properties were major factors in controlling Cd and Se levels in grain.

Kenyon hard red spring wheat

1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1165-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Hughes ◽  
P. Hucl
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Leaf Rust ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Recurrent Parent ◽  
Breeding Method ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Wide Adaptation ◽  
Cultivar Description ◽  
The University

Kenyon hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) possesses excellent resistance to leaf rust and stem rust. Kenyon was developed using the backcross breeding method, resulting in the recovery of the maturity and wide adaptation of its recurrent parent Neepawa. Kenyon was developed at the University of Saskatchewan. Key words: Cultivar description, leaf rust, Triticum aestivum L., spring wheat

INHERITANCE OF THE TYPE OF SOLID STEM IN GOLDEN BALL (TRITICUM DURUM): II. CYTOGENETICS OF THE RELATION BETWEEN SOLID STEM AND OTHER MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS IN HEXAPLOID F5 LINES OF A HYBRID WITH RESCUE (T. AESTIVUM)

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1207-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby I. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Morphological Characters ◽  
Genome Chromosome ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Stem Solidness ◽  
Pentaploid Hybrid ◽  
Golden Ball ◽  
Solid Stem

Cytogenetic analysis of selected F5 lines of the pentaploid hybrid, Rescue (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) × Golden Ball (T. durum Desf.) showed that chromosome XVI is the member of the D genome of Rescue that prevents transfer of the more solid top culm internode of Golden Ball to hexaploid segregates. It also produces a lax spike. Chromosome XX, which is the D-genome chromosome mainly responsible for the hollowness of hollow-stemmed hexaploids, probably has little effect in Rescue. Long awns were associated with low chromosome number but not with stem solidness or dense spike; therefore, the chromosome that suppresses awn development is probably not XVI.Three 42-chromosome segregates from the cross were more solid in the top internode than Rescue, presumably because of segregation of genes in the A and B genomes. It is unlikely, however, that a fully hexaploid segregate with a top internode as solid as that of Golden Ball can be selected from this hybrid.

AAC Foray red spring wheat

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Brown ◽  
H. S. Randhawa ◽  
J. Mitchell Fetch ◽  
S. L. Fox ◽  
D. G. Humphreys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Agronomic Performance ◽  
Head Blight ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Sitodiplosis Mosellana ◽  
Wheat Market ◽  
Market Class ◽  
Wheat Blossom Midge

Brown, P. D., Randhawa, H. S., Mitchell Fetch, J., Fox, S. L., Humphreys, D. G., Meiklejohn, M., Green, D., Wise, I., Fetch, T., Gilbert, J., McCallum, B. and Menzies, J. 2015. AAC Foray red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 799–803. AAC Foray, an orange wheat blossom midge (Sitodiplosis mosellana Géhin) tolerant hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), combined high grain yield and good agronomic performance with excellent resistance to leaf and stem rust, and improved resistance to Fusarium head blight. AAC Foray had maturity, straw strength, and test weight similar to the check cultivars. AAC Foray is eligible for grade of the Canada Prairie Spring Red wheat market class.

AAC Elie hard red spring wheat

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 919-927
Author(s):  
R.D. Cuthbert ◽  
R.M. DePauw ◽  
R.E. Knox ◽  
A.K. Singh ◽  
T.N. McCaig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Yellow Rust ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Loose Smut ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Head Blight ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Intermediate Resistance ◽  
Flour Yield

AAC Elie hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has grain yield and time to maturity within the range of the checks. AAC Elie has an awned spike, a low lodging score indicative of strong straw, and a short plant stature typical of a semidwarf. These traits were comparable to the check Carberry. AAC Elie expressed resistance to prevalent races of leaf and stem rust, and intermediate resistance to fusarium head blight, yellow rust, common bunt, and loose smut. Compared with the five Canada Western Red Spring checks, AAC Elie has improved flour yield, and lower flower ash. AAC Elie is eligible for grades of Canada Western Red Spring.

TRANSLOCATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS TO ROOTS OF PINE SEEDLINGS

1962 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1125-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Shiroya ◽  
G. R. Lister ◽  
G. Krotkov ◽  
C. D. Nelson ◽  
V. Slankis
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Pinus Strobus ◽  
Root Systems ◽  
Insoluble Residue ◽  
Artificial Light ◽  
Closed Chamber ◽  
Full Sunlight ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Artificial Illumination ◽  
Soluble Fractions

Pinus strobus or P. resinosa seedlings, 2 or 3 years old, were illuminated in a closed chamber for 1 hour in the presence of C14O2. This was followed by various periods up to 24 hours under different conditions of light and darkness. Then each seedling was divided into its shoot, stem, and roots, and these were extracted separately with 80% ethanol. The extracts were resolved first on resins into sugar, amino acid, and organic acid fractions and then resolved further by paper chromatography. The C14 content of various fractions and of the eluted compounds was determined by plating and counting their aliquots. Ethanol-insoluble residue was oxidized and counted as BaC14O3.Eight hours after administration of the C14O2, 91 to 94% of the total C14 was found in the ethanol-soluble fractions of shoot, stem, or root. In shoots sugars were found to represent more than 95% of the ethanol-soluble photosynthate, with sucrose forming three-quarters of it. In stem and roots sucrose represented from 75 to 94% of the translocated photosynthate. Raffinose, glucose, and fructose were present in both stem and root.Seedlings with poorly developed root systems translocated less photosynthate to roots than those with good roots. Seedlings, which prior to the experiments were grown in full sunlight or 2500 ft-c artificial illumination translocated more photosynthate to roots than those grown in 6% of full sunlight or 250 ft-c artificial light. Stronger light during translocation itself also had a slight stimulatory effect.Seedlings, which were illuminated in the presence of C14O2 for 1 hour and then retained in a closed chamber for a further period of 7 hours, translocated a larger fraction of absorbed C14 to their roots than comparable seedlings transferred to air after feeding C14O2.

Varietal differences in amino acid composition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) grain

1989 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel M Martín del Molino ◽  
Bárbara Rojo ◽  
Rafael Martínez-Carrasco ◽  
Pilar Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Amino Acid Composition ◽  
Acid Composition ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Varietal Differences

AC Abbey hard red spring wheat

2000 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. DePauw ◽  
J. M. Clarke ◽  
R. E. Knox ◽  
M. R. Fernandez ◽  
T. N. McCaig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Stem Rust ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Canadian Prairies ◽  
Wheat Stem Sawfly ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Moderate Resistance

AC Abbey, hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), is adapted to the Canadian prairies. It is significantly shorter than any of the check cultivars and has solid stems. AC Abbey expressed higher grain yield, earlier maturity, and heavier kernels than AC Eatonia, the solidstem check cultivar. It is resistant to the wheat stem sawfly (Cephus cinctus Nort.) and to prevalent races of common bunt and has moderate resistance to leaf rust and stem rust. AC Abbey is eligible for grades of Canada Western Red Spring wheat. Key words: Triticum aestivum L., red spring wheat, yield, wheat stem sawfly, plant height, maturity

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document