COMPARATIVE OIL AND GAS JOINT DEVELOPMENT REGIMES

EURASIA ◽  
2002 ◽  
pp. 207-223
2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chidinma Bernadine Okafor

AbstractThe delimitation of a maritime boundary is not necessarily a panacea for disputes over offshore resources. Neither petroleum reserves, which are fugacious in character, nor fish or marine mammals respect national boundaries. Even successful delimitation may still require a degree of close cooperation if opposite or adjacent states are to exploit such transboundary resources rationally. Such cooperation can be achieved by the concept of joint development. This paper reviews the literature on the joint development of offshore petroleum resources and the controversy surrounding the concept. The paper further examines its applicability as an alternative approach to the Nigeria-Cameroon maritime boundary dispute.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-81
Author(s):  
M Juraev ◽  
◽  
G Bimurzaev ◽  
B Razykov ◽  
B Khaidarov

The lithological-facies factor is considered with the aim of studying the natural and geological conditions in which hydrogen sulfide waters are formed in gas and oil fields in the artesian basins of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The distribution of hydrogen sulfide waters is closely related to the areas of joint development of halogen rocks and oil and gas complexes. Since the term “paragenesis” refers to the joint finding of minerals or chemical elements genetically related, this map is a map of the paragenesis of hydrogen sulfide waters with evaporites and oil and gas complexes. In the absence of one of the necessary conditions (sulfates or petroleum organics), hydrogen sulfide waters of high concentration are not formed. Hydrogen sulfide waters in the identified anticlinal structures are formed due to the presence of insignificant gas and oil deposits, which are not of industrial importance


Subject Thailand-Cambodia economic relations. Significance The scheduled completion of a Thai-Cambodian railway link in early 2017 is viewed in both countries as the symbol of a new phase in bilateral economic cooperation. The end goal is negotiation on joint development of the 27,000-square-kilometre Overlapping Claims Area (OCA) in the northern Gulf of Thailand, which is believed to be rich in oil and gas. Impacts Joint exploration in the Gulf of Thailand would take years. Nonetheless, the agreement would be a major symbolic gain for both sides. Regional infrastructure connectivity projects would improve economic prospects for mainland South-east Asia.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mendos James

Abstract Unitisation has evolved globally as the best mechanism for the joint development of hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs that straddle two or more concessions or licenses. The concept of unitisation is underpinned by the need to avoid competitive exploitation of hydrocarbon resources, maximise its economic recovery, eliminate proliferation of production facilities and reduce development and operating cost.1 The practice of unitisation in the Nigerian oil and gas landscape has gained traction over the years with several straddle fields identified as candidates for unitisation and more than ten (10) agreements for joint development (both Pre Unitisation Agreements and Unitisation and Unit Operating Agreements) executed in the industry. This has occurred under a regulatory regime for unitisation that has evolved from the concise provisions of Section 48 of the Petroleum (Drilling and Production) Regulation 1969 as amended, to the robust Guidelines for Unitisation issued by the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) in 2008 (revised in 2019) (Guidelines) in response to the complexities of joint development encountered by parties. While the Guidelines is an excellent attempt at providing a process for unitisation, it does not provide sufficient guidance on the contract regime for unitisation as the bedrock for joint development. A critical look at the contracts governing joint development in the light of global best practices is important to ensure that it meets in an effective manner the objectives of unitisation. A review of the contract regime for unitisation would be incomplete without recognising the impact that underlying contracts governing separate concessions have on unitisation. To this end, the posture of Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) on gas development in a unit is worth reviewing in the light of the benefits of commercialising gas to the State and the Contractor. This paper reviews the contract regime for unitisation in Nigeria as regulated by the Guidelines and the impact that underlying contracts (particularly PSCs) have on unitisation. The paper will proffer recommendations for inclusion in the Guidelines with a view to improving the process of joint development of shared reservoirs in Nigeria.


Asian Survey ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Kuchins

As global demand for energy supplies grew, Russia's Far East and Eastern Siberia in 2013 acquired ever more importance in the region's geopolitics. Moscow and Beijing reached accord on joint development of key oil fields in Eastern Siberia. But Moscow used arms sales to Vietnam as part of an apparent effort to thwart Chinese hegemony in the South China Sea. Still, just as Russian comparative economic advantage with Europe and the West has derived primarily from oil and gas, so has integration with Asia hinged on energy.


EURASIA ◽  
2010 ◽  
pp. 196-212
Author(s):  
Francis M Auburn ◽  
Vivian Forbes ◽  
John Scott

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document