Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s view on agricultural holdings and collective farming

2020 ◽  
pp. 205-217
Author(s):  
Y. Sreenivasulu ◽  
Md. Tajuddin
Keyword(s):  
Collective Farming

scholarly journals Development of dairy cattle breeding in the Tambov region

2021 ◽  
Vol 845 (1) ◽  
pp. 012044
Author(s):  
A V Nikitin ◽  
O Yu Antsiferova ◽  
A N Fedotov
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Cattle ◽  
Cattle Breeding ◽  
Resource Potential ◽  
Production Sector ◽  
Agricultural Enterprises ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Medical Standards ◽  
Self Sufficiency ◽  
Collective Farming ◽  
Dairy Cattle Breeding

Abstract The article shows that dairy farming is one of the most dynamically developing branches of agriculture, existing under the influence of internal and external environments, defined as: compliance with the breed standard, medical standards for milk consumption, increased investment in the industry, its resource potential. On the basis of a retrospective analysis, the evolution of technological structures in dairy cattle breeding in Russia is considered: pre-industrial, collective farming with agricultural mechanization, industrial, intensive technocratic, biotechnological. In addition, on the basis of the organizational and economic analysis of dairy cattle breeding in the Tambov region, the trends of its functioning have been determined: a decrease in the self-sufficiency of the region’s population with milk and dairy products; destructuring of the production sector with an increase in the share of enterprises with low-intensity and extensive milk production; low intensity of reproduction of a herd of cattle; a wide variety of breed composition of dairy cattle. It was found that agricultural enterprises of the region, as a rule, specializing in the development of dairy cattle breeding, choose the direction of organizing a purebred herd with standardized exterior features. This is a fundamentally different way of breeding work from all-Russian trends. On the basis of the research carried out, the priority directions of the development of dairy cattle breeding in an innovation-oriented context are substantiated.

scholarly journals Коренные народы Охотско-колымского края в годы Великой Отечественной войны

2020 ◽  
pp. 114-123
Author(s):  
L. N. Khakhovskaya ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Care ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Vocational Training ◽  
Nature Management ◽  
Reindeer Herding ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Collective Farming ◽  
Great Patriotic War ◽  
The Government

Based on archival sources, the author analyzes the situation of the indigenous peoples of the Okhotsk-Kolyma territory during the Great Patriotic War. The government continued to implement paternalistic social policies: the development of housing and social infrastructure in the areas where indigenous peoples live, improvement of medical care and education, and vocational training. It is shown that most indigenous peoples, involved with collective farming worked disciplinedly and responsibly in areas related to traditional nature management (reindeer herding, fishing, fur hunting). With their labor and personal donations, the indigenous people made a feasible contribution to the victory. The indigenous peoples also fought on the front and served in the rear troops.

scholarly journals Contribution of Farmer’s Profile Characteristics to the Perception of Collective Farming in Tirunelveli District, India

2020 ◽  
pp. 185-189
Author(s):  
V. Jothika ◽  
R. Rajasekaran
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Interview Schedule ◽  
Collective Farming ◽  
The Government ◽  
Profile Characteristics ◽  
Major Factors ◽  
Farming Awareness ◽  
Modern Technologies

Collective Farming Scheme was implemented in the year 2017-2018 by the Government of Tamil Nadu, India to empower the farmers and their access to modern technologies. This study aimed to ascertain the contribution of the profile characteristics to the perception of collective farming. The study was conducted in Alangulam block of Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu.  Data were collected through a well structured interview schedule with 120 farmers selected from four villages (Vadiyoor, Melamaruthappapuram, Ayyanarkulam and Sivalarulam). Regression analysis was carried out to determine the contribution of 12 selected farmer’s profile characteristics to the perception of collective farming. Social participation, training and innovativeness were the major factors that positively and significantly contributed to the perception of collective farming.  For the better perception and practice of collective farming awareness from the state department or extension officials can be provided to the farmers along with the advantages of collective farming.

scholarly journals Ambivalences of collective farming: Feminist political ecologies from the Eastern Gangetic Plains

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Leder ◽  
Fraser Sugden ◽  
Manita Raut ◽  
Dhananjay Ray ◽  
Panchali Saikia
Keyword(s):  
Gangetic Plains ◽  
Collective Farming ◽  
Political Ecologies

Determination of Women Collective Farming Groups in Kerala towards Attaining Goals: A Critical Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
T. Shahlas Binth ◽  
Basavaraj Hulagur ◽  
S. B. goudappa ◽  
Jagrati B. Deshmanya
Keyword(s):  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Collective Farming

scholarly journals Comparing the socialist rural architecture of the Baltic States: the past and the future of the administrative-cultural centres of collective farms.

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 11004
Author(s):  
Laura Ingerpuu
Keyword(s):  
Field Work ◽  
Architectural Heritage ◽  
Baltic States ◽  
Baltic Countries ◽  
Collective Farming ◽  
Independent States ◽  
Rural Architecture ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
The Baltic ◽  
Collective Farms

Collectivisation of agriculture in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania was a drastic change that shaped rural built landscapes of the Baltic countries for five decades. Although Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have been independent states, and collective farming has been abolished for almost thirty years now, the physical legacy of collective farms still exists. This paper examines what are the present processes in terms of preservation and valorisation of collective farm architectural heritage in the Baltic States. The focus of the analysis is on the administrativecultural buildings of the collective farms, built between the 1960s and 1990s, which represent the modernist and postmodernist rural architectural gems. I compare the context of the establishment of the administrative-cultural centres in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania as well as developments in reuse and protection of these buildings after the abolishment of collective farming. I also analyse today's situation in terms of acceptance of this socialist legacy as a meaningful part of the history. My study is based on the field work in the relevant countries, available literature and data, and interviews conducted with the heritage conservation experts and researchers in this field.

scholarly journals Changes in Social Capital

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Anh Tuan ◽  
Alison Cottrell ◽  
David King
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Land Reform ◽  
Mekong Delta ◽  
Rice Farming ◽  
Mutual Aid ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Rice Farmers ◽  
Labor Exchange ◽  
Collective Farming ◽  
The Social

This paper describes how the social capital of rice farmers of the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, as manifested in the tradition of collective farming practice, has changed. Collective rice farming persisted for decades, irrespective of critical events that challenged its continuation, due to two key factors: the high need for collective farming to ensure subsistence, and the availability of a closely knit social network that facilitated the exchange of labor. Despite its longevity, the practice of collective farming, particularly in terms of labor exchange and mutual aid in farming activities, has not been maintained under current agrarian reforms. Land reform, increased mechanization, and shortened crop cycles leading to labor shortages have all resulted in individualized rice farming, making mobilization for spontaneous collective action at the community level challenging.

scholarly journals Five-year plan in four: kolkhoz propaganda in film and documentaries in Estonia

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 10002
Author(s):  
Martti Veldi ◽  
Simon Bell ◽  
Friedrich Kuhlmann
Keyword(s):  
Rural Community ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Rural Landscape ◽  
Collective Ownership ◽  
Collective Effort ◽  
Collective Farming ◽  
Large Scale Land ◽  
Post War ◽  
Opera Singers

In 1951 the first colour film in was produced Soviet Estonia–Valgus Koordis (“Light in Koordi village”). This never-before-seen medium applied effective ideological symbols to visualise the power of collective effort with the scope of difficulties building up the new life in a freshly established collective farm (kolkhoz). It was straightforward propaganda to demonstrate that in spite of difficulties, collective farming was the only correct way to achieve prosperity in the countryside. The theme of the film was to show the goodness of Stalinist improvements in a poor post-war rural community at the end of the 1940s. In a very simple manner, topics such as nationalism, the class struggle, socialist ideology, kulaks, collective ownership, mechanisation of agriculture and large-scale land improvements were presented. To capture the wider audience and to increase social impact, the film also starred the rising opera star Georg Ots, still considered as one of the greatest Estonian opera singers ever. In addition to ideologically charged films, a type of propagandist short documentary, the ringvaade (newsreel) was produced in Soviet Estonia. These concentrated on various aspects ofSoviet lifestyle, aiming to demonstrate the achievements of collectiveideology, and the high morale of the Soviet working class. We studied these and other examples in order to examine the range of themes andmotifs presented in them, focusing on the ideological impact on the rural landscape caused by mechanisation, forest management and land melioration. What is revealed is an attempt to persuade the new kolkhozniki (collective farmers) of the benefits of the new system – which, ironically, had dispossessed many of them of their own farms which they had built up in the inter-war years (and which were restored to them after the collapse of the Soviet system in the 1990s).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document