scholarly journals Legal Protection for Consumers as Aviation Service Users(Study of Supreme Court Decision No: 975 K/PDT/2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Bilal Saputra ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Service Users ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court

The main problem discussed in this study is about legal protection for aviation consumers in which the airline did unlawful acts against consumers. The method used in this study uses a type of normative legal research, with a statute approach and case approach, using primary legal materials by collecting data on a library research base, then analyzed using qualitative methods. In the first and second level decisions, the judge rejected the passenger's claim because according to the judge, the lawsuit that should have been filed was a default and not unlawful acts lawsuit, while in the Supreme Court's decision, the judge granted the passenger's claim that the lawsuit was unlawful acts. In this case, the Supreme Court had properly implemented the law in accordance with the consumer protection law and the aviation law.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP NON MUSLIM DITINJAU DARI KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI) STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 331/K/AG/2018/MA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Liana Noviyanti ◽  
Mulati Mulati
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Supreme Court Ruling ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court

Islamic law has stated that every person of different religion cannot inherit each other, both Muslims inherit for non-Muslims and from non-Muslims inherit for Muslims, but in practice, Judges at the Supreme Court level implement mandatory wills, this is required which has been decided in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This study aims to examine how to implement the mandatory non-Muslim wills in the Supreme Court ruling Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA based on the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and what the Supreme Court Judges consider in implementing mandatory testaments against non-Muslims in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This research is a normative legal research with the nature of qualitative research with the type of library research. Based on the studies that have been carried out, the Decision of the Supreme Court Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA does not include legal considerations in force in Indonesia concerning inheritance provisions and concerning the granting of an approved mandatory will set out in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The application of mandatory wills in the Supreme Court Decision is contrary to the provisions of Islamic Law and the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Article 209 paragraphs (1) and (2) concerning mandatory wills.

scholarly journals Legal Protection For Brand Right Owner Famous For His Brand Immediate

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-229
Author(s):  
Chris Anggi Natalia Berutu ◽  
Sheila Elfira ◽  
Monica Sheren Tambuwun ◽  
Ericson Sebastian Sitohang
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Existing Data

Brand equality can cause harm to brand owners. Therefore, the legal protection of trademarks is very important. In this study, the authors will analyze the Supreme Court Decision No. 7K/pdt.sus-HKI/2016 whose purpose is that the consequences of the law of imitation of famous brands can be known and know the legal protection for owners of well-known brands if their brands are imitated. This research is descriptive and classified as normative legal research and uses existing data. Based on research, the famous brand ST. REGIS belonging to the plaintiff entered the list of registrants in Indonesia first, therefore the defendant's mark REGIS@the Peak at Sudirman has been registered with unfavorable conditions. The defendant's mark is essentially the same as the plaintiff's mark for similar and dissimilar services, as a result, the defendant's mark must be removed from the general register of marks. According to the law, Sheraton Internasional as the owner of the famous ST.REGIS brand won against REGIS@ the Peak at Sudirman.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MENYELESAIKAN PERKARA KONSUMEN (Studi Putusan No 481 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1087
Author(s):  
Takenia Tifany ◽  
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law

Consumer Protection Law regulates the legal protection of consumer and including Consumer Dispute Completion Firm who autorhized to resolve consumer disputes who feel harmed over the acts of business from people that sometimes arbitrary, but decisions taken by Consumer Dispute Completion Firm often incriminate business actors, and usually seem to exceed the limit of their authority even wrong in applying the law. Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority to adjudicate and decide a dispute is induced by Supreme Court’s decision which makes Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority to limited. Therefore, the writer proposed an issue about how are the limits of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority in adjudicate and decide a consumer disputes? And how are the implementation and Supreme Court’s views regarding the limitation of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority? The writer examines the problem using normative legal research methods that use secondary data. From the results of the research, it can be concluded that the limits of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm authority in solving consumer disputes are limited to the agreement between both parties. In sense the Supreme Court believes that all transactions based on an agreement become the jurisdiction of the court

scholarly journals KONSEP PEMBUKTIAN SEDERHANA DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Nelson Kapoyos
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Simple Proof ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Research Problem ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini mempermasalahkan pembuktian sederhana dalam proses kepailitan terkait kewajiban pemberitahuan adanya peralihan piutang (cessie) kepada debitur. Putusan Nomor 02/PDT.SUS.PAILIT/2014/PN.Niaga.Mks telah mengabulkan permohonan kreditur cessionaries yang dikuatkan oleh Putusan Nomor 19 K/PDT.SUSPAILIT/2015, namun pada upaya hukum peninjauan kembali majelis hakim justru mengabulkan permohonan peninjauan kembali dengan alasan pembuktian sederhana terhadap cessie belum diberitahukan kepada debitur secara resmi melalui juru sita pengadilan. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini ialah bagaimana konsep pembuktian sederhana dalam kepailitan terhadap kewajiban pemberitahuan pengalihan piutang (cessie) pada pertimbangan majelis hakim peninjauan kembali Nomor 125 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2015. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah konsep pembuktian sederhana di dalam pembuktian kepailitan tidak ada kewajiban pemberitahuan secara resmi melalui juru sita pengadilan karena Pasal 613 BW tidak mengaturnya, pemberitahuan hanya diajukan secara tertulis dan bisa kapanpun diberitahukan kepada debitur. Kata kunci: kepailitan, pembuktian sederhana, cessie.ABSTRACTThis analysis intends to question the simple proof in bankruptcy proceedings related to the transition of receivable notification obligation (cessie) to the debtors. The Commercial Court Decision Number 02/PDT.SUS.PAILIT/2014/PN.Niaga.Mks has granted the petitions of creditor’s cessionary which was strengthened by the Supreme Court Decision Number 19 K/PDT.SUSPAILIT/2015, but on the judicial review attempt, the Supreme Court has granted the petition for the judicial review on the grounds that a simple proof of cessie has not been officially disclosed to the debtor through a court bailiff. The formulation of this research problem is how the concept of simple proof in bankruptcy proceeding to the obligation of notification of transfer of receivables (cessie) in the consideration of Court Decision Number 125 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2015. The research method of this analysis is normative legal research. This analysis resolves thatin the simple proof concept of the bankruptcy proceedings, there is no obligation of official notice through the court bailiff because it is not set on Article 613 of Indonesia Civil Code Law, so the notification is only submitted in writing and may at any time be notified to the debtor. Keywords: bankruptcy, simple proof, cessie.

scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terkait Penyelundupan Hukum Dalam Hal Perjanjian Nominee

Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Cokorda Istri Ratih Dwiyanti Pemayun ◽  
I Made Sarjana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Lease Agreement ◽  
Land Leasing

The purpose of this study is to understand the validity of the lease agreement followed by the nominee agreement and the responsibilities of the notary in making the nominee deed. This research is a normative legal research. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a legal concept approach. The results of this study indicate that the legality of land leasing by foreigners followed by a nominee agreement is null and void, and the responsibility of the Notary regarding the nominee agreement in the Supreme Court Decision Number: 193 / PDT / 2015 / PT.DPS is subject to civil sanctions punished by compensation, namely compensating for losses by paying all costs incurred because of this case..   Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui keabsahan perjanjian sewa yang diikuti dengan perjanjian nominee dan tanggung jawab notaris dalam pembuatan akta nominee. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan statutori dan pendekatan konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa legalitas sewa tanah oleh pihak asing yang diikuti dengan perjanjian nominee batal demi hukum, dan Tanggung jawab Notaris terkait perjanjian nominee dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 193 / PDT / 2015 / PT.DPS dikenai sanksi perdata yang dihukum dengan santunan, yaitu mengganti kerugian dengan membayar semua biaya yang timbul karena kasus ini.

scholarly journals Implementation of Parate Executie Object of Liability

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Redi Res
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Ratio Decidendi

Parate executive is the primary purpose of establishing Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights to provide solid legal protection for creditors holding mortgage objects. The easy and inexpensive execution process should make the parate executive the leading choice for creditors in auctioning mortgage objects if the debtor defaults. However, in reality, the parate execution could not be carried out properly because of the Supreme Court Decision No. 3210 K/Pdt/1984, in which one of the ratio decidendi in it that the public auction conducted by the Bandung KPKNL is invalid, and this is also supported by book II of the Supreme Court's guidelines which requires fiat execution from the District Court. This paper will explain how the two conflicting legal bases will impact the implementation of parate executives in the field. Keywords: Parate Executie;  Mortgage; Land.

scholarly journals REDUKSI KEWENANGAN ATRIBUSI PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM PENGATURAN PEMILIHAN KEPALA DESA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Proborini Hastuti
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Literature Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Legal Force

ABSTRAKPemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Demak membuat peraturan turunan dari ketentuan pencalonan pemilihan kepala desa di Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa ke dalam Pasal 24 ayat (1) Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Demak Nomor 5 Tahun 2015 tentang Kepala Desa. Peraturan daerah tersebut berhenti berlaku setelah Mahkamah Agung melakukan hak uji materi dan menghasilkan Putusan Nomor 30 P/ HUM/2016 yang menyatakan peraturan daerah tersebut bertentangan dengan peraturan yang lebih tinggi sehingga tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat. Berdasarkan hal tersebut perlu dianalisis apakah Putusan Nomor 30 P/HUM/2016 memiliki dampak hukum terhadap kewenangan atribusi pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Demak berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan menggunakan penelitian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Agung tersebut memberikan implikasi terhadap adanya reduksi kewenangan atribusi yang dimiliki oleh pemerintah daerah dalam hal pemilihan kepala desa sebagai bagian dari penyelenggara pemerintahan di Indonesia.Kata kunci: kewenangan atribusi, pemilihan kepala desa, hak uji materi. ABSTRACT Demak Regency Administrative Government made a regulation derived from Village Chief Election Regulation in Article 33 of Law Number 6 of 2014 regarding Village and transformed into Article 24 paragraph (1) of Demak Regency Regulation Number 5 of 2015 regarding Village Chief. The regional regulation ceased to take effect after the Supreme Court conducted a judicial review and ruled Decision Number 30 P/ HUM/2016 stating that the regional regulation is in conflict with higher level regulations and therefore has no binding legal force. Based on this, it is necessary to analyze whether the Supreme Court Decision Number 30 P/HUM/2016 has a legal effect on the attribution authority of the Administrative Government of Demak Regency pursuant to Law Number 6 of 2014 regarding Village. This analysis is a normative legal research conducted using literature research. The result of the analysis shows that the Supreme Court Decision has implication to the reduction of attribution authority of the regional government in village chief election as part of managing governance in Indonesia.Keywords: attribution authority, village chief election, right to judicial review.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN ATAS PENERAPAN KLAUSULA BAKU

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Muhamad Syamsudin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Legal Questions ◽  
The Supreme Court

ABSTRAKKajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh putusan kasasi Mahkamah Agung yang memutus berbeda dengan putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen, yang dikuatkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya terkait dengan gugatan pelanggaran klausula baku oleh pelaku usaha jasa kebugaran milik PT X. Permasalahannya adalah: 1) Apakah isi klausula baku yang tercantum dalam perjanjian anggota jasa kebugaran milik PT X dapat dibenarkan berdasarkan Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen?; 2) Apakah dasar pertimbangan hakim Mahkamah Agung sudah tepat dan mencerminkan nilai-nilai keadilan bagi para pihak jika dibandingkan dengan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya? Kajian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan metode pendekatan kasus dan perundang-undangan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa klausula baku dalam perjanjian keanggotaan jasa kebugaran milik PT X telah melanggar ketentuan Pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf a, c, e, f, dan g Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Konsekuensinya adalah batal demi hukum. Putusan Mahkamah Agung tidak tepat dan cermat dalam mempertimbangkan fakta-fakta hukum dan penerapan hukumnya. Ditinjau dari substansinya, Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen yang dikuatkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya lebih memenuhi rasa keadilan dan melindungi konsumen jika dibandingkan dengan Putusan Mahkamah Agung.Kata kunci: perlindungan konsumen, klausula baku, perjanjian keanggotaan. ABSTRACTThe background of this study is related to the Supreme Court Decision which is contradicted the Decision of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) upheld by the Surabaya District Court in relation to the lawsuit regarding the violation of the standard clause by PT X. The legal questions are: 1) Does the standardized clause contained in the membership agreement of PT X violate the Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law?; 2) Are the considerations of the Supreme Court Judge appropriate and do they reflect the justice values for the parties when compared with the decision of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency and the Surabaya District Court? This study is a normative legal research done with case study and legislation review. The results indicate that the standardized clause in the membership agreement of PT X has violated the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) letters a, c, e, f, and g. The consequences is null and void. The Supreme Court failed to consider and employ the legal facts in the ruling. By the content, the Decision of BPSK strengthened by the Surabaya District Court is likely more justifiable and protective compared to the Supreme Court Decision.Keywords: consumer protection, standardized clause, membership agreement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document