Punitive damages in trademark infringement disputes in China: challenges and prospects

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-385
Author(s):  
Yanan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Punitive Damages ◽  
Judicial Interpretation ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Trademark Infringement ◽  
Judicial Practice

Punitive damages were introduced into the intellectual property field in China by legislation permitting their imposition for malicious and serious infringements. This paper offers a comprehensive legal framework of punitive damages regarding trademark infringement and a critical analysis of the application of punitive damages in trademark infringement disputes in Chinese judicial practice. My research reveals that punitive damages have rarely been imposed since the punitive damages provision, Article 63 of the Trademark Law, took effect in 2014, whereas statutory damages have been applied extensively. The reason for this is that there are few guidelines for the application of this provision. The challenges to the application include undefined statutory requirements, difficulties in not only assessing compensation but also providing evidence and determining the multiple of compensation, and an unclear relationship between statutory damages and punitive damages. The 2019 Amendment of the Trademark Law retains these problems. Fortunately, the recently released Judicial Interpretation and typical cases concerning punitive damages contribute to resolving them. Moreover, those cases in which punitive damages have been applied have gradually revealed some basic principles for their application. Reform suggestions are offered in order to stimulate the development of a more thorough and uniform application of the punitive damages provision.

scholarly journals THE COMPARISON OF LEGAL DAMAGES FOR COPYRIGHT & BRAND INFRINGEMENT AMONG INDONESIA-CHINA LAWS

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 466
Author(s):  
Heri Gunawan ◽  
Joni Emirzon ◽  
Muhammad Syaifuddin
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
Trademark Infringement ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Intellectual Property Rights or what is often abbreviated as HAKI is a legal protection given by a certain country to a person or group of individuals who express their ideas in the form of works. This law is a state territory. This means that a work will only be protected by rights in the country where the work originated to obtain IPR. As stated in the Copyright Laws, Intellectual Property Rights are exclusive rights granted by a regulation to a person or group of people for their copyrighted works. This protected work is in the form of intangible objects such as copyrights, patents, and trademarks and tangible objects in the form of information, technology, literature, art, skills, science, and so on. The idea of compensation law for copyright and trademark infringement in Indonesia, of course, can imitate the copyright law and trademark law of the People's Republic of China in regulating more clearly the calculation of the value of losses for copyright and trademark infringement in order to be able to provide legal certainty for the owner / rights holders whose rights have been violated. The research use normative juridical approach. The purpose of writing is to analyze and explain the calculation of compensation by looking at the criteria, evidence, basis, form and formulation of calculating compensation for copyright and trademark infringement. The results of the study stated that the law for compensation that arises as a result of copyright and trademark infringement according to positive law in Indonesia still does not regulate in detail the calculation of the value of the loss of both copyrights and trademarks. Copyright Act No.28 of 2014 and Trademark Act No.20 of 2016 only gives rights to the right owner/right holder to file a claim for compensation, but the law does not regulate how to determine the value of the loss for a copyright infringement as well as brands.

scholarly journals Actual Qualification Problems of Sexual Crimes: the Limits of Judicial Interpretation

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-113
Author(s):  
S F Miliukov ◽  
O Yu Stepanova
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Judicial Interpretation ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Individual

This article presents a critical analysis of postmen of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation «On judicial practice in cases of crimes against sexual inviolability and sexual freedom of the individual». The authors point out the limitations of WHO- judicial interpretation opportunities due to serious structural under-STATCOM relevant criminal law and suggest ways to improve them.

Summary of Results

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Kuenzler
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Networked Economy

The persuasive force of the accepted account’s property logic has driven antitrust and intellectual property law jurisprudence for at least the past three decades. It has been through the theory of trademark ownership and the commercial strategy of branding that these laws led the courts to comprehend markets as fundamentally bifurcated—as operating according to discrete types of interbrand and intrabrand competition—a division that had an effect far beyond the confines of trademark law and resonates today in the way government agencies and courts evaluate the emerging challenges of the networked economy along the previously introduced distinction between intertype and intratype competition. While the government in its appeal to the Supreme Court in ...

scholarly journals TUNTUTAN PROVISI DALAM GUGATAN PELANGGARAN MEREK PADA PENGADILAN NIAGA

1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Devi Marlita Martana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Trademark Infringement ◽  
Civil Proceeding ◽  
Investigation Process

Act Number 15 Year 2001 regarding  Trademark has set the provisional charges. Provisional charges may be filed by the plaintiff while the investigation process of trademark infringement lawsuit in court of commerce is still ongoing. In a civil proceeding, the provisional charge must not be the primary charge, however the provisional charge that is set out in the Trademark Act has already concerned the primary charge. Actions that can be requested in the provisional charge according to Article 78 paragraph (1) in the  Trademark Act include cessation of production, cessation of circulation of goods and / or services using Plaintiff's trademark illegally. Using literature study that utilizes primary legal materials and secondary legal materials as the research object, the results of the discussion are expected to be based on sufficient arguments to provide benefits for those who are interested to learn the trademark law enforcement.

REGULATORY AND LEGAL FUNCTIONING OF POWERS OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE ACTIVITIES OF ROAD PATROL AND PATROL POST SERVICES OF POLICE

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-59
Author(s):  
Ф.Н. Зейналов
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Road Safety ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Educational Organizations ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Internal Affairs ◽  
Legislative Activities

В статье автором рассматривается нормативное правовое закрепление порядка осуществления общеполицейских функций сотрудниками Госавтоинспекции, патрульно-постовой службы полиции в том числе и в сфере обеспечения безопасности дорожного движения. Приводятся статистические сведения, подчеркивающие актуальность имеющейся проблемы разграничения полномочий указанных служб федеральным законодательством, подзаконными актами и ведомственными приказами МВД. Авто- ром проведен анализ судебной практики по исследуемой проблеме, высказаны предложения по внесению изменений в федераль- ное законодательство. Положения работы могут быть использованы в законодательной деятельности государственных органов, правоприменительной деятельности правоохранительных органов, образовательном процессе образовательных организаций, на- учных исследованиях специалистов по проблемам обеспечения безопасности дорожного движения, совершенствования отраслей российской правовой системы. Новизна работы определяется практической и научной значимостью проблем правоприменительной деятельности правоохранительных органов в сфере обеспечения безопасности дорожного движения, а также необходимостью со- вершенствования правовых основ, регламентирующих полномочия подразделений и служб полиции России. In the article, the author considers the normative legal consolidation of the procedure for the implementation of general police functions by employees of the State Traffic Inspectorate, patrol and post service of the police, including in the field of road safety. The article provides statistical data that emphasize the relevance of the existing problem of delineating the powers of these services by federal legislation, by-laws and departmental orders of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The author analyzes the judicial practice on the problem under study, and makes suggestions for amendments to the federal legislation. The provisions of the work can be used in the legislative activities of state bodies, law enforcement activities of law enforcement agencies, the educational process of educational organizations, scientific research of specialists on the problems of ensuring road safety, improving the branches of the Russian legal system. The novelty of the work is determined by the practical and scientific significance of the problems of law enforcement activities of law enforcement agencies in the field of road safety,as well as the need to improve the legal framework governing the powers of police units and services in Russia.

Official discipline of civil servants: legal framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 434-442
Author(s):  
A.Ya. Petrov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Service ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation

On the basis of the analysis of Art. 11 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law of July 27, 2004 No. 79-FZ “On the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation” and judicial practice, topical legal issues of the official discipline of State civil servants are considered.

scholarly journals Relevant Issues of the Judicial Practice in Intellectual Property Protection

CIVIL LAW ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Konstantin A. Kirsanov ◽  
◽  
Olga N. Barmina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Main Current ◽  
A Company

Intellectual property is currently one of the key areas of modern civil law relations. In the present article, the authors reviewed and summarized the main current areas of judicial practice in the field of violations related to the exclusive rights to a company name, characters and trademarks.

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Law and Extra-Contractual Liability

2021 ◽  
pp. 82-95
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Frosio
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Common Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Trademark Infringement ◽  
The World ◽  
Emerging Issues ◽  
Intermediary Liability ◽  
Intellectual Property Infringement ◽  
Platform Economy

This chapter discusses intellectual property (IP) and extra-contractual liability by highlighting general comparative analysis issues within civil and common law systems, with some consideration given also to major theoretical clusters that might influence the different legal regimes. The chapter focuses on emerging issues of extra-contractual liability for intellectual property infringement in the platform economy, with special emphasis on copyright and trademark infringement, seeking to co-ordinate miscellaneous approaches from the United States (US), the European Union (EU), and selected European countries’ experiences. In doing so, this chapter highlights research and methodological issues related to limited harmonization at a regional level in secondary and extra-contractual liability doctrines when applied to IP. Finally, this chapter describes the World Intermediary Liability Maps (WILMap) as an attempt to provide consistency within a fragmented research framework while also presenting other miscellaneous endeavours seeking the same goal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document