scholarly journals The impact of indoor air pollution on asthma

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Won Park ◽  
Sang-Heon Kim ◽  
Ho Joo Yoon
2015 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 521-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxence Mendez ◽  
Nadège Blond ◽  
Patrice Blondeau ◽  
Coralie Schoemaecker ◽  
Didier A. Hauglustaine

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 00052-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneesa Vanker ◽  
Polite M. Nduru ◽  
Whitney Barnett ◽  
Felix S. Dube ◽  
Peter D. Sly ◽  
...  

Indoor air pollution (IAP) or environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure may influence nasopharyngeal carriage of bacterial species and development of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). The aim of this study was to longitudinally investigate the impact of antenatal or postnatal IAP/ETS exposure on nasopharyngeal bacteria in mothers and infants.A South African cohort study followed mother–infant pairs from birth through the first year. Nasopharyngeal swabs were taken at birth, 6 and 12 months for bacterial culture. Multivariable and multivariate Poisson regression investigated associations between nasopharyngeal bacterial species and IAP/ETS. IAP exposures (particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, volatile organic compounds) were measured at home visits. ETS exposure was measured through maternal and infant urine cotinine. Infants received the 13-valent pneumococcal andHaemophilus influenzaeB conjugate vaccines.There were 881 maternal and 2605 infant nasopharyngeal swabs. Antenatal ETS exposure was associated withStreptococcus pneumoniaecarriage in mothers (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.73 (95% CI 1.03–2.92)) while postnatal ETS exposure was associated with carriage in infants (aRR 1.14 (95% CI 1.00–1.30)) Postnatal particulate matter exposure was associated with the nasopharyngeal carriage ofH. influenzae(aRR 1.68 (95% CI 1.10– 2.57)) orMoraxella catarrhalis(aRR 1.42 (95% CI 1.03–1.97)) in infants.Early-life environmental exposures are associated with an increased prevalence of specific nasopharyngeal bacteria during infancy, which may predispose to LRTI.


2014 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chua Poh Choo ◽  
Juliana Jalaludin

AbstractThe indoor environment is a major source of human exposure to pollutants. Some pollutants can have concentrations that are several times higher indoors than outdoors. Prolonged exposure may lead to adverse biologic effects, even at low concentrations. Several studies done in Malaysia had underlined the role of indoor air pollution in affecting respiratory health, especially for school-aged children. A critical review was conducted on the quantitative literature linking indoor air pollution with respiratory illnesses among school-aged children. This paper reviews evidence of the association between indoor air quality (IAQ) and its implications on respiratory health among Malaysian school-aged children. This review summarizes six relevant studies conducted in Malaysia for the past 10 years. Previous epidemiologic studies relevant to indoor air pollutants and their implications on school-aged children’s respiratory health were obtained from electronic database and included as a reference in this review. The existing reviewed data emphasize the impact of IAQ parameters, namely, indoor temperature, ventilation rates, indoor concentration of carbon dioxide (CO


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1313-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Carslaw ◽  
David Shaw

Secondary Product Creation Potential (SPCP): a new metric for ranking the impact of volatile organic compounds on indoor air chemistry and human health.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Y. Edwards ◽  
Christian Langpap

AbstractMuch of the population in developing countries uses firewood for cooking. The resulting indoor air pollution has severe health consequences for children who are close to the fire while their mothers cook. We use survey data from Guatemala to examine the effects of firewood consumption on the health of children up to five years of age. We also investigate the impact of cooking inside the home, the importance of a mother cooking while caring for her children and the role played by the smoke permeability of housing construction materials. We find that children living in households that use more wood, and where exposure to indoor air pollution is higher because the mother cooks while caring for children or because cooking takes place inside, are more likely to have symptoms of respiratory infection. Simulations indicate that policies that target cooking habits in order to directly reduce exposure, particularly by reducing the number of women who simultaneously cook and care for children, may be more effective for improving young children's health than policies to accelerate the adoption of gas stoves.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 599
Author(s):  
Diana Mariana Cocârţă ◽  
Mariana Prodana ◽  
Ioana Demetrescu ◽  
Patricia Elena Maria Lungu ◽  
Andreea Cristiana Didilescu

(1) Background: Indoor air pollution can affect the well-being and health of humans. Sources of indoor pollution with particulate matter (PM) are outdoor particles and indoor causes, such as construction materials, the use of cleaning products, air fresheners, heating, cooking, and smoking activities. In 2017, according to the Global Burden of Disease study, 1.6 million people died prematurely because of indoor air pollution. The health effects of outdoor exposure to PM have been the subject of both research and regulatory action, and indoor exposure to fine particles is gaining more and more attention as a potential source of adverse health effects. Moreover, in critical situations such as the current pandemic crisis, to protect the health of the population, patients, and staff in all areas of society (particularly in indoor environments, where there are vulnerable groups, such as people who have pre-existing lung conditions, patients, elderly people, and healthcare professionals such as dental practitioners), there is an urgent need to improve long- and short-term health. Exposure to aerosols and splatter contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and blood produced during dental procedures performed on patients rarely leads to the transmission of infectious agents between patients and dental health care staff if infection prevention procedures are strictly followed. On the other hand, in the current circumstances of the pandemic crisis, dental practitioners could have an occupational risk of acquiring coronavirus disease as they may treat asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic patients. Consequently, an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection could occur in dental offices, both for staff that provide dental healthcare and for other patients, considering that many dental procedures produce droplets and dental aerosols, which carry an infectious virus such as SARS-CoV-2. (2) Types of studies reviewed and applied methodology: The current work provides a critical review and evaluation, as well as perspectives concerning previous studies on health risks of indoor exposure to PM in dental offices. The authors reviewed representative dental medicine literature focused on sources of indoor PM10 and PM2.5 (particles for which the aerodynamic diameter size is respectively less than 10 and 2.5 μm) in indoor spaces (paying specific attention to dental offices) and their characteristics and toxicological effects in indoor microenvironments. The authors also reviewed representative studies on relations between the indoor air quality and harmful effects, as well as studies on possible indoor viral infections acquired through airborne and droplet transmission. The method employed for the research illustrated in the current paper involved a desk study of documents and records relating to occupational health problems among dental health care providers. In this way, it obtained background information on both the main potential hazards in dentistry and infection risks from aerosol transmission within dental offices. Reviewing this kind of information, especially that relating to bioaerosols, is critical for minimizing the risk to dental staff and patients, particularly when new recommendations for COVID-19 risk reduction for the dental health professional community and patients attending dental clinics are strongly needed. (3) Results: The investigated studies and reports obtained from the medical literature showed that, even if there are a wide number of studies on indoor human exposure to fine particles and health effects, more deep research and specific studies on indoor air pollution with fine particles and implications for workers’ health in dental offices are needed. As dental practices are at a higher risk for hazardous indoor air because of exposure to chemicals and microbes, the occupational exposures and diseases must be addressed, with special attention being paid to the dental staff. The literature also documents that exposure to fine particles in dental offices can be minimized by putting prevention into practice (personal protection barriers such as masks, gloves, and safety eyeglasses) and also keeping indoor air clean (e.g., high-volume evacuation, the use of an air-room-cleaning system with high-efficiency particulate filters, and regularly maintaining the air-conditioning and ventilation systems). These kinds of considerations are extremely important as the impact of indoor pollution on human health is no longer an individual issue, with its connections representing a future part of sustainability which is currently being redefined. These kinds of considerations are extremely important, and the authors believe that a better situation in dentistry needs to be developed, with researchers in materials and dental health trying to understand and explain the impact of indoor pollution on human health.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viola N. Nyakato ◽  
Nicholas Mwine ◽  
Erez Lieberman Aiden ◽  
Aviva P. Aiden

AbstractExposure to smoke is a major cause of respiratory illness in the developing world. To date, cookstoves have been the most widely studied source of smoke exposure in developing countries. We hypothesized that exposure to kerosene lighting, utilized by 86% of rural off-the-grid communities in sub-Saharan Africa may also be a significant source of smoke exposure and may be responsible for respiratory pathology. We performed an interventional field trial including 230 people in rural Uganda to assess the impact of clean lighting on indoor air pollution and respiratory health. Each member of the study households were asked about their exposure to smoke, the types of lighting they used, and their recent history of respiratory symptoms. Next, we provided solar-powered lamps to households in the intervention group, and compared to households in the control group who continued to use kerosene lamps. We monitored indoor air quality in a subset of intervention and control households over a three-month period, and performed an exit survey to assess symptoms of respiratory illness in both groups. All of the households we surveyed were found to use kerosene lamps as their primary lighting source. We found that the average person was exposed to 3.3 hours of smoke from kerosene lamps, as compared to 44 minutes of exposure from cookstoves. Next, we found that average soot levels (elemental carbon) in intervention homes were 19-fold lower than soot levels in control homes. After three months, we observed reduced rates of all symptoms assessed, and significantly reduced risk of cough, sore throat, and overall illness in the intervention homes. Our findings demonstrate that kerosene lighting is a significant source of smoke exposure in the developing world, and that the introduction of clean lighting in homes reliant on kerosene lighting can have a rapid and significant impact on overall health.


Epidemiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (Suppl) ◽  
pp. S226
Author(s):  
D Pope ◽  
M Malla ◽  
M Hood ◽  
H Owalla ◽  
J Kithinji ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document